Article published in:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 10:2 (2021) ► pp. 171201


Boyd, R.
(1993) Metaphor and Theory Change: What is “Metaphor” and Metaphor for? In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd edition, pp. 481–532). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Camp, E.
(2020) Imaginative frames in scientific inquiry. Metaphors, telling facts, and just-so stories. In A. Levy & P. Godfrey-Smith (Eds.), The Scientific Imagination (pp. 304–336). Oxford. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cisek, P.
(1999) Beyond the Computer Metaphor: Behavior as Interaction. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11–12, 125–142.Google Scholar
Di Paolo, E. A., Buhrmann, T., & Barandiaran, X. E.
(2017) Sensorimotor Life. An Enactive Proposal. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faye, J.
(2016) The Nature of Scientific Thinking: On Interpretation, Explanation and Understanding. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillian.Google Scholar
Finsen, A. B., Steen, G., & Wagemans, J. H. M.
(2019) An Argumentative Reconstruction of the Computer Metaphor of the Brain. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 8(3), 317–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, S.
(2017) Enactivist Interventions. Rethinking the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Govier, T.
(2010a) A Practical Study of Argument (7th edition). Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
Jansen, H.
(2016) The strategic formulation of abductive arguments in everyday reasoning. In P. Bondy & L. Benacquista (Eds.), Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA) (pp. 1–10) Windsor: Scholarship at UWindsor.Google Scholar
Käufer, S. & Chemero, A.
(2015) Phenomenology: An introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kiverstein, J. D., & Rietveld, E.
(2018) Reconceiving representation-hungry cognition: an ecological-enactive proposal. Adaptive Behavior, 26(4), 147–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krein, K. & Ilundáin-Agurruza, J.
(2017) High-level Enactive and Embodied Cognition in Expert Sport Performance. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 11:3, 370–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Piccinini, Gualtiero
(2009) Computationalism in the Philosophy of Mind. Philosophy Compass, 4, 515–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piccinini, G. & Scarantino, A.
(2011) Information Processing, Computation and Cognition. Journal of Biological Physics, 37, 1–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Krenmayr, T., & Steen, G.
(2015) How Viruses and Beasts Affect our Opinions (or not). The Role of Extendedness in Metaphorical Framing. Metaphor and the Social World, 5:2, 245–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sangoi, M.
(2014) Features and Functions of Scientific Metaphor. In F. Ervas, & M. Sangoi (Eds.), Isonomia – Epistemologica Volume 5, special issue on Metaphor and Argumentation (pp. 25–38). Urbino: University of Urbino.Google Scholar
Shiyang, Y. & Zenker, F.
(2018) Peirce knew why abduction isn’t IBE – A scheme and critical questions for abductive argument. Argumentation, 32, 569–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G.
(2013) Deliberate Metaphor Affords Conscious Metaphorical Cognition. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 1–2, 179–197.Google Scholar
(2017) Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Basic Assumptions, Main Tenets, Urgent Issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14, 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thagard, P.
(1978) The Best Explanation: Criteria for Theory Choice. Journal of Philosophy, 75, 76–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, E.
(2007) Mind in Life. Phenomenology, Biology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F. H.
(2010) Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Argumentative Patterns Viewed from a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical Argumentative Patterns. Exploring the Relationship between Argumentative Discourse and Institutional Context (pp. 7–30). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B., & Wagemans
(2014) Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F. H. & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.
(2016) Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation (2nd edition). New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Gelder, Tim
(1995) What might cognition be if not computation? Journal of Philosophy 92 (7):345–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walton, D.
(2001) Abductive, presumptive and plausible arguments. Informal Logic, 21, 141–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Abductive Reasoning. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M.
(2005) Reconstructing the cognitive world. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagemans, J. H. M.
(2016a) Analyzing Metaphor in Argumentative Discourse. Rivista Italiana di Filoso a del Linguaggio, 10, 79–94.Google Scholar
(2016b) Argumentative Patterns for Justifying Scientific Explanations. Argumentation, 30, 97–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016c) Criteria for Deciding what is the ‘Best’ Scientific Explanation. In D. Mohammed & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015 (pp. 43–54). London: College Publications.Google Scholar
Zarefsky, D.
(2006) Strategic maneuvering through persuasive definitions: Implications for dialectic and rhetoric. Argumentation, 20(4), 399–416. CrossrefGoogle Scholar