Chapter published in:
Operationalizing Iconicity
Edited by Pamela Perniss, Olga Fischer and Christina Ljungberg
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 17] 2020
► pp. 4–19

Modality-specificity of iconicity

The case of motion ideophones in Japanese

| Nagoya University
This study examines the semantic variety and specificity of Japanese ideophones for spatial motion events to illustrate the modality-specificity of iconicity. As verbal icons, motion ideophones tend to depict dynamic (e.g., auditory, spatio-temporal) aspects of motion events. Suprasegmental features that elaborate ideophonic depiction also exhibit this tendency. In contrast, manual icons, such as iconic gestures and sign language, are more expressive of visual information, both dynamic and static. Motion events, which involve various concepts, allow us to observe this semiotic contrast clearly and reinforce the modality-specific view of iconicity.
Published online: 13 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.17.01aki
References

References

Ahlner, F. and Zlatev, J.
2010 Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism. Sign Systems Studies 38: 298–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Akita, K.
2009 A Grammar of Sound-Symbolic Words in Japanese: Theoretical Approaches to Iconic and Lexical Properties of Mimetics. Ph.D. dissertation, Kobe University.Google Scholar
2010 An embodied semantic analysis of psychological mimetics in Japanese. Linguistics 48: 1195–1220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Toward a frame-semantic definition of sound-symbolic words: A collocational of Japanese mimetics. Cognitive Linguistics 23: 67–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 The lexical iconicity hierarchy and its grammatical correlates. In Iconic Investigations, L. Elleström, O. Fischer, and C. Ljungberg (eds), 331–349. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 The typology of manner expressions: A preliminary look. In Motion and Space across Languages: Theory and Applications, I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (ed.), 39–60. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, B. and Dahl, Ö.
1994 Ideophones in sign language? The place of reduplication in the tense-aspect system of Swedish Sign Language. In Tense, Aspect and Action: Empirical and Theoretical Contributions to Language Typology, C. Bache, H. Basbøll, and C.-E. Lindberg (eds), 397–422. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boas, H. C.
2008 Toward a frame-constructional approach to verb classification. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 57: 17–48.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D.
1972 Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Börstell, C. and Östling, R.
2017 Iconic locations in Swedish Sign Language: Mapping form to meaning with lexical databases. In Proceedings of the 21st Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics, 221–225. Gothenburg: Linköping University Electronic Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R. and Pagliuca, W.
1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Childs, G. T.
1994 African ideophones. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols, and J. J. Ohala (eds), 178–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cienki, A.
2013a Cognitive Linguistics: Spoken language and gesture as expressions of conceptualization. In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction, Volume 1, C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, and S. Tessendorf (eds), 182–201. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2013b Image schemas and mimetic schemas in cognitive linguistics and gesture studies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 11: 417–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. and Gerrig, R. J.
1990 Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66: 764–805. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H.
2016 Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review 123: 324–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuskley, C.
2013 Mappings between linguistic sound and motion. The Public Journal of Semiotics 5: 39–62.Google Scholar
de Jong, N.
2001 The ideophone in Didinga. In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 121–138. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M.
2011 The Meaning and Use of Ideophones in Siwu. Ph.D. dissertation, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics and Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
2012 Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6: 654–672. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 Ideophones and reduplication: Depiction, description, and the interpretation of repeated talk in discourse. Studies in Language 39: 946–970.Google Scholar
2017 Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 70: 363–384.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. and Akita, K.
2017 An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics 53: 501–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Monaghan, P., Lupyan, G. and Christiansen, M. H.
2015 Arbitrariness, iconicity and systematicity in language: empirical and theoretical advances. Trends in Cognitive Science 19: 603–615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Schuerman, W., Reinisch, E., Tufvesson, S. and Mitterer, H.
2016 What sound symbolism can and cannot do: Testing the iconicity of ideophones from five languages. Language 92: e117–e133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, E. A. and Jacobs, A. M.
2013 Facial expressions, emotions, and sign languages. Frontiers in Psychology 4: Article 115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O.
2011 Cognitive iconic grounding of reduplication in language. In Semblance and Signification, P. Michelucci, O. Fischer, and C. Ljungberg (eds), 55–81. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, M., Sethuraman, N. and Hockema, S.
2010 Iconicity in expressives: An empirical investigation. In Experimental and Empirical Methods in the Study of Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, S. Rice and J. Newman (eds), 163–180. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Güldemann, T.
2008 Quotative Indexes in African Languages: A Synchronic and Diachronic Survey. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamano, S.
1998 The Sound-Symbolic System of Japanese. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Hinton, L., Nichols, J. and Ohala, J. J.
1994 Introduction: Sound-symbolic processes. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols, and J. J. Ohala (eds), 1–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2006 Sound Symbolism and Motion in Basque. München: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2017 Basque ideophones from a typological perspective. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62: 196–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 Towards a semantic typological classification of motion ideophones : The motion semantic grid In Ideophones, Mimetics, and Expressives K. Akita and P. Pardeshi (eds), 137–166 Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kadooka, K.
2007 Nihongo-onomatope-goi-ni okeru keitai-teki/on’in-teki-taikeisei-ni tuite [On the morphological and phonological systematicity of the Japanese ideophonic lexicon]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Kakehi, H., Tamori, I. and Schourup, L.
1996 Dictionary of Iconic Expressions in Japanese. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kawahara, S. and Braver, A.
2013 The phonetics of multiple vowel lengthening in Japanese. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 3: 141–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Durational properties of emphatically lengthened consonants in Japanese. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 44: 237–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kita, S.
1997 Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35: 379–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, B.
1993 English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Martin, S. E.
1975 A Reference Grammar of Japanese. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y.
2003 Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In Empirical and Theoretical Investigations into Language: A Festschrift for Masaru Kajita, S. Chiba et al. (eds), 403–417. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Mikone, E.
2001 Ideophones in the Balto-Finnic languages. In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 223–234. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nasu, A.
2002 Nihongo-onomatope-no gokeisei-to inritu-koozoo [Word formation and prosodic structure of Japanese mimetics]. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tsukuba.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, J. B.
1996 Sounds like Life: Sound-Symbolic Grammar, Performance, and Cognition in Pastaza Quechua. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2014 Ideophones’ challenges for typological linguistics: The case of Pastaza Quichua. Pragmatics and Society 5: 355–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, G., Sümer, B. and Özyürek, A.
2017 Type of iconicity matters in the vocabulary development of signing children. Developmental Psychology 53: 89–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C. S.
1932 Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volume 2: Elements of Logic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Perniss, P., Thompson, R. L. and Vigliocco, G.
2010 Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 1: Article 227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perniss, P. and Vigliocco, G.
2014 The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369: 20130300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, R.
1994 Aural images. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols, and J. J. Ohala (eds), 276–292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubino, C.
2001 Iconic morphology and word formation in Ilocano. In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 303–320. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saji, N., Akita, K., Imai, M., Kantartzis, K. and Kita, S.
2013 Cross-linguistically shared and language-specific sound symbolism for motion: An exploratory data mining approach. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2013), 1253–1258.Google Scholar
Schaefer, R. P.
2001 Ideophonic adverbs and manner gaps in Emai. In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 339–354. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, E.
2001 Ideophone-like characteristics of uninflected predicates in Jaminjung (Australia). In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 355–374. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
2004 The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, S. Strömqvist and L. Th. Verhoeven (eds), 219–257. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
1985 Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, T. Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2000 Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Toratani, K.
2012 The role of sound-symbolic forms in Motion event descriptions: The case of Japanese. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 10: 90–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsujimura, N. and Deguchi, M.
2007 Semantic integration of mimetics in Japanese. Papers from the Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 339–353.Google Scholar
Usuki, T. and Akita, K.
2015 What’s in a mimetic? On the dynamicity of its iconic stem. In Iconicity: East Meets West, M. K. Hiraga, W. J. Herlofsky, K. Shinohara, and K. Akita (eds), 109–123. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
van Gijn, R.
2010 Middle voice and ideophones, a diachronic connection: The case of Yurakaré. Studies in Language 34: 273–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, S.
2004 Cognitive iconicity: Conceptual spaces, meaning, and gesture in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics 15: 119–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winter, B., Perlman, M., Perry, L. K. and Lupyan, G.
2017 Which words are most iconic? Iconicity in English sensory words. Interactional Studies 18: 432–453.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. M. and Pullum, G. K.
1987 Plain morphology and expressive morphology. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 330–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Akita, Kimi
2020. A typology of depiction marking. Studies in Language Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.