Article published in:
Task-Based Language Teaching
Edited by Kris Van den Branden and Machteld Verhelst
[ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 152] 2006
► pp. 5584
References
Bowerman, M. & Levinson, S.
(Eds.) (2001) Language acquisition and conceptual development. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, C.
(1993) Factors affecting the acquisition of vocabulary: frequency and saliency of words. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 263–286). Norwood: NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Cummins, J.
(1979) Cognitive academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters. Working Papers in Bilingualism, 191, 197–205.Google Scholar
Doughty, C.
(2003) Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256–310). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. & Williams, J.
(1998) Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197–262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Doughty, C.
(2001) Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206–257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2005) Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Foster, P. & Skehan, P.
(1999) The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3, 3,215–247.Google Scholar
Gilabert, R.
(2005) Task complexity and L2 narrative oral production. PhD thesis, University of Barcelona.Google Scholar
forthcoming). The simultaneous manipulation of task complexity along planning time and +/-Here-and-Now: effects on oral production. In M. Garda Mayo Ed. Investigating tasks in formal language settings Clevedon Multilingual Matters
Huckin, T. & Coady, J.
(1999) Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 211, 181–193.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J., Hollander, M. & Greidanus, T.
(1996) Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language stUdents: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 801,327–339.Google Scholar
Kuiken, F. & Vedder, I.
forthcoming). Cognitive task complexity and linguistic performance in French L2 writing. In M. Garcia Mayo Ed. Investigating tasks in formal language settings Clevedon Multilingual Matters
(2004a) II Bed, & Breakfast piu bello d'italia. Cognitieve taakcomplexiteit en tekstkwaliteit in Italiaans T2. [II Bed & Breakfast piu bello d'italia. Cognitive task complexity and text quality in Italian L2.]Incontri, 19,1 ,31–39.Google Scholar
(2004b) De relatie tussen cognitieve taakcomplexiteit en lingu'istische performance bij het schrijven in T1 en T2. [The relationship between cognitive task complexity and linguistic performance in L 1 and L2 writing.] Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, 721, 23–32.Google Scholar
Kuiken, F., Mas, M. & Vedder, I.
(2005) Cognitive task complexity and second language writing performance. In S. Foster-Cohen, M.P. Garcia-Mayo and J. Cenol (Eds.), Eurosla Yearbook. Vol. 51 (pp. 195–222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Laufer, B.
(2005) Focus on form in second language vocabulary learning. In S.H. Foster-Cohen, M. Garcia-Mayo, & J. Cenol (Eds.), Eurosla Yearbook Vol. 51 (pp. 223–250). Amsterdaml Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Ughtbown, P.
(1998) The importance of timing in focus on form. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 177–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. & Crookes, G.
(1992) Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 1, 27–56.Google Scholar
Long, M., & Robinson, P.
(1998) Focus on form: theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mondria, J-A., & Wit-de Boer, M.
(1991) The Effects of contextual richness on the guessability and the retention of words in a foreign language. Applied Linguistics, 12, 3, 249–266.Google Scholar
Nation, P.
(2001) Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, J. & Ortega, L.
(2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 3, 417–528.Google Scholar
Oberauer, K.
et al. (2000) Working memory capacity - facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 291, 1017–1045.Google Scholar
Peters, E.
forthcoming). L2 vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension. The influence of task complexity In. M. Garcia Mayo Ed. Investigating tasks in formal language settings Clevedon Multilingual Matters
submitted). Manipulating students' online dictionary use and its effect on L2 word retention. Language Learning & Technology.
Peters, E. & Sercu, L.
submitted). The influence of task complexity on vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension. In Vliegen, M. ed. Variation in Sprachtheorie und Spracherwerb. Akten des 39. Linguistischen Kolloquiums in Amsterdam 2004 Frankfurt am Main Peter Lang
Read, J.
(2000) Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, P.
(1995) Attention, memory and the "noticing" hypothesis. Language Learning 451, 283–331.Google Scholar
(2001) Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: a triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Attention and memory during SLA. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631–678). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2005) Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a triadic componential framework for second language task design. IRAL. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 1, 1–32.Google Scholar
Sanders, A.
(1998) Elements of human performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R.
(2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
(2001) Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spada, N.
(1997) Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching Abstracts, 301, 73–87.Google Scholar
Staud, T.
(2003 October). Ossis sind Türken. 13 Jahre Einheit: In Gesamt-Westdeutschland sind die Ostdeutschen Einwanderer. Die Zeit, 411. Retrieved October 2, 2003 from http://​www​.zeil​.de​/2003​/41​/Einwanderer.
Van Loo, H. & Schoenaerts, P.
(2003) Niet vanzelfsprekend. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B.
(1990).Attending to content and form in the input: an experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 121,287–301.Google Scholar
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S. & Kim, H.Y.
(1998) Second language development in writing: measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity. Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.Google Scholar