The ability to successfully position oneself in relation to one’s claims through the use of stance markers is of central importance for academic writers. This study, which uses data from one expert corpus (LOCRA) and three learner corpora (ALEC, VESPA and BATMAT), investigates the use of morphologically related stance markers that occur in different syntactic constructions (such as possibly, the possibility of and it is possible that). In doing so, it examines to what extent lexis, level of expertise in academic writing and L1 transfer influence the distribution of the different realizations of stance under investigation. The results show that all three variables are important predictors. In addition, differences pertaining to information structure are found to influence the distribution of two largely synonymous constructions (disjuncts and the introductory it pattern). The findings suggest that there are principled explanations for why one construction is used instead of another functionally similar construction.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
(2003) ‘This mystery…’: A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(4), 313–326.
Conrad, S., & Biber, D.
(2000) Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 56–73). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2008) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 520 Million Words, 1990-present. Available online at [URL] (last accessed February 2017).
Fox, J., & Hong, J.
(2009) Effect displays in R for Multinomial and Proportional-odds logit models: Extensions to the Effects package. Journal of Statistical Software, 32(1), 1–24.
Gries, S. T.
(2013) Statistics for Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2005) Pattern and meaning across genres and disciplines: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(3), 257–277.
Hacker, D., & Sommers, N. I.
(2014) The Bedford Handbook (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martins.
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
(2009) “It is more than true that television reproduces life”: The effect of Greek rhetorical conventions on Greek learners’ academic writing in English. In T. Tsangalidis (Ed.), Selected Papers from the 18th International Symposium on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics (pp. 167–176). Thessaloniki: Monochromia.
(2000) A local grammar of evaluation. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 74–101). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G.
(Eds.) (2000) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2005) Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192.
(2005) Europarl: A parallel corpus for statistical machine translation. In Conference Proceedings: The Tenth Machine Translation Summit (MT Summit X) (pp. 9–86). Phuket, Thailand.
(2014, January). Introducing the Advanced Learner English Corpus (ALEC): A new learner corpus. Poster presented at the 2014 LOT Winter School, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
(2016) The introductory it pattern: Variability explored in learner and expert writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22(2016), 64–79.
forthcoming). A syntactic analysis of the introductory it pattern in non-native-speaker and native-speaker student writing. In M. Mahlberg & V. Wiegand Eds. Corpus Linguistics, Context and Culture Berlin De Gruyter Mouton
under review). A functional classification of the introductory it pattern: Investigating academic writing by non-native-speaker and native-speaker students.
Lindgrén, S -A.
(2015) The BATMAT Corpus Version 1.1. English Language and Literature, Åbo Akademi University, Åbo.
LOCRA (Louvain Corpus of Research Articles)
[Corpus]. Louvain-la-Neuve: Centre for English Corpus Linguistics, Université catholique de Louvain. Available online at [URL] (last accessed February2017).
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R.
(2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
(2003) Formulating writer stance: A contrastive study of EFL learner corpora. In D. Archer, P. Rayson, A. Wilson & T. McEnery (Eds.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2003 Conference. UCREL Technical Papers 16 (pp. 562–571). Lancaster University: UCREL.
Paquot, M., Hasselgård, H., & Oksefjell Ebeling, S.
(2013) Writer/reader visibility in learner writing across genres: A comparison of the French and Norwegian components of the ICLE and VESPA learner corpora. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin & F. Meunier (Eds.), Twenty Years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking Back, Moving Ahead (pp. 377–388). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
(1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
R Core Team
(2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed November 2016).
(1991) Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.