Article published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 29:3 (2002) ► pp. 329338
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Abrusán, Márta
2019. Semantic Anomaly, Pragmatic Infelicity, and Ungrammaticality. Annual Review of Linguistics 5:1  pp. 329 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Bach, Emmon
1964An Introduction to Transformational Grammars. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Bech, Gunnar
1983 [1955–1957]Studien über das deutsche Verbum infinitum. 2., unveränderte Auflage mit einem Vorwort von Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile
1966Problèmes de linguistique générale [I]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
1974Problèmes de linguistique générale, II. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933Language. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1968Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
1970 “Remarks on Nominalization”. Readings in English Transformational Grammar ed. by Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum, 184–221. Boston: Ginn.Google Scholar
Daneš, František
1964 “A Three-Level Approach to Syntax”. Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1 (L’École de Prague d’aujourd’hui), 225–240. Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio
1958 “Storia e analisi semantica di ‘classe’”. Rassegna di Filosofia 8.309–351.Google Scholar
Ernout, Alfred & Antoine Meillet
1932Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1963 “The Position of Embedding Transformations in a Grammar”. Word 19.208–231.Google Scholar
Frei, Henri
1929La grammaire des fautes. Paris & Genève: Geuthner. (Repr., Genève: Slatkine 1971.)Google Scholar
Hatcher, Anna G.
1944 “Je le vois sourire, Je le vois qui sourit, Je le vois souriant”. Modern Language Quarterly 5.275–301, 387–405.Google Scholar
1956 “Syntax and the Sentence”. Word 12.234–250.Google Scholar
Householder, Fred W.
1973 “On Arguments from Asterisks”. Foundations of Language 10.365–376.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. & Paul M. Postal
1964An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. Konrad
1977 “Sulla origine e la storia dell’asterisco nella linguistica storica. Un cenno storiografico”. Problemi della ricostruzione in linguistica ed. by Raffaele Simone & Ugo Vignuzzi, 253–258. Roma: Bulzoni. (Repr., with a “Postscript 1988”, in Koerner, Practicing Linguistic Historiography, 179–184. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1989.)Google Scholar
Lees, Robert B.
1966 [1 1960] The Grammar of English Nominalizations. 4th printing. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1963 “Analysis of the ‘Cleft Sentence’ in English”. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 16.371–388.Google Scholar
Migliorini, Bruno
1941Saggi sulla lingua del Novecento. Firenze: Sansoni.Google Scholar
Roberts, Paul
1964English Syntax. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
Sgroi, Salvatore Claudio
1997 “L’asterisco nella linguistica italiana, francese e spagnola”. Italica et Romanica: Festschrift für Max Pfister ed. by Günter Holtus, Johannes Kramer & Wolfgang Schweickard, vol. III, 441–447. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien
1959Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: C. Klincksieck. (2nd ed. 1966.)Google Scholar