Chapter published in:
Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions
Edited by Yo Matsumoto and Kazuhiro Kawachi
[Human Cognitive Processing 69] 2020
► pp. 281316
References

References

Afreh, E. S. & Osam, E. K.
2011The expression of path in motion events in Akan. Paper presented at International Conference of Cognitive Linguistics, Xian, China.
Aikhenvald, A.
2003A grammar of Tariana, from northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006aSerial verbs constructions in Tariana. In A. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology (178–201). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2006bSerial verbs constructions in typological perspective. In A. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology (1–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ameka, F., & Essegbey, J.
2013Serialising languages: Satellite-framed, verb-framed or neither. Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 2(1), 19–38.Google Scholar
Baker, M., & Fasola, C.
2009Araucanian: Mapudungun. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (594–608). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, M. A. R.
1964Klamath grammar (University of California Publications in Linguistics 32). Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, S.-W.
2010The typology of motion verbs revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 41, 331–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blomberg, J.
2014Motion in language and experience: Actual and non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai (Travaux de l’Institut de Linguistique de Lund, Vol. 53): The Faculties of Humanities and Theology, Lund University.Google Scholar
Cappelle, B.
This volume. Looking into visual motion expressions in Dutch, English and French: How languages stick to well-trodden typological paths.
Ceccagno, A., & Scalise, S.
2006Classification, structure and headedness of Chinese compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio, 2, 233–260.Google Scholar
Chafe, W.
2017Caddo. In M. Fortescue, M. Mithun, and N. Evans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of polysynthesis (583–602). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, L. L.-S., & Huang, C.-T. J.
1995On the argument structure of resultative compounds. In M. Chen & O. Tzeng (Eds.), In honor of William Wang: Interdisciplinary studies on language and language change (187–221). Taipei: Pyramid Press.Google Scholar
Choi, S., & Bowerman, M.
1991Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cifuentes-Férez, P.
2010The semantics of the English and Spanish motion verb lexicons. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 8, 233–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014A closer look at Paths of vision, Manner of vision and their translation from English into Spanish. Languages in Contrast, 14(2), 214–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Craig, C. G.
1993Jakaltek directionals: Their meaning and discourse function. Languages of the World, 7, 23–36.Google Scholar
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C.
2010Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex events. In H. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive construction grammar (201–235). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, T.
2002Serial verbs in Oceanic: A descriptive typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Bislama reference grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
DeLancey, S.
1999Lexical prefixes and the bipartite stem construction in Klamath. International Journal of American Linguistics, 65, 56–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Location and direction in Klamath. In E. Shay & V. Seibert (Eds.), Motion, direction, and location in language (59–90). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dewell, R. B.
2015The semantics of German verb prefixes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Durie, M.
1988Verb serialization and “verbal-prepositions” in Oceanic languages. Oceanic Linguistics, 27, 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fagard, B., Stosic, D. & Cerruti, M.
2017Within-type variation in Satellite-framed languages: The case of Serbian. Language Typology and Universals, 70, 637–660.Google Scholar
Filbeck, D.
1975A grammar of verb serialization in Thai. In J. G. Harris & J. R. Chamberlain (Eds.), Studies in Tai linguistics: In honor of William J. Gedney (112–129). Bangkok: Central Institute of English Language, Office of State Universities.Google Scholar
Fortis, J.-M. & Vittrant, A.
2016Path-expressing constructions: Toward a typology. Language Typology and Universals, 69, 341–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gaytan, E. H.
1998A study of path: The semantics of English and Spanish dynamic prepositions and motion and manner verbs. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.
1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. S.
1967 Look and see . Language, 43(4), 937–947. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamel, P. J.
1993Serial verbs in Loniu and an evolving preposition. Oceanic Linguistics, 32, 111–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hargreaves, D.
2004Directional prefixes in Kathmandu Newar. In A. Saxena (Ed.), Himalayan languages: Past and present (273–284). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, M.
2002A Grammar of Gaagudju. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
1993More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In B. Comrie & M. Polinsky (Eds.), Causatives and Transitivity (87–120). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.
2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M., & Hendriks, H.
2006Static and dynamic location in French and English. First Language, 26, 103–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hijazo-Gascón, A., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2013Same family, different path: Intratypological differences in three Romance languages. J. Goschler & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (39–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, C. F.
1990 Bring, take, come, and go . Journal of English Linguistics, 23, 239–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huumo, T.
2010Is perception a directional relationship? On directionality and its motivation in Finnish expressions of sensory perception. Linguistics, 48, 49–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iacobini, C., & Masini, F.
2006The emergence of verb-particle constructions in Italian: Locative and actional meanings. Morphology, 16, 155–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2017Motion and semantic typology: A hot old topic with exciting caveats. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion and space across languages: Theory and applications (13–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Hijazo-Gascón, A.
2012Variation in motion events: Theory and applications. In L. Filipović & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures: Linguistic diversity (349–371). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Im, S.-C.
2001Typological patterns of motion verbs in Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
1977X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kageyama, T.
1994Bunpo to gokeisei [Grammar and word formation]. Tokyo: Hituzi.Google Scholar
Kawachi, K.
2014Patterns of expressing motion events in Kupsapiny. In O. Hieda (Ed.), Recent advances in Nilotic linguistics (Studies in Nilotic linguistics Vol. 8) (103–136). Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
2017Shidaama-go no kuukan-idoo no keiro no hyoogen [Expressions of the path of spatial motion in Sidaama]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (213–246). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
This volume. Different patterns of expressing motion, agentive motion, and visual motion in Sidaama: Discussion of a possible reason.
Kazama, S.
2015Tsunguusu-shogo no jita ni tsuite [Transitivity in Tungusic languages]. In P. Pardeshi, K. Kiryū, & H. Narrog (Eds.), Yuu-tsui-dōshi no tsūgengoteki-kenkyū: Nihongo to shogengo no taishō kara mietekuru mono (91–107). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Kessakul, R.
2005The semantic structure of motion expressions in Thai. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
Klein, H. M.
1981Location and direction in Toba: Verbal morphology. International Journal of American Linguistics, 47, 227–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koga, K.
2016Event integration in Akan. Asian and African Languages and Linguistics, 10, 179–195.Google Scholar
Kopecka, A.
2004Étude typologique de l’expression de l’espace: Localisation et déplacement en français et en polonais. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Kopecka, A., & Narasimhan, B.
(Eds.) 2012Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kruspe, N., Burenhult, N., & Wnuk, E.
2015Northern Aslian. In M. Jenny & P. Sidwell (Eds.), The handbook of Austroasiatic languages, Volume 1 (419–474). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lamarre, C.
2008The linguistic categorization of deictic direction in Chinese: With reference to Japanese. In D. Xu (Ed.), Space in languages of China: Cross-linguistic, synchronic and diachronic perspectives (69–97). Springer Science+Business Media. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Chuugokugo no idoo-hyoogen. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (95–128). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A.
1981Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Y.
1990On V-V Compounds in Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 8, 177–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lizogub, S. I.
1992Syntax of verbs of motion in Burmese. In S. Luksaneeyanawin (Ed.), Pan-Asiatic linguistics: The third international symposium on language and linguistics, Bangkok, Thailand (187–197). Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
Lu, J. H. T.
1977Resultative verb compounds versus directional verb compounds in Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 5, 276–313.Google Scholar
Ma, S.
2016Fictive motion in Mandarin Chinese: A corpus-based study of coextension paths. Ph.D. thesis, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Margetts, A.
1999Valence and transitivity in Saliba, an Oceanic language of Papua New Guinea. Dissertation, MPI.Google Scholar
Maruo, M.
2014Gendai-chuugokugo hookoo-hogo no kenkyu [Studies in directional complements in Modern Chinese]. Tokyo: Hakuteisha.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y.
1996aComplex predicates in Japanese: A syntactic and semantic study of the notion ‘word’. Stanford: CSLI Publications & Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
1996bSubjective motion and English and Japanese verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 183–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Kuukan-idoo no gengo-hyoogen to sono kakutyoo [Linguistic expressions of motion in space and their extensions]. In S. Tanaka & Y. Matsumoto Kuukan to idoo no hyoogen [Expressions of space and motion] (125–230). Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
1998Nihongo no goiteki-fukugoo-dooshi ni okeru dooshi no kumiawase [Combinatory possibilities in Japanese V-V lexical compounds]. Gengo Kenkyu: The Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan, 114, 37–83.Google Scholar
2001Lexicalization patterns and caused and fictive motion: The case of typological split. Handout for a lecture at SUNY Buffalo, NY.Google Scholar
2003Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In S. Chiba et al. (Eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A festschrift for Masaru Kajita (403–417). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
2004Nihongo no shikaku-hyoogen ni okeru kyokoo idoo [Fictive motion in Japanese expressions of vision]. Nihongo Bunpo, 4, 111–128.Google Scholar
2014Common tendencies in the descriptions of manner, path and cause across languages: A closer look at their subcategories. Paper presented at Langacross 2 (Linguistic diversity and cognition: implications for first and second language acquisition), June 21, 2014, Université Lille 3, France.
2016Phonological and semantic subregularities in noncausative- causative verb pairs in Japanese. In T. Kageyama & W. Jacobsen (Eds.), Valency and transitivity alternations: Studies on Japanese and beyond (51–88). Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017aIdoo-hyoogen no ruikei ni kansuru kadai [Issues concerning the typology of motion event descriptions]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (1–24). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
2017bNihongo ni okeru Jishoo-hyoogen-taipu to keiro no hyoogen [Event-based expression types and expressions of path in Japanese] (247–273). In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions]. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
2017cIdoo-hyoogen no seishitu to sono ruikeisei [The nature of motion expressions and their typological status]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (337–353). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
2018Motion event descriptions in Japanese from typological perspectives. In P. Pardeshi & T. Kageyama (Eds.), Handbook of Japanese contrastive linguistics (273–289). Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y., Akita, K., & Takahashi, K.
2017The functional nature of deictic verbs and the coding patterns of Deixis: An experimental study in English, Japanese, and Thai. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion and space across languages and applications (95–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsuse, I.
This volume. The distinct coding of Deixis and Path in Kathmandu Newar.
Morita, T.
This volume. Visual saliency weighed against typology and cognitive cost: An experimental study of French motion descriptions.
Morita, T., & Ishihashi, M.
2017Nihongo to furansugo no idoo-hyoogen: Hanashikotoba to kakikotoba no tekusuto kara no koosatsu. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (275–302). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Muansuwan, N.
2002Verb complexes in Thai. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Newman, P.
2000The Hausa language: An encyclopedic reference grammar. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Osam, E. K.
1997Serial verbs and grammatical relations in Akan. In T. Givón (Ed.), Grammatical relations: A functionalist perspective (253–279). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Packard, J.
2000The morphology of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rubino, C.
2005Iloko. In A. Adelaar & N. P. Himmelmann (Eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar (326–349). London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schaefer, R. P.
1989Typological mixture in the lexicalization of manner and cause in Emai. In P. Newman & R. D. Botne (Eds.), Current approaches to African linguistics, Vol. 5 (127–140). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, E.
2000Simple and complex verbs in Jaminjung: A study of event categorisation in an Australian language. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
2015Complex verbs, simple alternations: Valency and verb classes in Jaminjung. In A. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages: Case studies from Austronesia, the Pacific, the Americas, and theoretical outlook (1117–1162). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sebba, M.
1987The syntax of serial verbs: An investigation into serialization in Sranan and other languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, C., & Kuteva, T.
1995Distributed spatial semantics. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 18, 167–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slater, K. W.
2003A grammar of Mangghuer: A Mongolic language of China’s Qinghai-Gansu sprachbund. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
1996Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2004The many ways to search for a frog. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–257). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2009Relations between Paths of motion and Paths of vision: A crosslinguistic and developmental exploration. In V. C. M. Gathercole (Ed.), Routes to language: Studies in honor of Melissa Bowerman (197–222). New York & London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I., & Hoiting, N.
1994Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. BLS, 20(1), 487–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sohn, H.-M.
1999The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Takahashi, K.
2000Expressions of emanation fictive motion events in Thai. Ph.D. dissertation, Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
2017Tai-go no idoo-hyoogen. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions]. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
2018Deictic motion constructions in Japanese and Thai. In P. Prashant & T. Kageyama (Eds.), The handbook of Japanese contrastive linguistics (291–312). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic descriptions: Vol. 3. Grammatical categories and the lexicon (36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1991Path to realization. Proceedings of the seventeenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 480–519. Berkeley Linguistics Society, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
1996Fictive motion in language and ‘ception’. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (211–276). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2009Main verb properties and equipollent framing. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (389–402). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
2012Main verb properties. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 1–24.Google Scholar
2016Properties of main verbs. Cognitive Semantics, 2, 133–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thepkanjana, K.
1986Serial verb construction in Thai. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Tida, S.
2017Domu-go no idoo-hyoogen [Motion expressions in Dom]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (159–188). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Verkerk, A.
2014aThe correlation between motion event encoding and path verb lexicon size in the Indo-European language family. Folia Linguistica Historica, 35, 307–358.Google Scholar
2014bWhere Alice fell into: Motion events in a parallel corpus. In B. Szmrecsanyi & B. Wälchli (Eds.), Aggregating dialectology, typology and register analysis: Linguistic variation in text and speech (324–354). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verhaar, J. W.
1995Toward a reference grammar of Tok Pisin: An experiment in corpus linguistics. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Wälchli, B.
2001A typology of displacement (with special reference to Latvian). Sprachtypologie & Universalienforschung, 54, 298–323.Google Scholar
Wälchli, B., & Sölling, A.
2013The encoding of motion events: Building typology bottom-up from text data in many languages. In J. Goschler & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (77–113). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wienold, G.
1995Lexical and conceptual structures in expressions for movement and space: With reference to Japanese, Korean, Thai, and Indonesian as compared to English and German. In U. Egli, P. Pause, C. Schwarze, A. von Stechow, & G. Wienold (Eds.), Lexical knowledge in the organization of language (301–340). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wnuk, E.
2016Semantic specificity of perception verbs in Maniq. Ph.D. dissertation, Radboud University, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Yoshinari, Y.
2017Itaria-go no idoo-hyoogen. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (189–212). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J.
2007Spatial semantics. In H. Cuyckens & D. Geeraerts (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (318–350). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., & Yangklang, P.
2004A third way to travel: The place of Thai and serial verb languages in motion event typology. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (159–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar