Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Graded Resources for Second and Foreign Language Learning
Edited by David Alfter and Thomas François
[ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 175:1] 2024
► pp. 1–7
Introduction

Graded resources for second and foreign language learning

ORCID logo | University of Gothenburg
ORCID logo | UCLouvain
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 13 September 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.00025.alf
References (26)
References
Alfter, D., & Volodina, E. (2018). Towards single word lexical complexity prediction. In Proceedings of the thirteenth workshop on innovative use of NLP for building educational applications, 79–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alfter, D. (2021). Exploring natural language processing for single-word and multi-word lexical complexity from a second language learner perspective (The dissertation is published here: [URL] ). University of Gothenburg.
Alonso-Ramos, M. (2013). Colocaciones, diccionario y corpus de aprendices. In Eugenio Coseriu, in memoriam: XIV Jornadas de Lingüística (pp. 57–72). Servicio de Publicaciones.Google Scholar
Bauer, L., & Nation, P. (1993). Word families. International Journal of Lexicography, 6 (4), 253–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beacco, J-C., Lepage, S., Porquier, R., & Riba, P. (2008). Niveau A2 pour le français: Un référentiel. Éditions Didier.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41 (4), 977–990. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., & Mandera, P. (2021). Which words do English non-native speakers know? New supranational levels based on yes/no decision. Second Language Research, 37 (2), 207–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capel, A. (2010). A1-B2 vocabulary: Insights and issues arising from the English Profile Wordlists project. English Profile Journal, 1 (1):1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dürlich, L. & François, T. (2018). EFLLex: A Graded Lexical Resource for Learners of English as a Foreign Language. In Proceedings of LREC 2018, 873–879.Google Scholar
Foster, P., Bolibaugh, C., & Kotula, A. (2014). Knowledge of nativelike selections in a L2: The influence of exposure, memory, age of onset, and motivation in foreign language and immersion settings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36 (1), 101–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
François, T., Gala, N., Watrin, P., & Fairon, C. (2014). FLELex: A graded lexical resource for French foreign learners. In Proceedings of LREC 2014, 3766–3773.Google Scholar
Fulcher, G. (2010). The reification of the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) and effect-driven testing. Advances in Research on Language Acquisition and Teaching. Selected Papers, 15–26.Google Scholar
Gala, N., François, T., Bernhard, D. & Fairon, C. (2014). Un modèle pour prédire la complexité lexicale et graduer les mots. In Proceedings of TALN 2014, 91–102.Google Scholar
Gougenheim, G., Michéa, R., Rivenc, P., & Sauvageot, A. (1964). L’Élaboration de français fondamental, 1er degré. Étude sur l’établissement d’un vocabulaire et d’une grammaire de base. Nouvelle édition, refondue et augmentée.Google Scholar
Hsueh-Chao, M. H., & Nation, P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13 (1), 403–30.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2007). The shaky ground beneath the CEFR: Quantitative and qualitative dimensions of language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 91 (4), 663–667. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Charalabopoulou, F., Gavrilidou, M., Johannessen, J. B., Khalil, S., Johansson Kokkinakis, S., … & Volodina, E. (2014). Corpus-based vocabulary lists for language learners for nine languages. Language Resources and Evaluation, 48 (1), 121–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C. (2010). Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22 (1), 15.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. (1992). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In P. J. L. Arnaud & H. Bejoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 126–132). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, G., & Rayson, P. (2014). Word frequencies in written and spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Keeffe, A., & Mark, G. (2017). The English Grammar Profile of learner competence: Methodology and key findings. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22 (4), 457–489.Google Scholar
Pilán, I., Volodina, E., & Johansson, R. (2014). Rule-based and machine learning approaches for second language sentence-level readability. Proceedings of the Ninth workshop on innovative use of NLP for building educational applications, 174–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Zimmerman, C. B. (2002). Derivative word forms: What do learners know? TESOL quarterly, 36 (2), 145–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tack, A., François, T., Desmet, P., & Fairon, C. (2018). NT2Lex: A CEFR-graded lexical resource for Dutch as a Foreign Language linked to Open Dutch WordNet. In Proceedings of the BEA Workshop 2018, 137–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Volodina, E., Alfter, D., & Tiedemann, T. L. (2024). Profiles for Swedish as a second language: Lexis, grammar, morphology. In Huminfra Conference, 10–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar