Chapter published in:
Conceptual Metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues
Edited by Olga Blanco-Carrión, Antonio Barcelona and Rossella Pannain
[Human Cognitive Processing 60] 2018
► pp. 2754
References

References

Barcelona, A.
2000Introduction. The cognitive theory of metaphor and metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (1–28). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2002Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: an update. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (207–277). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Metonymy in cognitive linguistics. An analysis and a few modest proposals. In H. Cuyckens, K.-U. Panther, & T. Berg (Eds.), Motivation in language: Studies in honor of Günter Radden (223–255). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005The multilevel operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse with particular attention to metonymic chains. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & S. Peña Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (313–352). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2009Metonymy in constructional meaning and form: Its motivational and inferential roles. In K. Panther, L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (363–401). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics. Towards a consensus view (7–57). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bierwiaczonek, B.
2013Metonymy in language, thought and brain. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Blanco-Carrión, O., Barcelona, A., Guarddon Anelo, M. del C., Guerrero Medina, P., Hernández-Gomariz, I., Rodríguez-Redondo, A.-L., & Portero-Muñoz, C.
n.d. Applying the entry model in a detailed database of metonymy: A discussion of the problems involved.
Croft, W.
2002/1993The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In R Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (161–205). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. [Reproduced with slight changes from the paper with the same title in Cognitive Linguistics 4(4): 335–371] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1997Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feyaerts, K.
2000Refining the inheritance hypothesis: Interaction between metaphoric and metonymic hierarchies. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (59–78). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D., & Peirsman, Y.
2011Zones, Facets and Prototype-based Metonymy. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics. Towards a consensus view (88–102). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G.
1998Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 37–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1993The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1 : Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary
2009CD-ROM edition (version 4.0.0.3) of Second Edition (1989) and of Additions Series (1993–1997). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L.
2007Metonymy. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (236–263). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peirsman, Y., & Geeraerts, D.
2006Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics, 17, 269–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radden, G.
2005The ubiquity of metonymy. In J. L. Otal Campo, I. Navarro i Ferrando, & B. Bellés Fortuño (Eds.), Cognitive and discourse approaches to metaphor and metonymy (11–28). Castellón (Spain): Universitat Jaume I.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
2000The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (109–132). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Barcelona, Antonio
2019.  In Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8],  pp. 49 ff. Crossref logo
Devylder, Simon
2019.  In Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8],  pp. 199 ff. Crossref logo
Pannain, Rossella
2017. Metonymy in numerals. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1  pp. 102 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.