Article published In:
Linguistica Berolinensia
Edited by Thorsten Fögen and E.F.K. Koerner †
[Historiographia Linguistica 31:2/3] 2004
► pp. 199276
References (755)
Research bibliography
This bibliography on gender-specific communication, which makes no claim whatsoever to be comprehensive, consists of two main parts and an appendix: the first part assembles contributions from modern linguistics, the second lists studies from classical philology, many of which have a broader perspective on women in Graeco-Roman antiquity and do not (only) concentrate on linguistic issues. The first two parts each consist of three sections: (1) bibliographies, (2) monographs and edited volumes and (3) articles published in journals and edited volumes. The final part provides a very selective catalogue of internet websites.
1. Contributions from modern linguistics
1.1 Bibliographies
Doughan, David & Denise Sanchez. 1987. Feminist Periodicals 1855–1984. An Annotated Critical Bibliography of British, Irish, Commonwealth and International Titles. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
Froitzheim, Claudia. 1980. Sprache und Geschlecht. Bibliographie. (= Linguistische Berichte. LB-Papier, 62.) Wiesbaden: Vieweg.Google Scholar
Henley, Nancy & Barrie Thorne. 1975. “Sex differences in language, speech, and nonverbal communication. An annotated bibliography”. Language and Sex. Difference and Dominance ed. by Barrie Thorne & Nancy Henley, 204–311. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Jarrard, Mary E. W. & Phyllis R. Randall. 1982. Women Speaking. An Annotated Bibliography of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication, 1970–1980. (= Garland Reference Library of Social Science, 108.) New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Key, Mary Ritchie. 1975. Male/Female Language. With a Comprehensive Bibliography. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press. (Revised edition: Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press, 1996.)Google Scholar
Kramarae, Cheris, Barrie Thorne & Nancy Henley. 1983. “Sex similarities and differences in language, speech, and nonverbal communication: an annotated bibliography”. Language, Gender, and Society ed. by Barrie Thorne, Cheris Kramarae & Nancy Henley, 151–342. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Peyer, Ann & Ruth Groth. 1996. Sprache und Geschlecht. (= Studienbibliographien Sprach-wissenschaft, 15.) Heidelberg: Groos.Google Scholar
1.2 Monographs and collective volumes
Adler, Max K. 1978. Sex Differences in Human Speech. A Sociolinguistic Study. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Aebischer, Verena. 1985. Les femmes et le langage. Représentations sociales d’une différence. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (Italian edition: Il linguaggio delle donne. Rappresentazioni sociali di una differenza. Roma: Armando, 1988.)Google Scholar
Aebischer, Verena & Claire A. Forel, eds. 1983. Parlers masculins, parlers féminins? Neuchâtel: Delachaux & Niestlé.Google Scholar
Ayres-Bennett, Wendy. 2004. Sociolinguistic Variation in Seventeenth-Century France. Methodology and Case Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Chapter on “Women’s language” (111–180).] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron, Dennis. 1986. Grammar and Gender. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Benor, Sarah et al., eds. 2002. Gendered Practices in Language. Stanford, Calif.: Center for Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Bergvall, Victoria L., Janet M. Bing & Alice F. Freed, eds. 1996. Rethinking Language and Gender Research. Theory and Practice. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bertoldi, Maria et al., eds. 1987. Donne e linguaggio: Contestazioni, prospettive e piste di ricerca. Atti dell’Incontro di studio promosso dal Gruppo Promozione donna e dal Centro di cultura Giancarlo Puecher (Milano, 24–25 maggio 1986). Milano: Dialogo.Google Scholar
Brandt, Gisela, ed. 1994. Bausteine zu einer Geschichte des weiblichen Sprachgebrauchs: Forschungsberichte, Projektangebote, Forschungskontexte. Internationale Fachtagung Rostock, 6.–8. September 1993. (= Stuttgarter Arbeiten zur Germanistik, 299.) Stuttgart: Heinz.Google Scholar
, ed. 1996. Bausteine zu einer Geschichte des weiblichen Sprachgebrauchs II: Forschungsberichte, Methodenreflexion. Internationale Fachtagung Lübben/Spreewald, 16.–19. Juli 1995. (= Stuttgarter Arbeiten zur Germanistik, 341.) Stuttgart: Heinz.Google Scholar
, ed. 1998. Bausteine zu einer Geschichte des weiblichen Sprachgebrauchs III: Forschungsberichte und feministische Fragestellungen. Internationale Fachtagung Dresden, 15.–16. September 1997. (= Stuttgarter Arbeiten zur Germanistik, 363.) Stuttgart: Heinz.Google Scholar
, ed. 2000. Bausteine zu einer Geschichte des weiblichen Sprachgebrauchs IV: Fragestellungen, Methoden, Studien. Internationale Fachtagung Potsdam, 12.–15. September 1999. (= Stuttgarter Arbeiten zur Germanistik, 380.) Stuttgart: Heinz.Google Scholar
, ed. 2002. Bausteine zu einer Geschichte des weiblichen Sprachgebrauchs V: Vertextungsstrategien und Sprachmittelwahl in Texten von Frauen. Internationale Fachtagung Dresden, 10.–12. September 2001. (= Stuttgarter Arbeiten zur Germanistik, 403.) Stuttgart: Heinz.Google Scholar
Braun, Friederike. 2000. Reden Frauen anders? Entwicklungen und Positionen in der linguistischen Geschlechterforschung. (= Linguistic Agency Series, A 520.) Essen: LAUD.Google Scholar
Braun, Friederike & Ursula Pasero, eds. 1997. Kommunikation von Geschlecht – Communication of Gender. (= Frauen, Männer, Geschlechterverhältnisse, 4.) Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus.Google Scholar
Bull, Tove & Toril Swan, eds. 1992. Language, Sex, and Society. (= International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 94.) Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Burton, Pauline, Ketaki Kushari Dyson & Shirley Ardener, eds. 1994. Bilingual Women. Anthropological Approaches to Second Language Use. (= Cross-cultural Perspectives on Women, 9.) Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Butturff, Douglas & Edmund L. Epstein, eds. 1978. Women’s Language and Style (= Studies in Contemporary Language, 1.) Akron, Ohio: University of Akron.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 2 1992 [1985]. Feminism and Linguistic Theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, ed. 1998 [1990]. The Feminist Critique of Language. A Reader. Londons & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah & Don Kulick. 2003. Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn et al., eds. 2002. Language and Sexuality. Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI.Google Scholar
Canary, Daniel J. & Kathryn Dindia, eds. 1998. Sex Differences and Similarities in Communication. Critical Essays and Empirical Investigations of Sex and Gender in Interaction. Mahwah, N.J. & London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cederschiöld, Gustaf. 1900. Om kvinnospråk och andra ämnen. Anteckningar och reflexioner. Lund: Gleerup. (2nd ed., 1917.)Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny & Peter Trudgill, eds. 1998. The Sociolinguistics Reader. Vol. II1: Gender and Discourse. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Cicero, Antonia, ed. 1997. Art of Speech. Frauen, Sprache, Macht. Wien: Passagen-Verlag.Google Scholar
Claudi, Ulrike. 1985. Zur Entstehung von Genussystemen. Überlegungen zu einigen theoretischen Aspekten, verbunden mit einer Fallstudie des Zande. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1987. Language and Sexism. (= Linguistic Agency Series, B 173.) Duisburg: LAUD.Google Scholar
. ²1993 [1985]. Women, Men and Language. A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 1996. Women Talk. Conversation Between Women Friends. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
, ed. 1998. Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer & Deborah Cameron, eds. 1989. Women in Their Speech Communities. New Perspectives on Language and Sex. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Collin, Françoise, ed. 1992. Le langage des femmes. (= Complexe poche, 15.) Bruxelles: Édition Complexe.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Correia, João da Silva. 1935. A linguagem da mulher. Lisboa: Academia das ciências de Lisboa.Google Scholar
, ed. 1927. A linguagem da mulher em relação à do homem. Conferéncia realizada na Associação dos Estudantes de Letras da Universidade de Coimbra. Lisboa: Sá da Costa.Google Scholar
Crawford, Mary. 1995. Talking Difference. On Gender and Language. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Dahmen, Wolfgang et al., eds. 1997. Sprache und Geschlecht in der Romania. Romanistisches Kolloquium X. (= Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik, 417.) Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Dubois, Betty Lou & Isabel Crouch, eds. 1979. The Sociology of the Languages of American Women. Proceedings of the Conference held at New Mexico State University, January 16– 17, 1976. (= Papers in Southwest English, 4.) San Antonio, Texas: Trinity University.Google Scholar
Eakins, Barbara Westbrook & R. Gene Eakins. 1978. Sex Differences in Communication. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2003. Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Einarsson, Jan & Tor G. Hultman. 1985. Godmorgon pojkar och flickor. Om språk och kön i skolan. Malmö: Liber.Google Scholar
Falk, Julia S. 1999. Women, Language, and Linguistics. Three American Stories from the first half of the twentieth century. (= Routledge Studies in the History of Linguistics, 2.) London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph. 1990. The Sociolinguistics of Language. (= Language in Society, 6.) Oxford: Blackwell. [Chapter on “Language and Sex” (89–119).]Google Scholar
Fernandez, M. M. Jocelyne, ed. 1998. Parler femme en Europe. La femme, image et langage, de la tradition à l’oral quotidien. Paris: Harmattan.Google Scholar
Foley, Geraldine. 2001. Performative Gender. Language and its Role in Gender. (= University of Manchester Sociology Working Papers, 22.) Manchester: University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Frank, Francine & Frank Anshen. 1983. Language and the Sexes. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Francine W., Paula A. Treichler et al. 1989. Language, Gender, and Professional Writing. Theoretical Approaches and Guidelines for Nonsexist Usage. New York: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
Frank, Karsta. 1992. Sprachgewalt: Die sprachliche Reproduktion der Geschlechterhierarchie. Elemente einer feministischen Linguistik im Kontext sozialwissenschaftlicher Frauenforschung. (= Reihe Germanistische Linguistik, 130.) Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mouton, Pilar. 1999. Cómo hablan las mujeres. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Gibbon, Margaret. 1999. Feminist Perspectives on Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Goddard, Angela & Lindsey Meân Patterson. 2000. Language and Gender. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gourmont, Rémy de. 1925. Les femmes et le langage. (= Le Sage et ses amis, 9.) Paris: Lesage.Google Scholar
Grabrucker, Marianne. 1993. Vater Staat hat keine Muttersprache. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
Graddol, David & Joan Swann. 1989. Gender Voices. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gräßel, Ulrike. 1991. Sprachverhalten und Geschlecht. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne & Helga Kotthoff, eds. 1991. Von fremden Stimmen. Weibliches und männliches Sprechen im Kulturvergleich. (= edition suhrkamp, 1721.) Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Gunnarsson, Britt-Louise & Caroline Liberg, eds. 1992. Språk, språkbruk och kön. Rapport från ASLAs nordiska symposium, Uppsala, 7–9 november 1991. (= ASLAs Skriftserie, 5.) Uppsala: ASLA.Google Scholar
Hall, Kira, Mary Bucholtz & Birch Moonwomon, eds. 1992. Locating Power. Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference, April 4 and 5, 1992 (21 Vol.). Berkeley: BWLG University of California.Google Scholar
Hall, Kira & Mary Bucholtz, eds. 1995. Gender Articulated. Language and the Socially Constructed Self. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hartig, Matthias. ²1998. Soziolinguistik des Deutschen. (= Germanistische Lehrbuchsammlung, 16.) Berlin: Weidler. [Chapter on “Geschlechtsspezifischer Sprachgebrauch und Sprachwandel” (156–167).]Google Scholar
Hausherr-Mälzer, Michael. 1990. Die Sprache des Patriarchats. Sprache als Abbild und Werkzeug der Männergesellschaft. (= Europäische Hochschulschriften, XXI 89.) Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Heilmann, Christa M., ed. 1995. Frauensprechen – Männersprechen. Geschlechtsspezifisches Sprechverhalten. (= Sprache und Sprechen, 30.) München: Reinhardt. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellinger, Marlis. 1990. Kontrastive feministische Linguistik. Mechanismen sprachlicher Diskriminierung im Englischen und Deutschen. Ismaning: Hueber.Google Scholar
, ed. 1985. Sprachwandel und feministische Sprachpolitik. Internationale Perspektiven. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellinger, Marlis & Christine Bierbach. 1993. Eine Sprache für beide Geschlechter. Richtlinien für einen nicht-sexistischen Sprachgebrauch. Bonn: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Hellinger, Marlis & Hadumod Bußmann, eds. 2001–2003. Gender Across Languages. The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. (= IMPACT. Studies in Language and Society, 9, 10 & 11.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henley, Nancy. 1977. Body Politics. Power, Sex and Nonverbal Communication. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Henn, Marianne & Britta Hufeisen, eds. 1997. Frauen, MitSprechen, MitSchreiben. Beiträge zur literatur und sprachwissenschaftlichen Frauenforschung. (= Stuttgarter Arbeiten zur Germanistik, 349.) Stuttgart: Heinz.Google Scholar
Hill, Alette O. 1986. Mother Tongue, Father Time. A Decade of Linguistic Revolt. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Ulrich. 1979. Sprache und Emanzipation. Zur Begrifflichkeit der feministischen Bewegung. (= Campus-Forschung, 89.) Frankfurt am Main & New York: Campus.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1995. Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.Google Scholar
, ed. 2000. Gendered Speech in Social Context. Perspectives from Gown and Town. Wellington: Victoria University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet & Miriam Meyerhoff, eds. 2003. The Handbook of Language and Gender. (= Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics, 13.) Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hufeisen, Britta, ed. 1993. “Das Weib soll schweigen …” (1. Kor. 14,34). Beiträge zur linguistischen Frauenforschung. (= Kasseler Arbeiten zur Sprache und Literatur, 19.) Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Hyrynen, Yvonne, ed. 1996. Voicing Gender. (= Tampere English Studies, 5.) Tampere: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Muhammad Hassan. 1973. Grammatical Gender. Its Origin and Development. (= Ianua Linguarum. Series minor, 166.) The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Illich, Ivan. 1982. Gender. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985. Parler n’est jamais neutre. Paris: Minuit. (English translation by Gail Schwab: To Speak Is Never Neutral. New York: Routledge, 2002.)Google Scholar
, ed. 1990. Sexes et genres à travers les langues. Éléments de communication sexuée. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce et al. 1987. Le sexe linguistique. (= Langages, 85.) Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language. Its Nature, Development and Origin. London: Allen & Unwin. [Chapter on “The woman” (237–254).]Google Scholar
Johnson, Sally & Ulrike Hanna Meinhof, eds. 1997. Language and Masculinity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Key, Mary Ritchie. 1975. Male/Female Language. With a Comprehensive Bibliography. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press. (Revised ed.: Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press, 1996.)Google Scholar
King, Ruth, ed. 1991. Talking Gender. A Guide to Nonsexist Communication. Toronto: Copp Clark Pitman.Google Scholar
Klüger, Ruth. 3 1997. Frauen lesen anders. Essays. München: dtv.Google Scholar
Kohlbrecher, Ludwig. 1990. Differenzen: Untersuchungen zum Sprachbau der Geschlechter. (= Sprache in der Gesellschaft, 16.) Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga & Ruth Wodak, eds. 1997. Communicating Gender in Context. (= Pragmatics & Beyond, N.S. 42.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kramarae, Cheris. 1981. Women and Men Speaking. Frameworks for Analysis. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
, ed. 1980. The Voices and Words of Women and Men. (= Women Studies International Quarterly, 3.2–3.) Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Kramarae, Cheris & Paula A. Treichler. 1992. Amazons, Bluestockings and Crones. A Feminist Dictionary. London: Pandora. (First edition published as: A Feminist Dictionary. Boston: Pandora, 1985.)Google Scholar
Kuhn, Elisabeth D., Geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede in der Sprachverwendung. (= Linguistic Agency Series, B 74.) Trier: L.A.U.T.
La Grasserie, Raoul de. 1906. De la catégorie du genre. Paris: Leroux.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. (= Harper Colophon Books, 389.) New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
. 1990. Talking Power. The Politics of Language in Our Lives. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
. 2004. Language and Woman’s Place. Text and Commentaries. Ed. by Mary Bucholtz. (= Studies in Language and Gender, 3.) New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Larsson, Kent, ed. 1981. Skola, språk och kön. (= Ord och stil, 13.) Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Linke, Angelika, Markus Nussbaumer & Paul R. Portmann. 2 1994. Studienbuch Linguistik. (= Reihe Germanistische Linguistik, 121.) Tübingen: Niemeyer. [Chapter “Beispiel für neuere soziolinguistische Forschung: Untersuchungen zum geschlechtsspezifischen Sprachverhalten” (318–323).]Google Scholar
Livia, Anna. 2001. Pronoun Envy. Literary Uses of Linguistic Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Löffler, Heinrich. 1985. Germanistische Soziolinguistik. (= Grundlagen der Germanistik, 28.) Berlin: Schmidt. [Chapter on “Geschlechtsspezifische Sprechweisen” (137–139).]Google Scholar
Maggio, Rosalie. 1987. The Nonsexist Word Finder. A Dictionary of Gender-Free Usage. Phoenix: Oryx.Google Scholar
Marcato, Gianna, ed. 1995. Donna & Linguaggio. Convegno Internazionale di Studi: Sappada/Plodn (Belluno) 1995. Padova: CLEUP.Google Scholar
Mayo, Clara & Nancy M. Henley, eds. 1981. Gender and Nonverbal Behavior. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, Sally, Ruth Borker & Nelly Furman, eds. 1980. Women and Language in Literature and Society. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
McIlvenny, Paul, ed. 2002. Talking Gender and Sexuality. (= Pragmatics & Beyond, N.S. 94.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McMaster, Susan & Cathy Ford, eds. 1992. Illegitimate Positions. Women & Language. Toronto: Feminist Caucus of the League of Canadian Poets.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1921. Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris: Champion. [Chapter on “La catégorie du genre et les conceptions indo-européennes” (211–229).]Google Scholar
Miller, Casey & Kate Swift. 1979. Words and Women. New Language in New Times. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
. 3 1995. The Handbook of Non-Sexist Writing. For Writers, Editors and Speakers. London: Women’s Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Margaret H., ed. 1999. Slavic Gender Linguistics. (= Pragmatics & Beyond, N.S. 61.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mills, Sara. 1991. Discourses of Difference. An Analysis of Women’s Travel Writing and Colonialism. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Feminist Stylistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
, ed. 1995. Language and Gender. Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Minns, Hilary. 1991. Language, Literacy and Gender. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Mühlen Achs, Gitta. 1993. Wie Katz und Hund. Die Körpersprache der Geschlechter. München: Frauenoffensive.Google Scholar
Müller, Sigrid & Claudia Fuchs. 1993. Handbuch zur nicht-sexistischen Sprachverwendung in öffentlichen Texten. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
Murphy, Peter F. 2001. Studs, Tools, and the Family Jewels. Metaphors Men Live By. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Nabrings, Kirsten. 1981. Sprachliche Varietäten. (= Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik, 147.) Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Niedzwiecki, Patricia. 2000. Le langage au féminin. Les mots pour la dire. Paris & Bruxelles: Castells.Google Scholar
Nilsen, Alleen Pace et al. 1977. Sexism and Language. Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Oppermann, Katrin & Erika Weber. 1995. Frauensprache – Männersprache. Die verschiedenen Kommunikationsstile von Männern und Frauen. Zürich: Orell Füssli.Google Scholar
Orasanu, Judith, Mariam K. Slater & Leonore Loeb Adler, eds. 1979. Language, Sex and Gender. Does ‘la différence’ make a difference? (= Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 327.) New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Pasero, Ursula & Friederike Braun, eds. 1999. Perceiving and Performing Gender. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Pauwels, Anne. 1998. Women Changing Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, Aneta, Adrian Blackledge, Ingrid Piller & Marya Teutsch-Dwyer, eds. 2001. Multilingualism, Second Language Learning, and Gender. (= Language, Power, and Social Process, 6.) Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penelope, Julia. 1990. Speaking Freely. Unlearning the Lies of the Fathers’ Tongues. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Penfield, Joyce, ed. 1987. Women and Language in Transition. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Perry, Linda A. M., Lynn H. Turner & Helen M. Sterk, eds. 1992. Constructing and Reconstructing Gender. The Links Among Communication, Language, and Gender. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Philips, Susan U., Susan Steele & Christine Tanz, eds. 1987. Language, Gender, and Sex in Comparative Perspective. (= Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language, 4.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piechotta, Mariola. 2001. Verbales und nonverbales Sprachverhalten in gemischtgeschlechtlicher Konversation. Stuttgart: Ibidem-Verlag.Google Scholar
Pohl, Margit. 1996. Geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede im Sprachverhalten. Eine psychologische Untersuchung von Kooperativität und Dominanz in informellen Gesprächssituationen. (= Europäische Hochschulschriften, VI 541.) Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Postl, Gertrude. 1991. Weibliches Sprechen. Feministische Entwürfe zu Sprache und Geschlecht. Wien: Passagen-Verlag.Google Scholar
Poynton, Cate. 1989. Language and Gender: Making the Difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Preisler, Bent. 1986. Linguistic Sex Roles in Conversation. Social Variation in the Expression of Tentativeness in English. (= Contributions to the Sociology of Language, 45.) Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pusch, Luise F. 1990. Alle Menschen werden Schwestern. Feministische Sprachkritik. (= edition suhrkamp, 1565.) Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
1993. “Ladies first”: Ein Gespräch über Feminismus, Sprache und Sexualität. Bamberg: Palette-Verlag.Google Scholar
1996. Das Deutsche als Männersprache. Aufsätze und Glossen zur feministischen Linguistik. (= edition suhrkamp, 3324.) Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Robinson, William P. 1972. Language and Social Behaviour. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1994. Language in Society. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Chapter on “Language and Gender” (99–133).]Google Scholar
. 1999. Communicating Gender. Mahwah, N.J. & London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Roman, Camille, Suzanne Juhasz & Cristanne Miller, eds. 1994. The Women and Language Debate: A Sourcebook. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Rotondo, Antonio. 1991. ’A vita è ’nu ’mbruòglio. Raccolta di proverbi, detti, modi di dire, wellerismi etc. sulla salute, i denari, le donne, gli amici ed i parenti. Sorrento: Di Mauro.Google Scholar
Samel, Ingrid. ²2000 [1995]. Einführung in die feministische Sprachwissenschaft. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
Schiewe, Jürgen. 1998. Die Macht der Sprache. Eine Geschichte der Sprachkritik von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. München: Beck. [Chapter on “Sprache und Geschlecht: Die feministische Sprachkritik” (270–273).]Google Scholar
Schipper, Mineke, ed. 1996. “Eine gute Frau hat keinen Kopf ”. Europäische Sprichwörter über Frauen. München: dtv.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Claudia. 1988. Typisch weiblich – typisch männlich. Geschlechtstypisches Kommunikationsverhalten in studentischen Kleingruppen. (= Reihe Germanistische Linguistik, 87.) Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Knaebel, Susanne. 1988. Frauen und Sprache. Wie gehen Frauen mit Sprache um, und wie geht die Sprache mit Frauen um. (= Oldenburger Universitätsreden, 23.) Oldenburg: Bibliotheksund Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg.Google Scholar
Schoenthal, Gisela, ed. 1998. Feministische Linguistik – linguistische Geschlechterforschung. Ergebnisse, Konsequenzen, Perspektiven. (= Germanistische Linguistik, 139–140.) Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Schramm, Hilde, ed. 1981. Frauensprache – Männersprache. Ein Arbeitsbuch zur geschlechtsspezifischen Sprachverwendung. Frankfurt am Main: Diesterweg.Google Scholar
Sellers, Susan. 1991. Language and Sexual Difference. Feminist Writing in France. Basingstoke: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibamoto, Janet S. 1985. Japanese Women’s Language. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sieburg, Heinz, ed. 1997. Sprache – Genus, Sexus. (= Dokumentation germanistischer Forschung, 3.) Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Singy, Pascal, ed. 1998. Les femmes et la langue. L’insécurité linguistique en question. Lausanne: Delachaux & Niestlé.Google Scholar
Smith, Philip M. 1985. Language, the Sexes and Society. (= Language in Society, 8.) Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spender, Dale. ²1990 [1980]. Man Made Language. London: Pandora.Google Scholar
Swann, Joan. 1992. Girls, Boys, and Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Talbot, Mary M. 1998. Language and Gender. An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1990. You just don’t understand. Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Ballantine. (German edition: Du kannst mich einfach nicht verstehen. Warum Männer und Frauen aneinander vorbeireden. Hamburg: Kabel, 1990. Paperback edition: München: Goldmann, 1993.)Google Scholar
. 1994. Gender and Discourse. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press. (German edition: Andere Worte, andere Welten. Kommunikation zwischen Frauen und Männern. München: Goldmann, 1999.)Google Scholar
, ed. 1993. Gender and Conversational Interaction. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thelander, Kerstin. 1986. Politikerspråk i könsperspektiv. (= Ord och stil, 17.) Malmö: Liber.Google Scholar
Thorne, Barrie & Nancy Henley, eds. 1975. Language and Sex. Difference and Dominance. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Thorne, Barrie, Cheris Kramarae & Nancy Henley, eds. 1983. Language, Gender, and Society. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Todd, Alexandra Dundas & Sue Fisher, eds. 1988. Gender and Discourse. The Power of Talk. (= Advances in Discourse Processes, 30.) Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Trömel-Plötz, Senta. 1979. Frauensprache in unserer Welt der Männer. (= Konstanzer Universitätsreden, 132.) Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
. 1982. Frauensprache – Sprache der Veränderung. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
. ²1993 [1992]. Vatersprache – Mutterland. Beobachtungen zu Sprache und Politik. München: Frauenoffensive.Google Scholar
. 1996. Frauengespräche: Sprache der Verständigung. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
, ed. 1984. Gewalt durch Sprache. Die Vergewaltigung von Frauen in Gesprächen. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1983. Sociolinguistics. An Introduction to Language and Society. Harmondsworth: Penguin. [Chapter on “Language and Sex” (78–99).]Google Scholar
Vetterling-Braggin, Mary, ed. 1981. Sexist Language. A Modern Philosophical Analysis. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wales, Katie. 1994. Feminist Linguistics in Literary Criticism. (= Essays and Studies, 47.) Cambridge: Brewer.Google Scholar
Wallinger, Sylvia & Monika Jonas, eds. 1986. Der Widerspenstigen Zähmung. Studien zur bezwungenen Weiblichkeit in der Literatur vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart. (= Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft. Germanistische Reihe, 31.) Innsbruck: Institut für Germanistik.Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, Ronald. 3 1998. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. [Chapter on “Language and Gender” (309–324).]Google Scholar
Warner, Marina. 1994. From the Beast to the Blonde. On Fairy Tales and Their Tellers. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Weatherall, Ann. 2002. Gender, Language and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wegener, Hildburg, Hanne Köhler & Cordelia Kopsch, eds. 1990. Frauen fordern eine gerechte Sprache. Gütersloh: Mohn.Google Scholar
Werner, Fritjof. 1983. Gesprächsverhalten von Frauen und Männern. (= Europäische Hochschulschriften, I 636.) Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 1983. Die Sprache von Müttern und Töchtern. Ein soziophonologischer Vergleich. (= Wiener linguistische Gazette, Beiheft 1.) Wien: Institut für Sprachwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth & Rosita Rindler-Schjerve. 1985. Funktionen der Mutter beim Sprachwechsel. Konsequenz für die Primärsozialisation und Identitätsentwicklung. (= Linguistische Berichte. LB-Papier, 71.) Wiesbaden: Vieweg.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth et al. 1987. Sprachliche Gleichbehandlung von Frau und Mann. Linguistische Empfehlungen zur sprachlichen Gleichbehandlung von Frau und Mann im öffentlichen Bereich. (= Schriftenreihe zur sozialen und beruflichen Stellung der Frau, 16.) Wien: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, ed. 1997. Gender and Discourse. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Yaguello, Marina. 1978. Les mots et les femmes. Essai d’approche socio-linguistique de la condition féminine. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
. 1989. Le sexe des mots. Paris: Belfond.Google Scholar
1.3 Journal articles and contributions in collective volumes
Adam, Lucien. 1879. “Du parler des hommes et du parler des femmes dans la langue caraïbe”. Revue de linguistique 12.275–304. (Also published as a separate volume: Du parler des hommes et du parler des femmes dans la langue caraïbe. Paris: Maisonneuve, 1879.)Google Scholar
Aries, Elizabeth. 1987. “Gender and communication”. Sex and Gender ed. by Phillip Shaver & Clyde Hendrick (= Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 7), 149–176. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Aronovitch, Charles D. 1976. “The voice of personality: stereotyped judgements and their relation to voice quality and sex of speaker”. Journal of Social Psychology 991.207–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baudouin de Courtenay, Jan. 1929. “Einfluß der Sprache auf Weltanschauung und Stimmung”. Prace filologiczne 141.185–256.Google Scholar
Betten, Anne. 1989. “Weiblicher Gesprächsstil und feministische Gesprächsanalyse? Überlegungen zum Forschungsstand”. Dialoganalyse II: Referate der 2. Arbeitstagung Bochum 1988 (Vol. II1) ed. by Edda Weigand & Franz Hundsnurscher (= Linguistische Arbeiten, 230), 265–276. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bierbach, Christine. 1995. “Normes et répresentations de comportement langagier: la parole féminine dans les proverbes”. Donna & Linguaggio. Convegno Internazionale di Studi: Sappada/Plodn (Belluno) 1995 ed. by Gianna Marcato, 267–284. Padova: CLEUP.Google Scholar
Bierbach, Christine & Beate Ellrich. 1990. “Französisch: Sprache und Geschlechter”. Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik (Vol. IV.11) ed. by Günter Holtus, Michael Metzeltin & Christian Schmitt, 248–266. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bleich, David. 1986. “Gender interests in reading and language”. Gender and Reading. Essays on Readers, Texts and Contexts ed. by Elizabeth A. Flynn & Patrocinio P. Schweickart, 234–266. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Braun, Friederike. 1993. “Was hat Sprache mit Geschlecht zu tun? Zum Stand linguistischer Frauenforschung”. Frauenforschung in universitären Disziplinen: “Man räume ihnen Kanzeln und Lehrstühle ein …” ed. by Ursula Pasero & Friederike Braun, 189–229. Opladen: Leske & Budrich. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brend, Ruth M. 1975. “Male-female intonation patterns in American English”. Language and Sex. Difference and Dominance ed. by Barrie Thorne & Nancy Henley, 84–87. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Brouwer, Dédé, Marinel Gerritsen & Dorian de Haan. 1979. “Speech differences between women and men: on the wrong track?”. Language in Society 81.33–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1972. “The pronouns of power and solidarity”. Language and Social Context ed. by Pier Paolo Giglioli, 252–282. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Brünner, Gisela. 1990. “Wie kommen Frauen und Männer in der Sprache vor? Eine Unterrichtseinheit in der Sekundarstufe 2”. Diskussion Deutsch 1111.46–71.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl. 1889. “Das Nominalgeschlecht in den indogermanischen Sprachen”. Internationale Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 41.100–109.Google Scholar
. 1890. “Zur Frage der Entstehung des grammatischen Geschlechts”. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 151.523–531.Google Scholar
Burr, Elizabeth, Susan Dunn & Norma Farquhar. 1972. “Women and the language of inequality”. Social Education 361.841–845.Google Scholar
Bußmann, Hadumod. 1995. “ Das Genus, die Grammatik und – der Mensch: Geschlechterdifferenz in der Sprachwissenschaft”. Genus. Zur Geschlechterdifferenz in den Kulturwissenschaften ed. by Hadumod Bußmann & Renate Hof (= Kröners Taschenausgabe, 492), 114–160. Stuttgart: Kröner.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 1985. “What has gender got to do with sex?”. Language & Communication 51.19–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. “What makes a linguistics feminist?”. Språk, språkbruk och kön. Rapport från ASLAs nordiska symposium, Uppsala, 7–9 november 1991 ed. by BrittLouise Gunnarsson & Caroline Liberg (= ASLAs Skriftserie, 5), 55–69. Uppsala: ASLA.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, Alexander. 1912. “Women’s languages”. American Anthropologist 141.579–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crosby, Faye & Linda Nyquist. 1977. “The female register: an empirical study of Lakoff ’s hypothesis”. Language in Society 61.313–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Karlheinz. 1985. “Geschlechtsspezifische Stereotypen im Sprichwort”. Sprache und Literatur 561.18–25.Google Scholar
Dubois, Betty Lou & Isabel Crouch. 1975. “The question of tag questions in women’s speech: they don’t really use more of them, do they?”. Language in Society 41.289–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eble, Connie. 1976. “Etiquette Books as linguistic authority”. The Second LACUS Forum 1975 ed. by Peter A. Reich, 468–475. Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1999. “New generalizations and explanations in language and gender research”. Language in Society 281.185–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edelsky, Carol. 1977. “Acquisition of an aspect of communicative competence: learning what it means to talk like a lady”. Child Discourse ed. by Susan Ervin-Tripp & Claudia Mitchell-Kernan, 225–243. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1979. “Question intonation and sex roles”. Language in Society 81.15–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekka, Francis. 1972. “Men’s and women’s speech in Kurux”. Linguistics 811.21–31.Google Scholar
Ervin, Susan. 1962. “The connotations of gender”. Word 181.249–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flannery, Regina. 1946. “Men’s and women’s speech in Gros Ventre”. International Journal of American Linguistics 121.133–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, István. 1959. “The origin of grammatical gender”. Lingua 81.1–41 and 186–214.Google Scholar
Forer, Rosa Barbara. 1986. “Genus und Sexus. Über philosophische und sprachwissenschaftliche Erklärungsversuche zum Zusammenhang von grammatischem und natürlichem Geschlecht”. Der Widerspenstigen Zähmung. Studien zur bezwungenen Weiblichkeit in der Literatur vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart ed. by Sylvia Wallinger & Monika Jonas (= Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft. Germanistische Reihe, 31), 21–41. Innsbruck: Institut für Germanistik.Google Scholar
Frank, Karsta. 1992. “Fremde Schwestern. Feministische Forschung in Linguistik und Literaturwissenschaft”. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Germanistenverbandes 391.28–30.Google Scholar
Frazer, James G. 1900. “A suggestion as to the origin of gender in language”. Fortnightly Review 731.79–90.Google Scholar
Freed, Alice F. & Alice Greenwood. 1996. “Women, men, and type of talk: what makes the difference?”. Language in Society 251.1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freytag, Sigrid. 1997. “‘Sprache und Geschlecht’ als thematischer Schwerpunkt in der germanistischen Linguistik”. Sprache und Geschlecht in der Romania. Romanistisches Kolloquium X ed. by Wolfgang Dahmen et al. (= Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik, 417), 375–396. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Furfey, Paul Hanly. 1944. “Men’s and women’s languages”. American Catholic Sociological Review 51.218–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallmann, Peter. 1991. “Bezeichnungen für männliche und weibliche Personen”. Sprachspiegel 471.150–160.Google Scholar
Glück, Helmut. 1979. “Der Mythos von den Frauensprachen”. Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie 91.60–95.Google Scholar
Gomard, Kirsten. 1995. “Feministische Linguistik. Eine Introduktion”. Augias 481.3–20.Google Scholar
. 1995. “Frauensprache – Männersprache. Mythen und Fakten”. Augias 481.21–38.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978. “How does a language acquire gender markers?”. Universals of Human Language (Vol. III1: Word Structure) ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith A. Moravcsik, 47–82. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Guentherodt, Ingrid. 1980. “Behördliche Sprachregelungen gegen und für eine sprachliche Gleichbehandlung von Frauen und Männern”. Linguistische Berichte 691.22–36.Google Scholar
Guentherodt, Ingrid, Marlis Hellinger, Luise F. Pusch & Senta Trömel-Plötz. 1981. “Richtlinien zur Vermeidung sexistischen Sprachgebrauchs”. Linguistische Berichte 711.1–7.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne. 1992. “Sprache und Geschlecht: Ist Kommunikation zwischen Frauen und Männern interkulturelle Kommunikation?”. Linguistische Berichte 1381.123–143.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary. 1944. “Men’s and women’s speech in Koasati”. Language 201.142–149. (Reprinted in: Language in Culture and Society. A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology ed. by Dell H. Hymes, 228–234. New York: Harper Row, 1964.)Google Scholar
Hall, Judith A. 1987. “On explaining gender differences: the case of nonverbal communication”. Sex and Gender ed. by Phillip Shaver & Clyde Hendrick (= Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 7), 177–200. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Hellinger, Marlis. 1980. “Zum Gebrauch weiblicher Berufsbezeichnungen im Deutschen. Variabilität als Ausdruck außersprachlicher Machtstrukturen”. Linguistische Berichte 691.37–58.Google Scholar
. 1980. “‘For men must work, and women must weep’: sexism in English language textbooks used in German schools”. Women’s Studies International Quarterly 31.267–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henley, Nancy. 1975. “Power, sex and nonverbal communication”. Language and Sex. Difference and Dominance ed. by Barrie Thorne & Nancy Henley, 184–203. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Henry, Victor. 1879. “Sur le parler des hommes et le parler des femmes dans la langue chiquita”. Revue de linguistique et de philologie comparée 121.305–313.Google Scholar
Hiatt, Mary P. 1976. “The sexology of style”. Language and Style 91.98–107.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1986. “Functions of you know in women’s and men’s speech”. Language in Society 151.1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. “Women, language and identity”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11.195–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. “Women talk too much”. Language Myths ed. by Laurie Bauer & Peter Trudgill, 41–49. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Homberger, Dietrich. 1993. “Männersprache – Frauensprache: Ein Problem der Sprachkultur”. Muttersprache 1031.89–112.Google Scholar
Houdebine, Anne-Marie. 1979. “La différence sexuelle et la langue”. Langage et Société 71.3–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ide, Sachiko. 1982. “Japanese sociolinguistics: politeness and women’s language”. Lingua 571.357–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irmen, Lisa & Astrid Köhncke. 1996. “Zur Psychologie des ‘generischen’ Maskulinums”. Sprache und Kognition 151.152–166.Google Scholar
Kalverkämper, Hartwig. 1979. “Die Frauen und die Sprache”. Linguistische Berichte 621.55–71.Google Scholar
. 1979. “Quo vadis linguistica? – Oder: Der feministische Mumpsismus in der Linguistik”. Linguistische Berichte 621.103–107.Google Scholar
Key, Mary Ritchie. 1972. “Linguistic behavior of male and female”. Linguistics 881.15–31.Google Scholar
Kipers, Pamela S. 1987. “Gender and topic”. Language in Society 161.543–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klann, Gisela. 1978. “Weibliche Sprache – Identität, Sprache und Kommunikation von Frauen”. Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie 81.9–62.Google Scholar
Klann-Delius, Gisela. 1980. “Welchen Einfluß hat die Geschlechtszugehörigkeit auf den Spracherwerb des Kindes?”. Linguistische Berichte 701.63–87.Google Scholar
. 1987. “Sex and language”. Soziolinguistik. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Wissenschaft von Sprache und Gesellschaft ed. by Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar & Klaus J. Mattheier (= Handbücher zur Sprachund Kommunikationswissenschaft, 3.1), 767–780. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Klein, Josef. 1988. “Benachteiligung der Frau im generischen Maskulinum – eine feministische Schimäre oder psycholinguistische Realität?”. Das Selbstverständnis der Germanistik. Aktuelle Diskussionen ed. by Norbert Oellers (= Germanistik und Deutschunterricht im Zeitalter der Technologie, 1), 310–319. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
De Klerk, Vivian. 1992. “How taboo are taboo words for girls?”. Language in Society 211.277–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knobloch, Johann. 1988. “‘Female speech’ in Greek, Armenian, and Albanian”. Journal of Indo-European Studies 161.123–125.Google Scholar
Kramarae, Cheris. 1982. “Gender: how she speaks”. Attitudes Towards Language Variation. Social and Applied Contexts ed. by Ellen Bouchard Ryan & Howard Giles (= The Social Psychology of Language, 1), 84–98. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Kraus, Flora. 1924. “Die Frauensprache bei den primitiven Völkern”. Imago. Zeitschrift für Anwendung der Psychoanalyse auf die Geisteswissenschaften 101.296–312.Google Scholar
Krosroshahi, Fatemeh. 1989. “Penguins don’t care, but women do: a social identity analysis of a Whorfian problem”. Language in Society 181.505–525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1973. “Language and woman’s place”. Language in Society 21.45–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1977. “Women’s language”. Language and Style 101.222–247.Google Scholar
Maier, Lonni. 1979. “Geschlechtsspezifisches Sprachverhalten als Gegenstand der Soziolinguistik”. Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie 91.163–179.Google Scholar
Maltz, Daniel N. & Ruth A. Borker. 1991. “Mißverständnisse zwischen Männern und Frauen – kulturell betrachtet”. Von fremden Stimmen. Weibliches und männliches Sprechen im Kulturvergleich ed. by Susanne Günthner & Helga Kotthoff (= edition suhrkamp, 1721), 52–74. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1988. “Language and gender”. Linguistics. The Cambridge Survey. Vol. IV1: Language. The Socio-Cultural Context ed. by Frederick J. Newmeyer, 75–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1923. “Le genre feminine dans les langues indo-européens”. Journal de psychologie normale et pathologique 201.943–944.Google Scholar
Meinhof, Carl. 1937. “Die Entstehung des grammatischen Geschlechts”. Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen 271.81–91.Google Scholar
Moulton, Janice, George M. Robinson & Cherin Elias. 1978. “Sex bias in language use. ‘Neutral’ pronouns that aren’t”. American Psychologist 331.1032–1036. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulac, Anthony. 1999. “Perceptions of women and men based on their linguistic behavior: the gender-linked language effect”. Perceiving and Performing Gender ed. by Ursula Pasero & Friederike Braun, 88–104. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Mulac, Anthony, Carol R. Incontro & Margaret R. James. 1985. “Comparison of the gender-linked language effect and sex role stereotypes”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 491.1098–1109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nirvi, Ruben Erik. 1947. “Die Erscheinung des Tabu als wortgeschichtlicher Faktor”. Studia Fennica 51.49–102.Google Scholar
. 1952. “Einige Erscheinungen von Wortvermeidung in der Sprache der Frauen”. Orbis 11.366–375.Google Scholar
Pillon, Agnesa. 1987. “Le sexe du locuteur est-il un facteur de variation linguistique? Revue critique”. La linguistique 23:1.35–48.Google Scholar
Pillon, Agnesa, C. Degauquier & F. Duquesne. 1992. “Males’ and females’ conversational behavior in cross-sex dyads. From gender differences to gender similarities”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 211.147–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pusch, Luise F. 1979. “Der Mensch ist ein Gewohnheitstier, doch weiter kommt man ohne ihr. Eine Antwort auf Hartwig Kalverkämpers Kritik an Trömel-Plötz’ Artikel über ‘Linguistik und Frauensprache’”. Linguistische Berichte 631.84–102.Google Scholar
Reik, Theodor. 1954. “Men and women speak different languages”. Psychoanalysis 21.3–15.Google Scholar
Robinson, William P. & Susan J. Rackstraw. 1967. “Variations in mothers’ answers to children’s questions”. Sociology 11.259–279.Google Scholar
Roca, Iggy M. 1989. “The organisation of grammatical gender”. Transactions of the Philological Society 871.1–31.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1929. “Male and female forms speech in Yana”. Donum natalicum Schrijnen. Verzameling van opstellen door oud-leerlingen en bevriende vakgenoten opgedragen aan Mgr. Prof. Dr. Josef Schrijnen bij gelegenheid van zijn zestigste verjaardag 3 Mei 1929 ed. by Stephan W. J. Teeuwen, 79–85. Nijmegen: Dekker & Van de Vegt. (Reprinted in: Edward Sapir, Selected Writings in Language, Culture and Personality ed. by David G. Mandelbaum. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1949, 206–212.)Google Scholar
Schmitter, Peter. 2001. “Für eine ‘gerechte’ Sprache. Zu den feministischen Bemühungen um eine Reform des Deutschen”. Dogeohak. Koreanische Zeitschrift für Deutsche Sprachwissenschaft 31.5–34.Google Scholar
Schoenthal, Gisela. 1985. “Sprache und Geschlecht”. Deutsche Sprache 131.143–185.Google Scholar
. 1989. “Personenbezeichnungen im Deutschen als Gegenstand feministischer Sprachkritik”. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 171.296–314.Google Scholar
. 1992. “Sprache, Geschlecht und Macht. Zum Diskussionsstand feministischer Thesen in der Linguistik”. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Germanistenverbandes 39:3.5–12.Google Scholar
. 1992. “Geschlecht und Sprache”. Deutsche Akademie für Sprache und Dichtung: Jahrbuch 1991, 90–105. Frankfurt am Main: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Siebert-Ott, Gesa. 1987. “Feministische Linguistik und linguistische Gesprächsforschung”. Über die Schwierigkeiten der Verständigung beim Reden. Beiträge zur Linguistik des Diskurses ed. by Rüdiger Vogt, 179–201. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Siegler, David M. & Robert S. Siegler. 1976. “Stereotypes of males’ and females’ speech”. Psychological Reports 391.167–170.Google Scholar
Smith, Philip M. 1979. “Sex markers in speech”. Social Markers in Speech ed. by Klaus M. Scherer & Howard Giles, 109–146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stickel, Gerhard. 1988. “Beantragte staatliche Regelung zur ‘Sprachlichen Gleichbehandlung’. Darstellung und Kritik”. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 161.330–355.Google Scholar
Straka, Georges. 1952. “Quelques observations phonétiques sur le langage des femmes”. Orbis 11.335–357.Google Scholar
Strunk, Klaus. 1994. “Grammatisches und natürliches Geschlecht in sprachwissenschaftlicher Sicht”. Frau und Mann. Geschlechterdifferenzierung in Natur und Menschenwelt ed. by Venanz Schubert (= Wissenschaft und Philosophie, 10), 141–164. Sankt Ottilien: EOS-Verlag.Google Scholar
Tagliavini, Carlo. 1938. “Modificazioni del linguaggio nella parlata delle donne”. Scritti in onore di Alfredo Trombetti, 86–142. Milano: Hoepli.Google Scholar
Takahara, Kumiko. 1991. “Female speech patterns in Japanese”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 921.61–85.Google Scholar
Trömel-Plötz, Senta. 1978. “Linguistik und Frauensprache”. Linguistische Berichte 571.49–68.Google Scholar
. 1980. “Sprache, Geschlecht und Macht”. Linguistische Berichte 691.1–14.Google Scholar
. 1991. “Selling the apolitical”. Discourse and Society 21.489–502.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1972. “Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the Urban British English of Norwich”. Language in Society 11.179–195.Google Scholar
Uchida, Aki. 1992. “When ‘difference’ is ‘dominance’: a critique of the ‘anti-power-based’ cultural approach to sex differences”. Language in Society 211.547–568.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Miorita. 1988. “‘Neutrale’ Männer – ‘markierte’ Frauen. Feminismus und Sprachwissenschaft”. Sprachwissenschaft 131.383–399.Google Scholar
Volmer, Annett & Andrea Sieber. 2002. “Wi(e)der die Frau. Zur Geschichte und Funktion misogyner Rede. Konferenz an der Freien Universität Berlin, 18. bis 20. Juli 2002”. L’Homme. Zeitschrift für Feministische Geschichtswissenschaft 21.262–266.Google Scholar
Widmark, Gun. 1983. “Språk och kön”. Annales Academiae regiae scientiarum Upsaliensis (Kungliga Vetenskapssamhällets i Uppsala Årsbok) 251.47–66.Google Scholar
Wienold, Götz. 1989. “Genus und Semantik im Indoeuropäischen”. Aufgaben, Rollen und Räume von Frau und Mann ed. by Jochen Martin & Renate Zoepffel (= Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Historische Anthropologie, 5.1), 79–156. Freiburg im Breisgau & München: Alber.Google Scholar
Wintermantel, Margret. 1979. “Geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede im Sprachverhalten”. Geschlechtsunterschiede. Psychologische und physiologische Grundlagen der Geschlechterdifferenzierung ed. by Heidi Keller, 140–153. Weinheim & Basel: Beltz.Google Scholar
Yaguello, Marina. 1998. “Femmes et langage”. Parler femme en Europe. La femme, image et langage, de la tradition à l’oral quotidien ed. by M. M. Jocelyne Fernandez, 9–11. Paris: Harmattan.Google Scholar
2. Contributions from classical philology
2.1 Bibliographies
Fögen, Thorsten. 2003. “Utraque lingua”: A Bibliography on Biand Multilingualism in Graeco-Roman Antiquity and in Modern Times. (= Linguistic Agency Series, A 573.) Essen: LAUD.Google Scholar
Goodwater, Leanna. 1975. Women in Antiquity. An Annotated Bibliography. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Gouma-Petersen, Thalia, ed. 1994. Bibliography on Women in Byzantium. Wooster, Ohio: College of Wooster.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, Sarah B. 1984. “Selected bibliography on women in classical antiquity”. Women in the Ancient World. The Arethusa Papers ed. by John Peradotto & John P. Sullivan, 315–372. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
2.2 Monographs and collective volumes
Achard, Guy. 1995. La femme à Rome. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Affeldt, Werner, ed. 1990. Frauen in Spätantike und Frühmittelalter: Lebensbedingungen – Lebensnormen – Lebensformen. Beiträge zu einer internationalen Tagung am Fachbereich Geschichtswissenschaften der Freien Universität Berlin (18. bis 21. Februar 1987). Sigmaringen: Thorbecke.Google Scholar
Alexiou, Margaret. 1974. The Ritual Lament in Greek Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allason-Jones, Lindsay. 1989. Women in Roman Britain. London: British Museum Publications.Google Scholar
Archer, Léonie J., Susan Fischler & Maria Wyke, eds. 1994. Women in Ancient Societies. An Illusion of the Night. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Arjava, Antti. 1996. Women and Law in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Arrigoni, Giampiera, ed. 1985. Le donne in Grecia. Roma & Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Assa, Janine. 1958. Les grandes dames romaines. Paris: Éditions du Seuil. (English translation: The Great Roman Ladies. New York: Grove Press, 1960.)Google Scholar
Balmer, Josephine, ed. 1996. Classical Women Poets. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Bloodaxe.Google Scholar
Balsdon, John P. V. D. 1962. Roman Women. Their History and Habits. London: Bodley Head. (German translation: Die Frau in der römischen Antike. München: Beck, 1979.)Google Scholar
Bartman, Elizabeth. 1999. Portraits of Livia. Imaging the Imperial Woman in Augustan Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard A. 1992. Women and Politics in Ancient Rome. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beaucamp, Joëlle. 1990–1992. Le statut de la femme à Byzance (4e–7e siècle). (= Travaux et mémoires du Centre de Recherche d’Histoire et Civilisation de Byzance, 5&6.) Paris: de Boccard.Google Scholar
Becher, Ilse. 1966. Das Bild der Kleopatra in der griechischen und lateinischen Literatur. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bernabé Pajares, Alberto & Helena Rodríguez Somolinos, eds. 1994. Poetisas griegas. Edición bilingüe. Madrid: Clásicas.Google Scholar
Bernard, Nadine. 2003. Femmes et société dans la Grèce classique. Paris: Colin.Google Scholar
Beta, Simone. 2004. Il linguaggio nelle commedie di Aristofane. Parola positiva e parola negativa nella commedia antica. (= Supplemento al « Bollettino dei Classici », 21/22.) Roma: Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. [Chapter on “Le donne” (269–274).]Google Scholar
Birt, Theodor. 1932. Frauen der Antike. Leipzig: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar
Blok, Josine H. & Peter Mason, eds. 1987. Sexual Asymmetry. Studies in Ancient Society. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
Blundell, Sue. 1995. Women in Ancient Greece. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Bravo, Benedetto. 1997. Pannychis e simposio. Feste private notturne di donne e uomini nei testi letterari e nel culto. (= Filologia e critica, 79.) Pisa & Roma: Istituti Editoriali e Poligrafici Internazionali.Google Scholar
Brooten, Bernadette J. 1996. Love Between Women. Early Christian Responses to Female Homoeroticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brosius, Maria. 1996. Women in Ancient Persia, 559–331 BC. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter. 1988. The Body and Society. Men, Women and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity. (= Lectures on the History of Religions, N.S. 13.) New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Brulé, Pierre. 2001. Les femmes grecques à l’époque classique. Paris: Hachette. (English translation by Antonia Nevill: Women of Ancient Greece. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2003.)Google Scholar
Buora, Maurizio, ed. 2004. Augustae: Donne e potere nell’antica Roma. (= Briciole Friulane, 4.) Trieste: Editreg.Google Scholar
Burck, Erich. 1969. Die Frau in der griechisch-römischen Antike. München: Heimeran.Google Scholar
Burger, Franz. 2 1926. Die griechischen Frauen. (= Tusculum-Schriften, 2.) München: Heimeran.Google Scholar
Callari, Licia A. 2001. Donne di spettacolo nella Roma antica. Palermo: Novecento.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil & Amélie Kuhrt, eds. 1983. Images of Women in Antiquity. London: Croom Helm. (Rev. ed., 1993.)Google Scholar
Campese, Silvia. 1997. La cittadina impossibile. La donna nell’Atene dei filosofi. (= Nuovo prisma, 8.) Palermo: Sellerio.Google Scholar
Campese, Silvia & Silvia Gastaldi, eds. 1981. La donna e i filosofi: Archeologia di un’immagine culturale. Testi di Platone, Aristotele, Presocratici. (= Lettere di filosofia e scienze umane, 8.) Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Campese, Silvia, Paola Manuli & Giulia Sissa, eds. 1983. Madre Materia. Sociologia e biologia della donna greca. Torino: Boringhieri.Google Scholar
Cantarella, Eva. 1981. L’ambiguo malanno. Condizione e immagine della donna nell’antichità greca e romana. (= Universale scienze sociali, 38.) Roma: Riuniti. (English translation: Pandora’s Daughters. The Role and Status of Women in Greek and Roman Antiquity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987.)Google Scholar
. 1985. Le donne e la città. Per una storia della condizione femminile. Como: New Press.Google Scholar
. 1988. Secondo natura. La bisessualità nel mondo antico. (= Nuova biblioteca di cultura, 289.) Roma: Riuniti. (English translation: Bisexuality in the Ancient World. New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 1992.)Google Scholar
. 1991. La mujer romana. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
. 1996. Passato prossimo. Donne romane da Tacita a Sulpicia. Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Castillo, Arcadio del. 1976. La emancipación de la mujer romana en el siglo I D.C. Granada: Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar
Churchill, Laurie J., Phyllis R. Brown & Jane E. Jeffrey, eds. 2002. Women Writing Latin. From Roman Antiquity to Early Modern Europe. Vol. I: Women Writing Latin in Roman Antiquity, Late Antiquity, and the Early Christian Era. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clark, Elizabeth A., ed. 1983. Women in the Early Church. (= Messages of the Fathers of the Church, 13.) Wilmington, Delaware: Glazier.Google Scholar
Clark, Gillian. 1989. Women in the Ancient World. (= Greece & Rome. New Surveys in the Classics, 21.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Repr. with addenda, 1993.)Google Scholar
. 1993. Women in Late Antiquity. Pagan and Christian Life Styles. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Cohen, Beth, ed. 1995. The Distaff Side. Representing the Female in Homer’s Odyssey. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Susan Guettel. 2004. Landscapes, Gender, and Ritual Space. The Ancient Greek Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Comucci Biscardi, Bianca M. 1987. Donne di rango e donne di popolo nell’età dei severi. (= Accademia Toscana di Scienze e Lettere “La Colombaria”. Studi, 88.) Firenze: Olschki.Google Scholar
Connor, Carolyn L. 2004. Women of Byzantium. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Kate. 1996. The Virgin and the Bride. Idealized Womanhood in Late Antiquity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Criniti, Nicola. 1999. “Imbecillus sexus”. Le donne nell’Italia antica. Brescia: Grafo.Google Scholar
Daube, David. 1971. Gewaltloser Frauenwiderstand im Altertum. (= Konstanzer Universitätsreden, 47.) Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Dean-Jones, Lesley Ann. 1994. Women’s Bodies in Classical Greek Science. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Des Bouvries, Synnøve. 1990. Women in Greek Tragedy. An Anthropological Approach. (= Symbolae Osloenses. Fasc. Suppl., 27.) Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Dettenhofer, Maria H., ed. 1994. Reine Männersache? Frauen in Männerdomänen der antiken Welt. Köln: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Dillon, Matthew. 2002. Girls and Women in Classical Greek Religion. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dixon, Suzanne. 1988. The Roman Mother. London & Sydney: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
. 2001. Reading Roman Women. Sources, Genres and Real Life. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Doherty, Lillian E. 2001. Gender and the Interpretation of Classical Myth. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Donaldson, James. 1907. Woman: Her Position and Influence in Ancient Greece and Rome, and among the Early Christians. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Doniger, Wendy. 1999. Splitting the Difference. Gender and Myth in Ancient Greece and India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
DuBois, Page. 1991. Sowing the Body. Psychoanalysis and Ancient Representations of Women. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dupriez, Flore. 1982. La condition féminine et les Pères de l’Église latine. Montréal: Paulines.Google Scholar
Edwards, Catharine. 1993. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eichenauer, Monika. 1988. Untersuchungen zur Arbeitswelt der Frau in der römischen Antike. (= Europäische Hochschulschriften, III 360.) Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Elm, Susanna. 1994. “Virgins of God”. The Making of Asceticism in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Evans, John K. 1991. War, Women and Children in Ancient Rome. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Evans Grubbs, Judith. 2002. Women and the Law in the Roman Empire. A Sourcebook on Marriage, Divorce and Widowhood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fantham, Elaine, Helene Peet Foley, Natalie Boymel Kampen, Sarah B. Pomeroy & H. A. Shapiro. 1994. Women in the Classical World. Image and Text. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, Joseph. 2001. Latin Language and Latin Culture. From Ancient to Modern Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Chapter on “The gender of Latin” (52–83).]Google Scholar
Fau, Guy. 1978. L’émancipation féminine dans la Rome antique. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Felson-Rubin, Nancy. 1994. Regarding Penelope. From Character to Poetics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Finnegan, Rachel. 1995. Women in Aristophanes. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Flemming, Rebecca. 2000. Medicine and the Making of Roman Women. Gender, Nature, and Authority from Celsus to Galen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fögen, Thorsten. 2000. “Patrii sermonis egestas”: Einstellungen lateinischer Autoren zu ihrer Muttersprache. Ein Beitrag zum Sprachbewußtsein in der römischen Antike. (= Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, 150.) München & Leipzig: Saur.Google Scholar
Föllinger, Sabine. 1996. Differenz und Gleichheit. Das Geschlechterverhältnis in der Sicht griechischer Philosophen des 4. bis 1. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. (= Hermes-Einzelschriften, 74.) Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Förtsch, Barbara. 1935. Die politische Rolle der Frau in der römischen Republik. (= Würzburger Studien zur Altertumswissenschaft, 5.) Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Foley, Helene P., ed. 1981. Reflections of Women in Antiquity. New York: Gordon & Breach.Google Scholar
Fornaciari, Elena. 1995. Donne di piacere dell’antica Roma. Milano: EDIS.Google Scholar
Foxhall, Lin & John Salmon, eds. 1998. Thinking Men. Masculinity and Its Self-Representation in the Classical Tradition. (= Leicester-Nottingham Studies in Ancient Society, 7.) London: Routledge.Google Scholar
, eds. 1998. When Men Were Men. Masculinity, Power and Identity in Classical Antiquity. (= Leicester-Nottingham Studies in Ancient Society, 8.) London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Franco, Cristiana. 2003. Senza ritegno. Il cane e la donna nell’immaginario della Grecia antica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Fraschetti, Augusto, ed. 2001. Roman Women. Edited and with a new introduction by Augusto Fraschetti. Translated by Linda Lappin. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press. (Italian original: Roma al femminile. Roma: Laterza, 1994.)Google Scholar
Frei-Stolba, Regula, Anne Bielman & Olivier Bianchi, eds. 2002. Les femmes antiques entre sphère privée et sphère publique. Actes du Diplôme d’Études Avancées, Universités de Lausanne et Neuchâtel, 2000–2002. (= Echo, 2.) Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Frontisi-Ducroux, Françoise. 2004. Femmes et images. (= Clio, 19.) Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail.Google Scholar
Fuhrer, Therese & Samuel Zinsli, eds. 2003. Gender Studies in den Altertumswissenschaften. Rollenkonstrukte in antiken Texten. (= IPHIS. Beiträge zur altertumswissenschaftlichen Genderforschung, 2.) Trier: WVT.Google Scholar
Gagé, Jean. 1963. Matronalia. Essai sur les dévotions et les organisations culturelles des femmes dans l’ancienne Rome. (= Collection Latomus, 60.) Bruxelles: Latomus.Google Scholar
Gaiser, Konrad, ed. 1974. Für und wider die Ehe. Antike Stimmen zu einer offenen Frage. (= Dialog mit der Antike, 1.) München: Heimeran.Google Scholar
Gardner, Jane F. 1986. Women in Roman Law and Society. London: Croom Helm. (German translation by Kai Brodersen: Frauen im antiken Rom. Familie, Alltag, Recht. München: Beck, 1995.)Google Scholar
Gardner, Jane F. & Thomas Wiedemann. 1991. The Roman Household. A Sourcebook. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garrido González, Elisa, ed. 1986. La mujer en el mundo antiguo. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
Gestri Greco, Flora. 2000. Le donne di Roma antica. Le vergini vestali e le altre. Firenze: Pugliese.Google Scholar
Gilleland, Michael E. 1982. Linguistic Differentiation of Character Type and Sex in the Comedies of Plautus and Terence (Diss. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 1979). Ann Arbor (Microfilm).Google Scholar
Gleason, Maud W. 1995. Making Men. Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goessler, Lisette. 1962. Plutarchs Gedanken über die Ehe. Zürich: Berichthaus.Google Scholar
Golden, Mark & Peter Toohey, eds. 2003. Sex and Difference in Ancient Greece and Rome. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Danielle. 1984. Le mal d’être femme. La femme et la médecine dans la Rome antique. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
. 1985. L’émancipation féminine à Rome: mythe ou réalité? (= Entretiens sur l’Antiquité romaine, C 23.) Liège: Université de Liège.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Danielle & Marie-Thérèse Raepsaet-Charlier. 2001. La femme dans la Rome antique. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Grillet, Bernard. 1975. Les femmes et les fards dans l’Antiquité grecque. Lyon: CNRS.Google Scholar
Günther, Rigobert. 1995. Römische Kaiserinnen. Zwischen Liebe, Macht und Religion. Leipzig: Militzke.Google Scholar
Guiducci, Armanda. 1989. Perdute nella storia. Storia delle donne dal I al VII secolo d. C. Firenze: Sansoni.Google Scholar
Gunderson, Erik. 2000. Staging Masculinity. The Rhetoric of Performance in the Roman World. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hallett, Judith P. 1984. Fathers and Daughters in Roman Society. Women and the Elite Family. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hatebur, Norbert. 1987. Antikes Patriarchat und Frauenfeindlichkeit. Entwurf einer nichtpatriarchalen Kultursoziologie. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
Hawley, Richard & Barbara Levick, eds. 1995. Women in Antiquity. New Assessments. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hemelrijk, Emily A. 1999. “Matrona docta”. Educated Women in the Roman Élite from Cornelia to Julia Domna. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Henderson, Jeffrey, ed. 1996. Three Plays by Aristophanes: Staging Women. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herfst, Pieter. 1922. Le travail de la femme dans la Grèce ancienne. Utrecht: Oosthoek.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Claudine. 1964. Le rôle judiciaire et politique des femmes sous la République romaine. (= Collection Latomus, 67.) Bruxelles: Latomus.Google Scholar
Hesberg-Tonn, Bärbel von. 1983. Coniunx carissima. Untersuchungen zum Normcharakter im Erscheinungsbild der römischen Frau. Diss. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Holst-Warhaft, Gail. 1992. Dangerous Voices. Women’s Laments and Greek Literature. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Homeyer, Helene, ed. 1979. Dichterinnen des Altertums und des frühen Mittelalters. Zweisprachige Textausgabe. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
Hubbard, Thomas K., ed. 2003. Homosexuality in Greece and Rome. A Sourcebook of Basic Documents. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Huchthausen, Liselot, ed. 1988. Die Frau in der Antike. Kolloquium der Winckelmann-Gesellschaft Stendal 1985. (= Beiträge der Winckelmann-Gesellschaft, 17.) Stendal: Winckelmann-Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
Jax, Karl. 1933. Die weibliche Schönheit in der griechischen Dichtung. Innsbruck: Wagner.Google Scholar
. 1938. Der Frauentypus in der römischen Dichtung. Innsbruck & Leipzig: Rauch.Google Scholar
Jensen, Anne. 2002. Frauen im frühen Christentum. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Jenzer, Annemarie. 1933. Wandlungen in der Auffassung der Frau im ionischen Epos und in der attischen Tragödie bis auf Sophokles. Zürich: Leemann.Google Scholar
Johnson, Marguerite & Terry Ryan, eds. 2004. Sexuality in Greek and Roman Literature and Society. A Sourcebook. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Joshel, Sandra R. & Sheila Murnaghan, eds. 1998. Women and Slaves in Greco-Roman Culture. Differential Equations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Just, Roger. 1989. Women in Athenian Law and Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keith, Alison M. 2000. Engendering Rome. Women in Latin Epic. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kerényi, Karl. 1952. Die Jungfrau und Mutter in der griechischen Religion. Eine Studie über Pallas Athene. (= Albae Vigiliae N.F., 12.) Zürich: Rhein-Verlag.Google Scholar
Keuls, Eva. 1985. The Reign of the Phallus. Sexual Politics in Ancient Athens. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
King, Helen. 1998. Hippocrates’ Woman. Reading the Female Body in Ancient Greece. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kleiner, Diana E. E. & Susan B. Matheson, eds. 1996. I, Claudia. Women in Ancient Rome. New Haven & Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
, eds. 2000. I, Claudia II. Women in Roman Art and Society. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Klimberg, Hermann, ed. 1960. Von Frauen des Altertums. Ein lateinisches Lesebuch (Vol. I1: Text, Vol. II1: Kommentar). Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Koloski-Ostrow, Ann Olga & Claire L. Lyons, eds. 1997. Naked Truths. Women, Sexuality and Gender in Classical Art and Archaeology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Königer, Hans. 1966. Gestalt und Welt der Frau bei Tacitus. Diss. Erlangen.Google Scholar
Konstan, David, ed. 1992. Documenting Gender. Women and Men in Non-literary Classical Texts. (= Helios, 19.1–2.) Lubbock, Texas: Texas Tech University Press.Google Scholar
Kornemann, Ernst. 1942. Große Frauen des Altertums. Leipzig: Dieterich.Google Scholar
Kraemer, Ross S., ed. 2004. Women’s Religions in the Greco-Roman World. A Sourcebook. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Expanded and completely revised edition of Maenads, Martyrs, Matrons, Monastics. A Sourcebook on Women’s Religions in the Greco-Roman World. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1988.)Google Scholar
Kreck, Bettina. 1975. Untersuchungen zur politischen und sozialen Rolle der Frau in der späten römischen Republik. Diss. Marburg.Google Scholar
Krumeich, Christa. 1993. Hieronymus und die christlichen feminae clarissimae. (= Habelts Dissertationsdrucke. Reihe Alte Geschichte, 36.) Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
Kunst, Christiane & Ulrike Riemer, eds. 2000. Grenzen der Macht. Zur Rolle der römischen Kaiserfrauen. (= Potsdamer altertumswissenschaftliche Beiträge, 3.) Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Lanza, Letizia. 1997. Vipere e demòni. Stereotipi femminili dell’antica Grecia. Venezia: Supernova.Google Scholar
. 2001. Donne greche (e diutorni). Da Omero a Ingeborg Bachmann. Venezia: Supernova.Google Scholar
Laporte, Jean. 1982. The Role of Women in Early Christianity. (= Studies in Women and Religion, 7.) New York: Mellen.Google Scholar
Lardinois, André & Laura McClure, eds. 2001. Making Silence Speak. Women’s Voices in Greek Literature and Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Larsson Lovén, Lena & Agneta Strömberg, eds. 1998. Aspects of Women in Antiquity. Proceedings of the First Nordic Symposium on Women’s Lives in Antiquity, Göteborg, 12–15 June 1997. (= Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology and Literature, 153.) Jonsered: Åström.Google Scholar
Le Corsu, France. 1981. Plutarque et les femmes dans les Vies parallèles. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, Mary R. 1981. Heroines and Hysterics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
1986. Women in Greek Myth. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. (German translation: Die Töchter des Zeus: Frauen im alten Griechenland. München: Beck, 1992.)Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, Mary R. & Maureen B. Fant, eds. 1982. Women’s Life in Greece and Rome. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Leipoldt, Johannes. 3 1965. Die Frau in der antiken Welt und im Urchristentum. Leipzig: Koehler & Amelang.Google Scholar
Leuteritz, Eva. 1997. Hellenistische Paideia und Randgruppen der Gesellschaft. Herrscher und Frauen – „Bildungspolitik“ und Eukosmia. München: Akademischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Lévy, Edmond, ed. 1983. La femme dans les sociétés antiques. Actes des Colloques de Strasbourg (mai 1980 et mars 1981). (= Contributions et travaux de l’Institut d’Histoire Romaine, 2.) Strasbourg: Université de Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Lewis, Sian. 2002. The Athenian Woman. An Iconographic Handbook. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lilja, Saara. 1965. The Roman Elegists’ Attitude to Women. (= Suomalaisen Tiedeakatemian toimituksia, B 135.1.) Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.Google Scholar
Llewellyn-Jones, Lloyd. 2002. Aphrodite’s Tortoise. The Veiled Woman of Ancient Greece. London: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
, ed. 2002. Women’s Dress in the Ancient Greek World. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, Hugh. 1975. Females of the Species. Semonides on Women. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
López, Aurora, Cándida Martínez López & Andrés Pociña Pérez, eds. 1990. La mujer en el mundo mediterráneo antiguo. (= Feminae, 5.) Granada: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar
Loraux, Nicole. 1981. Les enfants d’Athéna. Idées athéniennes sur la citoyenneté et la division des sexes. Paris: Maspero. (English translation: The Children of Athena. Athenian Ideas about Citizenship and the Division between the Sexes. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.)Google Scholar
. 1989. Les experiences de Tirésias. Le feminine et l’homme grec. Paris: Gallimard. (English translation: The Experiences of Tiresias. The Feminine and the Greek Man. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.)Google Scholar
, ed. 2003. La Grèce au feminin. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Loretto, Franz, ed. 1994. Frauen im Alten Rom. Ein lateinisches Lesebuch (21 Vol.: Text & Kommentar). Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Massey, Michael. 1988. Women in Ancient Greece and Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mattioli, Umberto. 1983. Astheneia e andreia. Aspetti della femminilità nella letteratura classica, biblica e cristiana antica. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
, ed. 1992. La donna nel pensiero cristiano antico. Genova: Marietti.Google Scholar
Mauch, Mercedes. 1997. Senecas Frauenbild in den philosophischen Schriften. (= Studien zur klassischen Philologie, 106.) Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Mayhew, Robert. 2004. The Female in Aristotle’s Biology. Reason or Rationalization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McAuslan, Ian & Peter Walcot, eds. 1996. Women in Antiquity. (= Greece & Rome Studies, 3.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McClure, Laura. 1999. Spoken like a Woman. Speech and Gender in Athenian Drama. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
, ed. 2002. Sexuality and Gender in the Classical World. Readings and Sources. Oxford & Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McHardy, Fiona & Eireann Marshall, eds. 2004. Women’s Influence on Classical Civilization. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McLeod, Glenda K. 1991. Virtue and Venom. Catalogs of Women from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McManus, Barbara F. 1997. Classics & Feminism. Gendering the Classics. New York: Twayne.Google Scholar
Meagher, Robert E. 1995. Helen. Myth, Legend, and the Culture of Misogyny. New York: Continuum. Misoginia e maschilismo in Grecia e in Roma. (= Pubblicazioni dell’Istituto di filologia classica e medievale, 71.) Genova: Università di Genova.Google Scholar
Monat, Pierre. 1989. Femmes romaines. Paris: Magnard.Google Scholar
Mossé, Claude. 1983. La femme dans la Grèce antique. Paris: Michel.Google Scholar
Oeri, Hans Georg. 1948. Der Typ der komischen Alten in der griechischen Komödie, seine Nachwirkungen und seine Herkunft. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
O’Higgins, Laurie. 2003. Women and Humor in Classical Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olmo Lete, Gregorio del, ed. 1987. La dona en l’antiguitat – La mujer en la antiguedad – La donna nell’antichità. (= Orientalia Barcinonensia, 1.) Sabadell: AUSA.Google Scholar
Paoli, Ugo Enrico. 1953. La donna greca nell’antichità. Firenze: Monnier. (German translation: Die Frau im alten Hellas. Bern: Francke, 1955.)Google Scholar
Peppe, Leo. 1984. Posizione giuridica e ruolo sociale della donna romana in età repubblicana. Milano: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Peradotto, John & John P. Sullivan, eds. 1984. Women in the Ancient World. The Arethusa Papers. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Petrocelli, Corrado. 1989. La stola e il silenzio. Sulla condizione femminile nel mondo romano. (= Prisma, 119.) Palermo: Sellerio.Google Scholar
Pircher, Josef. 1979. Das Lob der Frau im vorchristlichen Grabepigramm der Griechen. Innsbruck: Wagner.Google Scholar
Plant, Ian M., ed. 2004. Women Writers of Ancient Greece and Rome. An Anthology. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, Sarah B. 1975. Goddesses, Whores, Wives and Slaves. Women in Classical Antiquity. New York: Schocken. (German edition: Frauenleben im klassischen Altertum. Stuttgart: Kröner, 1985.)Google Scholar
1984. Women in Hellenistic Egypt. From Alexander to Cleopatra. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
, ed. 1991. Women’s History and Ancient History. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Power, Kim. 1995. Veiled Desire. Augustine’s Writing on Women. London: Darton, Longman & Todd.Google Scholar
Quéré-Jaulmes, France. 1968. La femme. Les grands texts des Pères de l’Église. (= Lettres chrétiennes, 12.) Paris: Centurion.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, Nancy S. 1993. Anxiety Veiled. Euripides and the Traffic in Women. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, Nancy S. & Amy Richlin, eds. 1993. Feminist Theory and the Classics. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, Nancy S. & Lisa Auanger, eds. 2002. Among Women: From the Homosocial to the Homoerotic in the Ancient World. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, Renato, ed. 1995. Vicende e figure femminili in Grecia e a Roma. Atti del convegno, Pesaro, 28–30 aprile 1994. Ancona: Commissione per le pari opportunità tra uomo e donna della Regione Marche.Google Scholar
Rayor, Diane J., ed. 1991. Sappho’s Lyre: Archaic Lyric and Women Poets of Ancient Greece. Translated, with introduction and notes. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rawson, Beryl, ed. 1986. The Family in Ancient Rome. New Perspectives. London & Sydney: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
, ed. 1991. Marriage, Divorce and Children in Ancient Rome. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Reeder, Ellen D., ed. 1995. Pandora. Women in Classical Greece. Baltimore: The Walters Art Gallery. (German edition: Pandora. Frauen im klassischen Griechenland. Mainz: von Zabern, 1996.)Google Scholar
Ricchi, Renzo. 1987. Femminilità e ribellione. La donna greca nei poemi omerici e nella tragedia attica. Firenze: Vallecchi.Google Scholar
Richlin, Amy. 1983. The Garden of Priapus. Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
, ed. 1992. Pornography and Representation in Greece and Rome. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzelli, Giunio. 2000. Le donne nell’esperienza giuridica di Roma antica: Il controllo dei comportamenti sessuali. Una raccolta di testi. Lecce: Grifo.Google Scholar
Rollinger, Robert, ed. 2000. Geschlechterrollen und Frauenbild in der Perspektive antiker Autoren. Innsbruck: Studien-Verlag.Google Scholar
Rollinger, Robert & Christoph Ulf, eds. 2002. Geschlechter – Frauen – fremde Ethnien: in antiker Ethnographie, Theorie und Realität. Innsbruck: Studien-Verlag.Google Scholar
Rosivach, Vincent J. 1998. When a Young Man Falls in Love. The Sexual Exploitation of Women in New Comedy. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rowlandson, Jane. 1999. Women and Society in Greek and Roman Egypt. A Sourcebook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Joyce E. 1997. Perpetua’s Passion. The Death and Memory of a Young Roman Woman. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2001. Encyclopedia of Women in the Ancient World. Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
Santoro L’Hoir, Francesca. 1992. The Rhetoric of Gender Terms. “Man”, “Woman”, and the Portrayal of Characters in Latin Prose. (= Mnemosyne Supplementum, 120.) Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Savalli, Ivana. 1983. La donna nella società della Grecia antica. Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
Schaps, David M. 1979. Economic Rights of Women in Ancient Greece. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt-Pantel, Pauline, ed. 1993. Geschichte der Frauen. Vol. I1: Antike. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
Schuhmann, Elisabeth. 1975. Die soziale Stellung der Frau in den Komödien des Plautus. Diss. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schuller, Wolfgang. 1985. Frauen in der griechischen Geschichte. (= Konstanzer Bibliothek, 3.) Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
. 1987. Frauen in der römischen Geschichte. (= Konstanzer Bibliothek, 4.) Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
. 1995. Frauen in der griechischen und römischen Geschichte. (= Konstanzer Bibliothek, 25.) Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Sealey, Raphael. 1990. Women and Law in Classical Greece. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Seltman, Charles. 1956. Women in Antiquity. London: Thames & Hudson. (German translation: Geliebte der Götter. Eine Kulturgeschichte der Frau im Altertum. Stuttgart: Spemann, 1958.)Google Scholar
Setälä, Päivi. 1993. Antiikin nainen. Helsinki: Otava. (Swedish translation: Antikens kvinnor. Stockholm: Tiden, 1995.)Google Scholar
Setälä, Päivi & Liisa Savunen, eds. 1999. Female Networks and the Public Sphere in Roman Society. (= Acta Instituti Romani Finlandiae, 22.) Roma: Institutum Romanum Finlandiae.Google Scholar
Setälä, Päivi & et al., eds. 2002. Women, Wealth and Power in the Roman Empire. (= Acta Instituti Romani Finlandiae, 25.) Roma: Institutum Romanum Finlandiae.Google Scholar
Sissa, Giulia. 1987. Le corps virginal. La virginité feminine en Grèce ancienne. (= Études de psychologie et de philosophie, 22.) Paris: Vrin. (English translation: Greek Virginity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.)Google Scholar
Skinner, Marilyn B., ed. 1987. Rescuing Creusa. New Methodological Approaches to Women in Antiquity. (= Helios, N.S. 13.2.) Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jane McIntosh. 1990. The Woman and the Lyre. Women Writers in Greece and Rome. Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Späth, Thomas. 1994. Männlichkeit und Weiblichkeit bei Tacitus. Zur Konstruktion der Geschlechter in der römischen Kaiserzeit. Frankfurt am Main & New York: Campus.Google Scholar
Späth, Thomas & Beate Wagner-Hasel, eds. 2000. Frauenwelten in der Antike. Geschlechterordnung und weibliche Lebenspraxis. Stuttgart & Weimar: Metzler.Google Scholar
Specht, Edith. 1989. Schön zu sein und gut zu sein. Mädchenbildung und Frauensozialisation im antiken Griechenland. (= Reihe Frauenforschung, 9.) Wien: Wiener Frauenverlag.Google Scholar
, ed. 1992. Nachrichten aus der Zeit. Ein Streifzug durch die Frauengeschichte des Altertums. (= Reihe Frauenforschung, 18.) Wien: Wiener Frauenverlag.Google Scholar
, ed. 1994. Frauenreichtum: Die Frau als Wirtschaftsfaktor im Altertum. (= Reihe Frauenforschung, 27.) Wien: Wiener Frauenverlag.Google Scholar
Strobel, Nicole. 2004. Männliche Perspektive – weibliche Identität. Frauenbilder und Rollenkonzeptionen in den Komödien des Terenz. (= Itinera classica, 4.) Sankt Katharinen: Scripta Mercaturae.Google Scholar
Stumpp, Bettina Eva. 1998. Prostitution in der römischen Antike. Berlin: Akademischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Taaffe, Lauren K. 1993. Aristophanes and Women. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Temporini, Hildegard, ed. 2002. Die Kaiserinnen Roms. Von Livia bis Theodora. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Teufer, Johannes. 1913. Zur Geschichte der Frauenemanzipation im alten Rom. Eine Studie zu Livius 34, 1–8. Leipzig & Berlin: Teubner.Google Scholar
Tibiletti, Carlo. 1969. Verginità e matrimonio in antichi scrittori cristiani. Napoli: Libreria Scientifica. (Reedited version: Roma: Bretschneider, 1983.)Google Scholar
Treggiari, Susan. 1991. Roman Marriage. Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Tudor, Dumitru. 1980. Donne celebri del mondo antico. Trad. del romeno (Femei vestite din lumea antica) di Giuseppe Munarini e Achille Tramarin. (= Storia e documenti, 36.) Milano: Mursia.Google Scholar
Uglione, Renato, ed. 1987. Atti del Convegno nazionale di Studi su la donna nel mondo antico (Torino, 21–23 aprile 1986). Torino: Regione Piemonte.Google Scholar
Vazaki, Anna. 2003. “Mousike Gyne”. Die musisch-literarische Erziehung und Bildung von Frauen im Athen der klassischen Zeit. Möhnesee: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Verdejo Sánchez, María Dolores, ed. 1995. Comportamientos antagónicos de las mujeres en el mundo antiguo. (= Atenea, 12.) Málaga: Universidad de Málaga.Google Scholar
Vérilhac, Anne-Marie & Claude Vial. 1990. La femme dans le monde méditerranéen. Vol. II1: La femme grecque et romaine. (= Travaux de la Maison de l’Orient, 19.) Lyon: Maison de l’Orient.Google Scholar
Vidén, Gunhild. 1993. Women in Roman Literature. Attitudes of Authors under the Early Empire. (= Studia Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia, 57.) Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Vogt, Joseph. 1960. Von der Gleichwertigkeit der Geschlechter in der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft der Griechen. (= Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur zu Mainz. Geistesund sozialwiss. Klasse, 1960/2.) Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Vons, Jacqueline. 2000. L’image de la femme dans l’œuvre de Pline l’Ancien. (= Collection Latomus, 256.) Bruxelles: Latomus.Google Scholar
Wagner, Beate. 1982. Zwischen Mythos und Realität. Die Frau in der frühgriechischen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Haag & Herchen.Google Scholar
Wagner-Hasel, Beate, ed. 1992. Matriarchatstheorien der Altertumswissenschaft. (= Wege der Forschung, 651.) Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Wallinger, Elisabeth. 1990. Die Frauen in der Historia Augusta. (= Althistorisch-epigraphische Studien, 2.) Wien: Selbstverlag der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Archäologie.Google Scholar
Watson, Patricia A. 1995. Ancient Stepmothers. Myth, Misogyny, and Reality. (= Mnemosyne Supplementum, 143.) Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wickert-Micknat, Gisela. 1982. Die Frau. (= Archaeologia Homerica, R 3.) Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Willi, Andreas. 2003. The Languages of Aristophanes. Aspects of Linguistic Variation in Classical Attic Greek. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Chapter on “Female speech” (157–197).]Google Scholar
Williams, Craig A. 1999. Roman Homosexuality. Ideologies of Masculinity in Classical Antiquity. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Margaret. 1995. Sappho’s Immortal Daughters. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Lyn Hatherly. 1996. Sappho’s Sweetbitter Songs. Configurations of Female and Male in Ancient Greek Lyric. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilson-Kastner, Patricia, G. Ronald Kastner, Ann Millen, Rosemary Rader & Jeremiah Reedy, eds. 1981. A Lost Tradition: Women Writers of the Early Church. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Winkler, John J. 1990. The Constraints of Desire. The Anthropology of Sex and Gender in Ancient Greece. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Witherington, Ben. 1988. Women in the Earliest Churches. (= Society for New Testament Studies, 59.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1990. Women and the Genesis of Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wittern, Susanne. 1994. Frauen, Heiligkeit und Macht. Lateinische Frauenviten aus dem 4. bis 7. Jahrhundert. (= Ergebnisse der Frauenforschung, 33.) Stuttgart & Weimar: Metzler.Google Scholar
Wyke, Maria. 2002. The Roman Mistress. Ancient and Modern Representations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, ed. 1998. Gender and the Body in the Ancient Mediterranean. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Froma I. 1996. Playing the Other. Gender and Society in Classical Greek Literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zelenak, Michael X. 1998. Gender and Politics in Greek Tragedy. (= Artists and Issues in the Theatre, 7.) New York: Lang.Google Scholar
Zini, Sergio. 1938. Il linguaggio dei personaggi nelle commedie di Menandro. Firenze: Le Monnier. [Chapter on “Il linguaggio delle donne” (57–80).]Google Scholar
Zinserling, Verena. 1972. Die Frau in Hellas und Rom. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
2.3 Journal articles and contributions in collective volumes
Adams, James N. 1972. “Latin words for woman and wife”. Glotta 501.234–255.Google Scholar
1983. “Words for ‘prostitute’ in Latin”. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 1261.320–358.Google Scholar
1984. “Female speech in Latin comedy”. Antichthon 181.43–77.Google Scholar
Adcock, Frank E. 1945. “Women in Roman life and letters”. Greece & Rome 141.1–11.Google Scholar
Adkin, Neil. 1993. “‘Adultery of the tongue’: Jerome, Epist. 22.29.6f.”. Hermes 1211.100–108.Google Scholar
Arjava, Antti. 1989. “Jerome and women”. Arctos 231.5–18.Google Scholar
Assaël, Jacqueline. 1985. “Misogynie et féminisme chez Aristophane et chez Euripide”. Pallas 321.91–103.Google Scholar
Auberger, Janick. 1993. “Parole et silence dans les Préceptes du mariage de Plutarque”. Les Études Classiques 611.297–308.Google Scholar
Bain, David. 1984. “Female speech in Menander”. Antichthon 181.24–42.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Barry. 1972. “Women in Tacitus”. Prudentia 41.83–101.Google Scholar
Barnard, Sylvia. 1978. “Hellenistic women poets”. Classical Journal 731.204–213.Google Scholar
Bavel, Tarcisius van. 1989. “Augustine’s view on women”. Augustiniana 391.5–53.Google Scholar
Bergren, Ann L. T. 1983. “Language and the female in early Greek thought”. Arethusa 161.69–95.Google Scholar
Best, Edward E. 1969/70. “Cicero, Livy and educated Roman women”. Classical Journal 651.199–204.Google Scholar
Bickel, Ernst. 1950. “Mehercules im Frauenmund”. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 931.190–191.Google Scholar
Boatwright, Mary T. 1991. “The imperial women of the early second century A.D.”. American Journal of Philology 1121.513–540.Google Scholar
Boissier, Gaston. 1873. “Les femmes à Rome, leur education et leur rôle dans la société romaine”. Revue des deux mondes 1081.525–553.Google Scholar
Boscherini, Silvano. 1995. “Come parlavano le donne a Roma”. Studi Linguistici per i 50 anni del Circolo Linguistico Fiorentino (= Accademia Toscana di Scienze e Lettere »La Colombaria«. Studi, 147), 55–60. Firenze: Olschki.Google Scholar
Bowra, Cecil M. 1957. “Melinno’s hymn to Rome”. Journal of Roman Studies 471.21–28.Google Scholar
Bradley, Keith. 1994. “The nurse and the child at Rome. Duty, affect and socialisation”. Thamyris 1:2.137–156.Google Scholar
Braund, Susanna Morton. 1992. “Juvenal – misogynist or misogamist?”. Journal of Roman Studies 821.71–86.Google Scholar
Bremmer, Jan N. 1984. “Oude vrouwen in Griekenland en Rome”. Lampas 171.96–113.Google Scholar
Cahoon, Leslie. 1990. “Let the Muse sing on: poetry, criticism, feminism, and the case of Ovid”. Helios 171.197–211.Google Scholar
Calvert, Brian. 1975. “Plato and the equality of women”. Phoenix 291.231–243.Google Scholar
Cameron, Alan. 1998. “Love (and marriage) between women”. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 391.137–156.Google Scholar
Cantarella, Eva. 1996. “La comunicazione femminile in Grecia e a Roma”. I signori della memoria e dell’oblio. Figure della comunicazione nella cultura antica ed. by Maurizio Bettini (= Biblioteca di cultura, 208), 3–21. Firenze: La nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Carr, Joan E. 1982. “The view of women in Juvenal and Apuleius”. Classical Bulletin 581.61–64.Google Scholar
Chastagnol, André. 1979. “Les femmes dans l’ordre senatorial: titulature et rang social à Rome”. Revue historique 2621.3–28.Google Scholar
Clark, Elizabeth A. 1994. “Ideology, history, and the construction of woman in Late Ancient Christianity. Ideological representation of the self according to the church fathers”. Journal of Early Christian Studies 21.155–184.Google Scholar
2000. “Women, gender, and the study of Christian history”. Church History 701.395–426.Google Scholar
Clark, Stephen R. L. 1982. “Aristotle’s women”. History of Political Thought 31.177–191.Google Scholar
Cohen, David. 1989. “Seclusion, separation, and the status of women in classical Athens”. Greece & Rome 361.3–15.Google Scholar
Cole, Susan Guettel. 1981. “Could Greek women read and write?Reflections of Women in Antiquity ed. by Helene P. Foley, 219–245. New York: Gordon & Breach.Google Scholar
Colton, Robert E. 1973/74. “Juvenal and Martial on women who ape Greek ways”. Classical Bulletin 501.42–44.Google Scholar
Crippa, Sabina. 1995. “Voce e genere: etnografia della comunicazione e mondo antico”. Donna & Linguaggio. Convegno Internazionale di Studi: Sappada/Plodn (Belluno) ed. by Gianna Marcato, 285–293. Padova: CLEUP.Google Scholar
Currie, Harry MacLeod. 1983. “The poems of Sulpicia”. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II 30:3.1751–1764.Google Scholar
Deißmann, Marie-Luise. 1989. “Aufgaben, Rollen und Räume von Mann und Frau im Antiken Rom”. Aufgaben, Rollen und Räume von Frau und Mann ed. by Jochen Martin & Renate Zoepffel (= Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Historische Anthropologie, 5.2), 501–564. Freiburg im Breisgau & München: Alber.Google Scholar
Delling, Gerhard. 1978. s.v. “Geschlechter”. Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum (Vol. 101), 780–803. Stuttgart: Hiersemann.Google Scholar
Dettenhofer, Maria H. 1992. “Zur politischen Rolle der Aristokratinnen zwischen Republik und Prinzipat”. Latomus 511.775–795.Google Scholar
1993. “Die Frauen von Sparta: Gesellschaftliche Position und politische Relevanz”. Klio 751.61–75.Google Scholar
Dixon, Suzanne. 1983. “A family business: women’s role in patronage and politics at Rome 80–44 BC”. Classica & Mediaevalia 341.91–112.Google Scholar
. 1984. “Infirmitas sexus: womanly weakness in Roman law”. Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 521.343–371.Google Scholar
. 1985. “Polybius on Roman women and property”. American Journal of Philology 1061.147–170.Google Scholar
Dobson, Elisabeth S. 1982. “Pliny the Younger’s depiction of women”. Classical Bulletin 581.81–85.Google Scholar
Egger, Brigitte. 1988. “Zu den Frauenrollen im griechischen Roman. Die Frau als Heldin und Leserin”. Groningen Colloquia on the Novel 11.33–66.Google Scholar
. 1994. “Women and marriage in the Greek novels”. The Search for the Ancient Novel ed. by James Tatum, 260–280. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Erbse, Hartmut. 1966. “Sokrates und die Frauen”. Gymnasium 731.201–220.Google Scholar
Eyben, Emiel. 1989. “Mann und Frau im frühen Christentum”. Aufgaben, Rollen und Räume von Frau und Mann ed. by Jochen Martin & Renate Zoepffel (= Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Historische Anthropologie, 5.2), 565–605. Freiburg im Breisgau & München: Alber.Google Scholar
Fantham, Elaine. 1986. “Women in antiquity: a selective (and subjective) survey 1979–1984”. Échos du monde classique 301.1–24.Google Scholar
. 1975. “Sex, status, and survival in Hellenistic Athens. A study of women in New Comedy”. Phoenix 291.44–74.Google Scholar
Fauth, Wolfgang. 1962. “Ein römisches Frauenporträt bei Sallust (Coniuratio Catilinae 25)”. Der altsprachliche Unterricht 5:5.34–41.Google Scholar
Favez, Charles. 1938. “Les opinions de Sénèque sur la femme”. Revue des Études Latines 161.335–345.Google Scholar
Finley, Moses I. 1968. “The silent women of Rome”. Aspects of Antiquity. Discoveries and Controversies ed. by Moses I. Finley, 129–143. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Fögen, Thorsten. 2000. “Zwei Satiren Juvenals. Anmerkungen zur Homosexualität in der römischen Antike”. Forum Homosexualität und Literatur 361.63–74.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Ancient theorizing on nonverbal communication”. LACUS Forum XXVII: Speaking and Comprehending ed. by Ruth M. Brend, Alan K. Melby & Arle R. Lommel, 203–216. Fullerton, Calif.: Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States.Google Scholar
Fögen, Thorsten & Annette M. Baertschi. 2005. “Zauberinnen und Hexen in der antiken Literatur”. Gymnasium 1121 [in print].Google Scholar
Forbis, Elizabeth P. 1990. “Women’s public image in Italian honorary inscriptions”. American Journal of Philology 1111.493–512.Google Scholar
Gardner, Jane F. 1995. “Gender-role assumptions in Roman law”. Classical Views 391.377–400.Google Scholar
Geddes, Anne. 1975. “The philosophic notion of women in antiquity”. Antichthon 91.35–40.Google Scholar
Gilleland, Michael E. 1980. “Female speech in Greek and Latin”. American Journal of Philology 1011.180–183.Google Scholar
Gomme, Arthur W. 1925. “The position of women in Athens in the fifth and fourth centuries”. Classical Philology 201.1–25.Google Scholar
Gould, John P. 1980. “Law, custom and myth: aspects of the social position of women in classical Athens”. Journal of Hellenic Studies 1001.38–59.Google Scholar
Gray-Fow, Michael J. G. 1988. “The wicked stepmother in Roman literature and history: an evaluation”. Latomus 471.741–757.Google Scholar
Green, Roger P. H. 1995. “Proba’s Cento: its date, purpose, and reception”. Classical Quarterly 451.551–563.Google Scholar
1997. “Proba’s introduction to her Cento”. Classical Quarterly 471.548–559.Google Scholar
Hallett, Judith P. 1973. “The role of women in Roman elegy: counter-cultural feminism”. Arethusa 61.103–24.Google Scholar
1989. “Women as ‘same’ and ‘other’ in the Classical Roman Elite”. Helios 161.59–78.Google Scholar
1992. “Heeding our native informants: the use of literary texts in recovering elite Roman attitudes towards age, gender and social status”. Échos du monde classique 361.333–355.Google Scholar
1999. “Literaturschaffende Frauen. II. Rom”. Der Neue Pauly (Vol. 71), 338–341. Stuttgart & Weimar: Metzler.Google Scholar
Hanson, Ann E. 1990. “The medical writer’s woman”. Before Sexuality. The Construction of Erotic Experience in the Ancient Greek World ed. by David M. Halperin, John J. Winkler & Froma Zeitlin, 309–338. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
1992. “Conception, gestation and the origin of the female nature in the Corpus Hippocraticum”. Helios 191.31–71.Google Scholar
Harich-Schwarzbauer, Henriette. 1993. “Zur Präsenz des Weiblichen und zur Einschätzung der Frau bei Seneca Philosophus”. Grazer Beiträge 191.129–155.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 1985. “Women in Thucydides”. Arethusa 181.67–90.Google Scholar
Henderson, Jeffrey. 1987. “Older women in Attic Old Comedy”. Transactions of the American Philological Association 1171.105–129.Google Scholar
Henderson, John. 1989. “Satire writes ‘woman’: gendersong”. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 2151.50–80.Google Scholar
. 1989. “Not ‘Woman in Roman satire’ but ‘When satire writes woman’”. Satire and Society in Ancient Rome ed. by Susanna Morton Braund, 89–125. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar
Hinds, Stephen. 1987. “The poetess and the reader: further steps towards Sulpicia”. Hermathena 1431.29–46.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Maryanne Cline. 1976. “Aristotle and woman”. Journal of the History of Biology 91.183–213.Google Scholar
Horsfall, Nicholas. 1987. “The ‘Letter of Cornelia’: yet more problems”. Athenaeum 651.231–234.Google Scholar
Instinsky, Hans Ulrich. 1971. “Zur Echtheitsfrage der Brieffragmente der Cornelia”. Chiron 11.177–189.Google Scholar
Irby-Massie, Georgia L. 1993. “Women in ancient science”. Woman’s Power, Man’s Game ed. by Mary M. DeForest, 354–372. Wauconda, Ill.: Bolchazy-Carducci.Google Scholar
Just, Roger. 1975. “Conceptions of women in classical Athens”. Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford 61.153–170.Google Scholar
King, Helen. 1998. s.v. “Geschlecht”. Der Neue Pauly (Vol. 41), 1005–1008. Stuttgart & Weimar: Metzler.Google Scholar
King, Helen, Beate Wagner-Hasel & Ines Stahlmann. 1998. s.v. “Geschlechterrollen”. Der Neue Pauly (Vol. 41), 1008–1014. Stuttgart & Weimar: Metzler.Google Scholar
Kraemer, Ross S. 1983. “Women in the religions of the Greco-Roman world”. Religious Studies Review 91.127–139.Google Scholar
Kramer, Johannes. 1997. “Ältere Zeugnisse zu geschlechtsspezifischen Sprachunterschieden”. Sprache und Geschlecht in der Romania. Romanistisches Kolloquium X ed. by Wolfgang Dahmen et al. (= Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik, 417), 15–42. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Lobel, Edgar. 1930. “Corinna”. Hermes 651.356–365.Google Scholar
Loraux, Nicole. 1985. “La Cité, l’historien, les femmes”. Pallas 321.7–39.Google Scholar
Loretto, Franz. 1977. “Das Bild der Frau in Senecas philosophischen Schriften”. Živa antika 271.119–128.Google Scholar
Lowe, Nick J. 1988. “Sulpicia’s syntax”. Classical Quarterly 381.193–205.Google Scholar
Luck, Georg. 1954. “Die Dichterinnen der griechischen Anthologie”. Museum Helveticum 111.170–187.Google Scholar
MacMullen, Ramsay. 1980. “Women in public in the Roman empire”. Historia 291.208–218.Google Scholar
. 1986. “Women’s power in the Principate”. Klio 681.434–443.Google Scholar
Marcos, Mar. 1986. “La visión de la mujer en san Jerónimo a través de su correspondencia”. La mujer en el mundo antiguo ed. by Elisa Garrido González, 315–322. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anthony J. 1975. “Roman women and the provinces”. Ancient Society 61.110–119.Google Scholar
Massaro, Matteo. 1977. “Aniles fabellae”. Studi italiani di filologia classica 491.104–135.Google Scholar
Mazzoni Dami, Daniela. 1999. “L’amore coniugale e la figura della sposa ideale nella trattatistica antica”. Atene e Roma 441.14–25.Google Scholar
McClure, Laura. 1995. “Female speech and characterization in Euripides”. Lo spettacolo delle voci (Vol. II1) ed. by Francesco de Martino & Alan H. Sommerstein, 35–60. Bari: Levante.Google Scholar
McNamara, Jo Ann. 1984. “Cornelia’s daughters: Paula and Eustochium”. Women’s Studies 111.9–27.Google Scholar
Moreau, Philippe. 1995. “Paroles des hommes, paroles des femmes”. Paroles romaines ed. by Florence Dupont (= Études anciennes, 12), 53–63. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.Google Scholar
Nickel, Diethard. 1979. “Berufsvorstellungen über weibliche Medizinalpersonen in der Antike”. Klio 611.515–518.Google Scholar
Nicolson, Frank W. 1893. “The use of hercle (mehercle), edepol (pol), ecastor (mecastor) by Plautus and Terence”. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 41.99–103.Google Scholar
Nieddu, Gian Franco. 2001. “Donne e ‘parole’ di donne in Aristofane”. Lexis 191.199–218.Google Scholar
Nürnberg, Rosemarie. 1988. “ Non decet neque necessarium est, ut mulieres doceant. Überlegungen zum altkirchlichen Lehrverbot für Frauen”. Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 311.57–73.Google Scholar
Pabón, J. M. 1939. “El griego, lengua de la intimidad entre los Romanos”. Emerita 71.126–131.Google Scholar
Parker, Holt N. 1993. “Sappho’s schoolmistress”. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 1231.309–351.Google Scholar
1997. “Women doctors in Greece, Rome and the Byzantine empire”. Women Healers and Physicians. Climbing a Long Hill ed. by Lilian R. Furst, 131–150. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Podlecki, Anthony J. 1990. “Could women attend the theater in ancient Athens? A collection of testimonies”. The Ancient World 211.21–43.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, Sarah B. 1977. “Technikai kai Mousikai. The education of women in the Fourth Century and in the Hellenistic Period”. American Journal of Ancient History 21.51–68.Google Scholar
1978. “Plato and the female physician (Republic 454d2)”. American Journal of Philology 991.496–500.Google Scholar
Post, W. A. 1940. “Women’s place in Menander’s Athens”. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 71.420.459.Google Scholar
Pucci, Pietro. 1979. “The song of the Sirens”. Arethusa 121.121–132.Google Scholar
Raepsaet-Charlier, Marie-Thérèse. 1993. “La femme, la famille, la parenté à Rome: thèmes actuels de la recherche”. L’Antiquité Classique 621.247–253.Google Scholar
Rayor, Diane J. 1993. “Korinna: gender and the narrative tradition”. Arethusa 261.219–231.Google Scholar
Redfield, James. 1977/78. “The women of Sparta”. Classical Journal 731.146–161.Google Scholar
Renehan, Robert. 1998. “On gender switching as a literary device in Latin poetry”. Style and Tradition. Studies in Honour of Wendell Clausen ed. by Peter E. Knox & Clive Foss (= Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, 92), 212–229. Stuttgart: Teubner.Google Scholar
Richlin, Amy. 1984. “Invective against women in Roman satire”. Arethusa 171.67–80.Google Scholar
. 1992. “Sulpicia the satirist”. Classical World 861.125–139.Google Scholar
. 1997. “Gender and rhetoric: producing manhood in the schools”. Roman Eloquence. Rhetoric in Society and Literature ed. by William J. Dominik, 90–110. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Philip. 1995. “‘Learned women’ and the development of a Christian culture in Late Antiquity”. Symbolae Osloenses 701.116–147.Google Scholar
Rousselle, Aline. 1980. “Observation féminine et idéologie masculine: le corps de la femme d’après les médecins grecs”. Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations 351.1089–1115.Google Scholar
Saller, Richard P. 1984. “ Patria potestas and the stereotype of the Roman family”. Continuity and Change 11.7–22.Google Scholar
Santirocco, Matthew S. 1979. “Sulpicia reconsidered”. Classical Journal 741.229–239.Google Scholar
Schaps, David M. 1977. “The woman least mentioned: etiquette and women’s names”. Classical Quarterly 271.323–330.Google Scholar
Schaps, David. 1982. “The women of Greece in wartime”. Classical Philology 771.193–213.Google Scholar
Schauwecker, Yela. 2002. “Zum Sprechverhalten der Frauentypen bei Plautus”. Gymnasium 1091.191–211.Google Scholar
Scheer, Tanja. 2000. “Forschungen über die Frau in der Antike. Ziele, Methoden, Perspektiven”. Gymnasium 1071.143–172.Google Scholar
Schouler, Bernard. 1985. “Hommages de Libanios aux femmes de son temps”. Pallas 321.123–148.Google Scholar
Schweers, Anja. 1999. “Frauenund Männerbilder im alten Rom”. Der altsprachliche Unterricht 42:2.2–14.Google Scholar
Sharrock, Alison. 1991. “Womanufacture”. Journal of Roman Studies 811.36–49.Google Scholar
. 1997. “Re(ge)ndering Gender(ed) studies”. Gender & History 91.603–614.Google Scholar
Shaw, Brent D. 1994. “Women and the early church”. History Today 441.21–28.Google Scholar
Shelton, Jo-Anne. 1990. “Pliny the Younger and the ideal wife”. Classica & Mediaevalia 411.163–186.Google Scholar
Sivan, Hagith. 1988. “Holy Land pilgrimage and Western audiences: some reflections on Egeria and her circle”. Classical Quarterly 381.528–535.Google Scholar
Skinner, Marilyn B. 1986. “Classical studies vs. women’s studies: duo moi ta noemata”. Helios 12:2.3–16.Google Scholar
1987. “Des bonnes dames et méchantes”. Classical Journal 831.69–74.Google Scholar
1993. “Woman and language in archaic Greece, or, Why is Sappho a woman?”. Feminist Theory and the Classics ed. by Nancy Sarkin Rabinowitz & Amy Richlin, 125–144. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, Julia M. H. 2000. “Did women have a transformation of the Roman world?”. Gender and History 121.552–571.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, Alan H. 1980. “The naming of women in Greek and Roman comedy”. Quaderni di storia 111.393–418.Google Scholar
1995. “The language of Athenian women”. Lo spettacolo delle voci (Vol. II1) ed. by Francesco de Martino & Alan H. Sommerstein, 61–85. Bari: Levante.Google Scholar
Thraede, Klaus. 1970. s.v. “Frau”. Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum (Vol. 81), 197–269. Stuttgart: Hiersemann.Google Scholar
. 1977. “Frauen im Leben frühchristlicher Gemeinden”. Una Sancta 321.286–299.Google Scholar
. 1977. “Ärger mit der Freiheit. Die Bedeutung von Frauen in Theorie und Praxis der alten Kirche”. “Freunde in Christus werden …”: Die Beziehung von Mann und Frau als Frage an Theologie und Kirche ed. by Gerta Scharffenorth & Klaus Thraede (= Kennzeichen, 1), 31–178. Gelnhausen: Burckhardthaus-Verlag.Google Scholar
. 1979. “Augustin-Texte aus dem Themenkreis ‘Frau’, ‘Gesellschaft’ und ‘Gleichheit’”. Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 221.70–97.Google Scholar
. 1988. s.v. “Antike”. Frauenlexikon: Traditionen, Fakten, Perspektiven ed. by Anneliese Lissner, Rita Süssmuth & Karin Walter, 54–62. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder.Google Scholar
. 1990. “Zwischen Eva und Maria: Das Bild der Frau bei Ambrosius und Augustin auf dem Hintergrund der Zeit”. Frauen in Spätantike und Frühmittelalter: Lebensbedingungen – Lebensnormen – Lebensformen. Beiträge zu einer internationalen Tagung am Fachbereich Geschichtswissenschaften der Freien Universität Berlin (18. bis 21. Februar 1987) ed. by Werner Affeldt, 129–139. Sigmaringen: Thorbecke.Google Scholar
Treggiari, Susan. 1976. “Jobs for women”. American Journal of Ancient History 11.76–104.Google Scholar
. 1979. “Lower class women in the Roman economy”. Florilegium 11.65–86.Google Scholar
Tsantsanoglou, Kyriakos. 1973. “The memoirs of a lady from Samos”. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 121.183–195.Google Scholar
Turcan, Marie. 1968. “Saint Jérôme et les femmes”. Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 259–272.Google Scholar
Ullman, B. L. 1943/44. “By Castor and Pollux”. Classical Weekly 371.87–89.Google Scholar
Vidén, Gunhild. 1998. “St. Jerome on female chastity: subjugating the elements of desire”. Symbolae Osloenses 731.139–157.Google Scholar
Vierow, Heidi. 1999. “Feminine and masculine voices in the Passion of Saints Perpetua and Felicitas”. Latomus 581.600–619.Google Scholar
Wagner-Hasel, Beate. 2000. “Arbeit und Kommunikation”. Frauenwelten in der Antike. Geschlechterordnung und weibliche Lebenspraxis ed. by Thomas Späth & Beate WagnerHasel, 311–335. Stuttgart & Weimar: Metzler.Google Scholar
Vogt, Sabine. 2003. “Die ‘Widernatürlichkeit’ des Kinäden: Zur Reflexion über sex und gender in der Antike”. Gender Studies in den Altertumswissenschaften. Rollenkonstrukte in antiken Texten ed. by Therese Fuhrer & Samuel Zinsli (= IPHIS. Beiträge zur altertumswissenschaftlichen Genderforschung, 2), 43–56. Trier: WVT.Google Scholar
Wagner-Hasel, Beate & Helen King. 1998. s.v. “Frau. II. Griechenland und Rom”. Der Neue Pauly (Vol. 41), 634–639. Stuttgart & Weimar: Metzler.Google Scholar
Walcot, Peter. 1991. “On widows and their reputation in antiquity”. Symbolae Osloenses 661.5–26.Google Scholar
. 1999. “Plutarch on women”. Symbolae Osloenses 741.163–183.Google Scholar
Waldstein, Wolfgang. 1983. “Zur Stellung der Frau im Römischen Recht”. Festschrift für Robert Muth zum 65. Geburtstag ed. by Paul Händel & Wolfgang Meid (= Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft, 22), 559–571. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Wallace, Kristine G. 1991. “Women in Tacitus 1903–1986”. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II 33:5.3556–3574.Google Scholar
Wenskus, Otta. 2001. “Wie schreibt man einer Dame? Zum Problem der Sprachwahl in der römischen Epistolographie”. Wiener Studien 1141.215–232.Google Scholar
West, Martin L. 1970. “Corinna”. Classical Quarterly 201.277–287.Google Scholar
1977. “Erinna”. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 251.95–119.Google Scholar
1978. “Die griechischen Dichterinnen der Kaiserzeit”. Kyklos: Griechisches und Byzantinisches. Rudolf Keydell zum 90. Geburtstag ed. by Hans-Georg Beck, 101–115. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wyke, Maria. 1987a. “Written women: Propertius’ scripta puella ”. Journal of Roman Studies 771.47–61.Google Scholar
. 1987b. “The elegiac woman at Rome”. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 331.153–178.Google Scholar
. 1989. “Mistress and metaphor in Augustan elegy”. Helios 161.25–47.Google Scholar
. 1992. “Augustan Cleopatras. Female power and poetic authority”. Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus ed. by Anton Powell, 98–146. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
. 1995. “Taking the woman’s part: engendering Roman love elegy”. Roman Literature and Ideology: Ramus Essays for John P. Sullivan ed. by Anthony J. Boyle, 110–128. Bendigo, Australia: Aureal.Google Scholar
Zoepffel, Renate. 1989. “Aufgaben, Rollen und Räume von Mann und Frau im archaischen und klassischen Griechenland”. Aufgaben, Rollen und Räume von Frau und Mann ed. by Jochen Martin & Renate Zoepffel (= Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Historische Anthropologie, 5.2), 443–500. Freiburg im Breisgau & München: Alber.Google Scholar
Zweig Vivante, Bella. 1999. s.v. “Literaturschaffende Frauen. I. Griechenland”. Der Neue Pauly (Vol. 71), 335–338. Stuttgart & Weimar: Metzler.Google Scholar
3. Select internet websites
3.1 Bibliographies
Diotima. Materials for the Study of Women and Gender in the Ancient World by Ross Scaife et al.: [URL]
Bibliography on Women in Antiquity by John Porter: [URL]
Bibliography on Women and the Family in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages (2nd to 7th century A.D.) by Antti Arjava: [URL]
Bibliography on Women in Byzantium (2003) by Alice-Mary Talbot & Thalia GoumaPetersen: [URL]
A General Bibliography on Gender and Language in two parts by Harold F. Schiffman: [URL]
Bibliographie zu Gender by Elisabeth Burr (with particular emphasis on Romance languages): [URL]
Chinese Language and Gender. On-line Bibliography by Marjorie Chan: [URL]
3.2 Small selection of links on women and gender studies
Diotima. Materials for the Study of Women and Gender in the Ancient World by Ross Scaife et al.: [URL]
Feminae Romanae. The Women of Ancient Rome by Suzanne Cross: [URL]
WWW-Dokumentation Genderlinguistik by Elisabeth Burr (with particular emphasis on Romance languages): [URL]
Women and Gender Studies by the Women’s Studies Section of the Association of College & Research Libraries (American Library Association): [URL]
Women’s Studies Database by the University of Maryland, College Park: [URL]
Women’s Studies / Women’s Issues Resource Sites by Joan Korenman: [URL]
L’homme. Zeitschrift für feministische Geschichtswissenschaft (first periodical in German on the history of women and gender, founded by Edith Saurer, History Department of the University of Vienna, in 2000): [URL]
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

WILLIAM MICHAEL SHORT
2013. MERCURY IN THE MIDDLE: THE MANY MEANINGS OF <em>(MEDIUS) SERMO</em> IN LATIN. The Classical Journal 108:2  pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2010. Bibliography. In A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language,  pp. 588 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2011. References. In A Companion to the Latin Language,  pp. 582 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.