Article published in:
Transfer Effects in Multilingual Language Development
Edited by Hagen Peukert
[Hamburg Studies on Linguistic Diversity 4] 2015
► pp. 53–86

Segmental targets versus lexical interference

Production of second-language targets on first exposure and the result of minimal training

| University of Calgary
| University of Calgary
This chapter reports on a study of Anglophone adults exposed to German for the first time. Production data are examined and compared to the stimuli participants were exposed to. Data provide clear evidence of lexical influences on speech behaviour; L1 words interfere in production and provide a context for sub-lexical contextual effects at the syllabic and foot level, as well as at the segmental level. We discuss vowels and /r/-sounds in particular. Our data are consistent with claims that speech perception involves a dynamic interaction between objective properties of the speech signal, the structure of the L1 lexicon, and the L1 phonetics-phonology interface. Crucially, we show that on first exposure, learners are already sensitive to L2 sounds not part of the L1. This will serve as a basis for learning novel phones, but lexical competition clearly constrains the learning process.
Keywords: first exposure learners, phonological features, rhotics, syllable positions, transfer
Published online: 29 April 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/hsld.4.03car
References
Best, C.T. & Strange, W
1992 Effects of language-specific phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics 20: 305-30.Google Scholar
Best, C.T., Traill, A., Carter, A., Harrison, K.D. & Faber, A
2003 !Xóõ click perception in English, Isizulu and Sesotho listeners. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, M.J. Solé, D. Recasens & J. Romero (eds), 853-56. Barcelona: Causal Productions.Google Scholar
Best, C.T., & Tyler, M.D
2007 Non-native and second-language speech perception. Commonalities and complementarities. In Second Language Speech Learning: The Role of Language Experience in Speech Perception and Production [Language Learning & Language Teaching 17], M.J. Munro & O.-S. Bohn (eds), 13-34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A.R., Pisoni, D.B., Akahane-Yamada, R.A. & Tohkura, Y
1997 Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101(4): 2299-2310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brent, M.R., & Cartwright, T.A
1996a Distributional regularity and lexical access. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 26: 363-375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brent, M.R. & Cartwright, T.A
1996b Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation. Cognition 61: 93-125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S.E
2012 Segmentation on first exposure to an L2: Evidence for knowledge-driven, top-down processing. In Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 13], K. Braunmüller, C. Gabriel & B. Hänel-Faulhaber (eds), 23-45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Processing ‘words’ in early-stage SLA: A comparison of first exposure and low proficiency learners. In Input Processing in Second Language Acquisition, Z.H. Han & R. Rast (eds). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Chambers, J.K
1975 Canadian raising. In Canadian English. Origins and Structures, J.K. Chambers, 83-100. Toronto: Methuen.Google Scholar
1989 Canadian raising: Blocking, fronting, etc. American Speech 64(1): 75-88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, K.E., Onishi, K.H. & Fisher, C
2003 Infants learn phonotactic regularities from brief auditory experience. Cognition 87: B69-B77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cholin, J., Schiller, N.O. & Levelt, W.J.M
2004 The preparation of syllables in speech production. Journal of Memory & Language 50(1): 47-61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, L., & Steele, J
2007 Acquiring /ʁ/ in context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29: 381-406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Caramazza, A. & Sebastian-Galles, N
2000 The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26(5): 1283-96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, S
2002 Representational Richness in Phonological Development. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
2009 Twelve-month-olds learn word-object associations differing only in stress patterns. Journal of Child Language 36: 1157-1165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, S., Mintz, T.H. & Christiansen, M.H
2005 Stress changes the representational landscape: Evidence from word segmentation. Cognition 96: 233-62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A
2012 Native listening. Language Experience and the Recognition of Spoken Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. & Norris, D.G
1988 The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14: 113-21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, K.J., Silbert, N.H. & Park, H
2009 Generalisation across segments in second language consonant identification. Language Learning 59(1): 1-31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, A., Grainger, J. & van Heuven, W.J.B
1999 Recognizing cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory & Language 41: 496-518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastián-Gallés, N. & Mehler, J
1997 A destressing 'deafness' in French? Journal of Memory & Language 36: 406-21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, P
2004 Grundriß der Deutschen Grammatik. Das Wort, 2nd edn. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Escudero, P
2005 Linguistic Perception and Second Language Acquisition: Explaining the Attainment of Optimal Phonological Categorisation. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.
2006 Second language phonology: The role of perception. In Phonology in Context, M.C. Pennington (ed.), 109-34. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Finn, A. & Hudson Kam, C.L
2008 The curse of knowledge: First language knowledge impairs adult learners' use of novel statistics for word segmentation. Cognition 108: 477-99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J.E
2003 Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production: Differences and Similarities, N.O. Schiller & A.S. Meyer (eds), 319-55. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J.E., Frieda, W.M. & Nozawa, T
1997 Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics 25: 169-86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J.E., Munro, M.J. & MacKay, I.R.A
1995 Effects of age of second language learning on the production of English consonants. Speech Communication 16: 1-26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J.E. & Wang, C
1989 Native-language phonotactic constraints affect how well Chinese subjects perceive the word-final English /t/-/d/ contrast. Journal of Phonetics 17: 299-315.Google Scholar
Flege, J.E., Yeni-Komshian, G.H. & Liu, S
1999 Age constraints on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory & Language 41: 78-104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friel, B.M. & Kennison, S.M
2001 Identifying German-English cognates, false cognates, and non-cognates: Methodological issues and descriptive norms. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4: 249-74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldrick, M. & Larson, M
2008 Phonotactic probability influences speech production. Cognition 107: 1155-64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guion, S., Flege, J.E. & Loftin, J.D
2000 The effect of L1 use on pronunciation in Quichua- Spanish bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics 28: 27-42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, M., Roberts, L., Dimroth, C., Veroude, K., & Indefrey, P
2010 Adult language learning after minimal exposure to an unknown natural language. Language Learning 60(Suppl. 2): 5-24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, M., Roberts, L. & Dimroth, C
2012 What word-level knowledge can adult learners acquire after minimal exposure to a new language? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) 50: 239-76.Google Scholar
Hall, T.A
1993 The phonology of German /R/. Phonology 10(1): 83-105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, S
2009 The learner of a perception grammar as a source of sound change. In Phonology in Perception, P. Boersma & S. Hamann (eds), 111-49. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hohne, E.A. & Jusczyk, P.W
1994 Two-month-old-infants' sensitivity to allophonic differences. Perception & Psychophysics 56: 613-23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P.W
1997 The Discovery of Spoken Language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, P.W., Cutler, A. & Redanz, N
1993 Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns in English. Child Development 64: 675-87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P.W., Luce, P.A. & Charles-Luce, J
1994 Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory & Language 35(5): 630-645. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, K
2010 German. In Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A Guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet, I. Maddieson & M. Barry (eds), 86-89. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M
1999 Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In The Neurocognition of Language, C.M. Brown & P. Hagoort (eds), 83-122. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Li, P
1996 Spoken word recognition of code-switched words by Chinese-English bilinguals. Journal of Memory & Language 35: 757-74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lisker, L. & Abramson, A.S
1967 Some effects of context on voice onset time in English stops. Language & Speech 10: 1-28.Google Scholar
Luce, P.A., Pisoni, D.B. & Goldinger, S.D
1990 Similarity neighbourhoods of spoken words. In Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives, G.T.M. Altmann (ed.), 122-47. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mattys, S.L. & Jusczyk, P.W
2001a Do infants segment words or recurring contiguous patterns? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 27(3): 644-55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001b Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants. Cognition 78: 91-121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mattys, S.L., Jusczyk, P.W., Luce, P.A., & Morgan, J.L
1999 Phonotactic and prosodic effects on word segmentation in infants. Cognitive Psychology 38(4): 465-94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mattys, S.L., White, L. & Melhorn, J.F
2005 Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: A hierarchical framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134(4): 477-500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McQueen, J.M
1998 Segmentation of continuous speech using phonotactics. Journal of Memory & Language 39: 21-46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moreton, E. & Thomas, E.R
2007 Origins of Canadian raising in voiceless-coda effects: A case study in phonologization. In Laboratory Phonology IX, J. Cole & J.I. Hualde (eds), 37-64. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S. & Dupoux, E
2002 A typological study of stress 'deafness'. In Laboratory Phonology VII, C. Gussenhoven & N. Warner (eds), 203-240. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piske, T
2007 Implications of James E. Flege's research for the foreign language classroom. In Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege [Language Learning & Language Teaching 17], M.J. Munro & O.-S. Bohn (eds), 301-314. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I., & Flege, J.E
2001 Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics 29: 181-215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piske, T., Flege, J.E., MacKay, I.R.A., & Meador, D
2002 The production of English vowels by fluent early and late Italian-English bilinguals. Phonetica 59: 49-71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pisoni, D.R., & Lively, S.E
1995 Variability and invariance in speech perception. A new look at some old problems in perceptual learning. In Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Cross-language Speech Research, W. Strange (ed.), 433-59. Timonium MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Polka, L
1992 Characterizing the influence of native experience on adult speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics 52: 37-52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rast, R
2008 Foreign Language Input: Initial Processing. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
2010 The role of linguistic input in the first hours of adult language learning. Language Learning 60 (Suppl.2): 64-84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rast, R. & Dommergues, J.-Y
2003 Towards a characterisation of saliency on first exposure to a second language. EUROSLA Yearbook 3: 131-56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, E., & Rast, R
2013 Extracting words from the speech stream at first exposure. Second Language Research 29(2): 165-83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tench, P
2003 Non-native speakers' misperception of English vowels and consonants: Evidence from Korean adults in UK. International Rreview of Applied Linguistics in Teaching (IRAL) 41: 145-73.Google Scholar
Tremblay, A
2008 Is L2 lexical access prosodically constrained? On the processing of word stress by French Canadian L2 learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics 29: 553-84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vitevitch, M.S. & Luce, P.A
1999 Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language 40: 374-408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weber, A. & Cutler, A
2006 First-language phonotactics in second language listening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119: 597-607. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J.F. & Tees, R.C
1984 Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual re- organisation during the first year of life. Infant Behavior & Development 7: 49-63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wright, R
2004 A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. In Phonetically based Phonology, B. Hayes, R. Kirchner & D. Steriade (eds), 34-57. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Carroll, Susanne E. & Angela George
2018. What absolute beginners learn from input. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 2:2 ► pp. 112 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.