The asterisk from historical to descriptive and theoretical linguistics
An historical note
The use of the asterisk in descriptive and theoretical linguistics is attested well before the 1950s (contrary to what has been maintained by Householder in 1973). It is suggested that the meaning of the asterisk was extended from that of ‘unattested form’, which was standard in historical linguistics, to that of ‘unattested form’ in sense of ‘non-existent’; a further step was to assign to the asterisk the meaning of ‘impossible form’, hence also of ‘ungrammatical sentence’.
References
Bach, Emmon
1964 An Introduction to Transformational Grammars. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Bech, Gunnar
1983 [1955–1957] Studien über das deutsche Verbum infinitum. 21., unveränderte Auflage mit einem Vorwort von
Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Benveniste, Émile
1966 Problèmes de linguistique générale [I1]. Paris: Gallimard.
Benveniste, Émile
1974 Problèmes de linguistique générale, II1. Paris: Gallimard.
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933 Language. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
Chomsky, Noam
1957 Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, Noam
1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam
1968 Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Chomsky, Noam
1970 “
Remarks on Nominalization”.
Readings in English Transformational Grammar ed. by
Roderick A. Jacobs &
Peter S. Rosenbaum, 184–221. Boston: Ginn.
Daneš, František
1964 “
A Three-Level Approach to Syntax”.
Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1 (L’École de Prague d’aujourd’hui), 225–240. Prague: Academia.
De Mauro, Tullio
1958 “
Storia e analisi semantica di ‘classe’”.
Rassegna di Filosofia 81.309–351.
Ernout, Alfred & Antoine Meillet
1932 Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine. Paris: Klincksieck.
Fillmore, Charles J.
1963 “
The Position of Embedding Transformations in a Grammar”.
Word 191.208–231.
Frei, Henri
1929 La grammaire des fautes. Paris & Genève: Geuthner. (Repr., Genève: Slatkine 1971.)
Hatcher, Anna G.
1944 “
Je le vois sourire, Je le vois qui sourit, Je le vois souriant”.
Modern Language Quarterly 51.275–301, 387–405.
Hatcher, Anna G.
1956 “
Syntax and the Sentence”.
Word 121.234–250.
Householder, Fred W.
1973 “
On Arguments from Asterisks”.
Foundations of Language 101.365–376.
Katz, Jerrold J. & Paul M. Postal
1964 An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Koerner, E. F. Konrad
1977 “
Sulla origine e la storia dell’asterisco nella linguistica storica. Un cenno storiografico”.
Problemi della ricostruzione in linguistica ed. by
Raffaele Simone &
Ugo Vignuzzi, 253–258. Roma: Bulzoni. (Repr., with a “Postscript 1988”, in Koerner,
Practicing Linguistic Historiography, 179–184. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1989.)
Lees, Robert B.
1966 [1
1960]
The Grammar of English Nominalizations. 4th printing. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; The Hague: Mouton.
Lees, Robert B.
1963 “
Analysis of the ‘Cleft Sentence’ in English”.
Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 161.371–388.
Migliorini, Bruno
1941 Saggi sulla lingua del Novecento. Firenze: Sansoni.
Roberts, Paul
1964 English Syntax. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
Sgroi, Salvatore Claudio
1997 “
L’asterisco nella linguistica italiana, francese e spagnola”.
Italica et Romanica: Festschrift für Max Pfister ed. by
Günter Holtus,
Johannes Kramer &
Wolfgang Schweickard, vol. III1, 441–447. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Tesnière, Lucien
1959 Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: C. Klincksieck. (2nd ed. 1966.)
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Abrusán, Márta
2019.
Semantic Anomaly, Pragmatic Infelicity, and Ungrammaticality.
Annual Review of Linguistics 5:1
► pp. 329 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.