Review published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 6:2 (2017) ► pp.260267
Eemeren, Frans H. van
(2012) “The role of logic in analyzing and evaluating argumentation.” In H. Jales Ribeiro, coord., Inside arguments: Logic and the study of argumentation (pp. 139–156). Newcastle upon Tyne (UK): Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
(2006) The pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. In B. B. Whaley & W. Samter, coords., Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 351–382). Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Garssen, Bart, & Wagemans, Jean
(2012) The pragma-dialectical method of analysis and evaluation. En R. C. Rowland, coord., Reasoned argument and social change (pp. 25–47). Washington (DC): National Communication Association.Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van
(2013) Fallacies as derailments of argumentative discourse: Acceptance based on understanding and critical assessment. Special issue Journal of Pragmatics, 59(B), 141–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Garssen, Bart, & Meuffels, Bert
(2012) The disguised abusive ad hominem empirically investigated: Strategic maneuvering with direct personal attacks. Thinking & Reasoning, 18(3), 344–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar