Article published in:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 85/86 (1989) ► pp. 105121
References
ABRAHAM, R.G.
(1983): Relationship between the Use of the Strategy of Monitoring and the Cognitive Style. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 61.17–32.Google Scholar
ALPTEKIN, C.
forthcoming): Neurolinguistic Dimensions of Foreign Language Tests. In Proceedings of the Seminar. Testing English at University Level (3-5 November 1987). Istanbul : Bogazici University Press.
BEAUMONT, J.G.
(1983): Methods for Studying Cerebral Hemispheric Function. In A. W. Young (ed.), Functions of the Righ t Cerebral Hemisphere. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
BEER, J.
(1988): Hemispheric Dominance Inferred from Your Style of Learning and Thinking on Reports of Necker Cube Reversals and Maze Learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills 661.887–890.Google Scholar
BROWN, H.D.
(1987): Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
BRYDEN, M.P.
(1966): Left-Right Differences in Tachistoscopic Recognition: Directional Scanning or Cerebral Dominance. Perceptual and Motor Skills 291.1127–1134.Google Scholar
CANTO NI-HARVEY, G.
(1987): Content-Area Language Instruction: Approaches and Strategies. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
CHAPELLE, C. and ROBERTS, C.
(1986): Ambiguity Tolerance and Field Indepen-dence as Predictors of Proficiency in English as a Second Language. Language Learning 361.27–45.Google Scholar
CORBALLIS, M.C. and BEALE I.L.
(1983): The Ambivalent Mind: The Neuropsychology of Left and Right. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
DAWSON, G.D.
(1981): Sex Differences in Dichhaptic Processing. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 531.935–944.Google Scholar
DAY, J.
(1977): Right Hemisphere Language Processing in Normal Right Handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31.518–528.Google Scholar
DULAY, H., Burt, M., and Krashen, S.
(1982): Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
EHRLICHMAN, H. and Weinberger A.
(1978): Lateral Eye Movements and Hemispheric Asymmetry: A Critical Review. Psychological Bulletin 851.1080–1101.Google Scholar
GALLOWAY, L.M.
(1983): Études cliniques et expérimentales sur la répartition hé-misphérique du traitement cérébral du langage chez les bilingues: modèles théoriques. Langages w21.79–113.Google Scholar
GUR, R.E.
(1975): Conjugate Lateral Eye Movement as an Index of Hemispheric Activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 311.751–757.Google Scholar
GUR, R.E., Gur, R.C., and Harris, L.J.
(1975): Cerebral Activation, as Measured by Subjects' Lateral Eye Movements, is Influenced by Experimenter Location. Neuropsychologia 131.35–44.Google Scholar
HANSEN, J. and STANSFIELD, C.
(1981): The Relationship of Field Dependent-In-dependent Cognitive Styles to Foreign Language Achievement. Language Learning 311.349–367.Google Scholar
HANSEN-STRAIN, L.
(1984): Field-Dependence-Independence and Language Testing: Evidence from Six Pacific Island Cultures. TESOL Quarterly 181.311–324. Second Language Test Performance. TESOL Quarterly 211.565–569.Google Scholar
HARTNETT, D.D.
(1975): The Relation of Cognitive Style and Hemispheric Preference to Deductive and Inductive Second Language Learning. Unpublished M.A. thesis. Los Angeles: UCLA.Google Scholar
(1980): The Relationship of Analytic and Holistic Cognitive Styles to Second Language Instructional Methods. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation. Los Angeles: UCLA.Google Scholar
HECAEN, H. and SAUGUET, J.
(1971): Cerebral-dominance in Left-handed Subjects. Cortex 7119–48.Google Scholar
KIMURA, D.
(1969): Cerebral Dominance and the Perception of Verbal Stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology 151.166–171.Google Scholar
(1973): The Asymmetry of the Brain. Scientific American 2281.70–76.Google Scholar
KOTIK, B.
(1975): Investigation of Speech Lateralization in Multilinguals. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Moscow: Moscow State University.Google Scholar
KRASHEN, S.D.
(1986): The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman.Google Scholar
KRASHEN, S.D., Seliger, H., and Hartnett, D.
(1974): Two Studies in Adult Second Language Learning. Kritikon Literarum 31.220–228.Google Scholar
LEVY, J.
(1985): Right Brain, Left Brain: Fact or Fiction. Psychology Today 191.38–44.Google Scholar
MCGLONE, J. and DAVIDSON, W.
(1973): The Relation between Cerebral Speech Laterality and Spatial Ability with Special Reference to Sex and Hand Preference. Neuropsychologia 111.105–113.Google Scholar
NAIMAN, N., FRÖHLICH, M., STERN, H.H., and TODESCO, A.
(1978): The Good Language Learner. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
OLTMAN, P.K., RASKIN, E., and WTTKIN, H.A.
(1971): Group Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CAL: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
OLTMAN, P.K., CHARMION, S., and GOLDSTEIN, L.
(1979): Cognitive Style and Interhemispheric Differentiation in the EEG. Neuropsychologia 171.699–702.
PIZZAMIGLIO, L. and ZOCCOLOTTI, P.
(1977): Laterality and Field Dependence. Paper presented at the Fifth Annual Meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society.
(1981): Sex and Cognitive Influence on Visual Hemifield Superiority for Face and Letter Recognition. Cortex 171.215–226.Google Scholar
ROBERTS, C.A.
(1983): Field Independence as a Predictor of Second Language Learning for Adult ESL Learners in the U.S. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
ROBINSON, G.L.N.
(1985): Crosscultural Understanding. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
SACKHEIM, H.A., Weiman, A.L., and Grega, D.M.
(1984): Effects of Predictors of Hemispheric Specialization on Individual Differences in Hemispheric Activation. Neuropsychologia 221.55–64.Google Scholar
SCHNEIDERMAN, E.I. and Wesche, M.B.
(1986): Right-Hemisphere Processing and Foreign Language Aptitude. ITL 711.43–64.Google Scholar
SHOHAMY, E.
(1984): Does the Testing Method Make a Difference? The Case of Reading Comprehension. Language Testing 1/2.147–170.Google Scholar
SILVERMAN, A.J., Adevai, G., and McGough, W.E.
(1966): Some Relationships between Handedness and Perception. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 101.151–158.Google Scholar
STANSFIELD, C. and HANSEN, J.
(1983): Field Dependence-Independence as a Var-iable in Second Language Cloze Test Performance. TESOL Quarterly 171.29–38.Google Scholar
STIEBLICH, C.H.
(1984): Language Learning: A Study on Cognitive Style, Lateral Eye-Movement and Deductive vs. Inductive Learning of Foreign Language Structures. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Montreal: McGill University.Google Scholar
TUCKER, G.H. and SUIB, M.R.
(1978): Conjugate Lateral Eye Movement (CLEM) Direction and its Relationship to Performance on Verbal and Visuospatial Tasks. Neuropsychologia 161.251–254.Google Scholar
WEITEN, W. and ETAUGH, C.F.
(1973): Lateral Eye Movement as Related to Verbal and Perceptual Motor Skills and Values. Perceptual and Motor Skills 361.423–428.Google Scholar
WITKIN, H.A., GOODENOUGH, D.R., and KARP, S.A.
(1967): Stability of Cognitive Style from Childhood to Young Adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71.291–300.Google Scholar
WITKIN, H.A., MOORE, C.A., GOODENOUGH, D.R., and COX, P.W.
(1977): Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and their Educational Implications. Review of Educational Research 471.1–64.Google Scholar
ZAIDEL, E.
(1985): Introduction. In D.F. Benson and E. Zaidel (eds.), The Dual Brain: Hemispheric Specialization in Humans. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
ZENHAUSERN. R.
(1978): Imagery, Cerebral Dominance, and Style of Thinking: Unified Field Model. Bulletin of the Psychonomie Society 121.381–384.Google Scholar