Corpora for Theory and Practice
Michael Barlow | Rice University
In this paper intuition-based studies of reflexive forms such as myself are contrasted with a corpus-based investigation of actual usage of reflexives. The examination of reflexives in English in several corpora reveals a variety of patterns, which are analysed within a schema-based approach to grammar (Barlow and Kemmer 1994). This approach follows the cognitive/functional tradition of grammatical analysis in viewing all grammatical units as composed of form-meaning pairings. The paper demonstrates that a schema-based approach is well-suited to the task of describing the major and minor patterns of use revealed by corpus analysis. The importance of text analysis in language teaching is highlighted and connections between the schema-based grammatical formalism and data-driven approaches to second language learning (Johns 1991b) are briefly explored.
Keywords: Reflexive, Lexis, Schema, Language Learning
Published online: 01 January 1996
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.1.1.03bar
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.1.1.03bar
Cited by
Cited by 28 other publications
Arizavi, Saleh & Yazdan Choubsaz
2019. To Use or Not to Use the Shorter Forms: A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Apologetic Expressions “Sorry and I’m sorry” in American Spoken English Discourse.
Corpus Pragmatics 3:1 ► pp. 21 ff. 
Beaugrande, Robert de
2001. 'If I were you...': language standards and corpus data in EFL.
Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 1:1 ► pp. 117 ff.
Ben Amor, Olfa & Faiza Derbel
2020. The Identification of English Non-finite Structures Using NooJ Platform.
In Formalizing Natural Languages with NooJ 2019 and Its Natural Language Processing Applications [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1153],
► pp. 27 ff.
Cori, Marcel, Sophie David & Jacqueline Léon
2008. Présentation : éléments de réflexion sur la place des corpus en linguistique.
Langages n° 171:3 ► pp. 5 ff.
Dash, Niladri Sekhar & S. Arulmozi
2018. Utilization of Language Corpora.
In History, Features, and Typology of Language Corpora,
► pp. 241 ff.
Dash, Niladri Sekhar & L. Ramamoorthy
2019. Processing Texts in a Corpus.
In Utility and Application of Language Corpora,
► pp. 73 ff.
Dash, Niladri Sekhar & L. Ramamoorthy
2019. Corpus as a Primary Resource for ELT.
In Utility and Application of Language Corpora,
► pp. 91 ff.
Dash, Niladri Sekhar & L. Ramamoorthy
2019. Corpus as a Secondary Resource for ELT.
In Utility and Application of Language Corpora,
► pp. 105 ff.
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2009. The family of object-related depictives in English and Spanish: towards a usage-based constructionist analysis.
Language Sciences 31:5 ► pp. 663 ff.
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2017. Chapter 5. Exploring inter-constructional relations in the constructicon.
In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58],
► pp. 135 ff.
Huyghe, Richard
2019. Les formes réfléchies du verbe : présentation.
Langages N° 216:4 ► pp. 5 ff.
Johns, Tim F., Lee Hsingchin & Wang Lixun
2008. Integrating corpus-based CALL programs in teaching English through children's literature.
Computer Assisted Language Learning 21:5 ► pp. 483 ff.
Katushemererwe, Fridah, Andrew Caines & Paula Buttery
2021. Building natural language processing tools for Runyakitara.
Applied Linguistics Review 12:4 ► pp. 585 ff.
Menezes, Danielle de Almdeira
2011. Discurso sobre literaturas de língua inglesa: uma análise baseada em ferramentas da linguística de Corpus.
Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada 50:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Montero Perez, Maribel, Hans Paulussen, Lieve Macken & Piet Desmet
2014. From input to output: the potential of parallel corpora for CALL.
Language Resources and Evaluation 48:1 ► pp. 165 ff.
O'Keeffe, Anne
2021. Data-driven learning – a call for a broader research gaze.
Language Teaching 54:2 ► pp. 259 ff.
Parameswarappa, S. & V. N. Narayana
2012. Kannada Word Sense Disambiguation Using Association Rules.
In Global Trends in Information Systems and Software Applications [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 270],
► pp. 47 ff.
Parameswarappa, S., V. N. Narayana & G. N. Bharathi
2012. .
In 2012 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Römer, Ute
2011. Corpus Research Applications in Second Language Teaching.
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31 ► pp. 205 ff.
Shortall, Terry
2007. The L2 syllabus: corpus or contrivance?.
Corpora 2:2 ► pp. 157 ff.
Sun, Yu-Chih
2007. Learner perceptions of a concordancing tool for academic writing.
Computer Assisted Language Learning 20:4 ► pp. 323 ff.
Talai, Touraj & Zahra Fotovatnia
2012. Data-driven Learning: A Student-centered Technique for Language Learning.
Theory and Practice in Language Studies 2:7
Woo, I-hao
2022. Pedagogical issues related to the adverb dou [都] in Mandarin Chinese.
Chinese as a Second Language Research 11:1 ► pp. 61 ff.
Yang, Yu-Fen, Wing-Kwong Wong & Hui-Chin Yeh
2013. Learning to construct English (L2) sentences in a bilingual corpus-based system.
System 41:3 ► pp. 677 ff.
Zhao, Qiurong
2016. Review of Zou, Smith & Hoey (2015): Corpus Linguistics in Chinese Contexts.
Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 7:1 ► pp. 166 ff.
김언조
2015. Lexico-grammar Knowledge Enhancement with Two Movies for University Learners.
STEM Journal 16:3 ► pp. 1 ff.
최승희 & Jo Il Jae
2010. A Corpus-based Instruction on Synonyms in the EFL Classroom: The Case of War, Warfare and Battle.
English Language and Linguistics 16:3 ► pp. 69 ff.
최승희 & 전주영
2011. A Corpus-based Genre Analysis of Curriculum Vitae: Genre Writing Instruction in EFL Contexts.
The New Korean Journal of English Lnaguage & Literature 53:4 ► pp. 289 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.