Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Language and Culture
Vol. 3:1 (2016) ► pp.1–33

Contrastive analysis of keywords in discourses

Intégration and Integration in French and German discourses about migration

 | University of Reading
 | Université Paris Descartes
This article suggests a theoretical and methodological framework for a systematic contrastive discourse analysis across languages and discourse communities through keywords. This constitutes a lexical approach to discourse analysis which is considered to be particularly fruitful for comparative analysis. We use a corpus-assisted methodology, presuming meaning to be constituted, revealed, and constrained by collocation environment. We compare the use of the keywords intégration/Integration in French and German public discourses about migration on the basis of newspaper corpora built from two French and German newspapers from 1998 to 2011. We look at the frequency of these keywords over the given time span, group collocates into thematic categories, and discuss indicators of discursive salience by comparing the development of collocation profiles over time in both corpora as well as the occurrence of neologisms and compounds based on intégration/Integration.
Keywords: Corpus Assisted Discourse Analysis, contrastive discourse analysis, discourse keywords, German migration discourse, French migration discourse, newspaper discourse
Published online: 5 August 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.3.1.01sch
References (38)
Aprile, S., & Dufoix, S. (2009). Les mots de l’immigration. Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., KhosraviNik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. (2004). Querying keywords: Questions of difference, frequency and sense in keyword analysis. Journal of English Linguistics, 32(4), 346–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, P., & McEnery, T. (2005). A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(2), 197–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, P (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T. (2013). Discourse analysis and media attitudes: The representation of Islam in the British press. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barats, C. (1994). Intégration et immigration dans les discours de François Mitterrand (1981-1990), thèse de science politiques, Université Paris 1.Google Scholar
Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2012). News discourse. London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bennett, T., Grossber, L., & Morris, M. (2005). New keywords: A revised vocabulary of culture and society. Malden, MA; Oxford; Carlton: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Benson, R. (2013). Shaping immigration news: A French-American comparison. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonnafous, S. (1991). L’immigration prise aux mots, Les immigrés dans la presse au tournant des années 80. Paris: éditions Kimé.Google Scholar
Brunner, O., Conze, W., & Kosellek, R. (1972-1997). Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, 8 Vols1. Stuttgart: Klett Cotta.Google Scholar
Cruse, A. (2000). Aspects of the micro-structure of word meanings. In Y. Ravin & C. Leacock (Eds.), Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches (pp. 30–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eitz, T. (2010). Das missglückte Wort. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. Themen. Retrieved November 18, 2014, from [URL]Google Scholar
Göktürk, D., Gramling, D., & Kaes, A. (2007). Germany in transit: Nation and migration 1955-2005. Berkley, London: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, S. (2004). The politics of exclusion: Institutions and immigration policy in contemporary Germany. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. (2012). CQPweb-combining power, flexibility in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(3), 380–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herbert, U. (2003). Geschichte der Ausländerpolitik in Deutschland. Saisonarbeiter, Zwangsarbeiter, Geastarbeiter, Flüchtlinge. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M. (2007). Lexical items in discourse: Identifying local textual functions of sustainable development. In M. Hoey, M. Mahlberg, M. Stubbs, & W. Teubert (Eds.), Text, discourse and corpora: Theory and analysis (pp. 191–218). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mautner, G. (2009). Checks and balances: How corpus linguistics can contribute to CDA. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 122–143). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Née, E., & Veniard, M. (2012). Lexical discourse analysis: Toward a revival using a semantic approach? Langage et Société, 1401, 15–28. Retrieved April 12, 2014 from [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns and meanings in discourse: Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schröter, M. (2013). Die kontrastive Analyse politischer Diskurse. Skizze, Verkomplizierung und Ausblick. In J. Kilian & T. Niehr (Eds.), Politik als sprachlich gebundenes Wissen. Politische Sprache im lebenslangen Lernen und politischen Handeln (pp. 91–105). Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Schröter, M., & Storjohann, P. (2015). Patterns of discourse semantics: A corpus-assisted study of financial crisis in British newspaper discourse in 2009. Pragmatics and Society, 6(1), 43–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. (2004). Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. (2007). Meaning in the framework of corpus linguistics. In W. Teubert & R. Krishnamurthy (Eds.), Corpus linguistics, Vol. 11 (pp. 182–196). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and phrases. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. (2010). Three concepts of keywords. In M. Bondi & M. Scott (Eds.), Keyness in texts (pp. 21–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (2014). Discourse keywords of migration: Community and communitá in UK and Italian newspapers. Paper presented at the 10th European Social Science History Conference, Vienna, April 2014.Google Scholar
Teubert, W., & Čermáková, A. (2007). Corpus linguistics: A short introduction. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Teubert, W. (2010). Meaning, discourse and society. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vollmer, B. (2014). Policy discourses on irregular migration in Germany and the United Kingdom. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding cultures through their key words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2006). English: Meaning and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2010). Experience, evidence, and sense: The hidden cultural legacy of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. (1976). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Wodak, R., & Boukala, S. (2015). (Supra)National identity and language: Rethinking national and European migration policies and the linguistic integration of migrants. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 351, 253–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Veniard, Marie
2022. La « rhétorique de l’équilibre » dans les discours sur la migration : éthos de la modération et effet d’euphémisme. Studia Neophilologica 94:2 ► pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Norberg, Cathrine & Maria Johansson
2021. “Women and “Ideal” Women”: The Representation of Women in the Construction Industry. Gender Issues 38:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Issel-Dombert, Sandra
2020. Using Mass and Pop Culture to Dominate Political Discourse: How the Left-Wing Party Podemos Conquered Spanish Living-Rooms with IKEA. In Discursive Approaches to Populism Across Disciplines, ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Taylor, Charlotte & Dario del Fante*
2020. Comparing across languages in corpus and discourse analysis: some issues and approaches. Meta 65:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Schröter, Melani, Marie Veniard, Charlotte Taylor & Andreas Blätte
2019. A comparative analysis of the keyword multicultural(ism) in French, British, German and Italian migration discourse. In Migration and Media [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 81], ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Czachur, Waldemar & Philipp Dreesen
2018. Porównawcza lingwistyka dyskursu. Założenia, zasady, problemy. tekst i dyskurs - text und diskurs :11 (2018) ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Moirand, Sophie
2018. L’apport de petits corpus à la compréhension des faits d’actualité. Corpus :18 DOI logo
Taylor, Charlotte
2017. Togetherness or othering?. In Representing the other in European media discourses [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 74], ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Truan, Naomi & Léa Renard
2017. Dire l’intégration. Les rapports français et allemands sur l’intégration entre injonction à la neutralité et volonté d’influence (1991-2014). Mots :114 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.