287014943
03
01
01
JB code
JB
John Benjamins Publishing Company
01
JB code
Impact 39 Hb
15
9789027258304
06
10.1075/impact.39
13
2015029382
00
BB
08
615
gr
10
01
JB code
Impact
02
1385-7908
02
39.00
01
02
IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society
IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society
01
01
Responses to Language Varieties
Variability, processes and outcomes
Responses to Language Varieties: Variability, processes and outcomes
1
B01
01
JB code
567194168
Alexei Prikhodkine
Prikhodkine, Alexei
Alexei
Prikhodkine
University of Geneva
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/567194168
2
B01
01
JB code
307194167
Dennis R. Preston
Preston, Dennis R.
Dennis R.
Preston
Oklahoma State University
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/307194167
01
eng
11
263
03
03
xiv
03
00
249
03
01
23
417
03
2015
P120.V37
04
Language and languages--Variation.
04
Speech perception.
04
Language awareness.
10
LAN009000
12
CFB
24
JB code
LIN.SOCIO
Sociolinguistics and Dialectology
01
06
02
00
This book is about responses to language variety — their variability, shape, and content, as well as the variable cognitive and neural pathways underlying them.
03
00
This book is about responses to language variety — their variability, shape, and content, as well as the variable cognitive and neural pathways underlying them. The chapters explore access to, processing of, and outcomes of that diversity and complexity. Many traditions are represented: from social psychology come classic experimental methods as well as more current discourse-based analyses; anthropology is represented in indexicality, iconization, recursivity, erasure, enregisterment, and ideologies; the sociolinguistic focus on specific rather than global elements that trigger responses is highlighted. The individual chapters address a variety of questions concerning language attitude, belief, and ideology, in some cases singly, in others with a more general focus, including attempts to relate one style of research to another. If we accept the fact that individuals house great variability in the underlying cognitive structures that inform responses, it follows that no single way of eliciting and studying them will do. This book provides a tour of the emerging tools that have been productive in such investigations.
01
00
03
01
01
D503
https://benjamins.com/covers/475/impact.39.png
01
01
D502
https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027258304.jpg
01
01
D504
https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027258304.tif
01
01
D503
https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/impact.39.hb.png
01
01
D503
https://benjamins.com/covers/125/impact.39.png
02
00
03
01
01
D503
https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/impact.39.hb.png
03
00
03
01
01
D503
https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/impact.39.hb.png
01
01
JB code
impact.39.001int
06
10.1075/impact.39.001int
vii
xiv
8
Article
1
01
04
Introduction
Introduction
1
A01
01
JB code
352250365
Alexei Prikhodkine
Prikhodkine, Alexei
Alexei
Prikhodkine
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/352250365
2
A01
01
JB code
543250366
Dennis R. Preston
Preston, Dennis R.
Dennis R.
Preston
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/543250366
01
eng
01
01
JB code
impact.39.s1
06
10.1075/impact.39.s1
Section header
2
01
04
Part 1: Theoretical Backgrounds
Part 1: Theoretical Backgrounds
01
eng
01
01
JB code
impact.39.01pre
06
10.1075/impact.39.01pre
1
36
36
Article
3
01
04
Does language regard vary?
Does language regard vary?
1
A01
01
JB code
944250367
Dennis R. Preston
Preston, Dennis R.
Dennis R.
Preston
Oklahoma State University & Michigan State University (Emeritus)
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/944250367
01
eng
03
00
This paper outlines a cognitive map for variation in language attitudes, metalinguistic beliefs about language, and language ideological frameworks — grouped together as “language regard.” After establishing input, processing, and response models, it goes on to examine experimental findings that show variability in regard that are consistent with this map and to outline the importance of that variability to more general concerns of sociolinguistics, touching in particular on its explanatory position in studies of variation and change.
01
01
JB code
impact.39.02pur
06
10.1075/impact.39.02pur
37
54
18
Article
4
01
04
REACT - A constructivist theoretic framework for attitudes
REACT – A constructivist theoretic framework for attitudes
1
A01
01
JB code
132250368
Christoph Purschke
Purschke, Christoph
Christoph
Purschke
University of Luxembourg
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/132250368
01
eng
03
00
This text is devoted to a new theoretical framework for (language) attitudes (REACT) integrating both the traditional idea of attitudes as (more or less stable) cognitive assessment categories and the constructivist view on attitudes as situated evaluative practices. The text discusses five constitutive elements to the theory (Relevance, Evaluation, Activation, Construction, and Targeting) against the background of respective theories: a theory of actional relevance (cf. Schütz 1970), a listener judgment theory (cf. Purschke 2011), a model for cognitive activation (cf. Kroeber-Riel et al. 2009), a constructivist symbol theory (cf. Cassirer 1953–57 |1923–29|), and a model for attitude functions (cf. Katz 1960). The paper then concludes with proposing an integrative definition of attitudes as evaluation routines in social practices that conforms to the constructivist criticism of classic attitude theory, while at the same time taking account of the fundamental structuring patterns of social interaction that also determine the structure and dynamics of attitudes.
01
01
JB code
impact.39.03sou
06
10.1075/impact.39.03sou
55
84
30
Article
5
01
04
Mixing methods in the study of language attitudes
Mixing methods in the study of language attitudes
01
04
Theory and application
Theory and application
1
A01
01
JB code
465250369
Barbara Soukup
Soukup, Barbara
Barbara
Soukup
University of Vienna
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/465250369
01
eng
03
00
Mixed methods research (MMR) is currently on the rise in the social sciences. This paper provides a theoretical discussion and a practical illustration of MMR in the social psychological study of language attitudes. First, I review perceived obstacles to MMR - in particular, the ‘incompatibility thesis’, whereby quantitative and qualitative methods are assumed to clash epistemologically. I propose an alternative account by which qual and quan research on language attitudes can be integrated on a common theoretical basis that holds attitudes to constitute interactionally processed ‘human epistemological constructs’ (HECs). I apply this approach in MMR on Austrian German, where I integrate a qual analysis of language-attitudinal HECs found in discourse data with a quan speaker evaluation experiment designed to corroborate the qual exegesis.
01
01
JB code
impact.39.s2
06
10.1075/impact.39.s2
Section header
6
01
04
Part 2: Implicit and/or explicit? When are attitudes "authentic"?
Part 2: Implicit and/or explicit? When are attitudes “authentic”?
01
eng
01
01
JB code
impact.39.04kri
06
10.1075/impact.39.04kri
85
116
32
Article
7
01
04
The
primary relevance of subconsciously offered attitudes
The primary relevance of subconsciously offered attitudes
01
04
Focusing the language ideological aspect of sociolinguistic change
Focusing the language ideological aspect of sociolinguistic change
1
A01
01
JB code
781250370
Tore Kristiansen
Kristiansen, Tore
Tore
Kristiansen
University of Copenhagen
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/781250370
01
eng
03
00
The chapter deals with the role of language-ideological structures in linguistic variation and change at the macro-level of societal life. It argues that we need to construe (conceptualize and operationalize) data collection contexts which allow for a clear distinction between consciously (overtly) and subconsciously (covertly) offered attitudes – because subconsciously offered attitudes appear to be a driving force in linguistic variation and change in a way that consciously offered attitudes are not. The argument is based on evidence from empirical investigations of attitudes and use in the ‘standard vs. non-standard’ dimension in Denmark, and in the ‘national vs. English’ dimension in seven Nordic communities (including the Icelandic, Faroese, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Finland-Swedish, and Finnish communities).
01
01
JB code
impact.39.05pan
06
10.1075/impact.39.05pan
117
136
20
Article
8
01
04
Applying the Implicit Association Test to language attitudes research
Applying the Implicit Association Test to language attitudes research
1
A01
01
JB code
67250371
Andrew J. Pantos
Pantos, Andrew J.
Andrew J.
Pantos
Metropolitan State University of Denver
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/67250371
01
eng
03
00
Incorporating concepts from the domain of Implicit Social Cognition (ISC), this quantitative study measured participants’ implicit attitudes (through an audio Implicit Association Test) and explicit attitudes (through self report questionnaires) toward foreign and U.S. accented speech stimuli. The study’s results revealed a pro-U.S. accent bias on the implicit measure, but a proforeign accent bias on explicit measures, supporting the conclusion that these are separable attitude constructs resulting from distinct mental processes. This distinction in attitude type explains previous inconsistencies in language attitudes research and is supported theoretically by the Associative Propositional Evaluation Model, a dynamic dual processing conceptualization of the attitude formation process consistent with ISC.
01
01
JB code
impact.39.06lou
06
10.1075/impact.39.06lou
137
156
20
Article
9
01
04
Implicit attitudes and the perception of sociolinguistic variation
Implicit attitudes and the perception of sociolinguistic variation
1
A01
01
JB code
499250372
Brandon C. Loudermilk
Loudermilk, Brandon C.
Brandon C.
Loudermilk
University of California-Davis
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/499250372
01
eng
03
00
We investigated individual differences in processing the social dimensions of speech, addressing whether the degree of implicit stereotypical attitude towards language variants modulates brain activity during comprehension. Subjects listened to spoken stories, in which sentence-final critical words were manipulated for ing/in’ variant which was congruent/incongruent with the variants in the preceding discourse and which was typical/atypical of speaker dialect. Subjects participated in an Implicit Association Test as a measure of language attitudes towards ing/in’ variation and were classified as high or low stereotype. Results showed that listeners with low IAT scores had higher N400-like negativities while processing word variants that violated dialectal expectancies (ing uttered by a Southern speaker and in’ spoken by a Californian). Our results provide evidence that the cognitive mechanisms that support language comprehension are sensitive not just to what is said, but also to how it is said, who says it, and who hears it.
01
01
JB code
impact.39.s3
06
10.1075/impact.39.s3
Section header
10
01
04
Part 3: What factors awaken attitudes?
Part 3: What factors awaken attitudes?
01
eng
01
01
JB code
impact.39.07cas
06
10.1075/impact.39.07cas
157
174
18
Article
11
01
04
Got class? Community-shared conceptualizations of social class in evaluative reactions to sociolinguistic variables
Got class? Community-shared conceptualizations of social class in evaluative reactions to sociolinguistic variables
1
A01
01
JB code
850250373
Laura Staum Casasanto
Staum Casasanto, Laura
Laura
Staum Casasanto
University of Chicago
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/850250373
2
A01
01
JB code
317250374
Stefan Grondelaers
Grondelaers, Stefan
Stefan
Grondelaers
Radboud University Nijmegen
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/317250374
3
A01
01
JB code
472250375
Roeland Hout
Hout, Roeland
Roeland
Hout
Radboud University Nijmegen
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/472250375
01
eng
03
00
In recent years, researchers have successfully used information about cultural identity and consumption behavior to uncover class-based variation in linguistic production data. Is this variation reflected in implicit class-related language attitudes, of which listeners may not even be aware? And which types of evaluative conceptualizations of class membership do listeners in fact use? In a two-alternative forced choice task, we compared how listeners associate linguistic variables with both more classic and newer conceptualizations of class membership. High social class responses were significantly more likely for standard linguistic variants than for nonstandard linguistic variants (for all five types of social class conceptualizations we used). The fact that there was no difference between the class conceptualizations indicates that conceptualizations in terms of economic production, culture, and consumption were equally successful in probing evaluative reactions to class-based linguistic variation in the region investigated.
01
01
JB code
impact.39.08cam
06
10.1075/impact.39.08cam
175
190
16
Article
12
01
04
Perceived foreign accent as a predicator of face-voice match
Perceived foreign accent as a predicator of face-voice match
1
A01
01
JB code
19250376
Kathryn Campbell-Kibler
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn
Kathryn
Campbell-Kibler
The Ohio State University
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/19250376
2
A01
01
JB code
203250377
Elizabeth A. McCullough
McCullough, Elizabeth A.
Elizabeth A.
McCullough
The Ohio State University
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/203250377
01
eng
03
00
This study examines perceived accentedness as a predictor of perceived match between faces and voices. 85 pictures were rated for the likely education, masculinity and accentedness of the person depicted. Independently, 300 recordings of disyllabic English words from native speakers of English, Hindi, Korean, Mandarin and Spanish were rated for degree of perceived foreign accent. The highest and lowest rated tokens from each of three male speakers from each language background (30 total tokens) were selected, as were 15 pictures, maximizing the variability in perceived accentedness while avoiding extremes of education or masculinity. All pairwise combinations of these 15 faces and 30 voices were rated for perceived match. The results show that listeners have clear and structured perceptions of “fit” between faces and voices which are based in part, but not entirely, on the congruence of key social attributes such as perceived accentedness and local understandings of ethnolinguistic groupings.
01
01
JB code
impact.39.09gro
06
10.1075/impact.39.09gro
191
218
28
Article
13
01
04
Is Moroccan-flavoured Standard Dutch standard or not? On the use of perceptual criteria to determine the limits of standard languages
Is Moroccan-flavoured Standard Dutch standard or not? On the use of perceptual criteria to determine the limits of standard languages
1
A01
01
JB code
520250378
Stefan Grondelaers
Grondelaers, Stefan
Stefan
Grondelaers
Radboud University Nijmegen
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/520250378
2
A01
01
JB code
724250379
Paul Gent
Gent, Paul
Paul
Gent
Radboud University Nijmegen
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/724250379
3
A01
01
JB code
652250380
Roeland Hout
Hout, Roeland
Roeland
Hout
Radboud University Nijmegen
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/652250380
01
eng
03
00
In view of the fact that Netherlandic Standard Dutch has been found to be stratifying – i.e. incorporating regional accent variation to allow speakers to profile local group membership in addition to their national affiliation – an evident question is whether non-Dutch accents are also tolerated in private conceptualizations of the standard: is Moroccan-flavoured Dutch Netherlandic Standard Dutch? In a speaker evaluation experiment designed to answer that question, 212 male and female listener-judges rated 8 short clips of spontaneous speech produced by native and Moroccan Dutchmen on 12 measures selected in function of 5 dimensions of accent attitude architecture (Status, Dynamism, Personal Integrity, Solidarity and Accent Norm); listener-judges also rated speech clips in terms of how beautiful they found them. Principal Component Analysis demonstrated that ratings on the 12 measures correlated into a Status and an Attractiveness dimension. The fact that Moroccan Dutch was systematically downgraded on the status dimension, and the fact that the Moroccan accent was deemed significantly less beautiful than the native accents, strongly suggests that a Moroccan accent is not acceptable as an ingredient of Standard Dutch; neither are there any indications of imminent change in these evaluations.
01
01
JB code
impact.39.10pri
06
10.1075/impact.39.10pri
219
242
24
Article
14
01
04
Attitudes and language detail
Attitudes and language detail
01
04
Effects of specifying linguistic stimuli
Effects of specifying linguistic stimuli
1
A01
01
JB code
559250381
Alexei Prikhodkine
Prikhodkine, Alexei
Alexei
Prikhodkine
University of Geneva
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/559250381
01
eng
03
00
In this chapter, I explore to what extent different levels of language detail in the presentation of attitude targets have an impact on the expression of language attitudes. Results from the research carried out in the Frenchspeaking part of Switzerland (Suisse romande) reveal that the evaluation of a given language variety through a global category name does not equal the sum of average evaluations of each specific feature composing that variety. Being ideologically loaded concepts, global category names (like accent) tend to elicit, in the Suisse romand context, attitudes mostly having for their target stigmatized patois features, while Swiss prestigious features are not mobilized by these concepts. Thus, the use of global category names for attitude elicitation in previous studies may have been a determining factor for the outcome of locating Standard French outside the Swiss community. Finally, results from my study indicate that the validity of language attitude data will be enhanced by taking into account ideology loaded in the process of sociolinguistic interpretation of global stimuli by lay persons, and by assigning to linguistic features under study the same level of specificity in terms of language regard as well as production.
01
01
JB code
impact.39.11top
06
10.1075/impact.39.11top
243
246
4
Article
15
01
04
Topic Index
Topic Index
01
eng
01
01
JB code
impact.39.12nam
06
10.1075/impact.39.12nam
247
250
4
Article
16
01
04
Name Index
Name Index
01
eng
01
JB code
JBENJAMINS
John Benjamins Publishing Company
01
01
JB code
JB
John Benjamins Publishing Company
01
https://benjamins.com
02
https://benjamins.com/catalog/impact.39
Amsterdam
NL
00
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers
onix@benjamins.nl
04
01
00
20151216
C
2015
John Benjamins
D
2015
John Benjamins
02
WORLD
WORLD
US CA MX
09
01
JB
1
John Benjamins Publishing Company
+31 20 6304747
+31 20 6739773
bookorder@benjamins.nl
01
https://benjamins.com
21
17
24
01
00
Unqualified price
02
JB
1
02
95.00
EUR
02
00
Unqualified price
02
80.00
01
Z
0
GBP
GB
US CA MX
01
01
JB
2
John Benjamins Publishing Company
+1 800 562-5666
+1 703 661-1501
benjamins@presswarehouse.com
01
https://benjamins.com
21
17
24
01
00
Unqualified price
02
JB
1
02
143.00
USD
628014944
03
01
01
JB code
JB
John Benjamins Publishing Company
01
JB code
Impact 39 Eb
15
9789027267931
06
10.1075/impact.39
13
2015033604
00
EA
E107
10
01
JB code
Impact
02
1385-7908
02
39.00
01
02
IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society
IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society
11
01
JB code
jbe-all
01
02
Full EBA collection (ca. 4,200 titles)
11
01
JB code
jbe-2015-all
01
02
Complete backlist (3,208 titles, 1967–2015)
05
02
Complete backlist (1967–2015)
11
01
JB code
jbe-2015-impact
01
02
IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society (vols. 1–40, 1997–2015)
05
02
Impact (vols. 1–40, 1997–2015)
11
01
JB code
jbe-2015-linguistics
01
02
Subject collection: Linguistics (2,773 titles, 1967–2015)
05
02
Linguistics (1967–2015)
01
01
Responses to Language Varieties
Variability, processes and outcomes
Responses to Language Varieties: Variability, processes and outcomes
1
B01
01
JB code
567194168
Alexei Prikhodkine
Prikhodkine, Alexei
Alexei
Prikhodkine
University of Geneva
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/567194168
2
B01
01
JB code
307194167
Dennis R. Preston
Preston, Dennis R.
Dennis R.
Preston
Oklahoma State University
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/307194167
01
eng
11
263
03
03
xiv
03
00
249
03
01
23
417
03
2015
P120.V37
04
Language and languages--Variation.
04
Speech perception.
04
Language awareness.
10
LAN009000
12
CFB
24
JB code
LIN.SOCIO
Sociolinguistics and Dialectology
01
06
02
00
This book is about responses to language variety — their variability, shape, and content, as well as the variable cognitive and neural pathways underlying them.
03
00
This book is about responses to language variety — their variability, shape, and content, as well as the variable cognitive and neural pathways underlying them. The chapters explore access to, processing of, and outcomes of that diversity and complexity. Many traditions are represented: from social psychology come classic experimental methods as well as more current discourse-based analyses; anthropology is represented in indexicality, iconization, recursivity, erasure, enregisterment, and ideologies; the sociolinguistic focus on specific rather than global elements that trigger responses is highlighted. The individual chapters address a variety of questions concerning language attitude, belief, and ideology, in some cases singly, in others with a more general focus, including attempts to relate one style of research to another. If we accept the fact that individuals house great variability in the underlying cognitive structures that inform responses, it follows that no single way of eliciting and studying them will do. This book provides a tour of the emerging tools that have been productive in such investigations.
01
00
03
01
01
D503
https://benjamins.com/covers/475/impact.39.png
01
01
D502
https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027258304.jpg
01
01
D504
https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027258304.tif
01
01
D503
https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/impact.39.hb.png
01
01
D503
https://benjamins.com/covers/125/impact.39.png
02
00
03
01
01
D503
https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/impact.39.hb.png
03
00
03
01
01
D503
https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/impact.39.hb.png
01
01
JB code
impact.39.001int
06
10.1075/impact.39.001int
vii
xiv
8
Article
1
01
04
Introduction
Introduction
1
A01
01
JB code
352250365
Alexei Prikhodkine
Prikhodkine, Alexei
Alexei
Prikhodkine
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/352250365
2
A01
01
JB code
543250366
Dennis R. Preston
Preston, Dennis R.
Dennis R.
Preston
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/543250366
01
eng
01
01
JB code
impact.39.s1
06
10.1075/impact.39.s1
Section header
2
01
04
Part 1: Theoretical Backgrounds
Part 1: Theoretical Backgrounds
01
eng
01
01
JB code
impact.39.01pre
06
10.1075/impact.39.01pre
1
36
36
Article
3
01
04
Does language regard vary?
Does language regard vary?
1
A01
01
JB code
944250367
Dennis R. Preston
Preston, Dennis R.
Dennis R.
Preston
Oklahoma State University & Michigan State University (Emeritus)
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/944250367
01
eng
03
00
This paper outlines a cognitive map for variation in language attitudes, metalinguistic beliefs about language, and language ideological frameworks — grouped together as “language regard.” After establishing input, processing, and response models, it goes on to examine experimental findings that show variability in regard that are consistent with this map and to outline the importance of that variability to more general concerns of sociolinguistics, touching in particular on its explanatory position in studies of variation and change.
01
01
JB code
impact.39.02pur
06
10.1075/impact.39.02pur
37
54
18
Article
4
01
04
REACT - A constructivist theoretic framework for attitudes
REACT – A constructivist theoretic framework for attitudes
1
A01
01
JB code
132250368
Christoph Purschke
Purschke, Christoph
Christoph
Purschke
University of Luxembourg
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/132250368
01
eng
03
00
This text is devoted to a new theoretical framework for (language) attitudes (REACT) integrating both the traditional idea of attitudes as (more or less stable) cognitive assessment categories and the constructivist view on attitudes as situated evaluative practices. The text discusses five constitutive elements to the theory (Relevance, Evaluation, Activation, Construction, and Targeting) against the background of respective theories: a theory of actional relevance (cf. Schütz 1970), a listener judgment theory (cf. Purschke 2011), a model for cognitive activation (cf. Kroeber-Riel et al. 2009), a constructivist symbol theory (cf. Cassirer 1953–57 |1923–29|), and a model for attitude functions (cf. Katz 1960). The paper then concludes with proposing an integrative definition of attitudes as evaluation routines in social practices that conforms to the constructivist criticism of classic attitude theory, while at the same time taking account of the fundamental structuring patterns of social interaction that also determine the structure and dynamics of attitudes.
01
01
JB code
impact.39.03sou
06
10.1075/impact.39.03sou
55
84
30
Article
5
01
04
Mixing methods in the study of language attitudes
Mixing methods in the study of language attitudes
01
04
Theory and application
Theory and application
1
A01
01
JB code
465250369
Barbara Soukup
Soukup, Barbara
Barbara
Soukup
University of Vienna
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/465250369
01
eng
03
00
Mixed methods research (MMR) is currently on the rise in the social sciences. This paper provides a theoretical discussion and a practical illustration of MMR in the social psychological study of language attitudes. First, I review perceived obstacles to MMR - in particular, the ‘incompatibility thesis’, whereby quantitative and qualitative methods are assumed to clash epistemologically. I propose an alternative account by which qual and quan research on language attitudes can be integrated on a common theoretical basis that holds attitudes to constitute interactionally processed ‘human epistemological constructs’ (HECs). I apply this approach in MMR on Austrian German, where I integrate a qual analysis of language-attitudinal HECs found in discourse data with a quan speaker evaluation experiment designed to corroborate the qual exegesis.
01
01
JB code
impact.39.s2
06
10.1075/impact.39.s2
Section header
6
01
04
Part 2: Implicit and/or explicit? When are attitudes "authentic"?
Part 2: Implicit and/or explicit? When are attitudes “authentic”?
01
eng
01
01
JB code
impact.39.04kri
06
10.1075/impact.39.04kri
85
116
32
Article
7
01
04
The
primary relevance of subconsciously offered attitudes
The primary relevance of subconsciously offered attitudes
01
04
Focusing the language ideological aspect of sociolinguistic change
Focusing the language ideological aspect of sociolinguistic change
1
A01
01
JB code
781250370
Tore Kristiansen
Kristiansen, Tore
Tore
Kristiansen
University of Copenhagen
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/781250370
01
eng
03
00
The chapter deals with the role of language-ideological structures in linguistic variation and change at the macro-level of societal life. It argues that we need to construe (conceptualize and operationalize) data collection contexts which allow for a clear distinction between consciously (overtly) and subconsciously (covertly) offered attitudes – because subconsciously offered attitudes appear to be a driving force in linguistic variation and change in a way that consciously offered attitudes are not. The argument is based on evidence from empirical investigations of attitudes and use in the ‘standard vs. non-standard’ dimension in Denmark, and in the ‘national vs. English’ dimension in seven Nordic communities (including the Icelandic, Faroese, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Finland-Swedish, and Finnish communities).
01
01
JB code
impact.39.05pan
06
10.1075/impact.39.05pan
117
136
20
Article
8
01
04
Applying the Implicit Association Test to language attitudes research
Applying the Implicit Association Test to language attitudes research
1
A01
01
JB code
67250371
Andrew J. Pantos
Pantos, Andrew J.
Andrew J.
Pantos
Metropolitan State University of Denver
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/67250371
01
eng
03
00
Incorporating concepts from the domain of Implicit Social Cognition (ISC), this quantitative study measured participants’ implicit attitudes (through an audio Implicit Association Test) and explicit attitudes (through self report questionnaires) toward foreign and U.S. accented speech stimuli. The study’s results revealed a pro-U.S. accent bias on the implicit measure, but a proforeign accent bias on explicit measures, supporting the conclusion that these are separable attitude constructs resulting from distinct mental processes. This distinction in attitude type explains previous inconsistencies in language attitudes research and is supported theoretically by the Associative Propositional Evaluation Model, a dynamic dual processing conceptualization of the attitude formation process consistent with ISC.
01
01
JB code
impact.39.06lou
06
10.1075/impact.39.06lou
137
156
20
Article
9
01
04
Implicit attitudes and the perception of sociolinguistic variation
Implicit attitudes and the perception of sociolinguistic variation
1
A01
01
JB code
499250372
Brandon C. Loudermilk
Loudermilk, Brandon C.
Brandon C.
Loudermilk
University of California-Davis
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/499250372
01
eng
03
00
We investigated individual differences in processing the social dimensions of speech, addressing whether the degree of implicit stereotypical attitude towards language variants modulates brain activity during comprehension. Subjects listened to spoken stories, in which sentence-final critical words were manipulated for ing/in’ variant which was congruent/incongruent with the variants in the preceding discourse and which was typical/atypical of speaker dialect. Subjects participated in an Implicit Association Test as a measure of language attitudes towards ing/in’ variation and were classified as high or low stereotype. Results showed that listeners with low IAT scores had higher N400-like negativities while processing word variants that violated dialectal expectancies (ing uttered by a Southern speaker and in’ spoken by a Californian). Our results provide evidence that the cognitive mechanisms that support language comprehension are sensitive not just to what is said, but also to how it is said, who says it, and who hears it.
01
01
JB code
impact.39.s3
06
10.1075/impact.39.s3
Section header
10
01
04
Part 3: What factors awaken attitudes?
Part 3: What factors awaken attitudes?
01
eng
01
01
JB code
impact.39.07cas
06
10.1075/impact.39.07cas
157
174
18
Article
11
01
04
Got class? Community-shared conceptualizations of social class in evaluative reactions to sociolinguistic variables
Got class? Community-shared conceptualizations of social class in evaluative reactions to sociolinguistic variables
1
A01
01
JB code
850250373
Laura Staum Casasanto
Staum Casasanto, Laura
Laura
Staum Casasanto
University of Chicago
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/850250373
2
A01
01
JB code
317250374
Stefan Grondelaers
Grondelaers, Stefan
Stefan
Grondelaers
Radboud University Nijmegen
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/317250374
3
A01
01
JB code
472250375
Roeland Hout
Hout, Roeland
Roeland
Hout
Radboud University Nijmegen
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/472250375
01
eng
03
00
In recent years, researchers have successfully used information about cultural identity and consumption behavior to uncover class-based variation in linguistic production data. Is this variation reflected in implicit class-related language attitudes, of which listeners may not even be aware? And which types of evaluative conceptualizations of class membership do listeners in fact use? In a two-alternative forced choice task, we compared how listeners associate linguistic variables with both more classic and newer conceptualizations of class membership. High social class responses were significantly more likely for standard linguistic variants than for nonstandard linguistic variants (for all five types of social class conceptualizations we used). The fact that there was no difference between the class conceptualizations indicates that conceptualizations in terms of economic production, culture, and consumption were equally successful in probing evaluative reactions to class-based linguistic variation in the region investigated.
01
01
JB code
impact.39.08cam
06
10.1075/impact.39.08cam
175
190
16
Article
12
01
04
Perceived foreign accent as a predicator of face-voice match
Perceived foreign accent as a predicator of face-voice match
1
A01
01
JB code
19250376
Kathryn Campbell-Kibler
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn
Kathryn
Campbell-Kibler
The Ohio State University
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/19250376
2
A01
01
JB code
203250377
Elizabeth A. McCullough
McCullough, Elizabeth A.
Elizabeth A.
McCullough
The Ohio State University
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/203250377
01
eng
03
00
This study examines perceived accentedness as a predictor of perceived match between faces and voices. 85 pictures were rated for the likely education, masculinity and accentedness of the person depicted. Independently, 300 recordings of disyllabic English words from native speakers of English, Hindi, Korean, Mandarin and Spanish were rated for degree of perceived foreign accent. The highest and lowest rated tokens from each of three male speakers from each language background (30 total tokens) were selected, as were 15 pictures, maximizing the variability in perceived accentedness while avoiding extremes of education or masculinity. All pairwise combinations of these 15 faces and 30 voices were rated for perceived match. The results show that listeners have clear and structured perceptions of “fit” between faces and voices which are based in part, but not entirely, on the congruence of key social attributes such as perceived accentedness and local understandings of ethnolinguistic groupings.
01
01
JB code
impact.39.09gro
06
10.1075/impact.39.09gro
191
218
28
Article
13
01
04
Is Moroccan-flavoured Standard Dutch standard or not? On the use of perceptual criteria to determine the limits of standard languages
Is Moroccan-flavoured Standard Dutch standard or not? On the use of perceptual criteria to determine the limits of standard languages
1
A01
01
JB code
520250378
Stefan Grondelaers
Grondelaers, Stefan
Stefan
Grondelaers
Radboud University Nijmegen
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/520250378
2
A01
01
JB code
724250379
Paul Gent
Gent, Paul
Paul
Gent
Radboud University Nijmegen
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/724250379
3
A01
01
JB code
652250380
Roeland Hout
Hout, Roeland
Roeland
Hout
Radboud University Nijmegen
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/652250380
01
eng
03
00
In view of the fact that Netherlandic Standard Dutch has been found to be stratifying – i.e. incorporating regional accent variation to allow speakers to profile local group membership in addition to their national affiliation – an evident question is whether non-Dutch accents are also tolerated in private conceptualizations of the standard: is Moroccan-flavoured Dutch Netherlandic Standard Dutch? In a speaker evaluation experiment designed to answer that question, 212 male and female listener-judges rated 8 short clips of spontaneous speech produced by native and Moroccan Dutchmen on 12 measures selected in function of 5 dimensions of accent attitude architecture (Status, Dynamism, Personal Integrity, Solidarity and Accent Norm); listener-judges also rated speech clips in terms of how beautiful they found them. Principal Component Analysis demonstrated that ratings on the 12 measures correlated into a Status and an Attractiveness dimension. The fact that Moroccan Dutch was systematically downgraded on the status dimension, and the fact that the Moroccan accent was deemed significantly less beautiful than the native accents, strongly suggests that a Moroccan accent is not acceptable as an ingredient of Standard Dutch; neither are there any indications of imminent change in these evaluations.
01
01
JB code
impact.39.10pri
06
10.1075/impact.39.10pri
219
242
24
Article
14
01
04
Attitudes and language detail
Attitudes and language detail
01
04
Effects of specifying linguistic stimuli
Effects of specifying linguistic stimuli
1
A01
01
JB code
559250381
Alexei Prikhodkine
Prikhodkine, Alexei
Alexei
Prikhodkine
University of Geneva
07
https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/559250381
01
eng
03
00
In this chapter, I explore to what extent different levels of language detail in the presentation of attitude targets have an impact on the expression of language attitudes. Results from the research carried out in the Frenchspeaking part of Switzerland (Suisse romande) reveal that the evaluation of a given language variety through a global category name does not equal the sum of average evaluations of each specific feature composing that variety. Being ideologically loaded concepts, global category names (like accent) tend to elicit, in the Suisse romand context, attitudes mostly having for their target stigmatized patois features, while Swiss prestigious features are not mobilized by these concepts. Thus, the use of global category names for attitude elicitation in previous studies may have been a determining factor for the outcome of locating Standard French outside the Swiss community. Finally, results from my study indicate that the validity of language attitude data will be enhanced by taking into account ideology loaded in the process of sociolinguistic interpretation of global stimuli by lay persons, and by assigning to linguistic features under study the same level of specificity in terms of language regard as well as production.
01
01
JB code
impact.39.11top
06
10.1075/impact.39.11top
243
246
4
Article
15
01
04
Topic Index
Topic Index
01
eng
01
01
JB code
impact.39.12nam
06
10.1075/impact.39.12nam
247
250
4
Article
16
01
04
Name Index
Name Index
01
eng
01
JB code
JBENJAMINS
John Benjamins Publishing Company
01
01
JB code
JB
John Benjamins Publishing Company
01
https://benjamins.com
02
https://benjamins.com/catalog/impact.39
Amsterdam
NL
00
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers
onix@benjamins.nl
04
01
00
20151216
C
2015
John Benjamins
D
2015
John Benjamins
02
WORLD
13
15
9789027258304
WORLD
09
01
JB
3
John Benjamins e-Platform
03
https://jbe-platform.com
29
https://jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027267931
21
01
00
Unqualified price
02
95.00
EUR
01
00
Unqualified price
02
80.00
GBP
GB
01
00
Unqualified price
02
143.00
USD
640016754
03
01
01
JB code
JB
John Benjamins Publishing Company
01
JB code
Impact 39 GE
15
9789027267931
06
10.1075/impact.39
13
2015033604
00
EA
E133
10
01
JB code
Impact
02
JB code
1385-7908
02
39.00
01
02
IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society
IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society
01
01
Responses to Language Varieties
Responses to Language Varieties
1
B01
01
JB code
567194168
Alexei Prikhodkine
Prikhodkine, Alexei
Alexei
Prikhodkine
University of Geneva
2
B01
01
JB code
307194167
Dennis R. Preston
Preston, Dennis R.
Dennis R.
Preston
Oklahoma State University
01
eng
11
263
03
03
xiv
03
00
249
03
24
JB code
LIN.SOCIO
Sociolinguistics and Dialectology
10
LAN009000
12
CFB
01
06
02
00
This book is about responses to language variety — their variability, shape, and content, as well as the variable cognitive and neural pathways underlying them.
03
00
This book is about responses to language variety — their variability, shape, and content, as well as the variable cognitive and neural pathways underlying them. The chapters explore access to, processing of, and outcomes of that diversity and complexity. Many traditions are represented: from social psychology come classic experimental methods as well as more current discourse-based analyses; anthropology is represented in indexicality, iconization, recursivity, erasure, enregisterment, and ideologies; the sociolinguistic focus on specific rather than global elements that trigger responses is highlighted. The individual chapters address a variety of questions concerning language attitude, belief, and ideology, in some cases singly, in others with a more general focus, including attempts to relate one style of research to another. If we accept the fact that individuals house great variability in the underlying cognitive structures that inform responses, it follows that no single way of eliciting and studying them will do. This book provides a tour of the emerging tools that have been productive in such investigations.
01
00
03
01
01
D503
https://benjamins.com/covers/475/impact.39.png
01
01
D502
https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027258304.jpg
01
01
D504
https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027258304.tif
01
01
D503
https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/impact.39.hb.png
01
01
D503
https://benjamins.com/covers/125/impact.39.png
02
00
03
01
01
D503
https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/impact.39.hb.png
03
00
03
01
01
D503
https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/impact.39.hb.png
01
01
JB code
impact.39.001int
06
10.1075/impact.39.001int
vii
xiv
8
Article
1
01
04
Introduction
Introduction
1
A01
01
JB code
352250365
Alexei Prikhodkine
Prikhodkine, Alexei
Alexei
Prikhodkine
2
A01
01
JB code
543250366
Dennis R. Preston
Preston, Dennis R.
Dennis R.
Preston
01
01
JB code
impact.39.s1
06
10.1075/impact.39.s1
Section header
2
01
04
Part 1: Theoretical Backgrounds
Part 1: Theoretical Backgrounds
01
01
JB code
impact.39.01pre
06
10.1075/impact.39.01pre
1
36
36
Article
3
01
04
Does language regard vary?
Does language regard vary?
1
A01
01
JB code
944250367
Dennis R. Preston
Preston, Dennis R.
Dennis R.
Preston
Oklahoma State University & Michigan State University (Emeritus)
01
01
JB code
impact.39.02pur
06
10.1075/impact.39.02pur
37
54
18
Article
4
01
04
REACT - A constructivist theoretic framework for attitudes
REACT – A constructivist theoretic framework for attitudes
1
A01
01
JB code
132250368
Christoph Purschke
Purschke, Christoph
Christoph
Purschke
University of Luxembourg
01
01
JB code
impact.39.03sou
06
10.1075/impact.39.03sou
55
84
30
Article
5
01
04
Mixing methods in the study of language attitudes
Mixing methods in the study of language attitudes
01
04
Theory and application
Theory and application
1
A01
01
JB code
465250369
Barbara Soukup
Soukup, Barbara
Barbara
Soukup
University of Vienna
01
01
JB code
impact.39.s2
06
10.1075/impact.39.s2
Section header
6
01
04
Part 2: Implicit and/or explicit? When are attitudes "authentic"?
Part 2: Implicit and/or explicit? When are attitudes “authentic”?
01
01
JB code
impact.39.04kri
06
10.1075/impact.39.04kri
85
116
32
Article
7
01
04
The
primary relevance of subconsciously offered attitudes
The primary relevance of subconsciously offered attitudes
01
04
Focusing the language ideological aspect of sociolinguistic change
Focusing the language ideological aspect of sociolinguistic change
1
A01
01
JB code
781250370
Tore Kristiansen
Kristiansen, Tore
Tore
Kristiansen
University of Copenhagen
01
01
JB code
impact.39.05pan
06
10.1075/impact.39.05pan
117
136
20
Article
8
01
04
Applying the Implicit Association Test to language attitudes research
Applying the Implicit Association Test to language attitudes research
1
A01
01
JB code
67250371
Andrew J. Pantos
Pantos, Andrew J.
Andrew J.
Pantos
Metropolitan State University of Denver
01
01
JB code
impact.39.06lou
06
10.1075/impact.39.06lou
137
156
20
Article
9
01
04
Implicit attitudes and the perception of sociolinguistic variation
Implicit attitudes and the perception of sociolinguistic variation
1
A01
01
JB code
499250372
Brandon C. Loudermilk
Loudermilk, Brandon C.
Brandon C.
Loudermilk
University of California-Davis
01
01
JB code
impact.39.s3
06
10.1075/impact.39.s3
Section header
10
01
04
Part 3: What factors awaken attitudes?
Part 3: What factors awaken attitudes?
01
01
JB code
impact.39.07cas
06
10.1075/impact.39.07cas
157
174
18
Article
11
01
04
Got class? Community-shared conceptualizations of social class in evaluative reactions to sociolinguistic variables
Got class? Community-shared conceptualizations of social class in evaluative reactions to sociolinguistic variables
1
A01
01
JB code
850250373
Laura Staum Casasanto
Staum Casasanto, Laura
Laura
Staum Casasanto
University of Chicago
2
A01
01
JB code
317250374
Stefan Grondelaers
Grondelaers, Stefan
Stefan
Grondelaers
Radboud University Nijmegen
3
A01
01
JB code
472250375
Roeland Hout
Hout, Roeland
Roeland
Hout
Radboud University Nijmegen
01
01
JB code
impact.39.08cam
06
10.1075/impact.39.08cam
175
190
16
Article
12
01
04
Perceived foreign accent as a predicator of face-voice match
Perceived foreign accent as a predicator of face-voice match
1
A01
01
JB code
19250376
Kathryn Campbell-Kibler
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn
Kathryn
Campbell-Kibler
The Ohio State University
2
A01
01
JB code
203250377
Elizabeth A. McCullough
McCullough, Elizabeth A.
Elizabeth A.
McCullough
The Ohio State University
01
01
JB code
impact.39.09gro
06
10.1075/impact.39.09gro
191
218
28
Article
13
01
04
Is Moroccan-flavoured Standard Dutch standard or not? On the use of perceptual criteria to determine the limits of standard languages
Is Moroccan-flavoured Standard Dutch standard or not? On the use of perceptual criteria to determine the limits of standard languages
1
A01
01
JB code
520250378
Stefan Grondelaers
Grondelaers, Stefan
Stefan
Grondelaers
Radboud University Nijmegen
2
A01
01
JB code
724250379
Paul Gent
Gent, Paul
Paul
Gent
Radboud University Nijmegen
3
A01
01
JB code
652250380
Roeland Hout
Hout, Roeland
Roeland
Hout
Radboud University Nijmegen
01
01
JB code
impact.39.10pri
06
10.1075/impact.39.10pri
219
242
24
Article
14
01
04
Attitudes and language detail
Attitudes and language detail
01
04
Effects of specifying linguistic stimuli
Effects of specifying linguistic stimuli
1
A01
01
JB code
559250381
Alexei Prikhodkine
Prikhodkine, Alexei
Alexei
Prikhodkine
University of Geneva
01
01
JB code
impact.39.11top
06
10.1075/impact.39.11top
243
246
4
Article
15
01
04
Topic Index
Topic Index
01
01
JB code
impact.39.12nam
06
10.1075/impact.39.12nam
247
250
4
Article
16
01
04
Name Index
Name Index
01
JB code
JBENJAMINS
John Benjamins Publishing Company
01
01
JB code
JB
John Benjamins Publishing Company
01
https://benjamins.com
Amsterdam
NL
00
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers
onix@benjamins.nl
04
01
00
20151216
C
2015
John Benjamins
D
2015
John Benjamins
02
WORLD
13
15
9789027258304
WORLD
03
01
JB
17
Google
03
https://play.google.com/store/books
21
01
00
Unqualified price
00
95.00
EUR
01
00
Unqualified price
00
80.00
GBP
01
00
Unqualified price
00
143.00
USD