Chapter published in:
Cognitive Linguistics and the Study of Chinese
Edited by Dingfang Shu, Hui Zhang and Lifei Zhang
[Human Cognitive Processing 67] 2019
► pp. 4772
References

References

Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S.
(Eds) 2000Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Biq, Y.
2001The grammaticalization of jiushi and jiushishuo in Mandarin Chinese. Concentric: Studies in English literature and linguistics, 27(2), 103–124.Google Scholar
2004Construction, reanalysis, and stance: ‘V yi ge N’ and variations in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1655–1672. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boas, H. C.
(Ed.) 2012Contrastive studies in construction grammar. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L.
2001Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L., & Scheibman, J.
1999The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics, 37(4), 575–596. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carston, R.
2002Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. L. 1994Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Y.
1968A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chu, C. C.
1998A discourse grammar of Mandarin Chinese. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Chu, C. C., & Ji, Z.
1999A cognitive-functional grammar of Mandarin Chinese. Taipei: Crane Publishing.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
1998Linguistic evidence and mental representations. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(2), 151–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.
2001Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, A. D.
2004Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donazzan, M.
2005Additive and scalar particles: A case study of Mandarin Chinese adverb HAI. Paper presented at the Workshop on EVEN and friends, November 5th , 2005, Paris.Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W.
1985Competing motivations. In J. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp. 343–365). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. W., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Cumming, S., & Paolino, D.
1993Outline of discourse transcription. In J. A. Edwards, & M. D. Lalmpert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 45–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
1982Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Eds.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–138). Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & Catherine O’Connor, M.
1988Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language, 64(3), 501–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fried, M.
2005A frame-based approach to case alternations: The swarm-class verbs in Czech. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(3/4), 475–512.Google Scholar
Fried, M., & Östman, J.
(Eds) 2004Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Construction grammar and spoken language: The case of pragmatic particles. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1752–1778. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
2003Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 219–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Argument realization: The role of constructions, lexical semantics and discourse factors. In J. Östman and M. Fried (Eds.), Constructions grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 17–43). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gundel, J. K., Hegarty, M., & Borthen, K.
2003Cognitive status, information structure, and pronominal reference to clausally introduced entities. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 12(3), 281–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Z. and Gries S.Th.
2009Schematic meaning and pragmatic inference: Mandarin adverbs hai, zai and you . Corpora, 4(1), 33–70.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 1987The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1987Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K.
1994Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, H.
1999A discourse-pragmatic analysis of the committal -ci in Korean: A synthetic approach to the form-meaning relation. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 243–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C.
2000Presumptive meaning: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A.
1981Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Y. C., Cheng, R. L., Foster, L., Ho, S. H., Hou, J. Y., & Yip, M.
1989Mandarin Chinese: A practical reference grammar for students and teachers (Vol.II). Taipei: Crane Publishing.Google Scholar
Liu, F-h
1996The meaning of hai . In T-f. Cheng, Y. Li, & H. Yhang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics and the 4th International Conference on Chinese Linguistics. Vol. 1 (pp. 205–222). Los Angeles, CA: Graduate Students in Linguistics, University of Southern California.
2000The scalar particle hai in Chinese. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale, 29(1), 41–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lu, J-m
1985Hai he geng [‘still’ and ‘even’]. In J-m. Lu, & Z. Ma (Eds.), Xiandai hanyu xuci sanlun (A discussion of the function words in modern Mandarin) (pp. 38–59). Beijing: Beijing University Press.Google Scholar
Lu, S-x
1980 Xiandai hanyu babaici (800 words in modern Chinese). Peking: Shangwu.Google Scholar
Lu, W-l
2014Contextualization and blending: A cognitive linguistic approach to the semantics of in . Theory and Practice in English Studies, 7(2), 97–114.Google Scholar
2016Polysemy and the semantic-pragmatic interface: The case of up in a context-based model. Intercultural Pragmatics, 13(4), 563–589.Google Scholar
2017Perspectivization and contextualization in semantic analysis: A parsimonious polysemy approach to in . Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviwensis, 134, 247–264.Google Scholar
2019Time, tense and viewpoint shift across languages: A multiple-parallel-text approach to “tense shifting” in a tenseless language. Cognitive Linguistics, 30(2), 377–397.Google Scholar
Lu, W-l., & Verhagen, A.
2016Shifting viewpoints: How does that actually work across languages? An exercise in parallel text analysis. In B. Dancygier, W-l. Lu, & A. Verhagen (Eds.). Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities (pp. 169–190). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lu, W-l., Verhagen, A., & Su, I-w.
2018A multiple-parallel-text approach for viewpoint research across languages: The case of demonstratives in English and Chinese. In Sz. Csábi (Ed.), Expressive minds and artistic creations (pp. 131–157). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ma, Z.
1985Guanyu biaoshi chengdu qian de fuci hai (The adverb hai indicating a lower degree). In J-m. Lu, & Z. Ma (Eds.), Xiandai hanyu xuci sanlun (A discussion of the function words in modern Mandarin), (pp. 60–74). Beijing: Beijing University Press.Google Scholar
Mey, J.
2001Pragmatics: An introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Michaelis, L. A. 1993‘Continuity’ within three scalar models: The polysemy of adverbial still . Journal of Semantics, 10, 193–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Cross-world continuity and the polysemy of adverbial still . In G. Fauconnier, & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Spaces, worlds, and grammar (pp. 179–226). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Michaelis, L. A., & Lambrecht, K.
1996Toward a construction-based theory of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language, 72, 215–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oh, S-Y.
2003The Korean verbal suffix -ess-: A diachronic account of its multiple uses. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1181–1222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ono, T., & Thompson, S. A.
1995What can conversation tell us about syntax? In P. W. Davis (Ed.), Alternative linguistics: Descriptive and theoretical modes in the new linguistics (pp. 213–271). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Östman, J.
2004Construction discourse: A prolegomenon. In M. Fried, & J. Östman (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 121–144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Östman, J., & Fried, M.
(Eds) 2005Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Östman, J., & Virtanen, T.
1999Theme, comment, and newness as figures in information structuring. In K. van Hoek, A. A. Kibrik, & L. Noordman (Eds.), Discourse studies in cognitive linguistics (pp. 91–110). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
1974A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandra, D.
1998What linguists can and can’t tell you about the human mind: A reply to Croft. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(4), 361–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H.
1977The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shao, J-m.
2002Zhuming zhongnian yuyanxuejia zixuanji, Shaojingming juan (Self-selected collections of distinguished mid-aged linguists. Volume of Shaojingming). Hefei, Anhui: Anhui Educational Publishing.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
1986Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E.
1988Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 389–405). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Tai, J. H-Y.
1985Temporal sequence and Chinese word order. In J. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (49–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. R.
2003Polysemy’s paradoxes. Language Sciences, 25, 637–655. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M.
2005Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
1989On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 65, 31–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L f-m
2002From a motion verb to an aspectual marker: A study of guo in Mandarin Chinese. Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, 28(2), 57–84.Google Scholar
Wang, L. 1992 Zhongguo xiandai yufa (Modern Chinese grammar). Shanghai: Shanghai Publishing.Google Scholar
Wang, Y-f
2003Thinking as saying: Shuo (‘say’) in Taiwan Mandarin conversation and BBS talk. Language Sciences, 25, 457–488. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xing, Z.
1999Semantic change in grammaticalization: A case study of huán. Paper presented at the 11th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Yeh, M.
1996The historical development of 還hai in Mandarin. In T-F. Cheng, Y. Li, & H. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics and the 4th International Conference on Chinese Linguistics . Vol. 2 (pp. 484–496). Los Angeles, CA: Graduate Students in Linguistics, University of Southern California.
1998On 還hai in Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 26(2), 236–280.Google Scholar