Argumentation is generally conceived of as a dialogic activity between two or more participants. Nonetheless, it operates also at an intrapersonal level (Rocci 2005), in a soliloquy where protagonist and antagonist of the critical discussion are embodied in the same person. We argue this case by analyzing journalists’ argumentation about linguistic choices in newswriting processes. Empirically, we draw on data generated with progression analysis (Perrin 2003), in particular with cue-based retrospective verbal protocols. The data was produced by the journalists under investigation when they, while watching video recordings of their text production processes, reconstructed and verbalized their decisions (Perrin 2011: 60). In the detail analysis, we focus on one editorial by an experienced journalist of Corriere del Ticino, the main Italian-language newspaper in Switzerland.
2007 “Conversations for Reflection: Augmenting Transitions and Transformations in Expertise”. In Rethinking Knowledge Management, ed. by Claire R. McInerney and Ronald E. Day, 1–20. Berlin/ Heidelberg: Springer
Aristotle
Posterior Analytics. Topica, ed. and transl. by Hugh Tredennick and Harold North Fowler. Cambridge/ London: Harvard University Press.
Aristotle
Art of Rhetoric ed. by Jeffrey Henderson transl. by John H. Freese Cambridge, Massachussetts/ London Harvard University Press
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
2006 [1935]The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. by Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bell, Allan
1991The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.
Billig, Michael
1996 [1987]Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bitzer, Lloyd F.
1959 “Aristotle’s Enthymeme Revisited.” The Quarterly Journal of Speech 451: 399–408.
Burger, Marcel, & Delaloye, Laura
this issue). The Framing of Argumentation in the Making of a Political Editorial: From Normative Expectations to Stylistic Credo of the Journalists. Journal of Argumentation in Context.
Clayman, Stephen E., and Ann Reisner
1998 “Gatekeeping in Action: Editorial Conferences and Assessments of Newsworthiness”. American Sociological Review 631: 178–199.
Cotter, Colleen
2010News Talk. Investigating the Language of Journalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2005 “Congruity Theory and Argumentation.” Studies in Communication Sciences: Argumentation in Dialogic Interaction. 75–96.
Rigotti, Eddo
2006 “Relevance of Context-bound loci to Topical Potential in the Argumentation Stage.” Argumentation 201: 519–540.
Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Greco Morasso
2009 “Argumentation as an Object of Interest and as a Social and Cultural Resource.” In Argumentation and Education, ed. by Natalie Muller Mirza and Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont, 9–66. Dordrecht: Springer.
Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Greco Morasso
2010 “Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to Other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material Components.” Argumentation 24 (4): 489–512.
Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Greco Morasso
In preparation. Inference in Argumentation: A Topics-based Approach to Argument Schemes. To be submitted to Springer Argumentation Library.
Rocci, Andrea
2005 “Connective Predicates in Monologic and Dialogic Argumentation.” Studies in Communication Sciences: Argumentation in Dialogic Interaction. 97–118.
Ruhmann, Gabriela, and Daniel Perrin
2002 “Schreibstrategien in Balance. Was Wissenschaftler von Journalistinnen lernen können.” In Schreiben. Von intuitiven zu professionellen Schreibstrategien, ed. by Daniel Perrin, Ingrid Boettcher, Otto Kruse and Arne Wrobel, 129–138. Wiesbaden [etc.]: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Shoemaker, Pamela J.
1991Gatekeeping. Newbury Park [etc.]: Sage.
Schön, Donald A.
2007 [1983]The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Tuchman, Gaye
1974 “Making News by Doing Work: Routinizing the Unexpected.” American Journal of Sociology 79 (1): 110–131.
Vygotsky, Lev
1962 [1934]Thought and Language, ed. and transl. by Eugenia Hanfmann, and Gertrude Vakar. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press and New York/ London: Wiley.
Zampa, Marta
2015News values as endoxa of newsmaking. An investigation of argumentative practices in the newsroom. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Lugano: Università della Svizzera italiana.
Zampa, Marta, and Marina Bletsas
forthcoming. “On the Production of a Multimodal News Item: An Argumentative Approach.” Semiotica: Argumentation and Multimodality.
Zittoun, Tania
2006Transitions. Development Through Symbolic Resources. Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.
Cited by
Cited by 13 other publications
Baumtrog, Michael D.
2018. Reasoning and Arguing, Dialectically and Dialogically, Among Individual and Multiple Participants. Argumentation 32:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
2019. Good Professional Reasons for Bad Journalism Practice: Inventing Audience Contributions in a Live Tv Debate. Journalism Practice 13:10 ► pp. 1185 ff.
Greco, Sara
2017. Using Argumentative Tools to Understand Inner Dialogue. Argumentation 31:2 ► pp. 331 ff.
Haapanen, Lauri
2020. Modelling Quoting in Newswriting: A Framework for Studies on the Production of News. Journalism Practice 14:3 ► pp. 374 ff.
Palmieri, Rudi
2017. The Role of Argumentation in Financial Communication and Investor Relations. In The Handbook of Financial Communication and Investor Relations, ► pp. 45 ff.
Perrin, Daniel
2015. Realism, social cohesion, and media policymaking: The case of Swiss public broadcasting. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 3:1 ► pp. 111 ff.
2023. Approach Two: Product Perspective. In Transdisciplinarity in Financial Communication [New Perspectives in Organizational Communication, ], ► pp. 63 ff.
Zampa, Marta & Marina Bletsas
2018. On the production of a multimodal news item: An argumentative approach
. Semiotica 2018:220 ► pp. 155 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.