Review published In:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 19:1 (2014) ► pp.156161
References
Bolinger, D.
1974 “Concept and percept: Two infinitive constructions and their vicissitudes.” In Phonetic Society of Japan (Eds), World Papers in Phonetics: Festschrift for Dr. Onish Kizyu. Tokyo: Phonetic Society of Japan, 65–91.Google Scholar
Gilquin, G. & Gries, S. Th.
2009 “Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5 (1), 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tummers, J., Heylen, K. & Geeraerts, D.
2005 “Usage-based approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: A technical state of the art”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1 (2), 225–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th.
2005 “Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34 (4), 365–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Corpus linguistics, theoretical linguistics, and cognitive/psycholinguistics: Towards more and more fruitful exchanges”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Huber (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics and Variation in English: Theory and Description. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 41–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar