Article published in:
Interaction Studies
Vol. 16:1 (2015) ► pp. 6888
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Bartneck, Christoph, Tony Belpaeme, Friederike Eyssel, Takayuki Kanda, Merel Keijsers & Selma Šabanović
2020.  In Human-Robot Interaction, Crossref logo
Butler, Crystal, Stephanie Michalowicz, Lakshmi Subramanian & Winslow Burleson
2017.  In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology,  pp. 773 ff. Crossref logo
Erden, Mustafa Suphi
2020. Social Robotics and Engineering Students: Do They Match? Does Culture Matter?. International Journal of Social Robotics 12:5  pp. 1149 ff. Crossref logo
Golant, Stephen M.
2017. A theoretical model to explain the smart technology adoption behaviors of elder consumers (Elderadopt). Journal of Aging Studies 42  pp. 56 ff. Crossref logo
Zafrani, Oded & Galit Nimrod
2019. Towards a Holistic Approach to Studying Human–Robot Interaction in Later Life. The Gerontologist 59:1  pp. e26 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Beer, J.M., Smarr, C.A., Chen, T.L., Prakash, A., Mitzner, T.L., Kemp, C.C., & Rogers, W.A.
(2012) The domesticated robot: Design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place. In HRI ‘12 Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 335–342). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, K.
(2004) The robot in the kitchen: The cultural politics of care-work and the development of in-home assistive technology. Middle States Geographer, 37, 72–79.Google Scholar
Breazeal, C. (2003) Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 167–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brewster, S.
(2013, September). Hoaloha Robotics’ founder on how robots can serve a growing senior population. Retrieved online from http://​gigaom​.com​/2013​/09​/09​/hoaloha​-robotics​-founder​-on​-how​-robots​-can​-serve​-a​-growing​-senior​-population/
Broekens, J., Heerink, M., & Rosendal, H.
(2009) Assistive social robots in elderly care: A review. Gerontechnology, 8(2), 94–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S., Kaouri, C., Walters, M.L., Koay, K.L., & Werry, I.
(2005, August). What is a robot companion – friend, assistant or butler? In Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2005. (IROS 2005). 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on (pp. 1192–1197). IEEE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dey, I.
(1999) Grounding grounded theory – Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fasola, J., & Mataric, M.
(2013) A socially assistive robot exercise coach for the elderly. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 2(2), 3–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feil-Seifer, D., & Mataric, M.J.
(2005) Defining socially assistive robotics. Proceedings of International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics , 465–468. Crossref
Fogg, B.J., & Nass, C.
(1997) Silicon sycophants: The effects of computers that flatter. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46(5), 551–561. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K.
(2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 143–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gigante, S.
(2010, February). How boomers will impact the health care industry. CNBC. Retrieved online from http://​www​.cnbc​.com​/id​/35524106Google Scholar
Goodrich, M.A., & Schultz, A.C.
(2007) Human-robot interaction: A survey. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 1(3), 203–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heerink, M., Kröse, B.J.A., Wielinga, B.J., & Evers, V.
(2008) Enjoyment, intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people. Proceedings HRI , Amsterdam, 113–120. Crossref
Khan, Z.
(1998) Attitudes towards intelligent service robots. NADA KTH, Stockholm, 17 .
Kiesler, S., & Goetz, J.
(2002) Mental models and cooperation with robotic assistants. Proceedings of CHI , 576–577. Crossref
Kim, K.J., Park, E., & Sundar, S.S.
(2013) Caregiving role in human–robot interaction: A study of the mediating effects of perceived benefit and social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1799–1806. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kitchenman, A.
(2013, April). Will ‘baby boom tsunami’ swamp healthcare, other services? Retrieved online from http://​www​.njspotlight​.com​/stories​/13​/04​/09​/will​-baby​-boom​-tsunami​-swamp​-healthcare​-other​-services/
Lee, K.M., Peng, W., Jin, S.A., & Yan, C.
(2006) Can robots manifest personality?: An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human–robot interaction. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 754–772. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, H., Syrdal, D., Dautenhahn, K., Gelderblom, G.J., Bedaf, S., & Amirabdollahian, F.
(2013) What should a robot do for you?- Evaluating the needs of the elderly in the UK. In ACHI 2013 The Sixth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions , Nice, France (pp. 83–88). IARIA XPS Press.
Mast, M., Burmester, M., Krüger, K., Fatikow, S., Arbeiter, G., Graf, B., & Qiu, R. (2012) User-centered design of a dynamic-autonomy remote interaction concept for manipulation-capable robots to assist elderly people in the home. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mori, M.
(1970) The uncanny valley. Energy, 7(4), 33–35.Google Scholar
Nass, C., Reeves, B., & Leshner, G.
(1996) Technology and roles: A tale of two TVs. Journal of Communication, 46(2), 121–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nass, C., Steuer, J., & Tauber, E.R
(1994, April). Computers are social actors. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 72–78). ACM. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nie, J., Park, M., Marin, A.L., & Sundar, S.S.
(2012) Can you hold my hand? Physical warmth in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of HRI , 201–202. Crossref
Ray, C., Mondada, F., & Siegwart, R.
(2008) What do people expect from robots? In Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2008. IROS 2008. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on (pp. 3816–3821). IEEE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, B., & Nass, C.
(1996) The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, E.B., Hummert, M.L., & Boich, L.H.
(1995) Communication predicaments of aging: Patronizing behavior toward older adults. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14(1–2), 144–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saygin, A.P., Chaminade, T., Ishiguro, H., Driver, J., & Frith, C.
(2012) The thing that should not be: Predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(4), 413–422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scheutz, M., Cantrell, R., & Schermerhorn, P.
(2011) Toward humanlike task-based dialogue processing for human robot interaction. AI Magazine, 32(4), 77–84.Google Scholar
Scopelliti, M., Giuliani, M.V., D’Amico, A.M., & Fornara, F.
(2004) If I had a robot at home… Peoples’ representation of domestic robots. In Designing a more inclusive world (pp. 257–266). Springer London. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibata, T., & Tanie, K.
(2001) Physical and affective interaction between human and mental commit robot. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , 2572–2577. Crossref
Sundar, S.S., Bellur, S., Oh, J., Jia, H., & Kim, H.S.
(2014) Theoretical importance of contingency in human-computer interaction: Effects of message interactivity on user engagement. Communication Research. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sundar, S.S., & Nass, C.
(2000) Source orientation in human-computer interaction: Programmer, networker, or independent social actor? Communication Research, 27 (6), 683–703. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Syrdal, D.S., Dautenhahn, K., Koay, K.L., Walters, M.L., & Otero, N.R.
(2010, September). Exploring human mental models of robots through explicitation interviews. In RO-MAN, 2010 IEEE (pp. 638–645). IEEE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tapus, A., Mataric’, M.J., & Scassellati, B.
(2007) The grand challenges in socially assistive robotics. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 14(1), 35–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torrey, C., Fussell, S., & Kiesler, S.
(2005) Appropriate accommodations: Speech technologies and the needs of older adults. Unpublished ms. HCII, Carnegie Mellon.
Tung, F.W., & Chang, T.Y. (2013) Exploring children’s attitudes towards static and moving humanoid robots. In Human-computer interaction: Users and contexts of use (pp. 237–245). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waddell, T., Sundar, S.S., & Jung, E.H.
(2014) The young and the vulnerable? Perceived negative effects of robots on youngsters prevent older adults from adopting companion robots. Proceedings of CHI’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ‘14) , 1981–1986. Crossref
Złotowski, J., Proudfoot, D., & Bartneck, C.
(2013) More human than human: Does the uncanny curve really matter? Proceedings of the HRI2013 Workshop on Design of Humanlikeness in HRI from uncanny valley to minimal design Tokyo , 7–1.