Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 310–324

Constructional analysis

Article outline
  • 1.Construction grammar and pragmatic analysis
  • 2.The pragmatics of grammar
  • 3.Extending the scope: conventional pragmatics and conventional discourse
  • 4.Constructions in grammaticalization
  • 5.Summary and prospects
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 3 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.con14
References (70)
References
Bernal, E. & J. Decesaris (eds.) 2008. Proceedings of the XIII Euralex International Congress. Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Google Scholar
Bybee, J. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In B. D. Joseph & >r.D. Janda (eds), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition. Language 82: 711–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., R. Perkins & W. Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Cole, P. (ed.) 1978. Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics. Academic PressGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1981. Radical pragmatics. Academic Press. Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & S. A. Thompson. 2000. Concessive patterns in conversation. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & B. Kortmann (eds.), Cause-condition-concession-contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives, 381–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & B. Kortmann (eds.) 2000. Cause-condition-concession-contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. & A. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Cuyckens, H., R. Dirven & J. R. Taylor (eds.) 2003. Cognitive perspectives on lexical semantics. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B. & E. Sweetser. 2005. Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ducrot, O. 1980. Les échelles argumentatives. Minuit. Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. 1975. Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry 6: 353–75. Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. 1981. Pragmatics and the description of discourse. In P. Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics 143–166. Google Scholar
1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6: 222–54. Google Scholar
1996. The pragmatics of constructions. In D. Slobin et al. (eds.), Social interaction social context, and language: 53–69. Google Scholar
2008. FrameNet meets construction grammar. In E. Bernal & J. Decesaris (eds.) Proceedings of the XIII Euralex International Congress, 49–68. Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. & S. Atkins. 1992. Toward a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In A. Lehrer & E. Feder Kittay (eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization: 75–102. Google Scholar
Fillmore, C., P. Kay & M. C. O. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language 64: 501–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, B. & S. A. Thompson. 1990. A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language 66: 297–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, M. & J.-O. Östman. 2004a. A thumbnail sketch of construction grammar. In M. Fried & J.-O. Stman (eds.), Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective, 11–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (eds.) 2004b. Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Construction grammar and spoken language: The case of pragmatic particles. Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1752–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givon, T. 1979. On understanding grammar. Academic Press. Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. & R. Jackendoff. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80: 532–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th & A. Stefanowitsch. 2006. Corpora in cognitive linguistics. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Hanks, P. 2008. The lexicographical legacy of John Sinclair. International Journal of Lexicography 21: 219–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. & E. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Horn, L. 1989. A natural history of negation. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Horn, L. & G. Ward. 2005. The handbook of pragmatics. Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1997. Twistin’ the night away. Language 73: 534–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Construction after construction. Language 84: 8–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, B. D. & R. D. Janda (eds.) 2003. The handbook of historical linguistics. Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kay, P. 2005. Pragmatic aspects of grammatical constructions. In L. Horn & G. Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics: 675–700.Google Scholar
Kay, P. & C. Fillmore. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The what–s X doing Y? . Language 75: 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women fire, and dangerous things,: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K. 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. On the interaction of information structure and formal structure in constructions: The case of French right-detached comme-N. In M. Fried & J.-O. Östman (eds.) Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective, 157–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 5–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12: 143–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, W. 1992. Historical linguistics. Routledge. Google Scholar
Lehrer, A. & E. Feder Kittay. 1992. Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Lindquist, H. & C. Mair. 2006. Corpus approaches to grammaticalization. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meillet, A. 1912. L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia 12. (Reprinted in A. Meillet 1948, Linguistique historique et linguistique générale 1, 130–48. Google Scholar
Michaelis, L. 2003. Word meaning sentence meaning, and syntactic meaning. In H. Cuyckens, R. Dirven & J. R. Taylor (eds.), Cognitive perspectives on lexical semantics: 163–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. Entity and event coercion in a symbolic theory of syntax. In J.-O. Östman & M. Fried (eds.) Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, 45–88. Google Scholar
Michaelis, L. & K. Lambrecht. 1996. Toward a construction-based theory of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language 72: 215–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moon, R. 1998. Fixed expressions and idioms in English: A corpus based approach. Clarendon Press. Google Scholar
Morgan, J. 1978. Two types of convention in indirect speech-acts. In P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, 261–80. Google Scholar
Nikiforidou, K. 1996. Modern Greek as: A case study in grammaticalization and grammatical polysemy. Studies in Language 20: 599–632. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Östman, J.-O. 2004. Construction discourse: A prolegomenon. In J.-O. Östman & M. Fried (eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, 121–44. Google Scholar
Östman, J.-O. & M. Fried. 2004. Construction grammars. Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K. U. & L. Thornburg. 2003. Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. 1991. Corpus concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
2014. Trust the text: Language corpus and discourse Routledge. Google Scholar
Slobin, D., J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis & J. Guo. 1996. Social interaction social context, and language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. 2003. A construction-based approach to indirect speech-acts. In K. -U. Panther & L. Thornburg (eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing: 105–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. & S. Th. Gries. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8: 209–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. Constructions in grammaticalization. In B. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (eds.) The handbook of historical linguistics, 624–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics 18: 523–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, A. 2005. Constructions of intersubjectivity. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar