Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 1303–1317

Speech act theory

Article outline
  • 1.Where does speech act theory come from?
    • 1.1Frege and the assertion sign
    • 1.2Wittgenstein and the uses of language
    • 1.3Austin and the performative utterance
    • 1.4Grice and speaker’s meaning
  • 2.Utterances as acts
    • 2.1Austin’s distinction of locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary acts
      • 2.1.1The complexities of saying
      • 2.1.2The three kinds of effects of the illocutionary act
      • 2.1.3The distinction between illocution and perlocution
    • 2.2Searle’s notion of the speech act as illocutionary act
      • 2.2.1Illocutionary force and propositional content
      • 2.2.2Felicity conditions as rules
      • 2.2.3Intention and perlocution
  • 3.Main problems in speech act theory
    • 3.1Illocutionary force-indicating devices
    • 3.2The classification of illocutionary acts
    • 3.3Modes of understanding
    • 3.4Speech acts and truth
    • 3.5Universality vs. the linguistic and cultural relativity of speech acts
  • 4.Trends of development in speech act theory
    • 4.1From the conventionality of performatives to the naturality of inferences
    • 4.2From interpersonal action to the intentionality of the speaker’s mind
    • 4.3Some collateral endeavors
  • 5.Open issues and possibilities of further development
  • References
Published online: 3 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.spe1
References
Alston, W. P.
2000 Illocutionary acts and sentence meaning. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Apel, K. O.
1991 Is intentionality more basic than linguistic meaning? In E. Lepore & R. Van Gulick (eds.): 31–55.Google Scholar
Asher, N. & A. Lascarides
2001 Indirect speech acts. Synthese 128: 183–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L.
1946 Other Minds. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Suppl. vol. 20.Google Scholar
1961 Philosophical papers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1962 How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bach, K. & R. M. Harnish
1979 Linguistic communication and speech acts. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ballmer, T. T. & W. Brennenstuhl
1981 Speech act classification. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, E.
1966 Problèmes de linguistique générale. Gallimard.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. et al.
1973 Essays on J. L. Austin. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Black, M.
(ed.) 1964 Philosophy in America. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., J. House & G. Kasper
(eds.) 1989 Cross-cultural pragmatics. Ablex.Google Scholar
(eds.) 1989 Investigating cross-cultural pragmatics. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House & G. Kasper (eds.): 1–34.Google Scholar
Brown, P. & S. C. Levinson
1978 Universals in language usage. In E. N. Goody (ed.): 56–289.Google Scholar
1987 Politeness. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bühler, K.
1934 Sprachtheorie. Fischer.Google Scholar
Cappelen, H. & E. Lepore
2005 Insensitive semantics: a defense of semantic minimalism and speech act pluralism. Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caffi, C.
1999 On mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 881–909. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, P. R., J. Morgan & M. E. Pollack
(eds.) 1990 Intentions in communication. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cole, P. & J. L. Morgan
(eds.) 1975 Syntax and Semantics 3. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
1994 Sentence typology and the taxonomy of speech acts. In S. L. Tsohatzidis (ed.): 460–77.Google Scholar
Davidson, D.
1979 Moods and performances. In A. Margalit (ed.): 9–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984 Truth and interpretation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, A.
1988 Intention, language and social action in a Samoan context. Journal of Pragmatics 12: 13–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Eemeren, F. H. & R. Grootendorst
2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fetzer A. & C. Meierkord
(eds.) 2002 Rethinking sequentiality. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frege, G.
1879 Begriffsschrift. Nebert.Google Scholar
1918 Der Gedanke. Eine logische Untersuchung. Beitraege zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1(2): 58–77.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G.
1979 Pragmatics. Academic Press.Google Scholar
1981 Speech act assignment. In A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber & I. A. Sag (eds.): 64–83.Google Scholar
Geis, M. L.
1995 Speech acts and conversational interaction. Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goody, E. N.
(ed.) 1978 Questions and politeness. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, M. S.
2000 Illocutionary force and semantic content. Linguistics & Philosophy 23: 435–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P.
1957 Meaning. The Philosophical Review 66: 377–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1975 Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds.): 41–58.Google Scholar
1989 Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J.
1981 Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hausendorf, H. & A. Bora
(eds.) in press Analysing citizenship talk John Benjamins DOI logo
Holmes, J.
1984 Modifying illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics 8: 345–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobs, R. A. & P. S. Rosenbaum
(eds.) 1970 Readings in English transformational grammar. Ginn.Google Scholar
Joshi, A. K., B. L. Webber & I. A. Sag
(eds.) 1981 Elements of discourse understanding. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Katriel, T. & M. Dascal
1989 Speaker’s commitment and involvement in discourse. In Y. Tobin (ed.): 275–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, G. N.
1983 Principles of pragmatics. Longman.Google Scholar
Lepore, E. & R. Van Gulick
(eds.) 1991 John Searle and his critics. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C.
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J.
1977 Semantics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Margalit, A.
(ed.) 1979 Meaning and use. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mcgowan, M.-K.
2003 Conversational exercitives and the force of pornography. Philosophy and Public Affairs 31: 155–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Récanati, F.
1981 Les énoncés performatifs. Minuit.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, M. Z.
1982 The things we do with words : Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society 11 : 203–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. R.
1970 On declarative sentences. In R. A. Jakobs & P. S. Rosenbaum (eds.): 222–272.Google Scholar
Sbisà, M.
1984 On illocutionary types. Journal of Pragmatics 8: 93–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Illocutionary force and degrees of strength in language use. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1791–1814. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Cognition and narrativity in speech act sequences. In A. Fetzer & C. Meierkord (eds.): 71–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R.
1964 What is a speech act? In M. Black (ed.): 120–136.Google Scholar
1968 Austin on locutionary and illocutionary acts. The Philosophical Review 77: 405–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1969 Speech acts. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1975 Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds.): 59–82.Google Scholar
1976 A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5(1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979 Expression and meaning. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983 Intentionality. Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989 How performatives work. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 535–558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. & D. Vanderveken
1985 Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson
1986 Relevance. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F.
1950 On referring. Mind 59: 320–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1964 Intention and convention in speech acts. The Philosophical Review 73: 439–460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1973 Austin and ‘locutionary meaning’. In I. Berlin et al. : 46–68.Google Scholar
Tobin, Y.
(ed.) 1989 From sign to text. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Travis, Ch.
2000 Unshadowed Thought. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tsohatzidis, S. L.
(ed.) 1994 Foundations of Speech Act Theory. Routledge.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z.
1972 Res cogitans. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J.
1983 Review article on speech act classification. Language 59: 166–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985 What people say they do with words. Ablex.Google Scholar
1989 Language on language. Papers in Pragmatics 3(2).Google Scholar
Warnock, G. J.
1973 Some types of performative utterances. In I. Berlin et al.: 69–89.Google Scholar
Weigand, E.
1994 Discourse, conversation, dialogue. In E. Weigand (ed.): 49–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1994 Concepts of dialogue. Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
1991 Cross-cultural pragmatics. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
1922 Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
1953 Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical investigations. Blackwell.Google Scholar
1958 The Blue and Brown Books. Blackwell.Google Scholar
1969 über Gewissheit/On certainty. Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wunderlich, D.
1976 Studien zur Sprechakttheorie. Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Zaefferer, D.
2001 Deconstructing a classical classification: a typological look at Searle’s concept of illocution type. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 55: 209–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Related articles: Analytical philosophy, Artificial intelligence, John L. Austin, émile Benveniste, Clinical pragmatics, Conversational implicature, Conversational logic, Indeterminacy and negotiation, Intentionality, Philosophy of language, Truthfulness