Cover not available
Part of
Neglected Aspects of Motion-Event Description: Deixis, asymmetries, constructions
Edited by Laure Sarda and Benjamin Fagard
[Human Cognitive Processing 72] 2022
► pp. 235–256

Chapter 11
Constraints constrained

Equipollent verb constructions in Emai

ORCID logo | Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
 | University of Ibadan
We investigate the framing typology for motion events initiated by Talmy (1985, 2000) relative to predications in Emai from West Benue Congo. We concentrate on Path, which appears either in a satellite or a verb. Two main framing patterns emerge. With a Cause co-event verb, Path lexicalizes in a verb when articulating punctual or durative contact but in a satellite when expressing basic dislocation and extended dislocation. Extended dislocation requires a Cause co-event verb in series with a verb of extended motion and a Path satellite. We interpret extended dislocation not as representing an additional framing type but as a reflex of Emai lexical and morphosyntactic resources. Consequently, we hold to a semantic typology whose primary design principle is Path assignment to a verb or a non-verb, with equipollent framing receiving a secondary status.
Keywords: Cause co-event verb, Edoid, Emai, framing patterns, serial verbs
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Basic motion
  • 3.Complex motion
    • 3.1Manner co-event
    • 3.2Cause co-event
      • 3.2.1Contact
      • 3.2.2Dislocation
  • 4.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • Abbreviations
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 7 July 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.72.11sch
References (24)
References
Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, S. W. 2010. The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 46(3), 331–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R., & Slobin, D. I. 1994. Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J., Enfield, N., Essegbey, J., Ibarretxe-Antunano, I., Kita, S., Lupke, F., & Ameka, F. 2007. Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language, 83(3), 495–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., Barddal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C. 2010. Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In Hans C. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive studies in construction grammar (201–235). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elugbe, B. 1989. Comparative Edoid: Phonology and lexicon. Port Harcourt: University of Port Harcourt Press.Google Scholar
Fagard, B., Zlatev, J., Kopecka, A., Cerruti, M., & Blomberg, J. 2013. The expression of motion events: A quantitative study of six typologically varied languages. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 39, 364–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iacobini, C. 2019. Review of “Motion and the English verb: A diachronic study, by Judith Huber. 2017. New York: Oxford University Press.” Language, 95(1), 188–189.Google Scholar
Iacobini, C., & Fagard, B. 2011. A diachronic approach to variation and change in the typology of motion event expression. A case study: From Latin to Romance. Cahiers de Faits de Langues, 3, 152–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montero-Melis, G., Eisenbeiss, S., Narashiham, B., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kita, S., Kopecka, A., Lüpke, F., Nikitina, T., Tragel, I., Jaeger, T. F., & Bohnemeyer, J. 2017. Satellite- and verb-framing underpredicts motion categorization: Insights from a large sample and simulations. Cognitive Semantics, 3, 36–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schadeberg, T. C. 2003. Derivation. In D. Nurse & G. Philippson (Eds.), The Bantu Languages (71–89). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schaefer, R P., & Gaines, R. 1997. Toward a typology of directional motion for African languages. Studies in African Linguistics, 26(2), 193–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, R. P., &. Egbokhare, F. O. 1999. Oral tradition narratives of the Emai people, part I and part II. Hamburg: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
2007. A dictionary of Emai: An Edoid language of Nigeria. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
Schaefer, R. P., & Egbokhare, F. O. 2017. A grammar of Emai. [Mouton Grammar Library Series.] Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative, vol. 2: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description III (57–149). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2000. Toward a cognitive semantics: Volumes I and II. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2009. Main verb properties and equipollent framing. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura & S. Özçalişkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language (389–402). New York: Psychology Press of Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
2016. Properties of main verbs. Cognitive Semantics, 2(2), 133–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voeltz, E. F. 1977. Proto Niger Congo verb extensions. PhD dissertation. UCLA, Los Angeles.
Williamson, K., & R. Blench. 2000. Niger Congo. In Bernd Heine, & Derek Nurse (Eds.), African languages: An introduction (11–42). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J. 2003. Holistic spatial semantics of Thai. In E. Casad & G. Palmer (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and non-Indo-European languages (305–336). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Spatial semantics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (318–350). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., & P. Yangklang. 2004. A third way to travel: The place of Thai in motion-event typology. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative, vol. 2: Typological and contextual perspectives (159–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar