Article published In:
Language and Covid-19Edited by Michaela Mahlberg and Gavin Brookes
[International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:4] 2021
► pp. 444–468
Edited by Michaela Mahlberg and Gavin Brookes
[International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:4] 2021
► pp. 444–468
The Covid infodemic
Competition and the hyping of virus research
Covid-19, the greatest global health crisis for a century, brought a new immediacy and urgency to international bio-medical research. The pandemic generated intense competition to produce a vaccine and contain the virus, creating what the World Health Organization referred to as an ‘infodemic’ of published output. In this frantic atmosphere, researchers were keen to get their research noticed. In this paper, we explore whether this enthusiasm influenced the rhetorical presentation of research and encouraged scientists to “sell” their studies. Examining a corpus of the most highly cited SCI articles on the virus published in the first seven months of 2020, we explore authors’ use of hyperbolic and promotional language to boost aspects of their research. Our results show a significant increase in hype to stress certainty, contribution, novelty and potential, especially regarding research methods, outcomes and primacy. Our study sheds light on scientific persuasion at a time of intense social anxiety.
Keywords: Covid research, hype, academic persuasion, scientific writing
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: The infodemic
- 2.The hyping of medical research
- 3.Corpus and analysis
- 4.Findings
- 4.1How much hyping is there?
- 4.2What are the most common hyping devices?
- 4.3What aspects of research are most hyped?
- 4.4Has hyping behaviour changed during the pandemic?
- 5.Conclusions
- Notes
-
References
References (42)
Allen-Mills, T., & Gregory, A. (2020, July 26). Bit by bit, British scientists are building an anti-Covid arsenal. Sunday Times. [URL]
Anthony, L. (2019). AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer software]. Waseda University. [URL]
Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brainard, J. (2020). Scientists are drowning in COVID-19 papers. Can new tools keep them afloat? Science [URL]
Chang, Y-Y. (2006, June 22–23). How do well-established scholars cite themselves over their academic careers? Six stories of six well-established scholars [Paper presentation]. Conference in Honour of John Swales, Ann Arbor, USA.
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. 
Daston, L. (2020). Ground zero empiricism. Critical Inquiry. [URL]
Dinis-Oliveira, R. J. (2020). COVID-19 research: Pandemic versus “paperdemic”, integrity, values and risks of the “speed science”. Forensic Sciences Research, 5(2), 174–187.
Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketisation of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 133–168.
Fowler, J. H., & Aksnes, D. W. (2007). Does self-citation pay? Scientometrics, 72(3), 427–437.
Fraser, N., Brierley, L., Dey, G., Polka, J., Pálfy, M., & Coates, J. (2020). Preprinting a pandemic: The role of preprints in the COVID-19 pandemic. BioRxiv.
Fraser, V., & Martin, J. (2009). Marketing data: Has the rise of impact factor led to the fall of objective language in the scientific article? Respiratory Research, 10, 35.
Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2013). A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 305–327.
Gilbert, G. N., & M. Mulkay. (1984). Opening Pandora’s box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientific Discourse. Cambridge University Press.
Heimstadt, M. (2020). Between fast science and fake news: Preprint servers are political. LSE Impact Blog. [URL]
Horbach, S. (2020). Pandemic Publishing: Medical journals drastically speed up their publication process for Covid-19. bioRxiv 2020.04.18.045963;
Hyland, K. (1999). Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In Candlin, C. & Hyland, K. (Eds.), Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices (pp. 99–121). Longman.
(2003). Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(3), 251–259.
(2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–191.
Hyland, K., & Jiang, K. (2019). Academic Discourse and Global Publishing: Disciplinary Persuasion in Changing Times. Routledge.
Johnson, R., Watkinson, A., & Mabe, M. (2018). The STM Report 5th ed. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, Holland.
Johnston, J. E., Berry, K. J., & Mielke, P. W. (2006). Measures of effect size for chi-squared and likelihood-ratio goodness-of-fit tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 103(2), 412–414.
Lindeberg, A.-C. (2004). Promotion and Politeness: Conflicting Scholarly Rhetoric in Three Disciplines. Åbo Akademi University Press.
London, A. J., & Kimmelman, J. (2020). Against pandemic research exceptionalism. Science, 368(6490), 476–477.
LSE Public Policy Group. (2011). Maximizing the Impacts of your Research: A Handbook for Social Scientists (Consultation draft 3). LSE Public Policy Group. [URL]
McCarthy, M. (2015). Superlatives are commonly used in news coverage of cancer drugs, study finds. British Medical Journal, 3511, h5803.
Millar, N., Salager-Meyer, F., & Budgell, B. (2019). “It is important to reinforce the importance of .”: ‘Hype’ in reports of randomized controlled trials. English for Specific Purposes, 541, 139–151.
Nature Index. (2020). COVID-19 research update: How many pandemic papers have been published? Nature Index. [URL]
Pichappan, P., & Sarasvady, S. (2002). The other side of the coin: The intricacies of author self-citations. Scientometrics, 54(2), 285–290.
Rayson, P. (2016). Log-likelihood spreadsheet. [URL]
Redden, E. (2020). Rush to publish risks undermining COVID-19 Research. Inside Higher Ed. June 8, 2020. [URL]
Samraj, B. (2016). Research articles. In K. Hyland, & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes (pp. 403–415). Routledge.
Shehzad, W. (2010). Announcement of the principal findings and value addition in computer science research papers. Iberica, 191, 97–119.
Swales, J. M., & Najjar, H. (1987). The writing of research article introductions. Written Communication, 2(4), 175–192.
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Tsigaris, P. & Erfanmanesh, M. (2020). Publishing volumes in major databases related to Covid-19. Scientometrics (2020).
Tingley, K. (2020). Coronavirus is forcing medical research to speed up. New York Times Magazine. April 21, 2020. [URL]
UNESCO. (2017). Science Report: Towards 2030. [URL]
Vinkers, C. H., Tijdink, J. K., & Otte, W. M. (2015). Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: Retrospective analysis. British Medical Journal, 3511, h6467.
Waite, M. (2009). Oxford Thesaurus of English (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Wang, W., & Yang, C. (2015). Claiming centrality as promotion in applied linguistics research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 201, 162–175.
Wellcome Trust. (2020). Publishers make coronavirus (COVID-19) content freely available and reusable. Wellcome Trust. [URL]
Wheatley, D. (2014). Drama in research papers. European Science Editing, 40(1), 14–16.
Cited by (18)
Cited by 18 other publications
Hyland, Ken & Feng Jiang
2024. Hyping the REF: promotional elements in impact submissions. Higher Education 87:3 ► pp. 685 ff. 
Ishak, Cita Nuary, Yazid Basthomi & Nurenzia Yannuar
2024. Hypes in undergraduate thesis abstracts by Indonesian students across years. Discourse and Interaction 17:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
Jaworska, Sylvia, Michael K. Goodman & Iwona Gibas
2024. The Making of #CovidTwitter: Who Were the Loudest “Covid Influencers” and What Did They Say About the COVID-19 Pandemic?. Social Media + Society 10:1
Moreno-Ortiz, Antonio
2024. Introduction. In Making Sense of Large Social Media Corpora, ► pp. 1 ff.
Rossiter, Timothy & Averil Coxhead
2024. Technical vocabulary in government spoken communications: The team of five million in bubbles, PPE and CBACs. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:4 ► pp. 1556 ff.
Zou, Hang (Joanna) & Ken Hyland
Zou, Hang (Joanna) & Ken Hyland
2024. Stance in article highlights: The promotion of Covid‐19 research. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 466 ff.
Zou, Hang (Joanna) & Ken Hyland
2024. “Let's start with the basics of the virus”: Engaging the public in two forms of explainers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 68 ► pp. 101353 ff.
Bondi, Marina & Jessica Jane Nocella
2023. Boosting Booster Trust: Negotiating a Jungle of Misinformation. Lingue Culture Mediazioni - Languages Cultures Mediation (LCM Journal) 10:2
Corneille, Olivier, Jo Havemann, Emma L Henderson, Hans IJzerman, Ian Hussey, Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry, Lee Jussim, Nicholas P Holmes, Artur Pilacinski, Brice Beffara, Harriet Carroll, Nicholas Otieno Outa, Peter Lush & Leon D Lotter
2023. Beware ‘persuasive communication devices’ when writing and reading scientific articles. eLife 12
Dong, Jihua, Shuai Dong & Louisa Buckingham
2023. A discourse dynamics exploration of terminology for Covid-19 in professional and public discourse. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 29:2 ► pp. 224 ff.
Hyland, Ken
2023. Academic publishing and the attention economy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 64 ► pp. 101253 ff.
Yao, Mingxin, Ying Wei & Huiyu Wang
2023. Promoting research by reducing uncertainty in academic writing: a large-scale diachronic case study on hedging in Science research articles across 25 years. Scientometrics 128:8 ► pp. 4541 ff.
Baker, Hannah, Shauna Concannon, Matthias Meller, Katie Cohen, Alice Millington, Samuel Ward & Emily So
2022. COVID-19 and science advice on the ‘Grand Stage’: the metadata and linguistic choices in a scientific advisory groups’ meeting minutes. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9:1
Jiang, Feng (Kevin) & Xuyan Qiu
2022. “These findings are very astonishing”: Hyping of disciplinary research in 3MT presentations and thesis abstracts. Australian Journal of Linguistics 42:3-4 ► pp. 300 ff.
Jiang, Feng Kevin & Ken Hyland
2022. COVID‐19 in the news: The first 12 months. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:2 ► pp. 241 ff.
Oxman, Andrew D., Atle Fretheim, Simon Lewin, Signe Flottorp, Claire Glenton, Arnfinn Helleve, Didrik Frimann Vestrheim, Bjørn Gunnar Iversen & Sarah E. Rosenbaum
2022. Health communication in and out of public health emergencies: to persuade or to inform?. Health Research Policy and Systems 20:1
Hyland, Ken & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2021. ‘Our striking results demonstrate …’: Persuasion and the growth of academic hype. Journal of Pragmatics 182 ► pp. 189 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.