Signed language pragmatics
Article outline
- 1.The world’s signed languages
- 1.1Language and its expression
- 2.Subjectivity
- 3.Speech acts
- 3.1Direct speech acts
- 3.2Performatives
- 3.3Indirect speech acts
- 4.Modality as an expression of subjectivity
- 4.1Agent-oriented uses in ASL
- 4.2Epistemic uses and the role of syntax
- 4.3Negative modal concepts
- 4.4Historical sources and grammaticization
- 5.Information flow
- 5.1Topic and constituent type
- 5.2Topic–comment structure
- 5.3Grammatical topics
- 5.4Tiered topics and topic scope
- 5.5Topic shift
- 6.Pragmatics and other signed languages
-
Notes
-
References
References (40)
References
Baker, C. & D. Cokely. 1980. American Sign Language: A Teacher’s Resource Text on Grammar and Culture. T.J. Publishers.
Battison, R. 1978. Lexical Borrowing in American Sign Language. Linstok Press.
Bouchard, D. & C. Dubuisson. 1995. Grammar, order and position of wh-signs in Quebec Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 24, 87: 99–139.
Brennan, R. 1994. Pragmatics and productivity. In I. Ahlgren, B. Bergman & M. Brennan (eds.) Perspectives on sign language usage: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Vol. 2: 371–390. International Sign Language Association.
Bybee, J., R. Perkins & W. Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. University of Chicago Press.
Bybee, J. & S. Fleishman. 1995. Introduction. In J. Bybee & S Fleishman (eds.): 1–14.
Celo, R. 1996. Pragmatic aspects of the interrogative form in Italian Sign Language. In C. Lucas (ed.) Multicultural aspects of sociolinguistics in deaf communities: 132–151. Gallaudet University Press.
Chafe, R. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. The University of Chicago Press.
Coates, R. 1990. Modal Meaning: The Semantic-Pragmatic Interface. Journal of Semantics 7: 53–63.
Engberg-Pedersen, E. 1995. Point of view expressed through shifters. In K. Emmorey & J. Reilly (eds.) Language, Gesture, and Space: 133–154. Erlbaum.
Ferreira-Brito, L. 1990. Epistemic, alethic, and deontic modalities in a Brazilian Sign Language. In S. D. Fischer & P. Siple (eds.) Theoretical issues in Sign Language Research. Vol. 1.: Linguistics. University of Chicago Press.
Girod, M. 1997. La Langue des Signes. ITV.
Haiman, J. 1978. Conditionals are topics. Language 54: 564–589.
Humphries, T., C. Padden & T. J. O’rourke. 1980. A basic course in American Sign Language. TJ Publishers.
Janzen, T. 1998. Topicality in ASL: Information ordering, constituent structure, and the function of topic marking. Ph.D. Diss., University of New Mexico.
Klima, E. S. & U. Bellugi. 1979. The Signs of Language. Harvard University Press.
Lewis, M. P. (ed.). 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Sixteenth edition. Dallas, Tex.: SIL International. Online version: [URL].
Li, C. N. & S. A. Thompson. 1976. Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C. N. Li (ed.) Subject and topic:457–490. Academic Press.
Liddell, S. 1980. American Sign Language Syntax. Mouton.
Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
Meier, R.P 2002. Why different, why the same? Explaining effects and non-effects of modality upon linguistic structure in sign and speech. In R. P. Meier, K. Cormier & D. Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages. Cambridge University Press. 1–25.
Nilsson, A.-L. 2008. Spatial Strategies in Descriptive Discourse: Use of Signing Space in Swedish Sign Language. CDS/LSCS Monograph No. 2. Dublin, Ireland: Centre for Deaf Studies, University of Dublin, Trinity College.
Poulin, C. & C. Miller. 1995. On narrative discourse and point of view in Quebec Sign Language. In K. Emmorey & J. Reilly (eds.) Language, Gesture, and Space: 117–131. Erlbaum.
Scheibman, J. 1999. Local patterns of subjectivity in person and verb type in American English conversation. Paper presented at Symposium on Frequency Effects and Emergent Grammar, Carnegie Mellon University, May 28–30.
Shaffer, B. 1996. The Future Gram in ASL. Unpublished ms, University of New Mexico.
Shaffer, B. 1999. Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives on Negative Modals in ASL. Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference of the High Desert Linguistics Society, March 26–28, 1999, Albuquerque.
Shaffer, B. 2000. A syntactic, pragmatic analysis of the expression of necessity and possibility in American Sign Language. Ph.D. Diss., University of New Mexico.
Shaffer, B. 2002. CAN’T: The negation of modal notions in ASL. Sign Language Studies, 3:1, 34–53.
Shaffer, B. 2004. Information ordering and speaker subjectivity: Modality in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics 15(2): 175–195.
Stokoe, W. C. 1978. Sign Language Structure: The First Linguistic Analysis of American Sign Language. Linstok Press.
Traugott, E. C. 1989. On the Rise of Epistemic Meaning: an Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change. Language 65: 31–55.
Van Der Auwera, J. 2000. On the Typology of Negative Modals. In E. A. Hoeksema (ed.) Proceedings of the Groningen Conference on Negation: 25–50.
Wilcox, S. 1996. Not from Jove’s Brow. Language & Communication 16(2): 179–192.
Wilcox, S. 1998. Cognitive Iconicity and Signed Language Universals. Paper presented at the Fourth Conference on Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, October 10–12, 1998, Emory University, Atlanta.
Wilcox, S. & P. Wilcox. 2010. The analysis of signed languages. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. Oxford University Press: 739–760.
Woll, B. 1981. Question structure in British Sign Language. In B. Woll, J. Kyle & M. Deuchar (eds.) Perspectives on British Sign Language and deafness: 136–149. Croom Helm.