Article published in:
(Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions
Edited by Chaoqun Xie
[Internet Pragmatics 1:2] 2018
► pp. 329351


2002aRhetorik (trans. and comm. by Christoph Rapp). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
2002bNikomachische Ethik (trans. and comm. by Ursula Wolf). Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Banks, James
2010 “Regulating hate speech online.” International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 24(3): 233–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, Nikolaus
2016 “Hassbotschaften und Hetze im Internet als Aufforderung zu Straftaten?” [Hate messages and rabble-rousing in the internet as incitement to criminal offences?] Juristische Ausbildung 4: 381–389.Google Scholar
[ p. 347 ]
Brodnig, Ingrid
2016Hass im Netz. Wien: Brandstätter.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an anatomy of impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25(3): 349–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 “Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link .” Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 35–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann
2003 “Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 35(10–11): 1545–1579. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deumert, Ana
2014 “The performance of a ludic self on social network(ing) sites.” In The Language of Social Media, ed. by Philip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 23–45. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dittler, Ullrich, and Michael Hoyer
(eds.) 2014Social Network – Die Revolution der Kommunikation. München: Kopaed.Google Scholar
Duggan, Maeve
2014Online Harassment. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. http://​www​.pewinternet​.org​/2014​/10​/22​/online​-harassment/ (accessed 11 July 2017).
Gordon, Robert W.
2001 “Legalizing outrage.” In Aftermath. The Clinton Impeachment and the Presidency in the Age of Political Spectacle, ed. by Leonard V. Kaplan, and Beverly I. Moran, 97–112. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Sage L.
2008 “A manual for (im)politeness?: The impact of the FAQ in an electronic community of Practice.” In Impoliteness in Language, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 281–304. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Graham, Sage L., and Claire Hardaker
2017 “(Im)politeness in digital communication.” In Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 785–814. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Groarke, Leo, Catherine H. Palczewski, and David Godden
2016 “Navigating the visual turn in argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy 52(4): 217–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan, and Selin Kesebir
2010 “Morality.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, ed. by Susan T. Fiske, Daniel T. Gilbert, and Gardner Lindzey, 797–852. Hoboken, N. J.: Wiley. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, Wei-Lin Melody Chang, and Dániel Z. Kádár
2015 “ ‘Doing deference’: Identities and relational practices in Chinese online discussion boards.” Pragmatics 25(1): 73–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ihnatko, Andy
(1997) Cyberspeak. An Online Dictionary. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z.
2017Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh
2013Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred
1992Alltagslogik. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
[ p. 348 ]
1996 “Structural semantics and Latin linguistics.” In Aspects of Latin, ed. by Hannah Rosén, 603–617. Innsbruck: Verlag des Instituts für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
1997 “Varieties of rudeness: Types and functions of impolite utterances.” Functions of Language 4 (2): 251–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999 “Zum Wortfeld ‘Liebe-Haß’ im Altgriechischen.” In Studia Celtica et Indogermanica, ed. by Peter Anreiter, and Erzsébet Jerem, 163–177. Budapest: Archäolingua.Google Scholar
2004 “Metaphern für Emotionen: Universalien oder Kulturspezifika?” In Translation in der globalen Welt und neue Wege in the Sprach- und Übersetzungsausbildung, ed. by Lew N. Zybatow, 61–91. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2008 “Impoliteness and emotional arguments.” Journal of Politeness Research 4(2): 243–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred, and Maria Stopfner
2017 “Ideologies of politeness.” In Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 61–87. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kleineberg, Christoph
2014 “Shitstorm-Attacken. Digitaler Orkan oder Sturm im Wasserglas.” In Social Network – Die Revolution der Kommunikation, ed. by Ullrich Dittler, and Michael Hoyer, 61–70. München: Kopaed.Google Scholar
Kleinke, Sonja, and Birte Bös
2015 “Intergroup rudeness and the metapragmatics of its negotiation in online discussion fora.” Pragmatics 25(1): 47–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langlotz, Andreas, and Miriam A. Locher
2017 “(Im)politeness and emotion.” In Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 287–322. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A.
2015 “Interpersonal pragmatics and its link to (im)politeness research.” Journal of Pragmatics 86: 5–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Sara
2003Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neurauter-Kessels, Manuela
2011 “Im/polite reader responses on British online news sites.” Journal of Politeness Research 7(2): 187–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nübling, Damaris
2014 “ Das Merkel – Das Neutrum bei weiblichen Familiennamen als derogatives Genus? “ In Linguistik der Familiennamen, ed. by Friedhelm Debus, Rita Heuser, and Damaris Nübling, 205–232. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar
Page, Ruth
2014 “Hoaxes, hacking and humour: Analysing impersonated identity on social network sites.” In The Language of Social Media, ed. by Philip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 46–64. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
1983Traité de l’argumentation. Bruxelles: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Perelmutter, Renee
2013 “ Klassika zhanra: The flamewar as a genre in the Russian bloggosphere.” Journal of Pragmatics 45(1): 74–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 349 ]
Schegloff, Emanuel
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1984 “Jewish argument as sociability.” Language in Society 13(3): 311–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Jan-Hinrik
2013Social Media. Wiesbaden: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzhaupt-Scholz, Dorothea
2004Impeachment im digitalen Zeitalter. München: Fischer.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Dániel Z. Kádár
2016 “The bases of (im)politeness evaluations: Culture, the moral order and the East-West debate.” East Asian Pragmatics 1(1): 73–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy
2012The Harm in Hate Speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas N.
1992Slippery Slope Arguments. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J.
2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993Webster’s New Encyclopaedic Dictionary. New York: Black Dog & Leventhal.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2015Politics of Fear. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Xie, Chaoqun
2007 “Controversies about politeness.” In Traditions of Controversy, ed. by Marcelo Dascal, and Han-liang Chang, 249–266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Rassismus Report. Wien: Verein Zara.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

No author info given
2020. Soziolinguistische Bibliographie europäischer Länder für 2018Sociolinguistic Bibliography of European Countries for 2018Bibliographie sociolinguistique des pays européens pour 2018. Sociolinguistica 34:1  pp. 277 ff. Crossref logo
Andersson, Marta
2021. The climate of climate change: Impoliteness as a hallmark of homophily in YouTube comment threads on Greta Thunberg's environmental activism. Journal of Pragmatics 178  pp. 93 ff. Crossref logo
Badarneh, Muhammad A.
2020. ‘Like a donkey carrying books’. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Ran, Yongping, Linsen Zhao & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. The rite of reintegrative shaming in Chinese public dispute mediation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1  pp. 40 ff. Crossref logo
Wang, Jiayi
2020. How and why people are impolite in danmu?. Internet Pragmatics Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.