Cover not available
Part of
Studies on Variation in Portuguese
Edited by Pilar P. Barbosa, Maria da Conceição de Paiva and Celeste Rodrigues
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 14] 2017
► pp. 177–198

Chapter 7
Conditions on variation in pre-nominal possessives in European Portuguese

| University of Porto, Portugal

Developing previous studies by Brito (2001, 2007), Castro and Costa (2002, 2003), Castro (2005), Miguel (2002a, 2002b, 2002c, 2004), this paper argues that there is a continuum of variation regarding the syntax of pre-nominal possessives in European Portuguese. There is a dominant, standard grammar, in which pre-nominal possessives occupy the spec of a high functional category in the DP (AgrP or PossP); in general they are used with definite articles and are [−degree]. Furthermore, there is a non-dominant grammar, where pre-nominal possessives are almost clitics to the definite article and can be phonetically reduced. In some written and formal registers pre-nominal possessives may occur immediately after indefinites and may even have the feature [+degree]. This paper argues that this is due to several linguistic conditions: in particular, lexical and semantic conditions. We also argue that the common property of possessives is that they are φP. Our paper also shows that the co-occurrence or non co-occurrence of the possessive with the definite article is not due to the different category of the possessive (contrary to Giorgi & Longobardi 1991 Parameter) but to the presence or absence of the definite article itself, a proposal already made in different ways by Brito (2007), Castro (2005) and Rinke (2010).

Keywords: pre-nominal possessives, variation, Possessive Parameter, relational nouns, DP structure
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Pre-nominal possessives: Determiners or adjectives?
  • 3.Strong, weak and clitic possessives?
  • 4.Pre-nominal possessives and the definite / indefinite article
  • 5.The structure
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.14.07bri
References

References

Abney, S. P.
(1987) The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
Barker, C.
(2011) Possessives and relational nouns. In C. von Maienborn, K. Heusinger & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, (pp. 1109–30). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brito, A.
(2001) Presença/ausência de artigo antes de possessivo no Português do Brasil. In C. N. Correia, & A. Gonçalves (Eds.), Actas do XVI Encontro da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, (pp. 551–575). Lisboa: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística; Colibri.Google Scholar
(2007) European Portuguese possessives and the structure of DP. Cuadernos de Lingüistica 14, 27–50.Google Scholar
Brito, A., & Lopes, R. E. V.
(2016) The structure of DPs. In W. L. Wetzels, S. Menuzzi, & J. Costa (Eds.), The handbook of Portuguese linguistics (pp. 254–274). Malden, MA: John Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, A.
(2016) Sui limiti dei pronomi clitici: Inventario ed estrazione. In A. Ledgeway, M. Cennamo, & G. Mensching (Eds.), Actes du XXVII Congrès International de linguistique et de philologie romanes (Nancy, 15–20 juillet 2013). Section 4: Syntaxe (pp. 49–62). Nancy: ATILF.Google Scholar
(1998) On the deficient/strong position in possessive systems. In A. Alexiadou & C. Wilder (Eds.), Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase, (pp. 17–53). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) Pronouns in Germanic and Romance languages. In H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe (pp. 33–82). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, A., & Starke, M.
(1994 [1999]) The typology of structural deficiency: on the three grammatical classes. In H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe (pp. 145–233). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Carrilho, E., & Pereira, S.
(2009) On the areal distribution of non-standard syntactic constructions in European Portuguese. Paper presented at the VIt Congress of Dialectology and Geolinguistics. University of Maribor, Slovenia, September.
Castro, A.
(2001) Os possessivos em Português Europeu e Português Brasileiro. Unidade e diversidade. In C. N. Correia, & A. Gonçalves (Eds.), Actas do XVI Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística (pp. 599–613). Lisboa: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística; Colibri.Google Scholar
(2005) Possessives in European Portuguese (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidade Nova de Lisboa and Paris VIII, Saint Denis, France.
Castro, A., & Costa, J.
(2002) Possessivos e advérbios: Formas fracas como Xº. In A. Gonçalves, & A. C. Correia (Eds.), Actas do XVII Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística (pp. 101–111). Lisboa: Associação Portuguesa de Linguistica; Colibri.Google Scholar
(2003) Weak forms as Xº: Prenominal possessives and preverbal adverbs in Portuguese. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux & Y. Roberge, (Eds.), Romance linguistics: Theory and acquisition, (pp. 95–110). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coene, M., & d’Hulst, Y.
(2003) Introduction: The syntax and semantics of noun phrases. Theoretical background. In M. Coene & Y. d’Hulst, (Eds.), From NP to DP, Volume I: The syntax and semantics of noun phrases, (pp. 1–33). Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Déchaine, R. M., & Wiltschko, M.
(2003) On pro-nouns and other pronouns. In M. Coene & Y. D’Hulst (Eds.), From NP to DP, Volume 1: The syntax and semantics of noun phrases (pp. 71–89). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franchi, C.
(1996) Anotações (Unpublished paper).Google Scholar
Giorgi, A., & Longobardi, G.
(1991) The syntax of noun phrases. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kayne, R.
(1975) French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1994) The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kroch, A.
(1989) Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change, 1, 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D.
(1999) The development of language: Acquisition, change and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Magalhães, T. V.
(2011) O uso de artigo definido diante de pronome possessivo em textos portugueses do século XVI a XIX, Leitura, 47, 123–143.Google Scholar
Marcotulio, L. L.
(2012) Vossa Mercê bem sabe de onde viestes: Um caso de gramaticalização na história do Português. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
Mattos e Silva, R. V.
(1989) Estruturas trecentistas: Elementos para uma gramática do Português Arcaico. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional; Casa da Moeda.Google Scholar
Miguel, M.
(2002a) Para uma tipologia dos possessivos. In A. Gonçaves, & A. C. Correia (Eds.), Actas do XVII Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística (pp. 287–299). Lisboa: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística; Colibri.Google Scholar
(2002b) O estatuto categorial dos possessivos: Possessivos e adjectivos. In Duarte, I. M. et al. (Eds.), Actas do Encontro Comemorativo dos 25 anos do Centro de Linguística da Universidade do Porto (Vol. 2, pp. 191–202). Porto: CLUP.Google Scholar
(2002c) Possessive pronouns in European Portuguese and Old French. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 2, 214–240.Google Scholar
(2004) O sintagma nominal em Português Europeu: Posições de Sujeito. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa.Google Scholar
Neves, H. M.
(1993) Possessivos. In A. T. Castilho, (Ed.), Gramática do Português falado, Vol. III: As Abordagens (pp.149–211). Campinas: FAPESP; Ed. da Unicamp.Google Scholar
Oliveira e Silva, G.
(1982) Estudo da regularidade na variação dos possessivos no Português do Rio de Janeiro. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Postal, P.
(1969) On the so-called “pronouns” in English. In D. Reidel & S. Schane (Eds.), Modern studies in English (pp.201–224). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Raposo, E. P.
(1973) Sobre a forma o em Português. Boletim de Filologia, 22, 361–415.Google Scholar
Rinke, E.
(2010) A combinação de artigo definido e pronome possessivo na história do português. Estudos de Lingüistica Galega, 2, 121–139.Google Scholar
Ritter, E.
(1991) Two functional categories in modern Hebrew noun phrases. Syntax and Semantics, 25, 37–60.Google Scholar
Schoorlemmer, M.
(1998) Possessors, articles and definiteness. In A. Alexiadou & C. Wilder (Eds.), Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase (pp. 55–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva, G., & Callou, D.
(1996) O uso do artigo definido diante de possessivo. In I. Duarte & I. Leiria (Eds.), Congresso Internacional sobre o Português, II (pp. 115–125). Lisboa: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística; Colibri.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, A.
(1987) Functional categories in the noun phrase. In I. Kenesei (Ed.), Approaches to Hungarian, (Vol. 2, pp.167–189). Szeged: JATE.Google Scholar