Article published in:
Information Design Journal
Vol. 25:3 (2019) ► pp. 265277


Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., & Angel, S.
(1977) A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Behavioural Insights Team
(2019a) Best practice guide Improving consumer understanding of contractual terms and privacy policies: Evidence-based actions for businesses. London. https://​www​.gov​.uk​/government​/publications​/contractual​-terms​-andprivacy​-policies​-how​-to​-improve​-consumer​-understanding
(2019b) Improving consumer comprehension of online contractual terms and privacy policies: Technical report. London. https://​www​.gov​.uk​/government​/publications​/contractual​-terms​-andprivacy​-policies​-how​-to​-improve​-consumer​-understanding
Bertin, J.
(1981) Graphics and graphic information processing. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burke, C., Kindel, E., & Walker, S.
(Eds.) (2013) Isotype: Design and contexts 1925–1971. London: Hyphen Press.Google Scholar
Gesellschaft und Wirtschaft
(1930) Leipzig. Bibliographisches Institut.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H.
(1960) Art and illusion. London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Kinross, R.
(1979) Otto Neurath’s contribution to visual communication (1925–45): The history, graphic language and theory of Isotype. MPhil thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
(2013) The graphic formation of Isotype 1925–1940. In C. Burke, E. Kindel, & S. Walker (Eds.), Isotype: Design and contexts 1925–1971 (pp. 107–185). London: Hyphen Press.Google Scholar
Kolers, P. A., Wrolstad, M. E., & Bouma, H.
(Eds.) (1979) Processing of visible language, Volume 1. New York: Plenum Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Eds.) (1980) Processing of visible language, Volume 2. New York: Plenum Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liiv, I.
(2010) Seriation and matrix reordering methods: An historical overview. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining, 3(2), 70–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald-Ross, M.
(1977a) How numbers are shown: A review of research on the presentation of quantitative data in texts. AV Communication Review, 25(4), 359–409.Google Scholar
(1977b) Graphics in texts. Review of Educational Research, 5(1), 49–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1978) Language in texts. Review of Educational Research, 6(1), 229–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald-Ross, M., & Smith, E.
(1977) Graphics in text: A bibliography, IET Monograph 6. Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Macdonald-Ross, M., & Waller, R.
(1975) Criticism, alternatives and tests: A conceptual framework for improving typography. Programmed Learning & Educational Technology, 12(2), 75–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1976) The transformer. The Penrose Annual, 69, 141–145.Google Scholar
(2000) The transformer revisited. Information Design Journal, 9(2), 177–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neurath, O.
(1944) Visual aids and arguing. The New Era in Home and School, 25(3), 51–61.Google Scholar
(2010) From hieroglyphics to Isotype: A visual autobiography. (M. Eve & C. Burke, Eds.). London: Hyphen Press.Google Scholar
Neurath, M., & Kinross, R.
(2008) The transformer: Principles of making Isotype charts. London: Hyphen Press.Google Scholar
Schön, D.
(1983) The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
Stiff, P.
(1997) Strategies for telling truths (review of Edward Tufte’s Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative). Eye, 25(7).Google Scholar
Vernon, M. D.
(1946) Learning from graphical material. British Journal of Psychology, 36, 145–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1953) Presenting information in diagrams. AV Communication Review, 1(3), 147–158.Google Scholar
(1962) The psychology of perception. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Waller, R.
(1979) Functional information design: Research and practice. Information Design Journal, 1(1), 43–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waller, R., Waller, J., Haapio, H., Crag, G., & Morrisseau, S.
(2016) Cooperation through clarity: Designing simplified contracts. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 2(1–2), 48–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar