Article published in:
Responses to Language Varieties: Variability, processes and outcomes
Edited by Alexei Prikhodkine and Dennis R. Preston
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 39] 2015
► pp. 157–174

Got class? Community-shared conceptualizations of social class in evaluative reactions to sociolinguistic variables

| University of Chicago
| Radboud University Nijmegen
| Radboud University Nijmegen
In recent years, researchers have successfully used information about cultural identity and consumption behavior to uncover class-based variation in linguistic production data. Is this variation reflected in implicit class-related language attitudes, of which listeners may not even be aware? And which types of evaluative conceptualizations of class membership do listeners in fact use? In a two-alternative forced choice task, we compared how listeners associate linguistic variables with both more classic and newer conceptualizations of class membership. High social class responses were significantly more likely for standard linguistic variants than for nonstandard linguistic variants (for all five types of social class conceptualizations we used). The fact that there was no difference between the class conceptualizations indicates that conceptualizations in terms of economic production, culture, and consumption were equally successful in probing evaluative reactions to class-based linguistic variation in the region investigated.
Published online: 16 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.39.07cas
References
Adank, Pati, van Hout, Roland & van de Velde, Hans
2004 An acoustic description of the vowels of Northern and Southern Standard Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116(3): 1729-1738. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn
2007 Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82(1): 32-64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 I'll be the judge of that: Diversity in social perceptions of (ING). Language in Society 37(5): 637-659. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dodsworth, Robin
2009 Modeling socioeconomic class in variationist sociolinguistics. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(5): 1314-1327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
2000 Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Garrett, Peter
2005 Attitude measurement. In Sociolinguistics: An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society, Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus Mattheier & Peter Trudgill (eds), 1251-1260. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Greenwald, Anthony G. & Banaji, Mahzarin R
1995 Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review 102: 4-27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grondelaers, Stefan
2013 Attitude measurements in the Low Countries. In Language and Space: Dutch, Johan Taeldeman & Frans Hinskens (eds), 586-602. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Grondelaers, Stefan & Kristiansen, Tore
2013 On the need to access deep evaluations when searching for the motor of standard language change. In Kristiansen & Grondelaers (eds), 9-52.Google Scholar
Grondelaers, Stefan & Speelman, Dirk
2013 Can speaker evaluation return private attitudes towards stigmatised varieties? Evidence from emergent standardization in Belgian Dutch. In Kristiansen & Grondelaers (eds), 171-191.Google Scholar
Jacobi, Irene
2009 On Variation and Change in Diphthongs and Long Vowels of Spoken Dutch. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Knops, Uus
1984 Taalattitudes in Vlaanderen en Nederland (Language attitudes in Flanders and The Netherlands). Tijdschrift voor Taal- en Tekstwetenschap 4: 335-353.Google Scholar
1988 Attitudes towards regional variation in Dutch pronunciation. In Language Attitudes in the Dutch Language Area, Roeland van Hout & Uus Knops (eds), 105-120. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore & Grondelaers, Stefan
(eds) 2013 Language (De)standardisation in Late Modern Europe: Experimental Studies. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1966 The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lambert, Wallace E., Hodgson, Richard C., Gardner, Robert C. & Fillenbaum, Samuel
1960 Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60(1): 44-51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mallinson, Christine
2007 Social class, social status, and stratification: Revisiting familiar concepts in sociolinguistics. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 13(2): 149–163.Google Scholar
Mallinson, Christine & Dodsworth, Robin
2010 Revisiting the need for new approaches to social class in variationist sociolinguistics. Sociolinguistic Studies 3(2): 253-278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pantos, Andrew J. & Perkins, Andrew W
2013 Measuring implicit and explicit attitudes toward foreign accented speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 32(1): 3-32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John R
1986 The need for new approaches to social class analysis in sociolinguistics. Journal of Communication 6: 215–221.Google Scholar
Smakman, Dick
2006 Standard Dutch in the Netherlands. A Sociolinguistic and Phonetic Description. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Squires, Lauren
2014 Processing, evaluation, knowledge: Testing the perception of English subject–verb agreement variation. Journal of English Linguistics 42(2): 144-172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strack, Fritz & Deutsch, Roland
2004) Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review 8: 220-247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van de Velde, Hans
1996 Variatie en Verandering in het Gesproken Standaard-Nederlands. PhD dissertation, University of Nijmegen.
van de Velde, Hans & van Hout, Roland
1999 The pronunciaton of (r). In Linguistics in the Netherlands, Renée van Bezooijen & René Kager (eds), 177-188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van de Velde, Hans, van Hout, Roeland & Gerritsen, Marinel
1997 Watching Dutch change: a real time study of variation and change in Standard Dutch pronunciation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1(3): 361-393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Berg, Rob & van Bezooijen, Renée
2004 De Gooise R: Wie ziet er wat in en waarom? Taal en Tongval 17: 86-108.Google Scholar