Review published In:
Journal of Argumentation in ContextVol. 6:2 (2017) ► pp.260–267
Book review
Fernando Leal Carretero (Ed. & Trans.). (2015). Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica: Estudios en honor a Frans van Eemeren
Reviewed by
This article is currently available as a sample article.
References (5)
Eemeren, Frans H. van. (2012). “The role of logic in analyzing and evaluating argumentation.” In H. Jales Ribeiro, coord., Inside arguments: Logic and the study of argumentation (pp. 139–156). Newcastle upon Tyne (UK): Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
. (2006). The pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. In B. B. Whaley & W. Samter, coords., Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 351–382). Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Garssen, Bart, & Wagemans, Jean. (2012). The pragma-dialectical method of analysis and evaluation. En R. C. Rowland, coord., Reasoned argument and social change (pp. 25–47). Washington (DC): National Communication Association.
Eemeren, Frans H. van. (2013). Fallacies as derailments of argumentative discourse: Acceptance based on understanding and critical assessment. Special issue Journal of Pragmatics, 59(B), 141–152. 
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Garssen, Bart, & Meuffels, Bert. (2012). The disguised abusive ad hominem empirically investigated: Strategic maneuvering with direct personal attacks. Thinking & Reasoning, 18(3), 344–364.