Part of
Cognitive Linguistics and the Study of Chinese
Edited by Dingfang Shu, Hui Zhang and Lifei Zhang
[Human Cognitive Processing 67] 2019
► pp. 285308
References
Allen, S., Ozyurek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., Ishizuka, T., et al.
2007Language-specific and universal influences in children’s syntactic packaging of Manner and Path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition, 102(1), 16–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R., & Slobin, D. I.
1994 Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Berthele, R.
2013Disentangling manner from path: Evidence from varieties of German and Romance. In J. Goschler, & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (pp. 55–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blomberg, J., & Zlatev, J.
2009Linguistic relativity, mediation and the categorization of motion. In J. Zlatev, M. Andrén, M. Johansson Falck, & C. Lundmark (Eds.), Studies in language and cognition (pp. 46–61). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J., Eisenbeiss, S., & Narasimhan, B.
2004Manner & path in non-linguistic cognition. Conference presentation, Language, Culture & Mind, Portsmouth.
Boroditsky, L.
2001Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, L., & Gaby, A.
2010Remembrances of times East: Absolute spatial representations of time in an Australian aboriginal community. Psychological Science, 21, 1635–1639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, M.
1999Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective. In P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 385–436). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chen, J.
2007The acquisition of verb compounding in Mandarin Chinese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Chen, L.
2005The acquisition and use of motion event expressions in Chinese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Louisiana.Google Scholar
Chen, L., & Guo, J.
2009Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equivalently-framed language. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1749–1766. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chief, L.
2004Serialization of simultaneity in Mandarin. Conference Presentation. The 30th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA. DOI logo
Chu, C.
1987The semantics, syntax, and pragmatics of the verbal suffix -zhe . Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association, 22(1), 1–41.Google Scholar
Durst-Andersen, P.
2011Linguistic supertypes: A cognitive-semiotic theory of human communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, M., Nicol, J., Greth, D., & Nakamura, K.
2002The role of language in memory for actions. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 31(5), 447–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gennari, S., Sloman, S., Malt, B., & Fitch, W.
2002Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83, 49–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, H., Hickmann, M., & Demagny, A. C.
2008How English native speakers learn to express caused motion in English and French. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 27, 15–41.Google Scholar
Hickmann, M.
2003Children’s discourse: Person, space and time across languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2006The relativity of motion in first language acquisition. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 281–308). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H., & Champaud, C.
2009Typological constraints on motion in French and English child language. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, S. Ervin-Tripp, N. Budwig, Ş. Özçalışkan, & K. Nakamura (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 209–224). NJ, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hickmann, M., & Robert, S.
(Eds.) 2006Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hohenstein, J.
2005Language-related motion event similarities in English- and Spanish-speaking children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 403–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
1996The architecture of the linguistic-spatial interface. In P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 1–30). London: Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ji, Y., Hendriks, H., Hickmann, M.
2011aHow children express caused motion events in Chinese and English: Universal and language-specific influences. Lingua, 121, 1796–1819. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011bThe expression of caused motion events in Chinese and in English: Some typological issues. Linguistics, 49(5), 1041–1076. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ji, Y.
2015The expression of motion events: Typological and developmental perspectives. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Ji, Y., & Hohenstein, J.
2018English and Chinese children’s motion event similarity judgments. Cognitive Linguistics, Vol. 29(1), 45–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C.
2003 Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A.
1976The meaning and structure of complex sentences with -zhe in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 96(4), 512–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucy, J.
1992Grammatical categories and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lupyan, G.
2012Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: The label-feedback hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
2000 The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M.
1992How to build a baby II: Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99, 587–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, J. H.
2014The language hoax. Why the world looks the same in any language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L.
2002Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition, 84, 189–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peyraube, A.
2006Motion events in Chinese: A diachronic study of directional complements. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 121–135). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pourcel, S.
2005Linguistic relativity in cognitive processes. Conference Presentation, The 1st UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference, University of Sussex.
Slobin, D. I.
1996From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
2004The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative Vol. 2: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Spelke, E. S.
2003What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the investigation of language and thought (pp. 277–311). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical form. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
2000Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L.
1956Language, thought and reality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wolff, P., & Holmes, K.
2011Linguistic relativity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2, 253–265.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J.
2011From cognitive to integral linguistics and back again. Intellectica, 56, 125–147.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., & Blomberg, J.
2015Language may indeed influence thought. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1631. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Y.
2005Causativity in Chinese and its representations in English, Japanese and Korean speakers’ L2 Chinese grammars. Doctoral dissertation. University of Cambridge.