Article published in:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 172:2 (2021) ► pp. 199228
Bachman, L. F.
(2004) Statistical analyses for language assessment. Ernst Klett Sprachen. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. F., Palmer, A. S.
(2010) Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, B. A.
(2010) Playing with the stakes: A consideration of an aspect of the social context of a gatekeeping writing assessment. Assessing Writing, 15(3), 133–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., & Mylonas, A.
(2002) Developing procedures for imple-menting peer assessment in large classes using an action research process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 271, 427–441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barkaoui, K.
(2013) Multifaceted Rasch analysis for test evaluation. The companion to language assessment, 31, 1301–1322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Nekrasova, T., & Horn, B.
(2011) The effectiveness of feedback for L1-English and L2- writing development: A meta-analysis. ETS Research Report Series 2011(1), i–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D.
(2004) Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi delta kappan, 86(1), 8–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Black, P., & Wiliam, D.
(1998) Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, 5(1), 7–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. K., & Jamieson, J. M.
(Eds.) (2008) Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign LanguageTM. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, W. & Warren, M.
(2005) Peer assessment of language proficiency. Language Testing, 22(3), 93–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Wilson, R. W.
(2006) Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 981, 891–901. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Ayala, R. J.
(2009) The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory. Psychometrika, 75(4), 778–779.Google Scholar
Esfandiari, R., & Myford, C. M.
(2013) Severity differences among self-assessors, peer- assessors, and teacher assessors rating EFL essays. Assessing writing, 18(2), 111–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Falchikov, N.
(1995) Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 321, 175–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Improving assessment through student involvement: Practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J.
(2000) Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farrokhi, F., Esfandiari, R., & Schaefer, E.
(2012) A many-facet Rasch measurement of differential rater severity/leniency in three types of assessment. JALT Journal, 34(1), 79–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K.
(2010) Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and instruction, 20(4), 304–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hattie, J.
(2009) Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.Google Scholar
Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormouth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. F., & Hughey, J. B.
(1981) Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Rowely, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Jeffery, D., Yankulov, K., Crerar, A., & Ritchie, K.
(2016) How to achieve accurate peer assessment for high value written assignments in a senior undergraduate course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 411, 127–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kearney, S. P., & Perkins, T.
(2014) Engaging students through assessment: the success and limitations of the ASPAL (authentic self and peer-assessment for learning) model. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 11 (3), 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kearney, S., Perkins, T. & Clark, S. K.
(2016) Using self- and peer-assessments for summative purposes: analysing the relative validity of the AASL (authentic assessment for sustainable learning) model. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41 (6), 840–853. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, T. E. R. R. Y.
(2010) Assessment of autonomy or assessment for autonomy? Evaluating learner autonomy for formative purposes. Testing the untestable in language education, 98–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. B.
(2016) University students’ experience of ‘scale-referenced’ peer assessment for a consecutive interpreting examination. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 411, 1–15.Google Scholar
Linacre, J. M.
(2002) What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 16(2), 878.Google Scholar
(2005)  A user’s guide to FACETS: Rasch-model computer programs [Software manual]. Chicago, IL: Winsteps.comGoogle Scholar
(2013) A user’s guide to FACETS. Program manual 3 71.0. Rasch-Model Computer Programs. Retrieved from: www​.winsteps​.com
Little, D.
(2009) Language learner autonomy and the European language portfolio: Two L2 English examples. Language Teaching, 42(2), 222–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, X. & Li, L.
(2014) Assessment training effects on student assessment skills and task performance in a technology-facilitated peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(3), 275–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsuno, S.
(2009) Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments in Japanese university EFL writing classrooms, Language Testing, 26(1), 75–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myford, C. M., & Wolfe, E. W.
(2004) Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: Part II. In E. V. Smith & R. M. Smith, (Eds.), Introduction to Rasch measurement (pp. 518–574). Maple Grove, MI: JAM Press.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Y.
(2002) Teacher Assessment and Peer Assessment in Practice (English Teaching). Educational studies, 441, 203–215.Google Scholar
Nguyen, L. T. C., & Gu, Y.
(2013) Strategy-based instruction: A learner-focused approach to developing learner autonomy. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 9–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ozogul, G., & Sullivan, H.
(2007) Student performance and attitudes under formative evaluation by teacher, self- and peer-evaluators. Education Technology Research and Development. 57(3), 393–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saito, H.
(2008) EFL classroom peer assessment: Training effects on rating and commenting. Language Testing, 251, 553–581. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saito, H., & Fujita, T.
(2004) Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classroom. Language Teaching Research, 311, 31–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Topping, K. J.
(2003) Self and peer assessment in school and university: Reliability, validity and utility. In M. S. R. Segers, F. J. R. C. Dochy, & E. C. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimizing new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 55–87). Dordrecht, Netherlands. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 201, 339–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H.
(2009) Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: the influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review, 41, 41–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: the role of interpersonal factors and conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 280–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., & Van Merrie¨nboer, J. J. G.
(2010) Effective peer assessment processes: research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 270–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, D., & Esposto, A.
(2012) Peer assessment as a method of improving student engagement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(7), 805–816. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weir, C. J.
(2005) Language testing and validation. Hampshire: Palgrave McMillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar