Part of
Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems
Edited by Sara Lenninger, Olga Fischer, Christina Ljungberg and Elżbieta Tabakowska
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 18] 2022
► pp. 369388
References
Aoyama, H.
1977Tyoosengo-no onsei-syootyoo [Sound symbolism of Korean]. Gengo [Linguistics] 6 (10): 26–33.Google Scholar
Bauer, L.
1997Evaluative morphology: In search of universals. Studies in Language 21: 533–575. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Böhmerová, A.
2011Suffixal diminutives and augmentatives in Slovak: A systemic view with some cross-linguistic considerations. Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology 6: 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cho, M. H.
1994Vowel harmony in Korean: A grounded phonology approach. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
Chung, C. W.
2000An optimality-theoretic account of vowel harmony in Korean ideophones. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 6: 431–450.Google Scholar
Coates, J.
1983The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
De Haan, F.
1999Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18 (1): 83–101.Google Scholar
de Jong, N.
2001The ideophone in Didinga. In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 121–138. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dhoorre, C. S., and Tosco, M.
1998111 Somali ideophones. Journal of African Cultural Studies 11 (2): 125–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diffloth, G.
1972Notes on expressive meaning. Chicago Linguistic Society 8: 440–447.Google Scholar
1979Expressive phonology and prosaic phonology in Mon-Khmer. In Studies in Mon-Khmer and Thai Phonology and Phonetics in Honor of E. Henderson, T. L. Thongkum (ed), 49–59. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
1994i: big, a: small. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols, and J. J. Ohala (eds), 107–114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M.
2011The meaning and use of ideophones in Siwu. Nijmegen: Radboud University dissertation.
2012Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6: 654–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Making new ideophones in Siwu: Creative depiction in conversation. Pragmatics and Society 5 (3): 384–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF: Language Typology and Universals 70 (2): 363–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., and Monaghan, P.
2015Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19 (10): 603–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamano, S.
1998The Sound-Symbolic System of Japanese. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Hayano, K.
2013Territories of knowledge in Japanese conversation. Ph.D. dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Hyland, K., and Milton, J.
1997Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 6 (2): 183–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jung, S. H.
2014Hyentay Hankwuke Pwusa-ey tayhan Kyeylyangene-hak-cek Yenkwu: Hwaklyul Thongkyey Mohyeng-kwa Neythuwekhu-lul Iyong-han Pwunsek [A quantitative linguistic study on Modern Korean adverbs: A using probability-statistical and network model]. Ph.D. dissertation, Seoul National University.
Kim, I. H.
1995Hyentay Hankwuke-uy Umsengsangcinge Yenkwu [A study on the lexicon exhibiting phonetic symbolism in Modern Korean]. Ph.D. dissertation, Ehwa Womans University.
Kim, J. K.
2000Quantity-sensitivity and feature-sensitivity of vowels: A constraint-based approach to Korean vowel phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
Kim, K. O.
1977Sound symbolism in Korean. Journal of Linguistics 13 (1): 67–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim-Renaud, Y. K.
1976Semantic features in phonology: Evidence from vowel harmony in Korean. In Papers from the Regional Meeting 12: 397–412.Google Scholar
Koo, H. J.
2007Force dynamics as a variational factor: A case in Korean. LACUS Forum 33: 201–210.Google Scholar
Kwon, N. H.
2018Iconicity correlated with vowel harmony in Korean ideophones. Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 9 (1): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen, D., and Heinz, J.
2012Neutral vowels in sound symbolic vowel harmony in Korean. Phonology 29 (3): 433–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Guen, O.
2011Materiality vs. expressivity: The use of sensory vocabulary in Yucatec Maya. The Senses and Society 6 (1): 117–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, D.
2017Epistemic congruence as motivation for grammar use: A study of the final suffix kel in Korean conversation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California Los Angeles.
Lee, J. S.
1992Phonology and sound symbolism of Korean ideophones. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
Lee, Y. K.
2002Hankwuke-uy tan-umcel sangcinge-uy umso-sangcing yenkwu [A study on the meaning of consonants in Korean monosyllabic symbolic words]. The Journal of Modern British and American Language and Literature 20 (3): 249–266.Google Scholar
Lim, G. H.
2013Kwuke sangcinge-uy uymi-ceni yangsang [On shifts in meaning of Korean symbolic words]. The Journal of Linguistic Science 67: 223–250.Google Scholar
Martin, S. E.
1962Phonetic symbolism in Korean. American Studies in Altaic Linguistics 13: 177–189.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J.
1983Phonological features and morphological structure. Chicago Linguistic Society 19: 135–161.Google Scholar
Mihas, E.
2012Ideophones in Alto Perené (Arawak) from eastern Peru. Studies in Language 36 (2): 300–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
National Institute of Korean Language: Republic of Korea
Phyocwun Kwuke Taysacen [Standard Korean Dictionary].
Noma, H.
1990Tyoosengo-no onomatope: Gisei/gitaigo-no kyookai-kakutei, oto-to keisiki, oto-to imi-ni tuite [Onomatopoeia in the Modern Korean language]. Bulletin of the Language Institute of Gakushuin University 13: 23–47.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, J. B.
2001Ideophones in Pastaza Quechua. In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 271–286. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J.
Oswalt, Robert L.
1994Inanimate imitatives in English. In Sound symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols and J. J. Ohala (eds), 293–306. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R.
2001Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, D. G.
1994‘-Hata, -tayta, -kelita, -ita’ yenkwu (1): Hwungnaymal-kwauy hyengthay/thonge-lon-cek thukseng-ey ttalun kyelhap kyuchik [A study on ‘-hada, -taeda, -korida, -ida’: Word formation rules with symbolic words by their morphosyntactic properties]. Kenkwuk Tayhakyo Tayhakwen Nonmwuncip [Bulletin of the Graduate School of Konkuk University] 38: 9–22.Google Scholar
1997Hyentay Hankwuke Hyungnaymal-uy Yenkwu [A study of symbolic words in Modern Korean]. Ph.D. dissertation, Konkuk University.
2015Hankwuke uysenge-wa uythaye-uy umwun pikyo [A phonological comparison between onomatopoetic and imitative words of Korean]. Hanmal Yenkwu 37: 177–203.Google Scholar
Rhee, S. H.
2018On the emergence of discourse markers of emphasis in Korean. The 26th Japanese/Korean Linguistics Conference. University of California, Los Angeles. Nov. 30, 2018.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Richard
1994Aural images. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols and J. J. Ohala (eds), 276–292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubino, C.
2001Iconic morphology and word formation in Ilocano. In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 303–320. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shon, D. I.
2012Hyentay-Kwuke Uysenguythaye-uy Hyengthay-wa Umwun Yenkwu [A study on the morphological and phonological characteristics of onomatopoeia in Modern Korean]. Ph.D. dissertation, Ehwa Womans University.
Sohn, H. S.
1986Toward an integrated theory of morphophonology: Vowel harmony in Korean. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 16 (2): 157–184.Google Scholar
Sohn, H. M.
1999The Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge Language Surveys.Google Scholar
Thompson, A. L., and Do, Y.
2019Defining iconicity: An articulation-based methodology for explaining the phonological structure of ideophones. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4 (1): 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
1995Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation in Language, D. Stein and S. Wright (eds), 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, Kyosuke
2016Irokano-go-no ideofon [Ideophones in Ilocano]. Kyoto University Linguistic Research 35: 35–57.Google Scholar
Yu, J. W.
1985Wulimal Yekswun Sacen [Korean Reverse Dictionary]. Seoul: Jungumsa.Google Scholar

Corpus

Sejong Corpus
National Institute of Korean Language Republic of Korea. Seoul, South Korea.