Cover not available
Part of
Advancedness in Second Language Spanish: Definitions, challenges, and possibilities
Edited by Mandy R. Menke and Paul A. Malovrh
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 31] 2021
► pp. 397–416

Chapter 17
The effects of study abroad on interlanguage development

A concept-oriented analysis of advanced Spanish majors’ direct object expression

ORCID logo | University of South Carolina
| Texas Tech University
The present study provides a concept-oriented analysis of direct object expression among advanced-level learners in classroom-only versus classroom+study abroad contexts. In doing so, it compares linguistic analysis at a morphological stage of development in different learning contexts using quantitative analysis across three levels of study abroad exposure. Results show that, while all learners are considered institutionally advanced, only those with the greatest level of study abroad exposure show evidence of morphological analysis and multifunctionality of forms in oral production. Such findings highlight limitations of traditional definitions of advanced performance by identifying specific individual differences based on learning context, and also challenge the pedagogical expectations of L2 learners reaching a morphological stage of linguistic analysis through classroom exposure alone.
Keywords: advanced L2 Spanish, object pronouns, concept-oriented approach, study abroad, morphological development
Article outline
  • Background
    • The L2 acquisition of object pronouns in Spanish
    • Stages of acquisition
    • The effects of study abroad
  • The present study
    • Approach
    • Research questions
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Procedure
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 8 February 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.31.17mal
References (48)
References
Andersen, R. (1983). Transfer to somewhere. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 177–201). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1984). Second language: A crosslinguistic perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1990). Models, processes, principles and strategies: Second language acquisition inside and outside the classroom. In B. VanPatten & J. F. Lee (Eds.), Second language acquisition-foreign language learning (pp. 45–78). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2004). The emergence of grammaticalized future expression in longitudinal production data. In M. Overstreet, S. Rott, B. VanPatten, & J. Williams (Eds.), Form and meaning in second language acquisition (pp. 115–137). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2007). One functional approach to SLA: The concept-oriented approach. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 57–76). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2015). One functional approach to SLA: The concept-oriented approach. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 54–74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2018). Concept-oriented analysis: A reflection on one approach to studying interlanguage development. In A. Gudmestad & A. Edmonds (Eds.), Critical reflections on data in second language acquisition (pp. 171–195). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruhn-Garavito, J., & Montrul, S. (1996). Verb-movement and clitic placement in French and Spanish as a second language. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes, & Z. Zukowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 123–134). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Czerwionka, L., & Cuza, A. (2017). A pragmatic analysis of L2 Spanish requests: Acquisition in three situational contexts during short-term study abroad. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14, 391–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collentine, J. G. (2004). The effects of learning contexts on morphosyntactic and lexical development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 227–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Campos, M. (2004). Context of learning in the acquisition of Spanish second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 249–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C., & Hasler-Barker, M. (2015). Complimenting in Spanish in a short-term study abroad context. System, 48, 75–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franceschina, F. (2001). Morphological or syntactic deficits in near-native speakers? An assessment of some current proposals. Second Language Research, 17, 213–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K., García-Amaya, L., Hasler-Barker, M., Henriksen, N., & Killam, J. (2010). The development of variation in clitic pronouns among Spanish L2 learners in an abroad immersion program. In C. Borgonovo, M. Español-Echevarría, & P. Prévost (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the Linguistics Symposium (pp. 246–259). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Gunterman, G. (1992). An analysis of interlanguage development over time: Part II, ser and estar. Hispania, 75, 1294–1303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ife, A., Boix, G. V., & Meara, P. (2000). The impact of study abroad on the vocabulary development of different proficiency groups. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 4, 55–84.Google Scholar
Isabelli, C. (2004). The acquisition of Null Subject Parameter properties in SLA: Some effects of positive evidence in a natural learning context. Hispania, 87, 150–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Isabelli, C., & Nishida, C. (2005). Development of Spanish subjunctive in a nine-month study-abroad setting. In D. Eddington, Selected proceedings of the 6th conference on the acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as first and second languages (pp.78–91). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Kanwit, M. (2017). What we gain by combining variationist and concept-oriented approaches: The case of acquiring Spanish future-time expression. Language Learning, 67, 461–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanwit, M., & Solon, M. (2013). Acquiring variation in future-time expression abroad in Valencia, Spain and Mérida, Mexico. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, G. Lord, A. de Prada Pérez, & J. E. Aaron (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 16th Hispanic linguistics symposium (pp. 206–221). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Kanwit, M., Geeslin, K. L., & Fafulas, S. (2015). Study abroad and the SLA of variable structures: A look at the present perfect, the copula contrast, and the present progressive in Mexico and Spain. Probus, 27, 307–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanwit, M., Elias, V., & Clay, R. (2018). Acquiring intensifier variation abroad: Exploring muy and bien in Spain and Mexico. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 455–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klee, C. A. (1989). The acquisition of clitic pronouns in the Spanish interlanguage of Peruvian Quechua speakers. Hispania, 72, 402–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lafford, B. (1995). Getting into, through and out of a survival situation: A comparison of communication strategies used by students studying Spanish abroad and “at home.” In B. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 97–121). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). The effects of study abroad vs. classroom contexts on Spanish SLA: Old assumptions, new insights and future research directions. In C. Klee & T. Face (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 7th conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as first and second languages (pp. 1–25). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Liceras, J. (1985). The value of clitics in non-native Spanish. Second Language Research, 1, 151–86.Google Scholar
Liceras, J., Maxwell, D., Laguardia, B., Fernández, Z., Fernández, R., & Díaz, L. (1997). A longitudinal study of Spanish non-native grammars: Beyond parameters. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux & W. R. Glass (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish, Vol. 1: Developing grammars (pp. 99–132). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Linford, B., Zahler, S., & Whatley, M. (2018). Acquisition, study abroad and individual differences: The case of subject pronoun variation in L2 Spanish. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education, 3, 243–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malovrh, P. A. (2007). La tortilla rag. Retrieved from <[URL]> (13 July, 2020).
Malovrh, P. A. (2014). Variability and Systematicity in Interlanguage Development: An Analysis of Mode and its Effect on L2 Spanish Morphology. Studies in Hispanic & Lusophone Linguistics, 7(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malovrh, P. A., & Lee, J. F. (2013). The developmental dimension in instructed second language learning: The L2 acquisition of object pronouns in Spanish. London, UK: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
McCarthy, C. (2008). Morphological variability in the comprehension of agreement: An argument for representation over computation. Second Language Research, 24, 459–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortiz-López, L. A., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2009). Interfaz sintáctica-semántica en los objetos directos: El español y el criollo haitiano [The syntactic-semantic interface in direct objects: Spanish and Haitian Criolle]. In J. Collentine, M. García, B. Lafford, & M. Marín (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 11th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 268–281). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Ryan, J., & Lafford, B. (1992). The acquisition of lexical meaning in a study abroad environment: Ser and estar and the Granada experience. Hispania, 74, 714–722. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salgado-Robles, F. (2014). Variación dialectal por aprendientes de español en un contexto de inmersión en el extranjero: Un análisis cuantitativo del uso leísta en el discurso oral y escrito. Lenguas Modernas, 43, 97–112.Google Scholar
Sánchez, L., & Al-Kasey, T. (1999). L2 acquisition of Spanish direct objects. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 3, 1–32.Google Scholar
Schwenter, S. A., & Torres Cacoullos, R. (2008). Defaults and indeterminacy in temporal grammaticalization: The ‘perfect’ road to perfective. Language Variation and Change, 20, 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. (2004). Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 173–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1994). Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simões, A. (1996). Phonetics in second language acquisition: an acoustic study of fluency in adult learners of Spanish. Hispania, 79, 87–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torres, J. P. (2003). A cognitive approach to the acquisition of clitics in l2 Spanish: Insights from study abroad and classroom learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Van Patten, B. (1990). The acquisition of clitic pronouns in Spanish: Two case studies. In B. Van Patten & J. F. Lee (Eds.) Second language acquisition-foreign language learning (pp. 118–139). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Zyzik, E. (2004). Encoding meaning with polyfunctional forms: The acquisition of clitics in L2 Spanish (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California Davis, Davis, CA.Google Scholar
(2006). Learners’ overgeneralization of dative clitics to accusative contexts: Evidence for prototype effects in SLA. In C. Klee & T. Face (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 7th conference on the acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as first and second languages (pp. 122–134). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
(2008). Null objects in second language acquisition: Grammatical versus performance models. Second Language Research, 24, 65–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar