Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 19:2 (2014) ► pp.225–251

The acquisition of formulaic language by EFL learners

A cross-sectional and cross-linguistic perspective

Most of the studies on the use of phraseology by second language learners concentrate on advanced L2 users. Researchers attempt to tease out to what extent learners’ phraseology is different from the native one. There are almost no accounts of formulaic language emerging at the early stages of learning, particularly in foreign language settings. The research reported in this paper attempts to bridge this gap. It is exploratory in nature and investigates the emergence and use of lexical bundles by a range of students learning English in the classroom setting. The data analyzed in the study were drawn from the ICCI corpus and are examined with reference to learners’ ages, stages of proficiency, and L1 backgrounds. The probed essays were written by students in grades 6, 9 and 12 with Chinese, German, Hebrew, Japanese, Polish and Spanish as their L1s.

Keywords: L2 phraseology, learner corpus, lexical bundles, L2 acquisition
Published online: 9 May 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19.2.04len
References
Altenberg, B.
1998 “On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations.” In A. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications . ­Oxford: Oxford University Press, 101–122.Google Scholar
Amosova, N. N.
1963  Osnovi Angliyskoy Frazeologii . Leningrad: University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D. & Barbieri, F.
2007 “Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers”. English for Specific Purposes , 261, 263–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E.
1999  Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English . Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Carlsen, C.
2012 “Proficiency level: A fuzzy variable in computer learner corpora”. Applied Linguistics , 33 (2), 161–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y. H. & Baker, P.
2010 “Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing”. Language Learning & Technology , 14 (2), 30–49.Google Scholar
Conklin, K. & Schmitt, N.
2008 “Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers?”. Applied Linguistics , 29 (1), 72–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowie, A. P.
1998 “Phraseological dictionaries: Some East-West comparisons”. In A. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Application . Oxford: Claredon Press, 209–228.Google Scholar
Davies, M.
2011  N-grams Data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) . Available at: [URL] (accessed February 2013).Google Scholar
2000 “Repetitive phrasal chunkiness and advanced EFL speech and writing”. In C. Mair & M. Hundt (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory . Amsterdam: Rodopi, 51–68.Google Scholar
De Cock, S., Granger, S., Leech, G. & McEnery, T.
1998 “An automated approach to the phrasicon of EFL learners”. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on Computer . London: Longman, 67–79.Google Scholar
Díez-Bedmar, M. B.
2012 “The use of the common European framework of reference for languages to evaluate compositions in the English exam section of the university admission examination”. Revista de Educación , 3571, 55–79.Google Scholar
Dunn, O. J.
1961 “Multiple comparisons among means”. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 561, 52–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
2002a “Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 241, 143–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002b “Reflections on frequency effects in language processing”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 241, 297–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., Simpson-Vlach, R. & Maynard, C.
2008 “Formulaic language in native and second-language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics and TESOL”. TESOL Quarterly , 41 (3), 375–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, B. & Warren, B.
2000 “The idiom principle and the open choice principle”. Text , 201, 29–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, S.
1998 “Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: collocations and formulae.” In A. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications . Oxford: Oxford ­University Press, 145–160.Google Scholar
Granger, S. & Paquot, M.
2008 “Disentangling the phraseological web”. In S. Granger & F. ­Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective . Amsterdam: John ­Benjamins, 27–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N. & Nekrasova, T. M.
2007 “The processing of formulaic sequences by second language speakers”. The Modern Language Journal , 911, 433–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leńko-Szymańska, A.
2008 “Formulaic sequences in apprentice writing: Does more mean better?”. In A. Frankenberg-García (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th Teaching and Language Corpora . Lisbon: ISLA-Lisboa, 207–212.Google Scholar
Nekrasova, T.
2009 “English L1 and L2 speakers’ knowledge of lexical bundles”. Language Learning , 59 (3), 647–686. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nesselhauf, N.
2003 “The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching”. Applied Linguistics , 241, 223–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawley, A. & Syder, F. H.
1983 “Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency”. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication . London: Longman, 191–225.Google Scholar
Pendar, N. & Chapelle, C.
2008 “Investigating the promise of learner corpora: Methodological Issues”. CALICO Journal , 25 (2), 189–206.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Grandage, S. & Adolphs, S.
2004 “Are corpus-derived recurrent clusters psycholinguistically valid?”. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic Sequences . Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 127–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.
1991  Corpus, Concordance, Collocation . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tono, Y., Kawaguchi, Y. & Minegishi, M. (Eds.)
2012  Developmental and Cross-linguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Lancker-Sidtis, D. & Rallon, G.
2004 “Tracking the incidence of formulaic expressions in everyday speech: Methods for classification and verification”. Language & Communication , 241, 207–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vidakovic, I & Barker, F.
2010 “Use of words and multi-word units in Skills for Life Writing examinations”. Cambridge ESOL: Research Notes , 411, 7–14.Google Scholar
Vinogradov, V. V.
1947 “Ob osnovnuikh tipakh frazeologicheskikh edinits v russkom yazuike”. In A. A. Shakhmatov (Ed.), 1864–1920. Sbornik Statey i Materialov . Moscow: Nauka, 339–364.Google Scholar
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Shunji, I. & Hae-Young, K.
1998  Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy and Complexity . Honolulu: University of Hawai’I Press.Google Scholar
Wray, A.
2002  Formulaic Language and the Lexicon . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 18 other publications

B. Silva, Breno
2022. The Importance of General and Academic Vocabulary Learning. In Writing to Learn Academic Words [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bestgen, Yves
2017. Beyond single-word measures: L2 writing assessment, lexical richness and formulaic competence. System 69 ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Bestgen, Yves
2018. Evaluating the frequency threshold for selecting lexical bundles by means of an extension of the Fisher's exact test. Corpora 13:2 ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Alvin Cheng‐Hsien
2019. Assessing Phraseological Development in Word Sequences of Variable Lengths in Second Language Texts Using Directional Association Measures. Language Learning 69:2 ► pp. 440 ff. DOI logo
Erman, Britt & Margareta Lewis
2022. Formulaic language in L1 and advanced L2 English speech: multiword structures in the speech of two Swedish groups compared to a group of L1 English speakers. Text & Talk 0:0 DOI logo
Garner, James, Scott Crossley & Kristopher Kyle
2019. N-gram measures and L2 writing proficiency. System 80 ► pp. 176 ff. DOI logo
Garner, James R.
2016. A phrase-frame approach to investigating phraseology in learner writing across proficiency levels. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
GARNER, JAMIE & SCOTT CROSSLEY
2018. A Latent Curve Model Approach To Studying L2 N‐Gram Development. The Modern Language Journal 102:3 ► pp. 494 ff. DOI logo
He, Mengyu, Leng Hong Ang & Kim Hua Tan
2021. A corpus-driven analysis of phrase frames in research articles on business management. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 39:2 ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Hsu, Chan-Chia & Shu-Kai Hsieh
2022. Identifying lexical bundles in Chinese. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 ► pp. 525 ff. DOI logo
Juknevičienė, Rita & Łukasz Grabowski
2018. Comparing Formulaicity of Learner Writing through Phrase-Frames: A Corpus-Driven Study of Lithuanian and Polish EFL Student Writing. Research in Language 16:3 ► pp. 303 ff. DOI logo
Leńko-Szymańska, Agnieszka
2015. The English Vocabulary Profile as a benchmark for assigning levels to learner corpus data. In Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 70], ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Li, Yuan Ke & An Bang Fang
2022. Synergistic effects of multiword sequences structure, function, frequency and association on raters’ evaluations of essay quality. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Nekrasova-Beker, Tatiana & Anthony Becker
2019. Lexical bundles in university course materials. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:2 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
O'Keeffe, Anne & Geraldine Mark
2022. Principled pattern curation to guide data-driven learning design. Applied Corpus Linguistics 2:3 ► pp. 100028 ff. DOI logo
Tan, Yi & Ute Römer
2022. Using phrase-frames to trace the language development of L1 Chinese learners of English. System 108 ► pp. 102844 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Min & Yiqiong Zhang
2021. ‘According to…’: The impact of language background and writing expertise on textual priming patterns of multi-word sequences in academic writing. English for Specific Purposes 61 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Xia, Detong, Yudi Chen & Hye K. Pae
2022. Lexical and grammatical collocations in beginning and intermediate L2 argumentative essays: a bigram study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.