In this paper, we analyze the argumentative strategies deployed in the Ecomodernist Manifesto,
published in 2015 by a group of leading environmental thinkers. We draw on pragma-dialectics and Perelman’s rhetoric to
characterize manifesto as a genre of practical argumentation. Our goal is to explore the relation of manifesto as a discursive
genre to the argumentative structures and techniques used in the Ecomodernist Manifesto. We therefore take into
scrutiny the elements of practical argumentation employed in the manifesto and describe the polylogical strategies of dissociation
in negotiating the ecological value of nature and the modernist value of progress.
2017 “Advancing polylogical analysis of large-scale argumentation: Disagreement management in the fracking controversy.” Argumentation, 31(1): 179–207.
2007On Rhetoric: A theory of Civic Discourse (2nd ed., transl. by George A. Kennedy). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
1994 “The reinvention of politics: Towards a theory of reflexive modernization.” In Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, ed. by U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash, 1–55. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beckert, Cristina and Maria José Varandas
2004Éticas e Políticas Ambientais. Lisboa: Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa.
Bitzer, Lloyd F.
1968 “The rhetorical situation.” Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1(1): 1–14.
2001 “Reflexivity and self-referentiality: On the normative foundations of ecological communication.” In Language Meaning Social Construction: Interdisciplinary Studies ed. by Grant, C. and D. McLaughlin, 181–201. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.
1994Silent Spring. Greenwich, Conn.: Fawcett Publications, Inc. (Original work published 1962).
2015 “The Reaches of Freedom: A Response to An Ecomodernist Manifesto.” Environmental Humanities, 7(1): 245–254.
Dahl, Trine and Kjersti Fløttum
2014 “A linguistic framework for studying voices and positions in the climate debate.” Text & Talk, 34(4): 401–420.
Dryzek, John S.
2013The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2007Moral Habitat: Ethos and Agency for the Sake of Earth. NY: State University of New York.
2012Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.
(ed.)2017The Role of Language in the Climate Change Debate. New York: Routledge.
1994 “Living in a Post-traditional Society.” In Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, ed. by U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash, 56–109. Cambridge: Polity Press.
2003The Death of Our Planet’s Species: A Challenge to Ecology and Ethics, transl. by Patricia Nevers. Washington, Covelo, London: Island Press.
1989The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (transl. by T. Burger). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1962).
Hajer, Maarten A.
1995The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2015 “The theodicy of the ‘Good Anthropocene’.” Environmental Humanities, 7(1): 233–238.
2012 “Manifesto form: The medium and the message.” Cine Qua Non, Bilingual Arts Magazine, 51: 51–71. [URL]. Last accessed 27 April 2018.
Harré, Rom, Jens Brockmeier and Peter Mühlhäusler
1999Greenspeak: A Study of Environmental Discourse. London: Sage.
2013 “Decoding Manifestos and Other Political Texts: The Case of Extreme-Right Ideology.” In Political Science Research Methods in Action, ed. by Bruter, M. and M. Lodge, 47–63. London: Research Methods Series, Palgrave Macmillan.
Heise, Ursula K.
2008Sense of Place and Sense of Planet: The Environmental Imagination of the Global. Oxford University Press.
2002 “Science Technology and the Quest for Sustainable Development.” In Technology Studies and Sustainable Development, ed. by A. Jamison and H. Rohracher, 17–40. Munich: Profil Verlag.
2015 “Fifty Shades of Green”. Environmental Humanities, 7(1): 219–225.
2014 “Argumentative polylogues: Beyond dialectical understanding of fallacies.” Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 36(1): 193–218.
2016 “Shale gas debate in Europe: Pro-and-con dialectics and argumentative polylogues.” Discourse & Communication, 10(6): 553–575.
2017 “Practical argumentation as reasoned advocacy.” Informal Logic, 37(2): 85–113.
2018 “Practical argumentation in the making: Discursive construction of reasons for action.” In Argumentation and Language. Linguistic, cognitive and discursive explorations, ed. by Oswald, Steve, Thierry Herman and Jérôme Jacquin, 219–241. Dordrecht: Springer.
Lewiński, Marcin and Mark Aakhus
2014 “Argumentative polylogues in a dialectical framework: A methodological inquiry.” Argumentation, 28(2): 161–185.
1969The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation, transl. by J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press (original work published 1958).
2006Poetry of the Revolution: Marx, Manifestos, and the Avant-Gardes. Princeton University Press.
Van Rees, M. Agnes
2009Dissociation in Argumentative Discussions. Dordrecht: Springer.
Shellenberger, Michael and Ted Nordhaus
2004The Death of Environmentalism, Global Warming Politics in a Post-Environmental World. [URL]. Last access 27 April 2018.
2003Defining Reality: Definitions and the Politics of Meaning. Southern Illinois University Press.
2011Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. [URL]. Last access 27 April 2018.
Üzelgün, Mehmet Ali and Paula Castro
2016 “Dissociating between ‘Is’ and ‘Ought’: Recognizing and interpreting positions in Climate Change controversies.” In Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015, ed. by Dima Mohammed and Marcin Lewiński, vol. II1, 985–997. London: College Publications.
Üzelgün, Mehmet Ali, Marcin Lewiński and Paula Castro
2016„Favorite battlegrounds of climate action: Arguing about scientific consensus, representing science-society relations.” Science Communication, 38(6): 699–723.
Üzelgün, Mehmet Ali, Dima Mohammed, Marcin Lewiński and Paula Castro
2015 “Managing disagreement through yes, but… constructions: An argumentative analysis.” Discourse Studies, 17(4): 467–484.
Varandas, Maria José
2004 “Introdução.” In Éticas e Políticas Ambientais, ed. by Beckert, Cristina and Maria José Varandas, Lisboa: Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa.
1987Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. [URL]. Last accessed 27 April 2018.
2013 “The Critical Manifesto: Marx and Engels, Haraway, and Utopian Politics.” Utopian Studies, 24(2): 216–231.
1967 “The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis.” Science New Series, 1551(3767) (Mar.10): 1203–1207.
2006Towards an Egalitarian Global Environmental Ethics. UNESCO.
2009 “Three Decades of Writing on Manifesto: The Making of a Genre.” Poetics Today, 30(2): 267–286.
2006 “Strategic Maneuvering through Persuasive Definitions: Implications for Dialectic and Rhetoric.” Argumentation 20(4): 399–416.
2020. Beyond the co-production of technology and society: The discursive treatment of technology with regard to near-term and long-term environmental goals. Technology in Society 61 ► pp. 101244 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.