Part of
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 39:2/3 (2012) ► pp.429439
References (33)
References
Amacker, René & Éric Junod, eds. 2002. Pamphile et Eusèbe de Césarée, Apologie pour Origène. Suivi de Rufin d’Aquilée, Sur la falsification des livres d’Origène. Tome I1. (= Sources chrétiennes, 464.) Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
Amsler, Mark. 1989. Etymology and Grammatical Discourse in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 44.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barney, Stephen A., W. J. Lewis, J. A. Beach & Oliver Berghof (with the collaboration of Muriel Hall). 2006. The Etymologies of Isidore of Seville. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borst, Arno. 1957–1963. Der Turmbau von Babel: Geschichte der Meinungen über Ursprung und Vielfalt der Sprachen und Völker. 4 vols. in 5. Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann.Google Scholar
Chin, Catherine M. 2008. Grammar and Christianity in the Late Roman World. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Elizabeth A. 1992. The Origenist Controversy: The cultural construction of an early Christian debate. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clines, David J. A., ed. 2010. The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew. Vol. VII1. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Descourtieux, Patrick & Jean Doignon, eds. 2008. Hilaire de Poitiers, Commentaires sur les Psaumes. Tome I1: Psaumes 1–14. (= Sources chrétiennes, 515.) Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
Doignon, Jean, ed. 1997. Sancti Hilarii Pictaviensis episcopi Tractatus super Psalmos. Instructio Psalmorum. In Psalmos I–XCI. (= Corpus Christianorum; Series Latina, 61.) Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Döpp, Siegmar & Wilhelm Geerlings (with the collaboration of Peter Brungs, Georg Röwekamp & Matthias Skeb OSB). 1999. Lexikon der antiken christlichen Literatur. Freiburg, Basel & Wien: Herder.Google Scholar
Edelstein, Jouri M. 1985. “Problemy jazyka v pamjatnikach patristiki [Language problems in the Patristic writings]”. Istorija lingvističeskich učenij: Srednevekovaja Evropa [History of linguistic research: Western Europe] ed. by A[gnija] V[asil’eva] Desnickaja & S[olomon] D[avidovič] Kacnel’son, 157–207. Leningrad: “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Fürst, Alfons. 2004, 2006. “Hieronymus”. Augustinus-Lexikon, vol. III1, ed. by Cornelius Petrus Mayer et al., fasc. 1/21 (2004), cols. 317–320; fasc. 3/41 (2006), cols. 321–336.Google Scholar
Herbermann, Clemens-Peter. 1981. “Moderne und antike Etymologie”. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 951.22–48.Google Scholar
Jackson, B. Darrell. 1969. “The Theory of Signs in St Augustine’s De doctrina christiana ”. Revue des études augustiniennes 151.9–49. (Repr. in Augustine: A collection of critical essays ed. by R. A. Markus, 92–147. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday. 1972.]Google Scholar
Joseph, John E. 2000. Limiting the Arbitrary: Linguistic naturalism and its opposites in Plato’s Cratylus and modern theories of language. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 96.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirwan, Christopher. 1994. “Augustine on the Nature of Speech”. Language ed. by Stephen Everson, 188–211. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lardet, Pierre, ed. 1982. S. Hieronymi presbyteri opera. Pars III, I: Contra Rufinum. (= Corpus Christianorum. Series Latina, 79.) Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Law, Vivien. 2003. The History of Linguistics in Europe from Plato to 1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, Wallace Martin, ed. 1911. Isidori Hispalensis episcopi Etymologiarum sive Originum libri XX. Tomus I libros I–X continens. Oxford: Clarendon. (Repr., 1966.)Google Scholar
Markus, Robert A. 1957. “St. Augustine on Signs”. Phronesis 21.69–83. (Repr. in Augustine: A collection of critical essays ed. by R. A. Markus, 61–91. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1972.)Google Scholar
Rebenich, Stefan. 1993. “Jerome: the ‘Vir Trilinguis’ and the ‘Hebraica Veritas’”. Vigiliae christianae 47:1.50–77.Google Scholar
Resnick, Irven M. 1990. “Lingua Dei, lingua hominis: Sacred Language and Medieval Texts”. Viator 211.51–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reydellet, Marc, ed. 1984. Isidore de Séville, Étymologies. Livre IX1: Les langues et les groupes sociaux. Paris: Éditions “Les Belles Lettres”.Google Scholar
Rochette, Bruno. 2009. “Les noms de la langue en latin”. Histoire – Épistémologie – Langage 31:2.29–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruef, Hans. 1981. Augustin über Semiotik und Sprache: Sprachtheoretische Analysen zu Augustins Schrift ‘De Dialectica’. Bern: Wyss Erben.Google Scholar
Sanders, Willy. 1967. “Grundzüge und Wandlungen der Etymologie”. Wirkendes Wort 171.361–384. (Repr. in: Etymologie ed. by Rüdiger Schmitt, 7–49. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1977.)Google Scholar
Simone, Raffaele. 1972. “Sémiologie augustinienne”. Semiotica 6:1.1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swiggers, Pierre. 1989. “Les pères de l’Église”. Histoire des idées linguistiques, vol. II1: Le développement de la grammaire occidentale ed. by Sylvain Auroux, 76–82. Liège: Pierre Mardaga.Google Scholar
. 1996. “L’étymologie: Les transformations de l’étude historique du vocabulaire aux Temps Modernes”. Geschichte der Sprachtheorie, Bd. 51: Sprachtheorien der Neuzeit II1: Von der Grammaire de Port-Royal (1660) zur Konstitution moderner linguistischer Disziplinen ed. by Peter Schmitter, 352–385. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Trabant, Jürgen. 2003. Mithridates im Paradies: Kleine Geschichte des Sprachdenkens. München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Van Hal, Toon. 2010. “Moedertalen en taalmoeders”: Het vroegmoderne taalvergelijkende onderzoek in de Lage Landen. Brussel: Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie voor Wetenschappen en Kunsten.Google Scholar
Vecchio, Sebastiano. 1994. Le parole come segni: Introduzione alla linguistica agostiniana. Palermo: Novecento.Google Scholar
Werner, Jürgen. 1992. “Zur Fremdsprachenproblematik in der griechisch-römischen Antike”. Zum Umgang mit fremden Sprachen in der griechisch-römischen Antike ed. by Carl Werner Müller, Kurt Sier & Jürgen Werner, 1–20. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Van Hal, Toon
2014. One continent, one language?Europa Celticaand its language in Philippus Cluverius'Germania antiqua(1616) and beyond. European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire 21:6  pp. 889 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.