Article published in:
Internet Pragmatics
Vol. 3:1 (2020) ► pp. 6494
References

References

Alhabash, Saleem, and Mengyan Ma
2017 “A tale of four platforms: Motivations and uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students?Social Media + Society 3(1): 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beger, Anke
2011 “Deliberate metaphors? An exploration of the choice and functions of metaphors in US-American college lectures.” Metaphorik.de 20: 39–60.Google Scholar
Benedek, Mathias, Roger Beaty, Emanuel Jauk, Karl Koschutnig, Andreas Fink, Paul J. Silvia, Beate Dunst, and Aljoscha C. Neubauer
2014 “Creating metaphors: The neural basis of figurative language production.” Neuroimage 90(100): 99–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boeynaems, Amber, Christian Burgers, Elly A. Konijn, and Gerard J. Steen
2017 “The effects of metaphorical framing on political persuasion: A systematic literature review.” Metaphor & Symbol 32(2): 118–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boozer, Robert W., David C. Wyld, and James Grant
1991 “Using metaphor to create more effective sales messages.” The Journal of Consumer Marketing 8(2): 59–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brugman, Britta C., Christian Burgers, and Barbara Vis
2019 “Metaphorical framing in political discourse through words vs. concepts: A meta-analysis.” Language and Cognition 11(1): 41–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burgers, Christian, Melanie Jong Tjien Fa, and Anneke de Graaf
2019 “A tale of two swamps: Transformations of a metaphorical frame in online partisan media.” Journal of Pragmatics 141: 57–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burroughs, James E., C. Page Moreau, and David Glen Mick
2008 “Toward a psychology of consumer creativity.” In Handbook of Consumer Psychology, ed. by Curtis P. Haugtvedt, Paul M. Herr, and Frank R. Kardes, 1011–1038. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald
2004Language and Creativity: The Art of Common Talk. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chaiken, Shelly
1987 “The heuristic model of persuasion.” In Social Influence: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 5, ed. by Mark P. Zanna, James M. Olsen, and C. Peter Herman, 3–39. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Deignan, Alice
2005Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delfino, Manuela, and Stefania Manca
2006 “The expression of social presence through the use of figurative language in a web-based learning environment.” Computers in Human Behavior 23(5): 2190–2211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dogruel, Leyla, Sven Joeckel, and Nicholas D. Bowman
2015 “Choosing the right app: An exploratory perspective on heuristic decision processes for smartphone app selection.” Mobile Media & Communication 3(1): 125–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
2014 “Towards a dialogic syntax.” Cognitive Linguistics 25(3): 359–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Escalas, Jennifer Edson
2007 “Self-referencing and persuasion: Narrative transportation versus analytical elaboration.” Journal of Consumer Research 33(4): 421–429. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flor, Michael, and Uri Hadar
2005 “The production of metaphoric expressions in spontaneous speech: A controlled-setting experiment.” Metaphor and Symbol 20(1): 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, Charles
2017 “Visual and multimodal metaphor in advertising: Cultural perspectives.” Styles of Communication 9(2): 26–41.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr.
1994The Poetics of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2018 “Words making love together: Dynamics of metaphoric creativity.” In Cultures and Traditions of Wordplay and Wordplay Research, ed. by Esme Winter-Froemel, and Verana Thaler, 23–46. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., and Lynne Cameron
2008 “The social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance.” Cognitive Systems Research 9(1–2): 64–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goncalo, Jack A., Francis J. Flynn, and Sharon H. Kim
2010 “Are two narcissist better than one? The link between narcissism, perceived creativity, and creative performance.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36(11): 1148–1495. Crossref
Hussey, Karen A., and Albert N. Katz
2006 “Metaphor production in online conversation: Gender and friendship status.” Discourse Processes 42(1): 75–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Rodney H.
2012Discourse and Creativity. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Koroleva, Ksenia, Vid Stimac, Hanna Krasnova, and Dominik Kunze
2011 “I like it because I (‘m) like you – Measuring user attitudes towards information on Facebook.” ICIS 2011 Proceedings 26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krennmayr, Tina
2015 “What corpus linguistics can tell us about metaphor use in newspaper texts.” Journalism studies 16(4): 530–546. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Landis, J. Richard, and Gary G. Koch
1977 “The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.” Biometrics 33: 159–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, Jeannette
2001 “The use of metaphor in university lectures and the problems that it causes for overseas students.” Teaching in Higher Education 6(3): 333–349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lubinga, Elizabeth, Margrit Schulze, Carel Jansen, and Alfons Maes
2010 “HIV/ AIDS messages as a spur for conversation among young South Africans?African Journal of AIDS Research 9(2): 175–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mascheroni, Giovanna, and Maria Francesca Murru
2017 “ ‘I can share politics but I don’t discuss it’: Everyday practices of political talk on Facebook.” Social Media + Society 4(4): 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, Miriam J., Andrew J. Flanagin, and Ryn B. Medders
2010 “Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online.” Journal of Communication 60(3): 413–439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Möller, A. Marthe, Susanne E. Baumgartner, Rinaldo Kühne, and Jochen Peter
2019 “The effects of social information on the enjoyment of online videos: An eye tracking study on the role of attention.” Media Psychology. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas
2017 “Metaphor, irony and sarcasm in public discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 109: 95–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nemeth, Charlan Jeanne, and Margaret Ormiston
2007 “Creative idea generation: Harmony versus stimulation.” European Journal of Social Psychology 37(3): 524–535. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
North, Sarah
2007 “ ‘The voices, the voices’: Creativity in online conversation.” Applied Linguistics 28(4): 538–555. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noyes, Andrew
2006 “Using metaphor in mathematics teacher preparation.” Teaching and Teacher Education 22(7): 898–909. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ozanne, Marie, Ana Cueva Navas, Anna S. Mattila, and Hubert B. Van Hoof
2017 “An investigation into Facebook ‘liking’ behavior: An exploratory study.” Social Media + Society 3(2): 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petty, Richard E., and John T. Cacioppo
1986 “The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19: 123–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pretz, Jean, & Victoria A. McCollum
2014 “Self-perceptions of creativity do not always reflect actual creative performance.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 8(2): 227–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. David, and Valrie Dyhouse
2008 “Hair of the frog and other empty metaphors: The play element in figurative language.” Metaphor and Symbol 23(2): 85–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosengren, Sara, Micael Dahlén, and Erik Modig
2013 “Think outside the ad: Can advertising creativity benefit more than the advertiser?Journal of Advertising 42(4): 320–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rossiter, John R., Larry Percy, and Lars Bergkvist
2018Marketing Communications: Objectives, Strategy, Tactics. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Slater, Michael D.
2016 “Combining content analysis and assessment of exposure through self-report, spatial, or temporal variation in media effects research.” Communication Methods and Measures 10(2–3): 173–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slater, Michael D., Catherine E. Goodall, and Andrew F. Hayes
2009 “Self-reported news attention does assess differential processing of media content: An experiment on risk perceptions utilizing a random sample of U.S. local crime and accident news.” Journal of Communication 59(1): 117–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sloan, Luke, Jeffrey Morgan, Pete Burnap, and Matthew Williams
2015 “Who tweets? Deriving the demographic characteristics of age, occupation and social class from Twitter user meta-data.” PloSONE 10(3). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sopory, Pradeep, and James Price Dillard
2002 “The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis.” Human Communication Research 28(3): 382–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Statista
2019 “Number of social media users worldwide from 2010 to 2021 (in billions).” https://​www​.statista​.com​/statistics​/278414​/number​-of​-worldwide​-social​-network​-users/ (accessed 5 April 2019).
Steen, Gerard J.
2008 “The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor.” Metaphor & Symbol 23(4): 213–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, Gerard J., Aletta G. Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna A. Kaal, and Tina Krennmayr
2010 “Metaphor in usage.” Cognitive Linguistics 21(4): 765–796. Crossref
Sundar, S. Shyam
2008 “The MAIN Model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility.” In Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility, ed. by Miriam J. Metzger, and Andrew J. Flanagin, 73–100. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suomi, Kati, Mervi Luonila, and Jaana Tähtinen
2020 “Ironic festival brand co-creation.” Journal of Business Research 106: 211–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thackeray, Rosemary, Brad L. Neiger, Carl Hanson, and James F. McKenzie
2008 “Enhancing promotional strategies within social marketing programs: Use of Web 2.0 social media.” Health Promotion Practice 9(4): 338–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Lynn, and Catherine Beauchamp
2011 “Understanding teachers’ professional identities through metaphor.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27(4): 762–769. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tom, Gail, and Anmarie Eves
1999 “The use of rhetorical devices in advertising.” Journal of Advertising Research 39: 39–44.Google Scholar
Trepte, Sabine, and Leonard Reinecke
2013 “The reciprocal effects of social network site use and the disposition for self-disclosure: A longitudinal study.” Computers in Human Behavior 29(3): 1102–1112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Heerik, Romy A. M., Charlotte M. J. van Hooijdonk, Christian Burgers, and Gerard J. Steen
2017 “Smoking is sóóó … sandals and white socks. Co-creation of a Dutch anti-smoking campaign to change social norms.” Health Communication 32(5): 621–628. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Deursen, Alexander J. A. M., Colin L. Bolle, Sabrina M. Hegner, and Piet A. M. Kommers
2015 “Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: The role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender.” Computers in Human Behavior 45: 411–420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Enschot, Renske, and Hans Hoeken
2015 “The occurrence and effects of verbal and visual anchoring of tropes on the perceived comprehensibility and liking of TV commercials.” Journal of Advertising 44(1): 25–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Mulken, Margot, Andreu van Hooft, and Ulrike Nederstigt
2014 “Finding the tipping point: Visual metaphor and conceptual complexity in advertising.” Journal of Advertising 43(4): 333–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Veale, Tony, Kurt Feyaerts, and Charles Forceville
(eds.) 2013Creativity and the Agile Mind: A Multi-Disciplinary Study of a Multi-Faceted Phenomenon. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wan, Wan, and Graham Low
2015Elicited Metaphor Analysis in Educational Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams-Whitney, Diana, Jeffery Scott Mio, and Paul Whitney
1992 “Metaphor production in creative writing.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 21: 497–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwass, Vladimir
2010 “Co-creation: Toward a taxonomy and an integrated research perspective.” International Journal of Electronic Commerce 15(1): 11–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar