Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 28:1/2 (2001) ► pp.121–141

‘Articulatory settings’

Genealogies of an idea

| University of Vienna

The term ‘articulatory setting’ first appeared in English phonetic literature in a much-cited article by Beatrice Honikman (1964). The link between this term and a set of synonyms used by a range of 19th century European scholars was amply demonstrated by Laver (1978). By examining a few of the many sources available, this article seeks to show, as Laver’s article did not, that the phenomenon that Honikman discusses has been almost continuously present in German phonetic literature from Sievers (1876) onward, and that British scholars in the 20th century failed to take account of this. As a result, the concept was entirely absent from British phonetic literature from about 1909 until 1964. Against this background the article also seeks to establish possible direct sources for Honikman’s ideas.

Published online: 13 June 2002
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.28.1.09jen
References
Abercrombie, David
1967 Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Abercrombie, D[avid], D[ennis] B. Fry, P[eter] A. D. MacCarthy, N. C. Scott & J[ohn] L. M. Trim
eds. 1964 In Honour of Daniel Jones. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Lilias
1940 The Phonetic and Tonal Structure of Kikuyu, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, R[oland] & K[laus] Hansen
1975 Englische Phonetik. Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
Catford, John C. (“Ian”)
1964 “Phonation Types”. Abercrombie et al. 19641.26–37.Google Scholar
Collins, B[everley] S. C. & I[nger] M. Mees
1998 The Real Professor Higgins. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David
1969 Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Christiane & Barbara Seidlhofer
1994 Pronunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dumville, Benjamin
1909 The Science of Speech. London: University Tutorial Press. (2nd ed. 1926.)Google Scholar
Dunstan, A[rthur] C[yril]
1921[1912] Englische Phonetik mit Lesestücken. 2nd ed. Berlin & Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Esling, John
1978 “The Identification of Features of Voice Quality in Social Groups”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 81.18–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franke, Felix
1889 “Die Umgangssprache der Niederlausitz in ihren Lauten”. Phonetische Studien 21.21–60. [Posthumous publication, ed. by Otto Jespersen.]Google Scholar
Gaspey, Thomas
1921 Englische Konversations-Grammatik. 28th ed. prepared by A. Bubert. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar
Gimson, A[lfred] C.
1970 An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hála, B[ohumil]
1957 “The Slavonic Languages”. Kaiser 1957.303ff.Google Scholar
Honikman, Beatrice
1964 “Articulatory Settings”. Abercrombie et al. 19641.73–84.Google Scholar
Jenner, Bryan
1984 Dutch-English: The phonological and prosodic systems of a non-native variety of English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
1987 “The Wood instead of the Trees”. Speak Out! 31.2–5. London: IATEFL.Google Scholar
Jenner, Bryan & Barbara Bradford
1982 “Teaching Pronunciation”. Modern English Teacher 10:2.38–41.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1899 Fonetik, en systematisk fremstilling af lœren om sproglyd. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel
1914 An Outline of English Phonetics. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner. (2nd ed. 1922.)Google Scholar
1949 The Pronunciation of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Later editions 1956, 1959.)Google Scholar
1956 Everyman’s English Pronouncing Dictionary. 11th ed. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Louise
ed. 1957 Manual of Phonetics. Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar
Kelz, Heinrich P.
1971 “Articulatory Basis and Second Language Teaching”. Phonetica 241.193–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keutsch, Muriel
1974 Praxis der englischen Aussprache. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Koziol, Herbert
1959 Die Aussprache des Englischen. Wien: Braumüller.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter
1972 “Phonological Features and Their Phonetic Correlates”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 21.2–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1980 “What Are Linguistic Sounds Made of?”. Language 561.485–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laver, John
1968 “Voice quality and indexical information”. British Journal of Disorders of Communication. 31.43–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978 “The Concept of Articulatory Settings: An historical survey”. Historiographia Linguistica 51.1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979 Voice Quality: A classified research bibliography. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1980 The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1991 The Gift of Speech. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
1994 Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malmberg, Bertil
1963 Phonetics. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
ed. 1968 Manual of Phonetics. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
O’Connor, J[ohn] D.
1973 Phonetics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rip(p)mann, Walter
1899 Elements of Phonetics: English, French and German. Translated and Adapted from Viëtor’s Kleine Phonetik. London: Dent. (4th ed. 1907.)Google Scholar
Roach, Peter
1991 English Phonetics and Phonology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sievers, Eduard
1876 Grundzüge der Lautphysiologie. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
1881 Grundzüge der Phonetik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel. (3rd ed. 1893.)Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry
1877 A Handbook of Phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (2nd ed. 1906.)Google Scholar
1890a A Primer of Phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (2nd ed. 1902.)Google Scholar
1890b A Primer of Spoken English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1908 The Sounds of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1911 “Phonetics”. Encycloædia Britannica, 11th ed., 465–466. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
1974 The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Viëtor, Wilhelm
1884 Elemente der Phonetik und Orthoepie des Deutschen, Englischen und Französischen. Leipzig: O. R. Reisland. (7th ed. 1923.)Google Scholar
1897 Kleine Phonetik des Deutschen, Englischen und Französischen. Leipzig: O. R. Reisland.Google Scholar
Vockeradt, Werner
1925 Die Deutsche und die englische Artikulationsbasis. Greifswald: Emil Hartmann.Google Scholar
Wells, John
1982 Accents of English. 31 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittig, K[urt]
1956 Phonetik des amerikanischen Englisch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Zacher, Oskar C.
1960 Deutsche Phonetik. Leningrad: Pedagogical Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Bottineau, Didier
2023. De la phonation interactive incarnée aux voix des langues naturelles. Langages N° 230:2 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Colantoni, Laura, Alexei Kochetov & Jeffrey Steele
2021. Articulatory settings and L2 English coronal consonants. Phonetica 78:4 ► pp. 273 ff. DOI logo
Pál, Enikő & Francisc Gafton
2016. Considerations on the theory of the basis of articulation (I). Diacronia :4 DOI logo
Pál, Enikő & Francisc Gafton
2016. Considerații asupra teoriei bazei de articulație (I). Diacronia :4 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.