Problems of Hellenistic ethics in Philo of Alexandria and
Ambrose
Article outline
- 1.Methodology
- 2.Doxography: Philo and Ambrose as heirs of Hellenistic
philosophy
- 3.The problem of immanentism
-
Notes
-
Bibliographic references
References (24)
Bibliographic references
Diels, H. (1879). Doxographi
Graeci. Berlin: Weidmann.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Floridi, L. (1997). Scepticism
and Animal Rationality: the Fortune of Chrysippus’ Dog in
the History of Western
Thought. Archiv für
Geschichte der
Philosophie, 79(1), pp. 27–57. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gerzaguet, C. (2012). Ambroise
de Milan, ‘De fuga saeculi’: introduction, texte critique,
traduction et
commentaire. Unpublished PHD. Lyon : Université de Lyon 2.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giusta, M. (1964–1967). I
dossografi di
etica (2 vol.). Torino: Giappichelli.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guérard, CH., (2000). Hérillos.
(2000). In R. Goulet (dir.) Dictionnaire
des philosophes
antiques (vol. 3). Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hadot, P. (1971). Marius
Victorinus, sa vie, son
œuvre. Paris : Études Augustiniennes.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lévy, C. (1980). Un
problème doxographique chez Cicéron: les
indifférentistes. Revue des
Études
Latines, 58, pp. 238–251.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lévy, C. (1992). Cicero
Academicus. Recherches sur les Académiques et sur la
philosophie
cicéronienne. Rome: École Française de Rome.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lévy, C. (1998). Éthique
de l’immanence, éthique de la
transcendance. In C. Lévy (ed.) Philon
d’Alexandrie et le langage de la
philosophie (pp. 153–164). Turnhout: Brepols. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lévy, C. (1999). Permanence
et mutations d’un projet aristotélicien: la doxographie
morale d’Aristote à
Varron. Methexis, 12, pp. 35–51. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lévy, C. (2000). Philon
d’Alexandrie et
l’épicurisme. In M. Erler and R. Bees (eds.) Epikureismus
in der Späten Republik und der
Kaiserzeit (pp. 122–136). Suttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lévy, C. (2016). De
l’epochè sceptique à
l’epochè transcendantale: Philon
d’Alexandrie fondateur du
fidéisme. In A.-I. Bouton-Touboulic and C. Lévy (eds.) Scepticismes
et religion. Constantes et évolutions, de la philosophie
hellénistique à la philosophie
médiévale (pp. 57–73). Turnhout: Brepols. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Madec, G. (1974). Saint
Ambroise et la
philosophie. Turnhout: Brepols.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. (1997–2017). Aëtiana.
The Method and Intellectual Context of a
Doxographer (4 vols.). Leiden: Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nikiprowetzky, V. (1977). Le
Commentaire de l’Écriture chez Philon d’Alexandrie: Son
caractère et sa portée. Observations
philologiques. Leiden: Brill. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nodet, E. (2011) Moïse
ou Platon ou …? Revue
Biblique, 118
(4), pp. 595–604.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radice, R. (2000). Oikeiôsis:
Richerche sul fondamento del pensisero stoico e sulla
genesi. Milano: Vita e pensiero.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reydams-schils, G. (2002). Philo
of Alexandria on Stoic and Platonic
Psychology. Ancient
Philosophy, 22, pp. 125–147. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reydams-schils, G. (2017). ‘Becoming
like God’ in Platonism and
Stoicism. In T. Engberg-Pedersen (ed.) From
Stoicism to Platonism. The
Development of Philosophy, 100 BCE-100 CE
(pp. 142–158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Runia, D. T. (1990). How
to read
Philo. In Idem,
Exegesis and Philosophy: Studies on Philo of
Alexandria (pp. 185–198). Aldershot: Variorum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Runia, D. T. (1993). Philo
in Early Christian Literature: a
Survey. Assen: Uitgeverij Van Gorcum; Minneapolis: Fortess Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Runia, D. T. (1995) Philo
and the Church Fathers: a Collection of
Papers. Leiden [The Netherlands]: Brill. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Runia, D. T. (2001). Philo
of Alexandria, On the Creation of the Cosmos according to
Moses. Leiden [The Netherlands]: Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Savon, H. (1977). Saint
Ambroise devant l’exégèse de Philon le
Juif. Paris: Études Augustiniennes.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)