Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 42:1 (2015) ► pp.85–105

Iconicity in Saussure’s Linguistic Work

And why it does not contradict the arbitrariness of the sign

 | University of Edinburgh
Ferdinand de Saussure (1857–1913) is routinely criticized for denying the possibility of iconicity in language through his principle of the arbitrariness of linguistic signs. Yet two of his articles, one from the beginning (1877) and the other from the end (1912) of his career, propose analyses of the development of certain Latin verbs and adjectives in which iconicity plays a key role. Saussure did not dismiss iconicity, but limited its sphere of application to the relationship between signs and their referents, which falls outside linguistics as he defined it. Hence iconicity does not contradict arbitrariness, which applies to the relationship between signifier and signified within the linguistic sign.
Published online: 26 May 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.42.1.05jos
References (46)
References
Ahlner, Felix & Jordan Zlatev. 2010. “Cross-modal Iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism”. Sign System Studies 38.1/4.298–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chien, Jui-Pi. 2011. “ Un mélange genevois: Tacit notions of iconicity in Ferdinand de Saussure’s Writings in General Linguistics ”. Semblance and Signification ed. by Pascale Michelucci, Olga Fischer & Christina Ljungberg, 135–148. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cifali, Mireille. 1983. “Théodore Flournoy, la découverte de l’inconscient”. Les bloc-notes de la psychanalyse 31.111–131, followed by her “Présentation” (pp. 133–135) of Saussure’s “Réponse à une enquête sur l’audition colorée” (137–139, repr. from Flournoy (1893: 50–52).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan. 2003. “L’essentiel de l’arbitraire”. Ferdinand de Saussure ed. by Simon Bouquet (= Cahiers de l’Herne, 76), 52–61. Paris: L’Herne.Google Scholar
De Crue, Francis. 1915 [1913]. “Allocution de M. le professeur Francis De Crue, doyen de la Faculté des Lettres et des Sciences sociales”. Ferdinand de Saussure (1857–1913) [assembled by Marie de Saussure], 15–23. [Genève: Imprimerie W. Kündig.]Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1974. Glas. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Egger, Victor. 1881. La parole intérieure: Essai de psychologie descriptive. Paris: Germer Baillière.Google Scholar
Flournoy, Théodore. 1893. Des phénomènes de synopsie (audition colorée): Photismes – schèmes visuels – personnifications. Genève: Charles Eggimann; Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
Gmür, Remo. 1990. “Saussures ‘Mémoire’-Prinzipien in seinen späteren indogermanistischen Arbeiten”. Présence de Saussure: Actes du Colloque internationale de Genève (21–23 mars 1988) ed. by René Amacker & Rudolf Engler, 39–51. Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Grassmann, Hermann. 1862. “Ueber die verbindung der konsonanten mit folgendem j und die davon abhängigen erscheinungen”. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete des Deutschen, Griechischen und Lateinischen (Kuhn’s Zeitschrift), 111.1–52.Google Scholar
Hartley, David. 1747. An Enquiry into the Origin of the Human Appetites and Affections, shewing how each arises from association, with an account of the entrance of moral evil into the world. To which are added some remarks on the independent scheme, which deduces all obligation on God’s part and man’s from certain abstract relations, truth, &c. Written for the use of the young gentlemen at the universities. Lincoln: Printed by W. Wood, and sold by R. Dodsley, at Tully’s Head, in Pall-Mall.Google Scholar
Havet, Louis. 1879. Review of Saussure (1879). Journal de Genève, 25 fév. 1879, n° 47, Supplément, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
Hutton, Christopher M. 1989. “The Arbitrary Nature of the Sign”. Semiotica 75.1/2.63–78.Google Scholar
Itkonen, Esa. 2013. “Philosophy of Linguistics”. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics ed. by Keith Allan, 747–774. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1965. “Quest for the Essence of Language”. Diogenes 131.21–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, John E. 2000a. Limiting the Arbitrary: Naturalism and its opposites in Plato’s Cratylus and modern theories of language. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 96.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000b. “The Unconscious and the Social in Saussure”. Historiographia Linguistica 271.307–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. “Orthodox Unorthodoxy”. Language Sciences 251.99–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010a. “‘La teinte de tous les ciels’: Divergence et nuance dans la conception saussurienne du changement linguistique”. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 631.145–158.Google Scholar
2010b. “Hermeneiaphobia: Why an ‘inventive’ linguistics must first embrace interpretation”. Inventive Linguistics ed. by Sandrine Sorlin, 95–105. Montpellier: Presses Universitaires de la Méditerranée.Google Scholar
2012. Saussure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2013. “Identity Work and Face Work across Linguistic and Cultural Boundaries”. Journal of Politeness Research 9/1.35–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. “Saussure’s Sound Symbolism”. History and Philosophy of the Language Sciences, [URL]
Forthcoming. “‘The vivid portrayal of what they value’: Imitation, association and nervous excitement in the history of sign theory”. Towards a History of Sound-Symbolic Theories ed. by Luca Nobile, 000–000. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Joseph, John E., Nigel Love & Talbot J. Taylor. 2001. Landmarks in Linguistic Thought II: The Western tradition in the 20th century. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Konow, Sten. 1927. “Obituary of Vilhelm Thomsen”. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, No. 4 (Oct. 1927), 929–934. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Penny. 1996. The Whorf Theory Complex: A critical reconstruction. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 81.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magnus, Margaret. 2013. “A History of Sound Symbolism”. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics ed. by Keith Allan, 191–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1867 [1 1865]. An Examination of Sir William Hamilton’s Philosophy, and of the principal philosophical questions discussed in his writings. 3rd ed. London: Longmans, Green, Reader & Dyer.Google Scholar
Morris, Charles. 1946. Signs, Language and Behavior. New York: Prentice-Hall. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931–1958. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. 81 vols. Vols. I–VI1 ed. by Charles Hartshorne & Paul Weiss (1931–1935), vols. VII–VIII1 ed. by Arthur W. Burks (1958). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Petrilli, Susan. 2011. Expression and Interpretation in Language. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1877. “Sur une classe de verbes latins en –eo ”. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 31.279–293. (Repr. in Saussure 1922.353–369.)Google Scholar
. 1879. Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indoeuropéennes. Leipzig: printed by B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
. 1905. “D’ὠμήλυσις à Τριπτόλεμος: Remarques étymologiques”. Mélanges Nicole: Recueil de mémoires de philologie classique et d’archéologie offerts à Jules Nicole, 503–514. Genève: Imprimerie W. Kündig & Fils. (Repr. in Saussure 1922.576–584.)Google Scholar
. 1909. “Sur les composés latins du type agricola ”. Philologie et linguistique: Mélanges offerts à Louis Havet par ses anciens élèves et ses amis à l’occasion du 60e anniversaire de sa naissance le 6 janvier 1909, 459–471. Paris: Hachette. (Repr. in Saussure 1922.585–594.)Google Scholar
. 1912. “Adjectifs indo-européens du type caecus ‘aveugle’”. Festschrift Vilhelm Thomsen zur Vollendung des siebzigsten Lebensjahres am 25. Januar 1912, dargebracht von Freunden und Schülern, 202–206. Leipzig: Otto Harrassowitz. (Repr. in Saussure 1922.595–599.)Google Scholar
. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Ed. by Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye, with the assistance of Albert Riedlinger. Lausanne & Paris: Payot. (2nd ed. 1922; subsequent editions have minor corrections only.)Google Scholar
. 1922. Recueil des publications scientifiques de Ferdinand de Saussure. [Ed. by Charles Bally & Léopold Gautier]. Genève: Sonor; Lausanne: Payot; Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
. 1997. Deuxième cours de linguistique générale (1908–1909), d’après les cahiers d’Albert Riedlinger et Charles Patois / Saussure’s Second Course on General Linguistics (1908–1909), from the notebooks of Albert Riedlinger and Charles Patois, ed. by Eisuke Komatsu, transl. by George Wolf. Oxford & New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de & Émile Constantin. 2005. Saussure, “Notes préparatoires pour le cours de linguistique générale 1910–1911”; Constantin, “Linguistique générale, cours de M. le professeur de Saussure 1910–1911”, ed. by Daniele Gambarara & Claudia Mejía Quijano, Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 581.71–290.Google Scholar
Wang, Xueqing. 2010. “Language Iconicity from Sociolinguistic Perspective”. Asian Social Science 6.7.176–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waugh, Linda R. 1994. “Degrees of Iconicity in the Lexicon”. Journal of Pragmatics 221.55–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1937. “A Linguistic Consideration of Thinking in Primitive Communities”. First published in Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Papers of Benjamin Lee Whorf ed. by John B. Carroll, 65–86. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Willems, Klaas. 2005. “Die Grenzen der Ikonizität der Sprache: Saussures Konzeption des ‘fait linguistique’ revisited”. Kodikas/Code Ars Semeiotica 28.3/4.243–272.Google Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Bross, Fabian
2024. What is iconicity?. Sign Language & Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Börstell, Carl
2024. Better letter: iconicity in the manual alphabets of American Sign Language and Swedish Sign Language. Language and Cognition 16:4 ► pp. 1272 ff. DOI logo
Luo, Yiheng & William Cannon Hunter
2024. A semiology of representations in tourism destination image: social construction of a Korean Hallyu narrative. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change 22:4 ► pp. 421 ff. DOI logo
Mututa, Addamms Songe
2024. Nationhood in South Sudan Cinema: The Iconicity of Motherhood in Akuol de Mabior’s No Simple Way Home (2023). African Studies Review 67:2 ► pp. 372 ff. DOI logo
D'Onofrio, Annette & Penelope Eckert
2021. Affect and iconicity in phonological variation. Language in Society 50:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
McCormick, Kelly, Simon Lacey, Randall Stilla, Lynne C. Nygaard & K. Sathian
2021. Neural Basis of the Sound-Symbolic Crossmodal Correspondence Between Auditory Pseudowords and Visual Shapes. Multisensory Research 35:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Lacey, Simon, Yaseen Jamal, Sara M. List, Kelly McCormick, K. Sathian & Lynne C. Nygaard
2020. Stimulus Parameters Underlying Sound‐Symbolic Mapping of Auditory Pseudowords to Visual Shapes. Cognitive Science 44:9 DOI logo
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2019. The Sign Theory of Language and the form-meaning interface / La Théorie du langage basée sur le signe et l’interface forme-sens. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 64:02 ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Urban, Matthias
2019. Spotlights on the notion of lexical motivation across languages in the Western linguistic tradition, from the 16th century to the present. Historiographia Linguistica 46:1-2 ► pp. 48 ff. DOI logo
Bidaud, Samuel
2018. Le phonosymbolisme des morphèmes du français. Travaux de linguistique n° 75:2 ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Sidhu, David M. & Penny M. Pexman
2018. Five mechanisms of sound symbolic association. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 25:5 ► pp. 1619 ff. DOI logo
Perlman, Marcus
2017. Debunking two myths against vocal origins of language. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 18:3 ► pp. 376 ff. DOI logo
Pleyer, Michael, Stefan Hartmann, James Winters & Jordan Zlatev
2017. Interaction and iconicity in the evolution of language. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 18:3 ► pp. 303 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.