Chapter published in:
Grammar and Cognition: Dualistic models of language structure and language processing
Edited by Alexander Haselow and Gunther Kaltenböck
[Human Cognitive Processing 70] 2020
► pp. 91131
References

References

Akhutina, T., Zasypkina, K., & Romanova, A.
2012Tekst i kontekst: rol’ levogo i pravogo polushariy mozga v postroyenii vyskazyvaniya. In T. Chernigovskaya, & A. Kibrik (Eds.), Kognitivnyye issledovaniya, Vol. 5 (209–229). Moskva: Institut psikhologii RAN.Google Scholar
Avanzi, M., Béguelin, M.-J., & Diémoz, F.
2012–2019Présentation du corpus OFROM – corpus oral de français de Suisse romande. Université de Neuchâtel, unine​.ch​/ofrom.
Barker, M. S., Young, B., & Robinson, G. A.
2017Cohesive and coherent connected speech deficits in mild stroke. Brain and language, 168, 23–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, S., Toocaram, S., Nickels, L., Beeke, S., Best, W., & Bloch, S.
2019Everyday conversation after right hemisphere damage: A methodological demonstration and some preliminary findings. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 52, 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baumgaertner, A., Hartwigsen, G., & Roman Siebner, H.
2013Right-hemispheric processing of non linguistic word features: implications for mapping language recovery after stroke. Hum Brain Mapp, 34, 1293–1305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beeman, M.
1993Semantic processing in the right hemisphere may contribute to drawing inferences from discourse. Brain and Language, 44, 80–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension. In M. Beeman, & C. Chiarello (Eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension: perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (51–78). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Beeman, M. J.
2005Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in cognitive sciences 9(11), 512–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beeman, C., & Chiarello, C.
(Eds.) 1998aRight Hemisphere Language Comprehension. Perspectives From Cognitive Neuroscience. Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
1998bComplementary right- and left-hemisphere language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science 7(1), 1–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beeman, M. J., Bowden, E. M., & Gernsbacher, M. A.
2000Right and left hemisphere cooperation for drawing predictive and coherence inferences during normal story comprehension. Brain and language 71(2), 310–336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Béguelin, M.-J., Matthey, M., Bronckart, J.-P., & Canelas, S.
2000De la phrase aux énoncés. Grammaire scolaire et descriptions linguistiques. Bruxelles: De Boeck-Duculot.Google Scholar
Berrendonner, A.
2002aLes deux syntaxes. Verbum XXIV(1–2), 23–36.Google Scholar
2002bMorpho-syntaxe, pragma-syntaxe et ambivalences sémantiques. In H. L. Andersen, & H. Nolke (Eds.), Macro-syntaxe et macro-sémantique (23–41). Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2002cPortrait de l’énonciateur en faux naïf. Semen, 15, 113–125.Google Scholar
2004Grammaire de l’écrit vs grammaire de l’oral: le jeu des composantes micro- et macro-syntaxiques. In A. Rabatel (Ed.), Interactions orales en contexte didactique (249–262). Lyon: PUL.Google Scholar
2005Questions et mémoire discursive. In C. Rossari, A. Beaulieu-Masson, C. Cojocariu, & A. Razgoulieva (Eds.), Les Etats de la question (147–173). Editions Nota Bene.Google Scholar
2011Unités syntaxiques et unités prosodiques. Langue française, 170, 81–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017La notion de phrase. In Encyclopédie grammaticale du français. encyclogram​.fr.
Blake, M. L.
2017Right-Hemisphere Pragmatic Disorders. In L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Clinical Pragmatics. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, Vol. 11 (243–266). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, C.
1989Constructions verbales “en incise” et rection faible des verbes. Recherches sur le français parlé, 9, 53–73.Google Scholar
1997Approches de la langue parlée en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
2002Phrase et construction verbale. Verbum XXIV(1–2), 7–22.Google Scholar
2003Le recouvrement de la syntaxe et de la macro-syntaxe. In A. Scarano (Ed.), Macro-syntaxe et pragmatique. L’analyse linguistique de l’oral (53–75). Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, C., Bilger, M., Rouget, C., & van den Eynde, K.
1990 (2005)Le français parlé. Études grammaticales. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Bottini, G., Corcoran, R., Sterzi, R., Paulesu, E., Schenone, P., Shenone, P., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D.
1994The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language: A positron emission tomography activation study. Brain, 117, 1241–1253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Broca, P.
1865Sur le siège de la faculté du langage articulé (15 juin). Bulletins de la Société Anthropologque de Paris, 6, 377–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brownell, H., & Martino, G.
1998Deficits in inference and social cognition: The effects of right hemisphere brain damage on discourse. In M. Beeman, & C. Chiarello (Eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (309–328). Mahwah: NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brownell, H. H., Simpson, T. L., Bihrle, A. M., Potter, H. H., & Gardner, H.
1990Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damaged patients. Neuropsychologia 28(4), 375–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, K. L., & Hale, J. B.
2001Differential effects of left and right hemisphere cerebral vascular accidents on language competency. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 655–664. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, G. A.
2012Is verbal irony special?. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(11), 673–685. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byng, S.
1988Sentence processing deficits: theory and therapy. Cognitive Neuropsychology 5, 629–676. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, N., Abrevaya, S., Martínez Cuitiño, M., Steeb, B., Zamora, D., Sedeño, L., Ibáñez, A., & García, A. M.
2019Rethinking the Neural Basis of Prosody and Non-literal Language: Spared Pragmatics and Cognitive Compensation in a Bilingual With Extensive Right Hemisphere Damage. Frontiers in Psychology 10(570), 1–13.Google Scholar
Carter, A. R., McAvoy, M. P., Siegel, J. S., Hong, X., Astafiev, S. V., Rengachary, J., Zinn, K., Metcalf, N. V., Shulman, G. L., & Corbetta, M.
2017Differential white matter involvement associated with distinct visuospatial deficits after right hemisphere stroke. Cortex, 88, 81–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Champagne-Lavau, M., Cordonier, N., Bellmann, A., & Fossard, M.
2018Context processing during irony comprehension in right-frontal brain-damaged individuals. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 32(8), 721–738. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1957 (2002)Syntactic structures. Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1965Aspects of theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Code, C.
1997Can the right hemisphere speak? Brain and Language, 57, 38–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, L.
2014Pragmatic Disorders. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019On making a sandwich: Procedural discourse in adults with right-hemisphere damage. In A. Capone, M. Carapezza, & F. Lo Piparo (Eds.), Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Part 2 Theories and Applications. Series: Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, Vol. 20 (331–355), Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Cutting, J.
1992The role of right hemisphere dysfunction in psychiatric disorders. The British Journal of Psychiatry 160(5), 583–588. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dara, C., Bang, J., Gottesman, R. F., & Hillis, A. E.
2014Right hemisphere dysfunction is better predicted by emotional prosody impairments as compared to neglect. Journal of Neurology and Translational Neuroscience 2(1), 1037–1051.Google Scholar
Dipper, L. T., Bryan, K. L., & Tyson, J.
1997Bridging inference and Relevance Theory: An account of right hemisphere inference, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 11(3), 213–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dostie, G.
2004Pragmaticalisation et marqueurs discursifs : Analyse sémantique et traitement lexicographique. Bruxelles: De Boeck Supérieur. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Federmeier, K. D., Wlotko, E. W., & Meyer, A. M.
2008What’s ‘Right’in Language Comprehension: Event-Related Potentials Reveal Right Hemisphere Language Capabilities. Language and linguistics compass 2(1), 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B.
1990An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 383–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frei, H.
1929 (2003)La grammaire des fautes. Rennes.Google Scholar
Gadet, F.
2017L’oralité ordinaire à l’épreuve de la mise en écrit: ce que montre la proximité, Langages 208(4), 113–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gajardo-Vidal, A., Lorca-Puls, D. L., Hope, T. M. H., Jones, O. P., Seghier, M. L., Prejawa, S., Crinion, J. T., Leff, A. P., Green, D. W., & Price, C. J.
2018How right hemisphere damage after stroke can impair speech comprehension, Brain 141(12), 3389–3404. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A., & Mauri, C.
2011The grammaticalization of coordinating interclausal connectives. In H. Narrog, & B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization (653–664). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Groupe de Fribourg
2012Grammaire de la période. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Guryev, A.
2019Critères de sélection des interrogatives en français: un éclairage par le biais du texto. In: I. Behr, & F. Lefeuvre (Eds.), Le genre bref : des contraintes grammaticales, lexicales et énonciatives à son exploitation ludique et esthétique (109–130). Frank & Timme.Google Scholar
Hansen, M.-B. M.
1998The semantic status of discourse markers. Lingua 104(3–4), 235–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haselow, A.
2016aMicro- et macro-syntaxe: sur deux principes de catégorisation cognitive en langue orale spontanée, Modèles linguistiques 73(2), 29–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016bA processual view on grammar: macrogrammar and the final field in spoken syntax. Language Sciences, 54, 77–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., Kuteva, T., Kaltenböck, G., & Long, H.
2015On some correlations between grammar and brain lateralization. Linguistics, Language and Cognition. Oxford Handbooks Online in Linguistics, 1–43. Crossref.Google Scholar
Hellige, J. B.
1993Hemispheric Asymmetry: What’s Right and What’s Left. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, L.
1968Prolégomènes à une théorie du langage. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Ivry, R., & Lebby, P.
1998The neurology of consonant perception: specialized module or distributed processors? In M. Beeman, & C. Chiarello (Eds.), Right Hemisphere Language Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience (3–25). Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H.
1874 (1958)On the nature of the duality of the brain. In J. Taylor (Ed.), Selected writings of John Hughlings Jackson, Vol. 2. London: Staples Press.Google Scholar
Joanette, Y., & Goulet, P.
1994Right hemisphere and verbal communication: Conceptual, methodological, and clinical issues. Clinical Aphasiology, 22, 1–23.Google Scholar
Joanette, Y., Champagne-Lavau, M., Kahlaoui, K., & Ska, B.
2007The future of our knowledge about communication impairments following a right-hemisphere lesion. In M. J. Ball, & J. S. Damico (Eds.), Clinical aphasiology. Future directions (284–298). Hove, UK & New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Johns, C. L., Tooley, K. M., & Traxler, M. J.
2008Discourse impairments following right hemisphere brain damage: A critical review. Language and linguistics compass 2(6), 1038–1062. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S., & Pylkkänen, L.
2019Composition of event concepts: Evidence for distinct roles for the left and right anterior temporal lobes. Brain and language, 188, 18–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kinsbourne, M.
(Ed.) 1978Asymmetrical Function of the Brain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knecht, S., Dräger, B., Deppe, M., Bobe, L., Lohmann, H., Flöel, A., Ringelstein, E.-B., & Henningsen, H.
2000Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans, Brain 123(12), 2512–2518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, M.
1997Time course of semantic activation in the cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychologia 24(3), 386–493.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
2010How not to disagree: The emergence of structure from usage. Language usage and language structure, 213, 107–143.Google Scholar
Lehman, M. T., & Tompkins, C. A.
2000Inferencing in adults with right hemisphere brain damage: an analysis of conflicting results. Aphasiology 14(5/6), 485–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehman-Blake, M., & Lesniewicz, K. S.
2005Contextual bias and predictive inferencing in adults with and without right hemisphere brain damage. Aphasiology, 19, 423–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehman-Blake, M. T., & Tompkins, C. A.
2001Predictive inferencing in adults with right hemisphere brain damage. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 44(3), 639–654. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mann, V. A., & Liberman, I. Y.
1984Phonological awareness and verbal short-term memory. Journal of learning disabilities 17(10), 592–599. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marini, A.
2012Characteristics of narrative discourse processing after damage to the right hemisphere. Seminars in Speech and Language 33(1), 68–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marini, A., Carlomagno, S., Caltagirone, C., & Nocentini, U.
2005The role played by the RH in the organization of complex textual structures. Brain and Language, 93, 46–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, A.
1967Éléments de linguistique générale. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
McGilchrist, I.
2010Reciprocal organization of the cerebral hemispheres. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 12(4), 503–515.Google Scholar
2019The master and his emissary: The divided brain and the making of the western world. Yale University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D., & Pedelty, L. L.
1995Right brain and gesture. In Emmorey, K. & Reilly, J. S. (Eds.), Language, gesture, and space (63–85). Hove, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J., Funnell, M., & Gazzaniga, M. S.
1995Right-hemisphere memory superiority: Studies of a split-brain patient. Psychological Science 6(3), 157–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. L., & Crow, T. J.
2005Right hemisphere language functions and schizophrenia: the forgotten hemisphere?. Brain 128(5), 963–978. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myers, P.
1999Right hemisphere damage: Disorders of communication and cognition. San Diego, CA: Singular.Google Scholar
Nebes, R. D.
1978Direct examination of cognitive function in the right and left hemispheres. In M. Kinsbourne (Ed.), Asymmetrical Function Of The Brain (99–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nikolaenko, N. N., Egorov, A. Y., & Freiman, E. A.
1997Representation activity of the right and left hemispheres of the brain. Behavioural neurology 10(2–3), 49–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M.
1998The other side of language: Pragmatic competence. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11, 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, D.
2003The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as ‘asymmetric sampling in time’. Speech Communication, 41, 245–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Powers, C., Bencic, R., Horton, W. S., & Beeman, M.
2012Hemispheric inference priming during comprehension of conversations and narratives. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2577–2583. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rasband, M. N., & Macklin, W. B.
2012Myelin structure and biochemistry. In S. T. Brady, G. J. Siegel, R. W. Albers, & D. L. Price (Eds.), Basic Neurochemistry (8th edition) (180–199). San Diego: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sabio, F.
2006Phrases et constructions verbales : quelques remarques sur les unités syntaxiques dans le français parlé. In D. Lebaud, C. Paulin, & K. Ploog (Eds.), Constructions verbales et production de sens (127–139). Besançon: Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté.Google Scholar
Salis, C., Martin, N., Meehan, S. V., & McCaffery, K.
2018Short-term memory span in aphasia: Insights from speech-timing measures. Journal of neurolinguistics, 48, 176–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sampaio-Baptista, C., & Johansen-Berg, H.
2017White matter plasticity in the adult brain. Neuron 96(6), 1239–1251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D.
1987Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, J. J., Hartje, W., & Willmes, K.
1997Hemispheric asymmetry in the recognition of emotional attitude conveyed by facial expression, prosody and propositional speech. Cortex, 33(1), 65–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sherratt, S., & Bryan, K.
2012Discourse production after right brain damage: Gaining a comprehensive picture using a multi-level processing model. Journal of Neurolinguistics 25(4), 213–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sidtis, D., Canterucci, G., & Katsnelson, D.
2009Effects of neurological damage on production of formulaic language. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 23(4), 270–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
1989La pertinence: Communication et cognition. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A.
2003A construction-based approach to indirect speech acts. In K.-U. Panther & L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing (105–126). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
1995Subjectfication in grammaticalization. In D. Stein, & S. Wright (Eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives (31–54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Lancker, D.
1997Rags to riches: our increasing appreciation of cognitive and communicative abilities of the human right cerebral hemisphere. Brain and Language, 57, 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vigneau, M., Beaucousin, V., Herve, P. Y., Jobard, G., Petit, L., Crivello, F. et al.
2011What is right-hemisphere contribution to phonological, lexicosemantic, and sentence processing? Insights from a meta-analysis, Neuroimage, 54, 577–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weed, E., McGregor, W., Nielsen, J. F., Roepstorff, A., & Frith, U.
2010Theory of Mind in adults with right hemisphere damage: What’s the story?. Brain and Language 113(2), 65–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, S.
1978Functional cerebral hemispheric asymmetry. In M. Kinsbourne (Ed.), Asymmetrical function of the brain (17–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Xu, J., Kemeny, S., Park, G., Frattali, C., & Braun, A.
2005Language in context: emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension. Neuroimage 25(3), 1002–1015. CrossrefGoogle Scholar