Part of
New Perspectives on the Study of Ser and Estar
Edited by Isabel Pérez-Jiménez, Manuel Leonetti and Silvia Gumiel-Molina
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 5] 2015
► pp. 120
References
Arche, M.J
(2012) On the aspectuality of the Individual-Level/Stage-Level dichotomy. Borealis, 1(2), 109–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Individuals in time: Tense, aspect and the individual/stage distinction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D
(1947) Still more on ser and estar . Hispania, 30, 361–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brucart, J.M
(2012) Copular alternations in Spanish and Catalan attributive sentences. Linguística: Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto, 7, 9–43.Google Scholar
(2010) La alternancia ser y estar y las construcciones atributivas de localización. In A. Avellana (Ed.), Actas del V Encuentro de Gramática Generativa (pp. 115–152). Neuquén, Argentina: Editorial Universitaria del Comahue.Google Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J., & Valenzuela, E
(2008) Eventive and stative passives in Spanish L2 acquisition: A matter of aspect. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(3), 323–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camacho, J
(2012)  Ser and estar: Individual/stage level predicates or aspect? In J.I. Hualde, A. Olarrea & E. O’Rourke (Eds.), The handbook of hispanic linguistics (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics) (pp. 453–476). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, G
(1977) Reference to kinds in English (Doctoral Dissertation). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Clements, J.C
(1988) The semantics and pragmatics of Spanish <COPULA+ADJECTIVE> construction. Linguistics, 26, 779–822. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crespo, L
(1946) Los verbos ser y estar explicados por un nativo. Hispania, 29, 45–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demonte, V
(1979) Semántica y sintaxis de las construcciones con ser y estar . Revista española de lingüística, 9, 133–171.Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, M.V
(2015) Evidentiality effects and the ser/estar distinction. Journal of Pragmatics (submitted).Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, M.V., & Leonetti, M
(2011) On the rigidity of procedural meaning. In M.V. Escandell-Vidal, M. Leonetti & A. Ahern (Eds.), Procedural meaning (pp. 81–102). Bingley, England: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) Coercion and the stage/individual distinction. In J. Gutierrez-Rexach (Ed.), From words to discourse: Trends in Spanish semantics and pragmatics (pp. 159–179). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Fábregas, A
(2014) On the locative reading of dimensional adjectives and the internal syntax of estar. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 7(1), 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) A guide to IL and SL in Spanish: Properties, problems and proposals. Borealis. An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 1(2), 1–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Falk, J
(1979) Visión de norma general vs. norma individual. Ensayo de explicación de la oposición ser/estar en unión con adjetivos que denotan belleza y corpulencia. Studia Neophilologica, 51, 275–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández Leborans, M.J
(1999) La predicación: las oraciones copulativas. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Dir.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 2357–2460). Madrid, Spain: RAE/Espasa.Google Scholar
(1995) Las construcciones con el verbo estar: aspectos sintácticos y semánticos. Verba, 22, 253–284.Google Scholar
Franco, F., & Steinmetz, D
(1986) Taming ser and estar with predicate adjectives. Hispania, 69, 379–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1983)  Ser y estar+adjetivo calificativo en español. Hispania, 66, 176–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Á., & Uriagereka, J
(2011) The lexical syntax of ser and estar (Unpublished manuscript). Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
(2009)  Estar=Ser+P. Paper presented at the XIX Colloquium on Generative Grammar. Universidad del País Vasco, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain: April 1–3, 2009.
Geist, L
(2006) Copular sentences in Russian vs Spanish at the syntax-semantics interface. In C. Ebert & C. Endriss (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 10. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 44, 99–110.Google Scholar
Gumiel-Molina, S., Moreno-Quibén, N., & Pérez-Jiménez, I
(2015) Comparison classes and the relative/absolute distinction: A degree-based compositional account of the ser/estar alternation in Spanish. To appear in B. Gehrke & E. Castroviejo (Eds.), Degree and manner modification across categories, special volume of Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumiel-Molina, S., & Pérez-Jiménez, I
(2012) Aspectual composition in <ser/estar+adjective> structures: Adjectival scalarity and verbal aspect in copular constructions. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 33–62. Retrieved from [URL] DOI: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lema, J., M. Saltarelli & M.L. Zubizarreta. (
1996) Aspectual parametric effects in Spanish. In C. Parodi, C. Quicoli, (Eds.), Aspects of Romance linguistics (pp. 279–292). Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Leonetti, M
(1994)  Ser y estar: estado de la cuestión. Barataria, 1, 182–205.Google Scholar
Luján, M
(1981) The Spanish copulas as aspectual indicators. Lingua, 54, 165–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maienborn, C
(2005) A discourse-based account of Spanish ser/estar . Linguistics, 43(1), 155–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marín, R
(2010) Spanish adjectives within bounds. In P. Cabredo-Hofherr & O. Matushansky (Eds.), Adjectives: Formal analyses in syntax and semantics (pp. 307–332). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Entre ser y estar. Madrid, Spain: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
McNally, L
(1994) Adjunct predicates and the individual/stage distinction. In E. Duncan, D. Farkas & P. Spaelti (Eds.), The Proceedings of the Twelfth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 561–576). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Porroche, M
(1990) Aspectos de la atribución en español. Zaragoza, Spain: Pórtico.Google Scholar
(1988) Ser, estar y verbos de cambio. Madrid, Spain: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
RAE-ASALE
(2009) Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid, Spain: RAE/Espasa.Google Scholar
Raposo, E., & Uriagereka, J
(1995) Two types of small clauses (toward a syntax of theme/rheme relations). In A. Cardinaletti & M.T. Guasti (Eds.), Small clauses (pp. 179–206). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Roby, D.B
(2009) Aspect and the categorization of states: The case of ser and estar in Spanish. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roldán, M
(1974) Toward a semantic characterization of ser and estar . Hispania, 57, 68–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romero, J
(2009) El sujeto en las construcciones copulativas. Verba, 36, 195–214.Google Scholar
Roy, I
(2013) Non-verbal predication. Copular sentences at the syntax-semantics interface. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silvagni, F
(2013) ¿Ser o estar? Un modelo didáctico. Madrid, Spain: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Zagona, K
(2012)  Ser and estar: Phrase structure and aspect. In C. Nishida & C. Russi (Eds.), Building a bridge between linguistic communities of the Old and the New World, Cahiers Chronos 25 (pp. 303–327). Amsterdam, The Netherlands and New York, NY: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Fábregas, Antonio, Rafael Marín & Sílvia Perpiñán
2023. Events always take (place with) ser . Linguistics 61:3  pp. 679 ff. DOI logo
Guijarro-Fuentes, Pedro, José Amenós-Pons & Aoife Ahern
Requena, Pablo E & Melisa Dracos
2021. Spanish copula selection with adjectives in school-aged bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism 25:3  pp. 548 ff. DOI logo
Wilson, Daniel
2023. The case for broader copulas. Spanish in Context 20:2  pp. 389 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.