Article published In:
Information Design JournalVol. 3:1 (1981) ► pp.51–58
Information mapping
A critique
The Information Mapping system of structured writing is described and reviewed. Various difficulties in accepting the system are listed and solutions suggested. Problems of evaluating the system are noted and further research questions posed. In conclusion, Information Mapping is seen as a valuable and powerful format.
Cited by
Cited by 7 other publications
HENDRY, D. G.
1995. Breakdowns in writing intentions when simultaneously deploying SGML-marked texts in hard copy and electronic copy. Behaviour & Information Technology 14:2 ► pp. 80 ff. 
Horn, Robert E.
1992. Opinion: Clarifying Two Controversies About Information Mapping's Method. Educational and Training Technology International 29:2 ► pp. 109 ff.
Jansen, C.
2002. Proceedings. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, ► pp. 307 ff.
Kools, Marieke, Robert A.C. Ruiter, Margaretha W.J. van de Wiel & Gerjo Kok
2008. The effects of headings in information mapping on search speed and evaluation of a brief health education text. Journal of Information Science 34:6 ► pp. 833 ff.
McLeod, P. J.
1991. How to produce instructional text for a medical audience. Medical Teacher 13:2 ► pp. 135 ff.
Screven, C. G.
1984. Educational Evaluation and Research in Museums and Public Exhibits: A Bibliography. Curator: The Museum Journal 27:2 ► pp. 147 ff.
WRIGHT, PATRICIA
1985. Editing: Policies and Processes. In Designing Usable Texts, ► pp. 63 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.