287014943 03 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code Impact 39 Hb 15 9789027258304 06 10.1075/impact.39 13 2015029382 00 BB 08 615 gr 10 01 JB code Impact 02 1385-7908 02 39.00 01 02 IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 01 01 Responses to Language Varieties Variability, processes and outcomes Responses to Language Varieties: Variability, processes and outcomes 1 B01 01 JB code 567194168 Alexei Prikhodkine Prikhodkine, Alexei Alexei Prikhodkine University of Geneva 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/567194168 2 B01 01 JB code 307194167 Dennis R. Preston Preston, Dennis R. Dennis R. Preston Oklahoma State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/307194167 01 eng 11 263 03 03 xiv 03 00 249 03 01 23 417 03 2015 P120.V37 04 Language and languages--Variation. 04 Speech perception. 04 Language awareness. 10 LAN009000 12 CFB 24 JB code LIN.SOCIO Sociolinguistics and Dialectology 01 06 02 00 This book is about responses to language variety — their variability, shape, and content, as well as the variable cognitive and neural pathways underlying them. 03 00 This book is about responses to language variety — their variability, shape, and content, as well as the variable cognitive and neural pathways underlying them. The chapters explore access to, processing of, and outcomes of that diversity and complexity. Many traditions are represented: from social psychology come classic experimental methods as well as more current discourse-based analyses; anthropology is represented in indexicality, iconization, recursivity, erasure, enregisterment, and ideologies; the sociolinguistic focus on specific rather than global elements that trigger responses is highlighted. The individual chapters address a variety of questions concerning language attitude, belief, and ideology, in some cases singly, in others with a more general focus, including attempts to relate one style of research to another. If we accept the fact that individuals house great variability in the underlying cognitive structures that inform responses, it follows that no single way of eliciting and studying them will do. This book provides a tour of the emerging tools that have been productive in such investigations. 01 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/impact.39.png 01 01 D502 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027258304.jpg 01 01 D504 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027258304.tif 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/impact.39.hb.png 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/impact.39.png 02 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/impact.39.hb.png 03 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/impact.39.hb.png 01 01 JB code impact.39.001int 06 10.1075/impact.39.001int vii xiv 8 Article 1 01 04 Introduction Introduction 1 A01 01 JB code 352250365 Alexei Prikhodkine Prikhodkine, Alexei Alexei Prikhodkine 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/352250365 2 A01 01 JB code 543250366 Dennis R. Preston Preston, Dennis R. Dennis R. Preston 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/543250366 01 eng 01 01 JB code impact.39.s1 06 10.1075/impact.39.s1 Section header 2 01 04 Part 1: Theoretical Backgrounds Part 1: Theoretical Backgrounds 01 eng 01 01 JB code impact.39.01pre 06 10.1075/impact.39.01pre 1 36 36 Article 3 01 04 Does language regard vary? Does language regard vary? 1 A01 01 JB code 944250367 Dennis R. Preston Preston, Dennis R. Dennis R. Preston Oklahoma State University & Michigan State University (Emeritus) 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/944250367 01 eng 03 00 This paper outlines a cognitive map for variation in language attitudes, metalinguistic beliefs about language, and language ideological frameworks — grouped together as “language regard.” After establishing input, processing, and response models, it goes on to examine experimental findings that show variability in regard that are consistent with this map and to outline the importance of that variability to more general concerns of sociolinguistics, touching in particular on its explanatory position in studies of variation and change. 01 01 JB code impact.39.02pur 06 10.1075/impact.39.02pur 37 54 18 Article 4 01 04 REACT - A constructivist theoretic framework for attitudes REACT – A constructivist theoretic framework for attitudes 1 A01 01 JB code 132250368 Christoph Purschke Purschke, Christoph Christoph Purschke University of Luxembourg 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/132250368 01 eng 03 00 This text is devoted to a new theoretical framework for (language) attitudes (REACT) integrating both the traditional idea of attitudes as (more or less stable) cognitive assessment categories and the constructivist view on attitudes as situated evaluative practices. The text discusses five constitutive elements to the theory (Relevance, Evaluation, Activation, Construction, and Targeting) against the background of respective theories: a theory of actional relevance (cf. Schütz 1970), a listener judgment theory (cf. Purschke 2011), a model for cognitive activation (cf. Kroeber-Riel et al. 2009), a constructivist symbol theory (cf. Cassirer 1953–57 |1923–29|), and a model for attitude functions (cf. Katz 1960). The paper then concludes with proposing an integrative definition of attitudes as evaluation routines in social practices that conforms to the constructivist criticism of classic attitude theory, while at the same time taking account of the fundamental structuring patterns of social interaction that also determine the structure and dynamics of attitudes. 01 01 JB code impact.39.03sou 06 10.1075/impact.39.03sou 55 84 30 Article 5 01 04 Mixing methods in the study of language attitudes Mixing methods in the study of language attitudes 01 04 Theory and application Theory and application 1 A01 01 JB code 465250369 Barbara Soukup Soukup, Barbara Barbara Soukup University of Vienna 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/465250369 01 eng 03 00 Mixed methods research (MMR) is currently on the rise in the social sciences. This paper provides a theoretical discussion and a practical illustration of MMR in the social psychological study of language attitudes. First, I review perceived obstacles to MMR - in particular, the ‘incompatibility thesis’, whereby quantitative and qualitative methods are assumed to clash epistemologically. I propose an alternative account by which qual and quan research on language attitudes can be integrated on a common theoretical basis that holds attitudes to constitute interactionally processed ‘human epistemological constructs’ (HECs). I apply this approach in MMR on Austrian German, where I integrate a qual analysis of language-attitudinal HECs found in discourse data with a quan speaker evaluation experiment designed to corroborate the qual exegesis. 01 01 JB code impact.39.s2 06 10.1075/impact.39.s2 Section header 6 01 04 Part 2: Implicit and/or explicit? When are attitudes "authentic"? Part 2: Implicit and/or explicit? When are attitudes “authentic”? 01 eng 01 01 JB code impact.39.04kri 06 10.1075/impact.39.04kri 85 116 32 Article 7 01 04 The primary relevance of subconsciously offered attitudes The primary relevance of subconsciously offered attitudes 01 04 Focusing the language ideological aspect of sociolinguistic change Focusing the language ideological aspect of sociolinguistic change 1 A01 01 JB code 781250370 Tore Kristiansen Kristiansen, Tore Tore Kristiansen University of Copenhagen 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/781250370 01 eng 03 00 The chapter deals with the role of language-ideological structures in linguistic variation and change at the macro-level of societal life. It argues that we need to construe (conceptualize and operationalize) data collection contexts which allow for a clear distinction between consciously (overtly) and subconsciously (covertly) offered attitudes – because subconsciously offered attitudes appear to be a driving force in linguistic variation and change in a way that consciously offered attitudes are not. The argument is based on evidence from empirical investigations of attitudes and use in the ‘standard vs. non-standard’ dimension in Denmark, and in the ‘national vs. English’ dimension in seven Nordic communities (including the Icelandic, Faroese, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Finland-Swedish, and Finnish communities). 01 01 JB code impact.39.05pan 06 10.1075/impact.39.05pan 117 136 20 Article 8 01 04 Applying the Implicit Association Test to language attitudes research Applying the Implicit Association Test to language attitudes research 1 A01 01 JB code 67250371 Andrew J. Pantos Pantos, Andrew J. Andrew J. Pantos Metropolitan State University of Denver 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/67250371 01 eng 03 00 Incorporating concepts from the domain of Implicit Social Cognition (ISC), this quantitative study measured participants’ implicit attitudes (through an audio Implicit Association Test) and explicit attitudes (through self report questionnaires) toward foreign and U.S. accented speech stimuli. The study’s results revealed a pro-U.S. accent bias on the implicit measure, but a proforeign accent bias on explicit measures, supporting the conclusion that these are separable attitude constructs resulting from distinct mental processes. This distinction in attitude type explains previous inconsistencies in language attitudes research and is supported theoretically by the Associative Propositional Evaluation Model, a dynamic dual processing conceptualization of the attitude formation process consistent with ISC. 01 01 JB code impact.39.06lou 06 10.1075/impact.39.06lou 137 156 20 Article 9 01 04 Implicit attitudes and the perception of sociolinguistic variation Implicit attitudes and the perception of sociolinguistic variation 1 A01 01 JB code 499250372 Brandon C. Loudermilk Loudermilk, Brandon C. Brandon C. Loudermilk University of California-Davis 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/499250372 01 eng 03 00 We investigated individual differences in processing the social dimensions of speech, addressing whether the degree of implicit stereotypical attitude towards language variants modulates brain activity during comprehension. Subjects listened to spoken stories, in which sentence-final critical words were manipulated for ing/in’ variant which was congruent/incongruent with the variants in the preceding discourse and which was typical/atypical of speaker dialect. Subjects participated in an Implicit Association Test as a measure of language attitudes towards ing/in’ variation and were classified as high or low stereotype. Results showed that listeners with low IAT scores had higher N400-like negativities while processing word variants that violated dialectal expectancies (ing uttered by a Southern speaker and in’ spoken by a Californian). Our results provide evidence that the cognitive mechanisms that support language comprehension are sensitive not just to what is said, but also to how it is said, who says it, and who hears it. 01 01 JB code impact.39.s3 06 10.1075/impact.39.s3 Section header 10 01 04 Part 3: What factors awaken attitudes? Part 3: What factors awaken attitudes? 01 eng 01 01 JB code impact.39.07cas 06 10.1075/impact.39.07cas 157 174 18 Article 11 01 04 Got class? Community-shared conceptualizations of social class in evaluative reactions to sociolinguistic variables Got class? Community-shared conceptualizations of social class in evaluative reactions to sociolinguistic variables 1 A01 01 JB code 850250373 Laura Staum Casasanto Staum Casasanto, Laura Laura Staum Casasanto University of Chicago 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/850250373 2 A01 01 JB code 317250374 Stefan Grondelaers Grondelaers, Stefan Stefan Grondelaers Radboud University Nijmegen 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/317250374 3 A01 01 JB code 472250375 Roeland Hout Hout, Roeland Roeland Hout Radboud University Nijmegen 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/472250375 01 eng 03 00 In recent years, researchers have successfully used information about cultural identity and consumption behavior to uncover class-based variation in linguistic production data. Is this variation reflected in implicit class-related language attitudes, of which listeners may not even be aware? And which types of evaluative conceptualizations of class membership do listeners in fact use? In a two-alternative forced choice task, we compared how listeners associate linguistic variables with both more classic and newer conceptualizations of class membership. High social class responses were significantly more likely for standard linguistic variants than for nonstandard linguistic variants (for all five types of social class conceptualizations we used). The fact that there was no difference between the class conceptualizations indicates that conceptualizations in terms of economic production, culture, and consumption were equally successful in probing evaluative reactions to class-based linguistic variation in the region investigated. 01 01 JB code impact.39.08cam 06 10.1075/impact.39.08cam 175 190 16 Article 12 01 04 Perceived foreign accent as a predicator of face-voice match Perceived foreign accent as a predicator of face-voice match 1 A01 01 JB code 19250376 Kathryn Campbell-Kibler Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn Kathryn Campbell-Kibler The Ohio State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/19250376 2 A01 01 JB code 203250377 Elizabeth A. McCullough McCullough, Elizabeth A. Elizabeth A. McCullough The Ohio State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/203250377 01 eng 03 00 This study examines perceived accentedness as a predictor of perceived match between faces and voices. 85 pictures were rated for the likely education, masculinity and accentedness of the person depicted. Independently, 300 recordings of disyllabic English words from native speakers of English, Hindi, Korean, Mandarin and Spanish were rated for degree of perceived foreign accent. The highest and lowest rated tokens from each of three male speakers from each language background (30 total tokens) were selected, as were 15 pictures, maximizing the variability in perceived accentedness while avoiding extremes of education or masculinity. All pairwise combinations of these 15 faces and 30 voices were rated for perceived match. The results show that listeners have clear and structured perceptions of “fit” between faces and voices which are based in part, but not entirely, on the congruence of key social attributes such as perceived accentedness and local understandings of ethnolinguistic groupings. 01 01 JB code impact.39.09gro 06 10.1075/impact.39.09gro 191 218 28 Article 13 01 04 Is Moroccan-flavoured Standard Dutch standard or not? On the use of perceptual criteria to determine the limits of standard languages Is Moroccan-flavoured Standard Dutch standard or not? On the use of perceptual criteria to determine the limits of standard languages 1 A01 01 JB code 520250378 Stefan Grondelaers Grondelaers, Stefan Stefan Grondelaers Radboud University Nijmegen 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/520250378 2 A01 01 JB code 724250379 Paul Gent Gent, Paul Paul Gent Radboud University Nijmegen 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/724250379 3 A01 01 JB code 652250380 Roeland Hout Hout, Roeland Roeland Hout Radboud University Nijmegen 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/652250380 01 eng 03 00 In view of the fact that Netherlandic Standard Dutch has been found to be stratifying – i.e. incorporating regional accent variation to allow speakers to profile local group membership in addition to their national affiliation – an evident question is whether non-Dutch accents are also tolerated in private conceptualizations of the standard: is Moroccan-flavoured Dutch Netherlandic Standard Dutch? In a speaker evaluation experiment designed to answer that question, 212 male and female listener-judges rated 8 short clips of spontaneous speech produced by native and Moroccan Dutchmen on 12 measures selected in function of 5 dimensions of accent attitude architecture (Status, Dynamism, Personal Integrity, Solidarity and Accent Norm); listener-judges also rated speech clips in terms of how beautiful they found them. Principal Component Analysis demonstrated that ratings on the 12 measures correlated into a Status and an Attractiveness dimension. The fact that Moroccan Dutch was systematically downgraded on the status dimension, and the fact that the Moroccan accent was deemed significantly less beautiful than the native accents, strongly suggests that a Moroccan accent is not acceptable as an ingredient of Standard Dutch; neither are there any indications of imminent change in these evaluations. 01 01 JB code impact.39.10pri 06 10.1075/impact.39.10pri 219 242 24 Article 14 01 04 Attitudes and language detail Attitudes and language detail 01 04 Effects of specifying linguistic stimuli Effects of specifying linguistic stimuli 1 A01 01 JB code 559250381 Alexei Prikhodkine Prikhodkine, Alexei Alexei Prikhodkine University of Geneva 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/559250381 01 eng 03 00 In this chapter, I explore to what extent different levels of language detail in the presentation of attitude targets have an impact on the expression of language attitudes. Results from the research carried out in the Frenchspeaking part of Switzerland (Suisse romande) reveal that the evaluation of a given language variety through a global category name does not equal the sum of average evaluations of each specific feature composing that variety. Being ideologically loaded concepts, global category names (like accent) tend to elicit, in the Suisse romand context, attitudes mostly having for their target stigmatized patois features, while Swiss prestigious features are not mobilized by these concepts. Thus, the use of global category names for attitude elicitation in previous studies may have been a determining factor for the outcome of locating Standard French outside the Swiss community. Finally, results from my study indicate that the validity of language attitude data will be enhanced by taking into account ideology loaded in the process of sociolinguistic interpretation of global stimuli by lay persons, and by assigning to linguistic features under study the same level of specificity in terms of language regard as well as production. 01 01 JB code impact.39.11top 06 10.1075/impact.39.11top 243 246 4 Article 15 01 04 Topic Index Topic Index 01 eng 01 01 JB code impact.39.12nam 06 10.1075/impact.39.12nam 247 250 4 Article 16 01 04 Name Index Name Index 01 eng 01 JB code JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 https://benjamins.com 02 https://benjamins.com/catalog/impact.39 Amsterdam NL 00 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 04 01 00 20151216 C 2015 John Benjamins D 2015 John Benjamins 02 WORLD WORLD US CA MX 09 01 JB 1 John Benjamins Publishing Company +31 20 6304747 +31 20 6739773 bookorder@benjamins.nl 01 https://benjamins.com 21 17 24 01 00 Unqualified price 02 JB 1 02 95.00 EUR 02 00 Unqualified price 02 80.00 01 Z 0 GBP GB US CA MX 01 01 JB 2 John Benjamins Publishing Company +1 800 562-5666 +1 703 661-1501 benjamins@presswarehouse.com 01 https://benjamins.com 21 17 24 01 00 Unqualified price 02 JB 1 02 143.00 USD 628014944 03 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code Impact 39 Eb 15 9789027267931 06 10.1075/impact.39 13 2015033604 00 EA E107 10 01 JB code Impact 02 1385-7908 02 39.00 01 02 IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 11 01 JB code jbe-all 01 02 Full EBA collection (ca. 4,200 titles) 11 01 JB code jbe-2015-all 01 02 Complete backlist (3,208 titles, 1967–2015) 05 02 Complete backlist (1967–2015) 11 01 JB code jbe-2015-impact 01 02 IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society (vols. 1–40, 1997–2015) 05 02 Impact (vols. 1–40, 1997–2015) 11 01 JB code jbe-2015-linguistics 01 02 Subject collection: Linguistics (2,773 titles, 1967–2015) 05 02 Linguistics (1967–2015) 01 01 Responses to Language Varieties Variability, processes and outcomes Responses to Language Varieties: Variability, processes and outcomes 1 B01 01 JB code 567194168 Alexei Prikhodkine Prikhodkine, Alexei Alexei Prikhodkine University of Geneva 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/567194168 2 B01 01 JB code 307194167 Dennis R. Preston Preston, Dennis R. Dennis R. Preston Oklahoma State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/307194167 01 eng 11 263 03 03 xiv 03 00 249 03 01 23 417 03 2015 P120.V37 04 Language and languages--Variation. 04 Speech perception. 04 Language awareness. 10 LAN009000 12 CFB 24 JB code LIN.SOCIO Sociolinguistics and Dialectology 01 06 02 00 This book is about responses to language variety — their variability, shape, and content, as well as the variable cognitive and neural pathways underlying them. 03 00 This book is about responses to language variety — their variability, shape, and content, as well as the variable cognitive and neural pathways underlying them. The chapters explore access to, processing of, and outcomes of that diversity and complexity. Many traditions are represented: from social psychology come classic experimental methods as well as more current discourse-based analyses; anthropology is represented in indexicality, iconization, recursivity, erasure, enregisterment, and ideologies; the sociolinguistic focus on specific rather than global elements that trigger responses is highlighted. The individual chapters address a variety of questions concerning language attitude, belief, and ideology, in some cases singly, in others with a more general focus, including attempts to relate one style of research to another. If we accept the fact that individuals house great variability in the underlying cognitive structures that inform responses, it follows that no single way of eliciting and studying them will do. This book provides a tour of the emerging tools that have been productive in such investigations. 01 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/impact.39.png 01 01 D502 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027258304.jpg 01 01 D504 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027258304.tif 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/impact.39.hb.png 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/impact.39.png 02 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/impact.39.hb.png 03 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/impact.39.hb.png 01 01 JB code impact.39.001int 06 10.1075/impact.39.001int vii xiv 8 Article 1 01 04 Introduction Introduction 1 A01 01 JB code 352250365 Alexei Prikhodkine Prikhodkine, Alexei Alexei Prikhodkine 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/352250365 2 A01 01 JB code 543250366 Dennis R. Preston Preston, Dennis R. Dennis R. Preston 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/543250366 01 eng 01 01 JB code impact.39.s1 06 10.1075/impact.39.s1 Section header 2 01 04 Part 1: Theoretical Backgrounds Part 1: Theoretical Backgrounds 01 eng 01 01 JB code impact.39.01pre 06 10.1075/impact.39.01pre 1 36 36 Article 3 01 04 Does language regard vary? Does language regard vary? 1 A01 01 JB code 944250367 Dennis R. Preston Preston, Dennis R. Dennis R. Preston Oklahoma State University & Michigan State University (Emeritus) 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/944250367 01 eng 03 00 This paper outlines a cognitive map for variation in language attitudes, metalinguistic beliefs about language, and language ideological frameworks — grouped together as “language regard.” After establishing input, processing, and response models, it goes on to examine experimental findings that show variability in regard that are consistent with this map and to outline the importance of that variability to more general concerns of sociolinguistics, touching in particular on its explanatory position in studies of variation and change. 01 01 JB code impact.39.02pur 06 10.1075/impact.39.02pur 37 54 18 Article 4 01 04 REACT - A constructivist theoretic framework for attitudes REACT – A constructivist theoretic framework for attitudes 1 A01 01 JB code 132250368 Christoph Purschke Purschke, Christoph Christoph Purschke University of Luxembourg 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/132250368 01 eng 03 00 This text is devoted to a new theoretical framework for (language) attitudes (REACT) integrating both the traditional idea of attitudes as (more or less stable) cognitive assessment categories and the constructivist view on attitudes as situated evaluative practices. The text discusses five constitutive elements to the theory (Relevance, Evaluation, Activation, Construction, and Targeting) against the background of respective theories: a theory of actional relevance (cf. Schütz 1970), a listener judgment theory (cf. Purschke 2011), a model for cognitive activation (cf. Kroeber-Riel et al. 2009), a constructivist symbol theory (cf. Cassirer 1953–57 |1923–29|), and a model for attitude functions (cf. Katz 1960). The paper then concludes with proposing an integrative definition of attitudes as evaluation routines in social practices that conforms to the constructivist criticism of classic attitude theory, while at the same time taking account of the fundamental structuring patterns of social interaction that also determine the structure and dynamics of attitudes. 01 01 JB code impact.39.03sou 06 10.1075/impact.39.03sou 55 84 30 Article 5 01 04 Mixing methods in the study of language attitudes Mixing methods in the study of language attitudes 01 04 Theory and application Theory and application 1 A01 01 JB code 465250369 Barbara Soukup Soukup, Barbara Barbara Soukup University of Vienna 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/465250369 01 eng 03 00 Mixed methods research (MMR) is currently on the rise in the social sciences. This paper provides a theoretical discussion and a practical illustration of MMR in the social psychological study of language attitudes. First, I review perceived obstacles to MMR - in particular, the ‘incompatibility thesis’, whereby quantitative and qualitative methods are assumed to clash epistemologically. I propose an alternative account by which qual and quan research on language attitudes can be integrated on a common theoretical basis that holds attitudes to constitute interactionally processed ‘human epistemological constructs’ (HECs). I apply this approach in MMR on Austrian German, where I integrate a qual analysis of language-attitudinal HECs found in discourse data with a quan speaker evaluation experiment designed to corroborate the qual exegesis. 01 01 JB code impact.39.s2 06 10.1075/impact.39.s2 Section header 6 01 04 Part 2: Implicit and/or explicit? When are attitudes "authentic"? Part 2: Implicit and/or explicit? When are attitudes “authentic”? 01 eng 01 01 JB code impact.39.04kri 06 10.1075/impact.39.04kri 85 116 32 Article 7 01 04 The primary relevance of subconsciously offered attitudes The primary relevance of subconsciously offered attitudes 01 04 Focusing the language ideological aspect of sociolinguistic change Focusing the language ideological aspect of sociolinguistic change 1 A01 01 JB code 781250370 Tore Kristiansen Kristiansen, Tore Tore Kristiansen University of Copenhagen 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/781250370 01 eng 03 00 The chapter deals with the role of language-ideological structures in linguistic variation and change at the macro-level of societal life. It argues that we need to construe (conceptualize and operationalize) data collection contexts which allow for a clear distinction between consciously (overtly) and subconsciously (covertly) offered attitudes – because subconsciously offered attitudes appear to be a driving force in linguistic variation and change in a way that consciously offered attitudes are not. The argument is based on evidence from empirical investigations of attitudes and use in the ‘standard vs. non-standard’ dimension in Denmark, and in the ‘national vs. English’ dimension in seven Nordic communities (including the Icelandic, Faroese, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Finland-Swedish, and Finnish communities). 01 01 JB code impact.39.05pan 06 10.1075/impact.39.05pan 117 136 20 Article 8 01 04 Applying the Implicit Association Test to language attitudes research Applying the Implicit Association Test to language attitudes research 1 A01 01 JB code 67250371 Andrew J. Pantos Pantos, Andrew J. Andrew J. Pantos Metropolitan State University of Denver 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/67250371 01 eng 03 00 Incorporating concepts from the domain of Implicit Social Cognition (ISC), this quantitative study measured participants’ implicit attitudes (through an audio Implicit Association Test) and explicit attitudes (through self report questionnaires) toward foreign and U.S. accented speech stimuli. The study’s results revealed a pro-U.S. accent bias on the implicit measure, but a proforeign accent bias on explicit measures, supporting the conclusion that these are separable attitude constructs resulting from distinct mental processes. This distinction in attitude type explains previous inconsistencies in language attitudes research and is supported theoretically by the Associative Propositional Evaluation Model, a dynamic dual processing conceptualization of the attitude formation process consistent with ISC. 01 01 JB code impact.39.06lou 06 10.1075/impact.39.06lou 137 156 20 Article 9 01 04 Implicit attitudes and the perception of sociolinguistic variation Implicit attitudes and the perception of sociolinguistic variation 1 A01 01 JB code 499250372 Brandon C. Loudermilk Loudermilk, Brandon C. Brandon C. Loudermilk University of California-Davis 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/499250372 01 eng 03 00 We investigated individual differences in processing the social dimensions of speech, addressing whether the degree of implicit stereotypical attitude towards language variants modulates brain activity during comprehension. Subjects listened to spoken stories, in which sentence-final critical words were manipulated for ing/in’ variant which was congruent/incongruent with the variants in the preceding discourse and which was typical/atypical of speaker dialect. Subjects participated in an Implicit Association Test as a measure of language attitudes towards ing/in’ variation and were classified as high or low stereotype. Results showed that listeners with low IAT scores had higher N400-like negativities while processing word variants that violated dialectal expectancies (ing uttered by a Southern speaker and in’ spoken by a Californian). Our results provide evidence that the cognitive mechanisms that support language comprehension are sensitive not just to what is said, but also to how it is said, who says it, and who hears it. 01 01 JB code impact.39.s3 06 10.1075/impact.39.s3 Section header 10 01 04 Part 3: What factors awaken attitudes? Part 3: What factors awaken attitudes? 01 eng 01 01 JB code impact.39.07cas 06 10.1075/impact.39.07cas 157 174 18 Article 11 01 04 Got class? Community-shared conceptualizations of social class in evaluative reactions to sociolinguistic variables Got class? Community-shared conceptualizations of social class in evaluative reactions to sociolinguistic variables 1 A01 01 JB code 850250373 Laura Staum Casasanto Staum Casasanto, Laura Laura Staum Casasanto University of Chicago 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/850250373 2 A01 01 JB code 317250374 Stefan Grondelaers Grondelaers, Stefan Stefan Grondelaers Radboud University Nijmegen 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/317250374 3 A01 01 JB code 472250375 Roeland Hout Hout, Roeland Roeland Hout Radboud University Nijmegen 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/472250375 01 eng 03 00 In recent years, researchers have successfully used information about cultural identity and consumption behavior to uncover class-based variation in linguistic production data. Is this variation reflected in implicit class-related language attitudes, of which listeners may not even be aware? And which types of evaluative conceptualizations of class membership do listeners in fact use? In a two-alternative forced choice task, we compared how listeners associate linguistic variables with both more classic and newer conceptualizations of class membership. High social class responses were significantly more likely for standard linguistic variants than for nonstandard linguistic variants (for all five types of social class conceptualizations we used). The fact that there was no difference between the class conceptualizations indicates that conceptualizations in terms of economic production, culture, and consumption were equally successful in probing evaluative reactions to class-based linguistic variation in the region investigated. 01 01 JB code impact.39.08cam 06 10.1075/impact.39.08cam 175 190 16 Article 12 01 04 Perceived foreign accent as a predicator of face-voice match Perceived foreign accent as a predicator of face-voice match 1 A01 01 JB code 19250376 Kathryn Campbell-Kibler Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn Kathryn Campbell-Kibler The Ohio State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/19250376 2 A01 01 JB code 203250377 Elizabeth A. McCullough McCullough, Elizabeth A. Elizabeth A. McCullough The Ohio State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/203250377 01 eng 03 00 This study examines perceived accentedness as a predictor of perceived match between faces and voices. 85 pictures were rated for the likely education, masculinity and accentedness of the person depicted. Independently, 300 recordings of disyllabic English words from native speakers of English, Hindi, Korean, Mandarin and Spanish were rated for degree of perceived foreign accent. The highest and lowest rated tokens from each of three male speakers from each language background (30 total tokens) were selected, as were 15 pictures, maximizing the variability in perceived accentedness while avoiding extremes of education or masculinity. All pairwise combinations of these 15 faces and 30 voices were rated for perceived match. The results show that listeners have clear and structured perceptions of “fit” between faces and voices which are based in part, but not entirely, on the congruence of key social attributes such as perceived accentedness and local understandings of ethnolinguistic groupings. 01 01 JB code impact.39.09gro 06 10.1075/impact.39.09gro 191 218 28 Article 13 01 04 Is Moroccan-flavoured Standard Dutch standard or not? On the use of perceptual criteria to determine the limits of standard languages Is Moroccan-flavoured Standard Dutch standard or not? On the use of perceptual criteria to determine the limits of standard languages 1 A01 01 JB code 520250378 Stefan Grondelaers Grondelaers, Stefan Stefan Grondelaers Radboud University Nijmegen 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/520250378 2 A01 01 JB code 724250379 Paul Gent Gent, Paul Paul Gent Radboud University Nijmegen 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/724250379 3 A01 01 JB code 652250380 Roeland Hout Hout, Roeland Roeland Hout Radboud University Nijmegen 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/652250380 01 eng 03 00 In view of the fact that Netherlandic Standard Dutch has been found to be stratifying – i.e. incorporating regional accent variation to allow speakers to profile local group membership in addition to their national affiliation – an evident question is whether non-Dutch accents are also tolerated in private conceptualizations of the standard: is Moroccan-flavoured Dutch Netherlandic Standard Dutch? In a speaker evaluation experiment designed to answer that question, 212 male and female listener-judges rated 8 short clips of spontaneous speech produced by native and Moroccan Dutchmen on 12 measures selected in function of 5 dimensions of accent attitude architecture (Status, Dynamism, Personal Integrity, Solidarity and Accent Norm); listener-judges also rated speech clips in terms of how beautiful they found them. Principal Component Analysis demonstrated that ratings on the 12 measures correlated into a Status and an Attractiveness dimension. The fact that Moroccan Dutch was systematically downgraded on the status dimension, and the fact that the Moroccan accent was deemed significantly less beautiful than the native accents, strongly suggests that a Moroccan accent is not acceptable as an ingredient of Standard Dutch; neither are there any indications of imminent change in these evaluations. 01 01 JB code impact.39.10pri 06 10.1075/impact.39.10pri 219 242 24 Article 14 01 04 Attitudes and language detail Attitudes and language detail 01 04 Effects of specifying linguistic stimuli Effects of specifying linguistic stimuli 1 A01 01 JB code 559250381 Alexei Prikhodkine Prikhodkine, Alexei Alexei Prikhodkine University of Geneva 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/559250381 01 eng 03 00 In this chapter, I explore to what extent different levels of language detail in the presentation of attitude targets have an impact on the expression of language attitudes. Results from the research carried out in the Frenchspeaking part of Switzerland (Suisse romande) reveal that the evaluation of a given language variety through a global category name does not equal the sum of average evaluations of each specific feature composing that variety. Being ideologically loaded concepts, global category names (like accent) tend to elicit, in the Suisse romand context, attitudes mostly having for their target stigmatized patois features, while Swiss prestigious features are not mobilized by these concepts. Thus, the use of global category names for attitude elicitation in previous studies may have been a determining factor for the outcome of locating Standard French outside the Swiss community. Finally, results from my study indicate that the validity of language attitude data will be enhanced by taking into account ideology loaded in the process of sociolinguistic interpretation of global stimuli by lay persons, and by assigning to linguistic features under study the same level of specificity in terms of language regard as well as production. 01 01 JB code impact.39.11top 06 10.1075/impact.39.11top 243 246 4 Article 15 01 04 Topic Index Topic Index 01 eng 01 01 JB code impact.39.12nam 06 10.1075/impact.39.12nam 247 250 4 Article 16 01 04 Name Index Name Index 01 eng 01 JB code JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 https://benjamins.com 02 https://benjamins.com/catalog/impact.39 Amsterdam NL 00 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 04 01 00 20151216 C 2015 John Benjamins D 2015 John Benjamins 02 WORLD 13 15 9789027258304 WORLD 09 01 JB 3 John Benjamins e-Platform 03 https://jbe-platform.com 29 https://jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027267931 21 01 00 Unqualified price 02 95.00 EUR 01 00 Unqualified price 02 80.00 GBP GB 01 00 Unqualified price 02 143.00 USD 640016754 03 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code Impact 39 GE 15 9789027267931 06 10.1075/impact.39 13 2015033604 00 EA E133 10 01 JB code Impact 02 JB code 1385-7908 02 39.00 01 02 IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 01 01 Responses to Language Varieties Responses to Language Varieties 1 B01 01 JB code 567194168 Alexei Prikhodkine Prikhodkine, Alexei Alexei Prikhodkine University of Geneva 2 B01 01 JB code 307194167 Dennis R. Preston Preston, Dennis R. Dennis R. Preston Oklahoma State University 01 eng 11 263 03 03 xiv 03 00 249 03 24 JB code LIN.SOCIO Sociolinguistics and Dialectology 10 LAN009000 12 CFB 01 06 02 00 This book is about responses to language variety — their variability, shape, and content, as well as the variable cognitive and neural pathways underlying them. 03 00 This book is about responses to language variety — their variability, shape, and content, as well as the variable cognitive and neural pathways underlying them. The chapters explore access to, processing of, and outcomes of that diversity and complexity. Many traditions are represented: from social psychology come classic experimental methods as well as more current discourse-based analyses; anthropology is represented in indexicality, iconization, recursivity, erasure, enregisterment, and ideologies; the sociolinguistic focus on specific rather than global elements that trigger responses is highlighted. The individual chapters address a variety of questions concerning language attitude, belief, and ideology, in some cases singly, in others with a more general focus, including attempts to relate one style of research to another. If we accept the fact that individuals house great variability in the underlying cognitive structures that inform responses, it follows that no single way of eliciting and studying them will do. This book provides a tour of the emerging tools that have been productive in such investigations. 01 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/impact.39.png 01 01 D502 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027258304.jpg 01 01 D504 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027258304.tif 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/impact.39.hb.png 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/impact.39.png 02 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/impact.39.hb.png 03 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/impact.39.hb.png 01 01 JB code impact.39.001int 06 10.1075/impact.39.001int vii xiv 8 Article 1 01 04 Introduction Introduction 1 A01 01 JB code 352250365 Alexei Prikhodkine Prikhodkine, Alexei Alexei Prikhodkine 2 A01 01 JB code 543250366 Dennis R. Preston Preston, Dennis R. Dennis R. Preston 01 01 JB code impact.39.s1 06 10.1075/impact.39.s1 Section header 2 01 04 Part 1: Theoretical Backgrounds Part 1: Theoretical Backgrounds 01 01 JB code impact.39.01pre 06 10.1075/impact.39.01pre 1 36 36 Article 3 01 04 Does language regard vary? Does language regard vary? 1 A01 01 JB code 944250367 Dennis R. Preston Preston, Dennis R. Dennis R. Preston Oklahoma State University & Michigan State University (Emeritus) 01 01 JB code impact.39.02pur 06 10.1075/impact.39.02pur 37 54 18 Article 4 01 04 REACT - A constructivist theoretic framework for attitudes REACT – A constructivist theoretic framework for attitudes 1 A01 01 JB code 132250368 Christoph Purschke Purschke, Christoph Christoph Purschke University of Luxembourg 01 01 JB code impact.39.03sou 06 10.1075/impact.39.03sou 55 84 30 Article 5 01 04 Mixing methods in the study of language attitudes Mixing methods in the study of language attitudes 01 04 Theory and application Theory and application 1 A01 01 JB code 465250369 Barbara Soukup Soukup, Barbara Barbara Soukup University of Vienna 01 01 JB code impact.39.s2 06 10.1075/impact.39.s2 Section header 6 01 04 Part 2: Implicit and/or explicit? When are attitudes "authentic"? Part 2: Implicit and/or explicit? When are attitudes “authentic”? 01 01 JB code impact.39.04kri 06 10.1075/impact.39.04kri 85 116 32 Article 7 01 04 The primary relevance of subconsciously offered attitudes The primary relevance of subconsciously offered attitudes 01 04 Focusing the language ideological aspect of sociolinguistic change Focusing the language ideological aspect of sociolinguistic change 1 A01 01 JB code 781250370 Tore Kristiansen Kristiansen, Tore Tore Kristiansen University of Copenhagen 01 01 JB code impact.39.05pan 06 10.1075/impact.39.05pan 117 136 20 Article 8 01 04 Applying the Implicit Association Test to language attitudes research Applying the Implicit Association Test to language attitudes research 1 A01 01 JB code 67250371 Andrew J. Pantos Pantos, Andrew J. Andrew J. Pantos Metropolitan State University of Denver 01 01 JB code impact.39.06lou 06 10.1075/impact.39.06lou 137 156 20 Article 9 01 04 Implicit attitudes and the perception of sociolinguistic variation Implicit attitudes and the perception of sociolinguistic variation 1 A01 01 JB code 499250372 Brandon C. Loudermilk Loudermilk, Brandon C. Brandon C. Loudermilk University of California-Davis 01 01 JB code impact.39.s3 06 10.1075/impact.39.s3 Section header 10 01 04 Part 3: What factors awaken attitudes? Part 3: What factors awaken attitudes? 01 01 JB code impact.39.07cas 06 10.1075/impact.39.07cas 157 174 18 Article 11 01 04 Got class? Community-shared conceptualizations of social class in evaluative reactions to sociolinguistic variables Got class? Community-shared conceptualizations of social class in evaluative reactions to sociolinguistic variables 1 A01 01 JB code 850250373 Laura Staum Casasanto Staum Casasanto, Laura Laura Staum Casasanto University of Chicago 2 A01 01 JB code 317250374 Stefan Grondelaers Grondelaers, Stefan Stefan Grondelaers Radboud University Nijmegen 3 A01 01 JB code 472250375 Roeland Hout Hout, Roeland Roeland Hout Radboud University Nijmegen 01 01 JB code impact.39.08cam 06 10.1075/impact.39.08cam 175 190 16 Article 12 01 04 Perceived foreign accent as a predicator of face-voice match Perceived foreign accent as a predicator of face-voice match 1 A01 01 JB code 19250376 Kathryn Campbell-Kibler Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn Kathryn Campbell-Kibler The Ohio State University 2 A01 01 JB code 203250377 Elizabeth A. McCullough McCullough, Elizabeth A. Elizabeth A. McCullough The Ohio State University 01 01 JB code impact.39.09gro 06 10.1075/impact.39.09gro 191 218 28 Article 13 01 04 Is Moroccan-flavoured Standard Dutch standard or not? On the use of perceptual criteria to determine the limits of standard languages Is Moroccan-flavoured Standard Dutch standard or not? On the use of perceptual criteria to determine the limits of standard languages 1 A01 01 JB code 520250378 Stefan Grondelaers Grondelaers, Stefan Stefan Grondelaers Radboud University Nijmegen 2 A01 01 JB code 724250379 Paul Gent Gent, Paul Paul Gent Radboud University Nijmegen 3 A01 01 JB code 652250380 Roeland Hout Hout, Roeland Roeland Hout Radboud University Nijmegen 01 01 JB code impact.39.10pri 06 10.1075/impact.39.10pri 219 242 24 Article 14 01 04 Attitudes and language detail Attitudes and language detail 01 04 Effects of specifying linguistic stimuli Effects of specifying linguistic stimuli 1 A01 01 JB code 559250381 Alexei Prikhodkine Prikhodkine, Alexei Alexei Prikhodkine University of Geneva 01 01 JB code impact.39.11top 06 10.1075/impact.39.11top 243 246 4 Article 15 01 04 Topic Index Topic Index 01 01 JB code impact.39.12nam 06 10.1075/impact.39.12nam 247 250 4 Article 16 01 04 Name Index Name Index 01 JB code JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 https://benjamins.com Amsterdam NL 00 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 04 01 00 20151216 C 2015 John Benjamins D 2015 John Benjamins 02 WORLD 13 15 9789027258304 WORLD 03 01 JB 17 Google 03 https://play.google.com/store/books 21 01 00 Unqualified price 00 95.00 EUR 01 00 Unqualified price 00 80.00 GBP 01 00 Unqualified price 00 143.00 USD