Introduction published In:
Argumentation and the interpretation of religious texts
Edited by Fabrizio Macagno and Lucia Salvato
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 12:1] 2023
► pp. 218
Abaelardus, Petrus
1970Dialectica. Edited by Lambertus. Marie de Rijk. Assen, Netherlands: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
1991a “Rhetoric.” In The Complete Works of Aristotle, Vol. II, ed. by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
1991b “Topics.” In The Complete Works of Aristotle, Vol. I, ed. by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine, and Pierre Nicole
1996Logic or the Art of Thinking. Edited by Jill Vance Buroker. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atlas, Jay David
2008 “Presupposition.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence Horn and Gregory Ward, 29–52. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Atlas, Jay David, and Stephen Levinson
1981 “It-Clefts, Informativeness and Logical Form: Radical Pragmatics (Revised Standard Version).” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 1–62. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John Langshaw
1962How to Do Things with Words. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Kent, and Robert Harnish
1979Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barth, Else, and Erik Krabbe
1982From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blair, Anthony, and Ralph Johnson
1987 “Argumentation as Dialectical.” Argumentation 1 (1): 41–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius
2003Topica. Edited by Tobias Reinhardt. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dascal, Marcelo, and Jerzy Wróblewski
1988 “Transparency and Doubt: Understanding and Interpretation in Pragmatics and in Law.” Law and Philosophy 7 (2): 203–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eck, Ernest Van
2001 “Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation: Theoretical Points of Departure.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 57 (1/2). Faculty of Theology, University of Pretoria: 593–611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans van
2009Examining Argumentation in Context. Fifteen Studies on Strategic Maneuvering. Amsterdam, Netherlands-Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans van, and Rob Grootendorst
1984Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Floris Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Elliott, John
1991A Home for the Homeless: A Social-Scientific Criticism of 1 Peter, Its Situation and Strategy. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers.Google Scholar
Everardus, Nicolaus
1601Loci Argumentorum Legales. Venice, Italy: Matthaeum Valentinum.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent
2015Interpreting the Constitution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, 41–58. New York, NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guastini, Riccardo
2011Interpretare e Argomentare. Milano, Italy: Giuffrè. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamblin, Charles Leonard
1970Fallacies. London, UK: Methuen.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, David
1998 “Does the Traditional Treatment of Enthymemes Rest on a Mistake?Argumentation 12 (1): 15–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017On Reasoning and Argument: Essays in Informal Logic and on Critical Thinking. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hurley, Patrik, and Lori Watson
2018A Concise Introduction to Logic (13th Edition). Boston, MA: Cengage.Google Scholar
Johnson, Ralph
1996The Rise of Informal Logic. Newport: Vale Press.Google Scholar
Jonsen, Albert, and Stephen Toulmin
1988The Abuse of Casuistry. A History of Moral Reasoning. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press Journals.Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan
2008 “Dueling Contexts: A Dynamic Model of Meaning.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (3): 385–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “The Paradox of Communication: Socio-Cognitive Approach to Pragmatics.” Pragmatics and Society 1 (1): 50–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kock, Christian
2013 “Defining Rhetorical Argumentation.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 46 (4): 437–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krabbe, Erik
2002 “Profiles of Dialogue as a Dialectical Tool.” In Advances in Pragma-Dialectics, edited by Frans Van Eemeren, 153–67. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983Principles of Pragmatics. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
2000Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macagno, Fabrizio
2008 “Dialectical Relevance and Dialogical Context in Walton’s Pragmatic Theory.” Informal Logic 28 (2): 102–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macagno, Fabrizio, and Sarah Bigi
2017 “Analyzing the Pragmatic Structure of Dialogues.” Discourse Studies 19 (2): 148–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macagno, Fabrizio, and Alessandro Capone
2016 “Interpretative Disputes, Explicatures, and Argumentative Reasoning.” Argumentation 30 (4): 399–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macagno, Fabrizio, and Douglas Walton
2015 “Classifying the Patterns of Natural Arguments.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 48 (1): 26–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macagno, Fabrizio, Douglas Walton, and Giovanni Sartor
2014 “Argumentation Schemes for Statutory Interpretation.” In Proceedings of JURIX 2014: The Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, ed. by Rinke Hoekstra, 11–20. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil
1995 “Argumentation and Interpretation in Law.” Argumentation 9 (3): 467–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mack, Peter
1993Renaissance Argument: Valla and Agricola in the Traditions of Rhetoric and Dialectic. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mailloux, Steven
1991 “Rhetorical Hermeneutics Revisited.” Text and Performance Quarterly 11 (3): 233–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moshavi, Adina
2015 “Between Dialectic and Rhetoric: Rhetorical Questions Expressing Premises in Biblical Prose Argumentation.” Vetus Testamentum 65 (1). Brill: 136–51.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, Daniel
1977 “Two Concepts of Argument.” Journal of the American Forensic Society 131: 121–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Dennis
2005 “Interpretation in Law.” San Diego Law Review 421: 685–710.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
1969The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Pontifical Biblical Commission
1996The Interpretation of the Bible in the Church. Sydney, Australia: Pauline Books & Media.Google Scholar
Reboul, Olivier
1991Introduction à La Rhétorique. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Rigotti, Eddo
1995 “Verità e Persuasione.” Il Nuovo Areopago 1 (3): 3–14.Google Scholar
Robbins, Vernon
1996The Tapestry of Early Christian Discourse: Rhetoric, Society, and Ideology. London, UK, and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
1998a “Enthymemic Texture in the Gospel of Thomas.” Seminal Papers, no. 37: 343–66.Google Scholar
1998b “From Enthymeme to Theology in Luke 11: 1–13.” In Literary Studies in Luke-Acts, ed. by ‎Richard Thompson and ‎Thomas Phillips, 191–214. Macon, GE: Mercer University Press.Google Scholar
1999 “Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation from Its Beginnings to the Present.” In Proceedings of the Studiorum Novi Testamenti Societas Conference. Pretoria. [URL]
2002 “Argumentative Textures in Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation.” In Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts, ed. by Anders Eriksson, Thomas Olbricht, and Walter Ubelacker, 27–65. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press.Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin, and Bryan Garner
2012Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts. Eagan, MN: Thomson West.Google Scholar
Searle, John
2002Consciousness and Language. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snodgrass, Klyne
2008Stories with Intent: A Comprehensive Guide to the Parables of Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing.Google Scholar
Tarello, Giovanni
1980L’interpretazione Della Legge. Milano, Italy: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Thurén, Lauri
2014Parables Unplugged: Reading the Lukan Parables in Their Rhetorical Context. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tindale, Christopher
1999Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
2015The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen
1958The Uses of Argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen, Richard Rieke, and Allan Janik
1984An Introduction to Reasoning. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas
1984Logical Dialogue-Games and Fallacies. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
1985Physician-Patient Decision-Making: A Study in Medical Ethics. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
1987Informal Fallacies. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989Informal Logic. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1990 “What Is Reasoning? What Is an Argument?Journal of Philosophy 871: 399–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997Appeal to Expert Opinion. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
1998The New Dialectic. Conversational Contexts of Argument. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 “Profiles of Dialogue for Evaluating Arguments from Ignorance.” Argumentation 13 (1): 53–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002Legal Argumentation and Evidence. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
2006Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2007Media Argumentation: Dialectic, Persuasion and Rhetoric. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2011 “Defeasible Reasoning and Informal Fallacies.” Synthese 179 (3). Springer: 377–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas, and Erik Krabbe
1995Commitment in Dialogue. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas, Fabrizio Macagno, and Giovanni Sartor
2021Statutory Interpretation: Pragmatics and Argumentation. New York, NY, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas, and Chris Reed
2005 “Argumentation Schemes and Enthymemes.” Synthese 145 (3): 339–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas, Christopher Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno
2008Argumentation Schemes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas, Giovanni Sartor, and Fabrizio Macagno
2016 “An Argumentation Framework for Contested Cases of Statutory Interpretation.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 24 (1): 51–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilder, Amos N.
1956 “Scholars, Theologians, and Ancient Rhetoric.” Journal of Biblical Literature. JSTOR, 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Peter
2001Catholic Principles for Interpreting Scripture: A Study of the Pontifical Biblical Commission’s The Interpretation of the Bible in the Church. Rome, Italy: Pontificio Istituto Biblico.Google Scholar
2003 “Catholic Principles for Interpreting Scripture.” The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 65 (3). JSTOR: 327–49.Google Scholar
Zarefsky, David
2006 “Strategic Maneuvering through Persuasive Definitions: Implications for Dialectic and Rhetoric.” Argumentation 20 (4): 399–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Ruban
2015Puzzling the Parables of Jesus: Methods and Interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar