Cover not available
Article published In:
How the Brain Got Language: Towards a New Road Map
Edited by Michael A. Arbib
[Interaction Studies 19:1/2] 2018
► pp. 200–215

Pantomime and imitation in great apes

Implications for reconstructing the evolution of language

 | Glendon College of York University
This paper assesses great apes’ abilities for pantomime and action imitation, two communicative abilities proposed as key contributors to language evolution. Modern great apes, the only surviving nonhuman hominids, are important living models of the communicative platform upon which language evolved. This assessment is based on 62 great ape pantomimes identified via data mining plus published reports of great ape action imitation. Most pantomimes were simple, imperative, and scaffolded by partners’ relationship and scripts; some resemble declaratives, some were sequences of several inter-related elements. Imitation research consistently shows great apes perform action imitation at low fidelity, but also that action imitation may not represent a distinct process or function. Discussion focuses on how findings may advance reconstruction of the evolution of language, including what great apes may contribute to understanding ‘primitive’ forms of pantomime and imitation and how to improve their study.
Keywords: pantomime, imitation, great apes, language evolution
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Pantomime
    • Semantics
    • Tools, relationships, scripts
  • Imitation
  • Towards a new road map
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 17 September 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.17028.rus
References (39)
References
Arbib, M. A. (2012). How the Brain Got Language: The Mirror System Hypothesis. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Towards a computational comparative neuroprimatology: Framing the language-ready brain. Physics of Life Reviews, 161, 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arbib, M. A., Liebal, K., & Pika, S. (2008). Primate vocalization, gesture, and the evolution of human language. Current Anthropology, 49(6), 1053–1076. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrne, R.W. & Russon, A. E. (1998). Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 667–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrne, R. W. & Tanner, J. E. (2006). Gestural imitation by a gorilla: evidence and nature of the capacity. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 61, 215–31.Google Scholar
Byrne, R. W. & Whiten, A. (1990). Tactical deception in primates: the 1990 database. Primate Report, 271, 1–101.Google Scholar
Call, J. (2001). Body imitation in an enculturated orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus). Cybernetics and Systems, 321, 97–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connolly, K. & Dalgleish, M. (1989). The emergence of a tool-using skill in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 25(6), 894–912. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corballis, M. C. (2017). Precursors to language. Topoi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Custance, D., Whiten, A., & Bard, K. A. (1995). Can young chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) imitate arbitrary actions? Hayes & Hayes (1952) revisited. Behaviour, 1321, 837–859. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Waal, F. B. M. (1982). Chimpanzee Politics. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Douglas, P. H. & Moscovice, L. R. (2015). Pointing and pantomime in wild apes? Female bonobos use referential and iconic gestures to request genito-genital rubbing. Scientific Reports, 5–13999. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halina, M., Rossano, F., & Tomasello, M. (2013). The ontogenetic ritualization of bonobo gestures. Animal Cognition, 161, 653–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, K. J. & Hayes, C. (1952). Imitation in a home-raised chimpanzee. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 461, 450–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinde, R. A. (1976a). Interactions, relationships and social structure. Man, 111, 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1976b). On describing relationships. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 171, 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hobaiter, C., & Byrne, R. W. (2011). The gestural repertoire of the wild chimpanzee. Animal Cognition. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyn, H., Greenfield, P. M., Savage-Rumbaugh, S., Gillespie-Lynch, K., & Hopkins, W. D. (2011). Nonhuman primates do declare! A comparison of declarative symbol and gesture use in two children, two bonobos, and a chimpanzee. Language and Cognition, 311, 63–74.Google Scholar
Lyons, D. E., Young, A. G., & Keil, F. C. (2007). The hidden structure of overimitation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1041, 19751–19756. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (ed.), (2000). Language and Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meinel, M. (1995). Eliciting true imitation of object use in captive orangutans. Unpublished BA thesis, York University, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Miles, H. L., Mitchell, R. W. & Harper, S. E. (1996). Simon says: the development of imitation in an enculturated orangutan. In A. E. Russon, K. A. Bard & S. T. Parker (Eds.), Reaching into Thought, (pp. 278–299). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitani, J. C., Call, J., Kappeler, P. M., Palombit, R. A., & Silk, J. B. (2012). The Evolution of Primate Societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. W. (1999). Deceit and concealment as strategic script violation in great apes and humans. In S. T. Parker, R. W. Mitchell & H. L. Miles (Eds.), The Mentalities of Gorillas and Orangutans: Comparative Perspectives, (pp. 295–315). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (1981). Social cognition in a script framework. In J. H. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds.), Social Cognitive Development (pp. 97–118). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orangutan Cultures (2017). Orangutan Network, Dept. Anthropology, Universität Zurich. [URL] (Sept. 30, 2017)
Russon, A. E. & Andrews, K. A. (2010). Orangutan pantomime: elaborating on the message. Biology Letters, 7(4), 627–630. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Russon, A. E., & Andrews, K. A. (2011). Pantomime in great apes: evidence and implications. Communicative and Integrative Biology, 4(3), 315–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russon, A. E. & Begun, D. (eds.) (2004). The Evolution of Thought: Evolutionary Origins of Great Ape Intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russon, A. E. & Galdikas, B. M. F. (1993). Imitation in free-ranging rehabilitant orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1071, 147–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995). Constraints on great apes’ imitation: Model and action selectivity in rehabilitant orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) imitation. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 109(1), 5–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Subiaul, F., Renner, E., & Krajkowski, E. (2016). The comparative study of imitation mechanisms in non-human primates. In S. S. Obhi & E. S. Cross (Eds.), Shared Representations: Sensorimotor Foundations of Social Life (pp. 109–136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suddendorf, T., Fletcher-Flinn, C., & Johnston, L. (1999). Pantomime and theory of mind. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 160(1), 31–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taniguchi, Y. & Sanefuji, W. (2017). The boundaries of overimitation in preschool children: Effects of target and tool use on imitation of irrelevant actions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1591, 83–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanner, J. E. (2008). Commentary. Current Anthropology, 49(6), 1067–1068.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Call, J. (1997). Primate Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and Language. MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yando, R., Seitz, V., & Zigler, E. (1978). Imitation: A Developmental Perspective. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Yu, Y. & Kushner, T. (2014). Social context effects in 2- and 4-year olds’ selective versus faithful imitation. Developmental Psychology, 50(3), 922–933. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Arbib, Michael
2024. Chapter 1. Pantomime within and beyond the evolution of language. In Perspectives on Pantomime [Advances in Interaction Studies, 12], ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Żywiczyński, Przemysław, Johan Blomberg & Monika Boruta-Żywiczyńska
2024. Introduction. Perspectives on pantomime. In Perspectives on Pantomime [Advances in Interaction Studies, 12], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Żywiczyński, Przemysław, Marta Sibierska, Sławomir Wacewicz, Joost van de Weijer, Francesco Ferretti, Ines Adornetti, Alessandra Chiera & Valentina Deriu
2021. Evolution of conventional communication. A cross-cultural study of pantomimic re-enactments of transitive events. Language & Communication 80 ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Żywiczyński, Przemysław, Sławomir Wacewicz & Casey Lister
2021. Pantomimic fossils in modern human communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376:1824 DOI logo
Andrews, Kristin
2020. How to Study Animal Minds, DOI logo
Arbib, Michael A., Francisco Aboitiz, Judith M. Burkart, Michael C. Corballis, Gino Coudé, Erin Hecht, Katja Liebal, Masako Myowa-Yamakoshi, James Pustejovsky, Shelby S. Putt, Federico Rossano, Anne E. Russon, P. Thomas Schoenemann, Uwe Seifert, Katerina Semendeferi, Chris Sinha, Dietrich Stout, Virginia Volterra, Sławomir Wacewicz & Benjamin Wilson
2020. The comparative neuroprimatology 2018 (CNP-2018) road map for research on How the Brain Got Language. In How the Brain Got Language – Towards a New Road Map [Benjamins Current Topics, 112], ► pp. 370 ff. DOI logo
Arbib, Michael A
2018. In support of the role of pantomime in language evolution. Journal of Language Evolution 3:1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Arbib, Michael A.
2018. Computational challenges of evolving the language-ready brain. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 19:1-2 ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Arbib, Michael A.
2020. Computational challenges of evolving the language-ready brain. In How the Brain Got Language – Towards a New Road Map [Benjamins Current Topics, 112], ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Arbib, Michael A., Francisco Aboitiz, Judith M. Burkart, Michael Corballis, Gino Coudé, Erin Hecht, Katja Liebal, Masako Myowa-Yamakoshi, James Pustejovsky, Shelby Putt, Federico Rossano, Anne E. Russon, P. Thomas Schoenemann, Uwe Seifert, Katerina Semendeferi, Chris Sinha, Dietrich Stout, Virginia Volterra, Sławomir Wacewicz & Benjamin Wilson
2018. The comparative neuroprimatology 2018 (CNP-2018) road map for research on How the Brain Got Language . Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 19:1-2 ► pp. 370 ff. DOI logo
Stout, Dietrich
2018. Archaeology and the evolutionary neuroscience of language. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 19:1-2 ► pp. 256 ff. DOI logo
Stout, Dietrich
2020. Archaeology and the evolutionary neuroscience of language. In How the Brain Got Language – Towards a New Road Map [Benjamins Current Topics, 112], ► pp. 256 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

video

Video 1

Video 2