Article published In:
Journal of Argumentation in ContextVol. 10:3 (2021) ► pp.368–396
“Completely impartial opinion, okay?”
An argumentation-theoretical approach to sponsorships on YouTube
Sponsorships on YouTube – i.e., video creators on YouTube promoting a third-party product or service to their audience – have attracted considerable research interest recently in various disciplines. This multidisciplinary study analyzes it from the perspective of argumentation theory, specifically pragma-dialectics, which offers valuable new insights into the discursive tensions inherent to this type of promotion. These tensions arise between the creator’s relationship with their audience on the one hand, which is built upon ‘parasocial’ evaluations of authenticity and community, and the commercial third party brand on the other. The insights provided by the pragma-dialectic analysis are demonstrated by means of a case study examining a sponsorship segment by YouTuber PewDiePie, which shows that creators can employ specific types of presentational choices and audience adaptation strategically to undercut commitment to the sponsor while furthering the relationship with their viewers.
Keywords: activity type, argumentation theory, ethos, influencers, parasocial interaction, pragma-dialectics, social media, sponsorship, strategic maneuvering, YouTube
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.YouTube creators, viewers and sponsorships
- 3.An argumentation-theoretical perspective
- 3.1Pragma-dialectics, strategic maneuvering and ethos
- 3.2The sponsorship as an argumentative activity type
- 4.Case study: “Completely impartial opinion, okay?”
- 4.1Method
- 4.2Analysis
- 4.2.1Presentational choices
- 4.2.2Audience adaptation
- 4.3Overview and evaluation
- 5.Discussion and conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Aristotle
1991 On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse. Translated by George A. Kennedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2004 The art of rhetoric [Rhetorica]. Translated by Hugh Lawson-Tancred. London: Penguin.
Averbeck, Joshua
2013 “Comparisons of Ironic and Sarcastic Arguments in Terms of Appropriateness and Effectiveness in Personal Relationships.” Argumentation and Advocacy 501: 47–57. 
Banet-Weiser, Sarah
2012 AuthenticTM: The politics of ambivalence in a brand culture. New York/London: New York University Press.
Beers Fägersten, Kristy
2017 “The role of swearing in creating an online persona: The case of YouTuber PewDiePie.” Discourse, Context & Media 181: 1–10.
Boogaart, Ronny
2013 “Strategische manoeuvres met sterke drank: Redelijk effectief?” In Neerlandistiek in beeld, ed. by Theo Janssen and Ton van Strien, 283–292. Amsterdam/Münster: Stichting Neerlandistiek VU/Nodus Publikationen.
Boogaart, Ronny, Henrike Jansen and Maarten van Leeuwen
2021 “ ‘Those are your words, not mine!’ Defence strategies for denying speaker commitment.” Argumentation 351: 209–235.
Chen, Chih-Ping
2013 “Exploring personal branding on YouTube.” Journal of Internet Commerce 121: 332–347.
2016 “Forming digital self and parasocial relationships on YouTube.” Journal of Consumer Culture 161: 232–254.
Cocker, Hayley, and James Cronin
2017 “Charismatic authority and the YouTuber: Unpacking the new cults of personality.” Marketing Theory 171: 455–472.
Cunningham, Stuart, and David Craig
2017 “Being ‘really real’ on YouTube: Authenticity, community and brand culture in social media entertainment.” Media International Australia 1641: 71–81.
De Jans, Steffi, Veroline Cauberghe, and Liselot Hudders
2018 “How and advertising disclosure alerts young adolescents to sponsored vlogs: The moderating role of a peer-based advertising literacy intervention through an informational vlog.” Journal of Advertising 471: 309–325.
Duffy, Brooke, and Jefferson Pooley
2019 “Idols of promotion: The triumph of self-branding in an age of precarity.” Journal of Communication 691: 26–48.
Duffy, Brooke, and Elizabeth Wissinger
2017 “Mythologies of creative work in the social media age: Fun, free, and ‘just being me’.” International Journal of Communication 111: 4652–4671.
van Eemeren, Frans
2010 Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2016 “Identifying argumentative patterns: A vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics.” Argumentation 301: 1–23.
van Eemeren, Frans, and Rob Grootendorst
1984 Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
1992 Argumentation, communication and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2004 A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Eemeren, Frans, and Peter Houtlosser
2002 “Strategic manoeuvring: Maintaining a delicate balance.” In Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis, ed. by Frans van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser, 131–160. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
van Eemeren, Frans, Rob Grootendorst and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2002 Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
van Eemeren, Frans and Peter Houtlosser
2005 “Theoretical construction and argumentative reality: An analytical model of critical discussion and onventionalized types of argumentative activity.” In The Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a conference at McMaster University, 18–21 May 2005, ed. by David Hitchcock and Daniel Farr, 75–84. Hamilton, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
van Eemeren, Frans, and Peter Houtlosser
2006 “Strategic maneuvering: A synthetic recapitulation.” Argumentation 201: 381–392.
van Eemeren, Frans, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2011 Argumentatie. 4th edition. Groningen/Houten: Noordhoff.
van Eemeren, Frans, and Peng Wu
Ferchaud, Arienne, Jenna Grzeslo, Stephanie Orme, and Jared LaGrouge
2018 “Parasocial attributes and YouTube personalities: Exploring content trends across the most subscribed YouTube channels.” Computers in Human Behavior 801: 88–96.
García Jiménez, Antonio, Beatriz Catalina García and María Cruz López de Ayala
2016 “Adolescents and YouTube: Creation, participation and consumption.” Prisma Social 11: 60–89.
Gerhards, Claudia
2017 “Product placement on YouTube: An explorative study on YouTube creators’ experiences with advertisers.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 231: 1–18.
Hearn, Alison, and Stephanie Schoenhoff
2016 “From celebrity to influencer: Tracing the diffusion of celebrity value across the data stream.” In A Companion to Celebrity, ed. by David Marshall and Sean Redmond, 194–212. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Horton, Donald and Richard Wohl
1956 “Mass communication and para-social interaction.” Psychiatry 191: 215–229.
Hou, Mingyi
2018 “Social media celebrity and the institutionalization of YouTube.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 241: 1–20.
Houtlosser, Peter
2001 “Points of view.” In Crucial concepts in argumentation theory, ed. by Frans van Eemeren, 27–48. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Kjeldsen, Jens
2015 “The study of visual and multimodal argumentation.” Argumentation 291: 115–132.
Kjellberg, Felix [PewDiePie]
2019 “I paid Belle Delphine $0 (she is happy) TikTok part 12.” YouTube. Retrieved from [URL]. Published March 1, 2019; last accessed September 14, 2019.
Koll-Stobbe, Amei
1994 “Message merchants: Cognitive aspects of advertising cultural discourse.” Folia Linguistica 281: 385–398.
Kress, Gunther
2010 Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
Labrecque, Lauren, Ereni Markos and George Milne
2011 “Online personal branding: Processes, challenges, and implications.” Journal of Interactive Marketing 251: 37–50.
Majdik, Zoltan, and William Keith
2011 “Expertise as argument: Authority, democracy, and problem-solving.” Argumentation 251: 371–384.
Marwick, Alice
2015 “You may know me from YouTube: (micro-)celebrity in social media.” In A Companion to Celebrity, ed. by ed. by David Marshall and Sean Redmond, 333–350. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Pilgram, Roosmaryn
2012 “Reasonableness of a doctor’s argument by authority: A pragma-dialectical analysis of the specific soundness conditions.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 11: 33–50.
2015 A doctor’s argument by authority: An analytical and empirical study of strategic manoeuvring in medical consultation. University of Amsterdam: PhD thesis.
van Poppel, Lotte
2009 “Institutionele invloed op het strategisch manoeuvreren in adviserende gezondheidsbrochures.” In Studies in Taalbeheersing 3, ed. by Wilbert Spooren, Margreet Onrust and José Sanders, 309–322. Assen: Van Gorcum.
Raun, Tobias
2018 “Capitalizing intimacy: New subcultural forms of micro-celebrity strategies and affective labour on YouTube.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 241: 99–113.
Rihl, Alexander, and Claudia Wegener
2017 “YouTube celebrities and parasocial interaction: Using feedback channels in mediatized relationships.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 231: 1–13.
Tindale, Christopher, and James Gough
1987 “The use of irony in argumentation.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 201: 1–17.
Trilling, Lionel
1971 Sincerity and Authenticity. Cambridge: Mass.
Tseronis, Assimakis
2018 “Multimodal argumentation: Beyond the verbal/visual divide.” Semiotica 2201: 41–67.
Walton, Douglas
1996a Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
1996b Argument structure: A pragmatic theory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Walton, Douglas, Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno
2008 Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wierda, Renske, and Jacky Visser
2017 “Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs as an argumentative activity type.” In Contextualizing pragma-dialectics, ed. by Frans van Eemeren and Peng Wu, 77–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.