Cover not available
Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 119/120 (1998) ► pp.9–26

The effect of gender on the choice of speech style

| Department of French, Birkbeck College, University of London 43 Gordon Square, London WC1HOPD

The analysis of a number of linguistic variables reflecting formality in the advanced oral French interlanguage of 27 Dutch-speaking students showed significant differences between male and female speakers. Female speakers were found to opt for a much more implicit and deictical speech style, especially in an informal situation. As the situation became more formal, the differences between male and female speakers weakened. The same variation was found in a corpus of native Dutch.

Published online: 1 January 1998
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.119-120.02dew
References
ADAMSON, H.D. & REGAN, V.M.
(1991) : “The Acquisition of Community Speech Norms by Asian Immigrants Learning English as a Second Language”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 131, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ALLEN, L.S. & GORSKI, R.A.
(1991) : “Sexual dimorphism of the anterior commissure and massa intermedia of the human brain”. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 312, 1, 97–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ANASTASI, A.
(1985) : “Reciprocal Relations between Cognitive and Affective Development- With Implications for Sex Differences”, in : Psychology and Gender. T.B. Sonderegger (ed.), Nebraska : University of Nebraska Press, 1–35.Google Scholar
BENSON, J. & GREAVES, W.
(1973) : The Language People Really Use. Agincourt, Ontario : Book Society of Canada.Google Scholar
BLANCHE-BENVENISTE, C. & JEANJEAN, C.
(1987) : Le français parlé : transcription et édition. Paris : Didier.Google Scholar
BROUWER, D.
(1991) : Vrouwentaal Feiten en verzinsels. Bloemendaal : Aramith.Google Scholar
CRAVENS, T.D. & GIANELLI, L.
(1995) : “Relative salience of gender and class in a situation of multiple competing norms”, Language Variation and Change, 71, 261–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DE JONG, E.D.
(1979) : Spreektaal Woordfrequenties in gesproken Nederlands. Utrecht : Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema.Google Scholar
DEWAELE, J.M.
(1994) : “Variation synchronique des taux d’exactitude. Analyse de fréquence des erreurs morpholexicales dans trois styles d’interlangue française”, I.R.A.L., International Review of Applied Linguistics, XXXIII1, 4, 275–300.Google Scholar
(1995) : “Style-shifting in oral interlanguage : Quantification and definition”, in : The Current State of Interlanguage, L. Eubank, L. Selinker & M. Sharwood Smith (eds.), Amsterdam- New York : John Benjamins, 231–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996a) : “Variation dans la composition lexicale de styles oraux”, I.R.A.L., International Review of Applied Linguistics, XXXIV 4, 261–282.Google Scholar
(1996b) : “How to measure formality of speech? A Model of Synchronic Variation”, in : Approaches to second language acquisition, Jyväskylä Cross-Language Studies, 171, K. Sajavaara and C. Fair-weather (eds.), Jyväskylä : University of Jyväskylä, 119–133.Google Scholar
(1998) : “Speech rate variation in 2 oral styles of advanced French interlanguage”, in : Contemporary Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, v. Regan (ed.). Dublin : University College Academic Press, 113–123.Google Scholar
in press) : La composition lexicale de styles oraux et écrits Language Style, 25, 1 (winter 1992).
FISHER, J.L.
(1958) : “Social Influences in the Choice of a Linguistic Variant”, Word 141, 47–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
GILES, H.
(1977) : “Social psychology and applied linguistics : towards an integrative approach”, ITL : Review of Applied Linguistics, 331, 27–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
GILES, H. & HEWSTONE, M.
(1985) : “Cognitive Structures, Speech, and Social Situations : Two Integrative Models”, in : Social Behaviour in Context, A. Furnham (ed.), Boston : Allyn and Bacon, 240–269.Google Scholar
GRADOLL, D. & SWANN, J.
(1989) : Gender Voices. Cambridge : Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
GREGORY, M. & CAROLL, S.
(1981) : Language and Situation. London : Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
GUDYKUNST, W.B. & TING-TOOMEY, E.
(1988) : Culture and interpersonal communication. Newbury Park : Sage Publications.Google Scholar
HALLIDAY, M.A.K.
(1985) : Spoken and written language. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
HOGG, M.A.
(1985) : Masculine and feminine speech in dyads and groups : A study of speech style and gender salience, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4.21 : 99–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
HUDSON, R.
(1994) : “About 37% of word-tokens are nouns”, Language, 701 : 331–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KIMURA, D.
(1992) : “Sex differences in the brain”, Scientific American 267, 3, 80–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LABOV, W.
(1972) : Sociolinguistic Patterns. Pennsylvania : University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
(1990) : “The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change”, Language Variation and Change, 21, 205–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LEVELT, W.J.M.
(1989) : Speaking. From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, Mass-London : ACL-MIT Press.Google Scholar
MILROY, J.
(1996) : Gender factor as a factor in linguistic change. Paper presented at a seminar at the University of London.Google Scholar
MOUGEON, R. & BENIAK, E.
(1991) : Linguistic Consequences of Language Contact and Restriction. The case of French in Ontario, Canada. Oxford : Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
PHILIPS, S.U. & REYNOLDS, A.
(1987) : “The interaction of variable syntax : and discourse structure in women’s and men’s speech”, in : Language, gender, and sex in comparative perspective. S.U. Philips, S. Steele & C. Tanz (eds.), Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 71–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SANKOFF, G.
(1974) : “A quantitative paradigm for the study of communicative competence”, in : Explorations in the ethnography of speaking, R. Bauman & J. Scherzer (eds.), Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 18–49.Google Scholar
SHAYWITZ, B.A.; SHAYWITZ, S.E.; PUGH, K.R.; CONSTABLE, R.T.; SKUDLARSKI, P.; FULBRIGHT, R.K.; BRONEN, R.A.; FLETCHER, J.M.; SHANKWEILER, D.P.; KATZ, L. & GORE, J.C.
(1995) : “Sex Differences in the Functional Organization of the Brain for Language”, Nature, 373, 6515, 607–609. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SILVERMAN, I. & EALS, M.
(1992) : “Sex Differences in Spatial Abilities : Evolutionary Theory and Data”, in : The Adapted Mind, Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, J.H. Barkow; L. Cosmides & J. Tooby (eds.), New York-Oxford : Oxford University Press, 533–549.Google Scholar
SMITH, P.M.
(1979) : “Sex markers in speech”, in : Social markers in speech, K.R. Scherer & H. Giles (eds.), Cambridge-Paris : Cambridge University Press & Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’Homme, 109–146.Google Scholar
SWANN, J.
(1992) : Girls, boys and language, Oxford : Blackwell.Google Scholar
TANNEN, D.
(1992) : You just don’t understand. Women and Men in Conversation. London : Virago Press.Google Scholar
(1993) : Gender and Conversational Interaction. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
THORNE, B.; KRAMARAE, C. & HENLEY, N.
(1983) : Language, gender and society. Rowley MA : Newbury House.Google Scholar
TRUDGILL, P.
(1974) : The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
WESTMORELAND, R.; STARR, D.P.; SHELTON, K. & PASADEOS, Y.
(1977) “News Writing Styles of Male and Female students”, Journalism Quarterly, 541 : 599–601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar