Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 5:1/2 (1978) ► pp.15–43

Condillac, Mandeville, and the Origin of Language

| Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule, Aachen
The study of 18th-century theories on the origin of language offers interesting insights into history of linguistics. These theories are intimately linked with 17th-century inquiries into the social and intellectual nature of man, and particularly with the views of Hobbes, Locke, and the Cartesians. 18th-century thinkers analyse these problems from a genetic viewpoint. Condillac in his Essai sur Vorigine des connoissances humaines (1746) tries to solve them by advancing a theory of the progress of the operations of the mind, a theory in which a central role is attributed to language. This theory has recently attracted the attention of historians of linguistics, since it is considered the main source of an international debate on the origin of language culminating in Herder. It can be shown, however, that a large number of Condillac’s ideas were anticipated in Bernard Mandeville’s Fable of the Bees (1729). The present study suggests that Condillac was very likely familiar with the theses of the Fable and that he made use of them in his Essai. This suggestion is supported by an anlysis of the arguments and of certain fundamental concepts common to both works and by an account of the influence of Mandeville’s theses in France during the first decades of the 18th century. But, as Condillac mentions neither Mandeville nor his Fable, his indebtedness to his precursor cannot be proved once for all. Nevertheless, the evidence presented makes it very plausible that Condillac profited from the original and innovative ideas of Mandeville.
Published online: 1 January 1978
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.5.1-2.03sch
References
Aarsleff, Hans
1970 “The History of Linguistics and Professor Chomsky”. Lg 461.570–85.Google Scholar
1974 “The Tradition of Condillac: The problem of the origin of language in the eighteenth century and the debate in the Berlin Academy before Herder”. Studies in the History of Linguistics ed. by Dell Hymes, 93–156. Bloomington & London: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
1975 “Condillac’s Speechless Statue”. Studia Leibniteana. Supplementa XV – Akten des II. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses Hannover, 171-22.Juli 1972 Vol.41.287–303.Google Scholar
Albrecht, Erhard
1975 Sprache und Philosophie. Berlin: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wisschenschaften.Google Scholar
Allen, Don Cameron
1949 “Some Theories of the Growth and Origin of Language in Milton’s Age”. PhQ 281.5–16.Google Scholar
Allen, W. Sydney
1948 “Ancient Ideas on the Origin and Development of Language”. TPhS 811.35–60.Google Scholar
Auroux, Sylvain
1973 L’Encyclopédie: “grammaire” et “langue” au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Mame.Google Scholar
Bibliothèque Angloise
1729 Review of Bernard Mandeville 1729 Bibliothèque angloise; ou histoire littéraire de la Grande Bretagne 131.97–125.Google Scholar
Bibliothèque Britannique
1733 Review of Bernard Mandeville, An Enquiry into the Origin of Honour, and the Usefulness of Christianity in War (London 1732) Bibliothèque britannique ou histoire des ouvrages des savans de la Grande Bretagne.Google Scholar
Bibliothèque Raisonnée
1729 Review of Bernard Mandeville 1729 Bibliothèque raisonnée des ouvrages des savans de l’Europe, 402–45. Amsterdam: Wetsteins & Smith.Google Scholar
Borst, Arno
1957–63 Der Turmbau von Babel: Geschichte der Meinungen über Ursprung und Vielfalt der Sprachen und Völker. 4 vols. in 6. Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann.Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, G. L.
1970 “The History of Linguistics”. CJL 151.143–50.Google Scholar
Condillac, Étienne Bonnot de
1947. (1746) Oeuvres philosophiques. Texte établi et présenté par Georges Le Roy. 31 vols. Paris: Presses Univ. de France.Google Scholar
1953 Lettres inédites à Gabriel Cramer. Ed. par Georges Le Roy. Paris: Presses Univ. de France.Google Scholar
1977 Essai über den Ursprung der menschlichen Erkenntnisse. Herausgegeben und aus dem Französischen übersetzt von Ulrich Ricken. Leipzig: Reclam.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio
1974 Die Geschichte der Sprachphilosophie von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart: Eine Übersicht. Teil II1: Von Leibniz bis Rousseau. Tübingen: TBL Verlag Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Formigari, Lia
1974 “Language and Society in the Late Eighteenth Century”. JHI 351.275–92. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grégoire, François
1947 Bernard de Mandeville et la “Fable des abeilles”. Nancy: Georges Thomas.Google Scholar
Harnois, Guy
1928 Les théories du langage en France de 1660 à 1821. ( Études Françaises, 17.) Paris: Société d’Édition “Les belles Lettres”.Google Scholar
Hazard, Paul
1961 La crise de la conscience européenne de 1680–1821. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Hine, Ellen McNiven
1973 “Condillac and the Problem of Language”. Publications de l’Institut et Musée Voltaire. Studies on Voltaire and the 18th Century, 1061.21–62. Genève.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas
1960. (1651) Leviathan, or the Matter, Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil. Ed. with an introduction by Michael Oakeshott. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hübner, Walther
1920 “John Locke als Sprachphilosoph”. NS 271.385–412.Google Scholar
1941 “Mandevilles Bienenfabel und die Begründung der praktischen Zweckethik in der englischen Aufklärung. Ein Beitrag zur Genealogie des englischen Geistes”. Grundformen der englischen Geistesgeschichte. Ed. by P. Meissner, 277–331. Stuttgart & Berlin.Google Scholar
Josephs, Herbert
1969 Diderot’s Dialogue of Language and Gesture: Le neveu de Rameau. Ohio State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Juliard, Pierre
1970 Philosophies of Language in Eighteenth Century France. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Frederick Benjamin
1922 “The Influence of Bernard Mandeville”. SPH. 191.83–108.Google Scholar
1924 “Mandeville on the Origin of Language”. MLN 391.136–42.Google Scholar
Knight, Isabel
1968 The Geometric Spirit: The Abbé de Condillac and the French Enlightenment. New Haven & London: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Knowlson, James R.
1975 Universal Language Schemes in England and France, 1600–1800. Toronto-Buffalo-New York: Univ. of Toronto Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuehner, Paul
1944 Theories on the Origin and the Formation of Language in the Eighteenth Century in France. Dissertation. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, Roger
1966 Condillac ou la joie de vivre. Presentation, choix de textes, bibliographie. Paris: Seghers.Google Scholar
1967 “Condillac, maître du langage”. Le Langage: Actes du congrès des sociétés de philosophie et de langue française. Vol.I1, 147–52. Neuchâtel.Google Scholar
Lenoir, Raymond
1924 Condillac. Paris: Felix Alcan.Google Scholar
Le Roy, Georges
1937 La psychologie de Condillac. Paris: Boivin.Google Scholar
Locke, John
1961 (1690) An Essay concerning Human Understanding. Ed. with an introduction by John W. Yolton. 21 vols. London & New York: Dent & Dutton.Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard
1957 (1729) The Fable of the Bees: or, Private vices, publick benefits. With a commentary critical, historical and explanatory by F. B. Kaye. 21 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (1st ed. 1924.)Google Scholar
Mémoires de Trévoux
1740 Review of Mandeville 1729 (1957) Mémoires pour l’histoire des sciences et des beaux arts, 941–981, 1596–1636, 2103–2147. Paris: Chaubert.Google Scholar
Parenti, Roberto
1962 “Il pensiero storico del Condillac”. Revista critica di storia della filosofia 171.167–79, 309–20.Google Scholar
1965 “Illuminismo e tradizione nel pensiero di Condillac”. Aurea Parma 491.5–25.Google Scholar
Parret, Herman
ed. 1976 History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics. Berlin & New York: W. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rauter, Herbert
1970 Die Sprachauffassung der englischen Vorromantik in ihrer Bedeutung für die Dichtungstheorie der Zeit. ( Frankfurter Beiträge zur Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 1.) Bad Homburg: Gehlen.Google Scholar
Ricken, Ulrich
1964 “Condillacs liaison des idées und die clarté des Französischen”. NS 121.552–67.Google Scholar
1976 “Die Kontroverse Du Marsais und Beauzée gegen Batteux, Condillac und Diderot – Ein Kapitel der Auseinandersetzung zwichen Sensualismus und Rationalismus in der Sprachtheorie der Aufklärung”. Parret 1976.460–87.Google Scholar
Rodis-Lewis, Geneviève
1967 “Langage humain et signes naturels dans le Cartésianisme”. Le Langage: Actes du congrès des sociétés de philosophie et de langue française. Vol. I1, 132–36. Neuchâtel.Google Scholar
Rosiello, Luigi
1967 Linguistica illuminista. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
1968 “Le teorie linguistiche di Vico e Condillac”. FI 21.386–93.Google Scholar
Sakman(n), Paul
(1864–1936) 1897 Bernard de Mandeville und die Bienenfabel-Controverse: Eine Episode in der Geschichte der englischen Aufklärung. Freiburg i.Br.-Leipzig-Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Salvucci, Pasquale
1957 Linguaggio e mondo umano in Condillac. Urbino: S.T.E.U.Google Scholar
1961 Condillac filosofa delia communità umana. Milano: Nuova Academia.Google Scholar
Schaupp, Zora
1926 The Naturalism of Condillac. (= University of Nebraska Studies in Language, Literature, and Criticism, 7.) Lincoln.Google Scholar
Schottländer, Rudolf
1969 “Die verkannte Lehre Condillacs vom Sprachursprung”. BRPh 81.158–65.Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas A.
ed. 1975 Current Trends in Linguistics. Vol.131: Historiography of Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean
1967a, “Langage, nature et société selon Rousseau”. Le Langage. Actes du congrès des sociétés de philosophie et de langue française. Vol.I1,143–46. Neuchâtel.Google Scholar
1967b “Rousseau et l’origine des langues”. Europäische Aufklärung: Herbert Dieckmann zum 60. Geburtstag ed. by Hugo Friedrich und Fritz Schalk, 281–300. München: W. Fink.Google Scholar
Texte, Joseph
1899 Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the Cosmopolitan Spirit in Literature: A study of the literary relations between France and England during the 18th century. Transl. by J. W. Matthews. London.Google Scholar
Tort, Patrick
1976 “Dialectique des signes chez Condillac”. Parret 1976.488–502.Google Scholar
Venturi, Franco
1939 La jeunesse de Diderot (1713–1753). Transl. by Juliette Bertrand. Paris: Skira.Google Scholar
Viertel, John
1966 “Concepts of Language Underlying the 18th Century Controversy about the Origins of Language”. MSLL 191.109–32.Google Scholar
Wade, Ira O.
1938 The Clandestine Organization and Diffusion of Philosophic Ideas in France from 1700 to 1750. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Droś, Agnieszka
2022. Geneza społeczeństwa w myśli Bernarda Mandeville’a. Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Knud Haakonssen
2000. The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, DOI logo
Knud Haakonssen
2006. The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, DOI logo
Hewes, Gordon
1992. History of Glottogonic Theories. In Language Origin: A Multidisciplinary Approach, ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Janson, Tore
1979. Lucretius on the Origin of Language. Historiographia Linguistica 6:2 ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
López Lloret, Jorge
2022. El Mercado en el Ágora: La Retórica Deliberativa en Adam Smith. Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 39:1 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Schreyer, Rudiger
1978.  Essai über den Ursprung der menschlichen Erkenntnisse. By [Etienne Bonno de] Condillac. Historiographia Linguistica 5:3 ► pp. 328 ff. DOI logo
Schreyer, Rüdiger
1983.  The Forbidden Experiment: The story of the wild boy of Aveyron. By Roger Shattuck. Historiographia Linguistica 10:1-2 ► pp. 138 ff. DOI logo
Schreyer, Rüdiger
1985. The origin of language: A scientific approach to the study of man. Topoi 4:2 ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Subbiondo, Joseph L.
1981. Thomas stackhouse’s theory of linguistic rhetoric. Historiographia Linguistica 8:1 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.