Review published in:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 4:1 (2014) ► pp. 133136
References

References

Howe, Stephen.
1996The Personal Pronouns in the Germanic Languages. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Humboldt, Wilhelm.
1827Ueber den Dualis. Abhandlungen der historisch-philologischen Klasse der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 161–187.Google Scholar
Luján, Eugenio R..
2012 Review of Fritz (2011). Folia Linguistica Historica 33.260–267.Google Scholar
Pauw, Jan W..
1980The Dual Number in Indo-European: A Two Stage Development. University of California at Los Angeles PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans.
1989On Humboldt on the Dual. Linguistic Categorization ed. by Roberta Corrigan, Fred Eckman & Michael Noonan, 293–333. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rix, Helmut.
1992Historische Grammatik des Griechischen. Laut- und Formenlehre. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (2. Auflage.)Google Scholar
Rukeyser, Alison.
1997A Typology of the Nominal Dual: Evidence from Indo-European, Finno-Ugric, Semitic, and Australian languages. University of California at Davis master’s thesis.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald.
1990Einführung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (4. durchgesehene Auflage.)Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Scarlata, S.
2015. FRITZ, MATTHIAS: Der Dual im Indogermanischen. Genealogischer und typologischer Vergleich einer grammatischen Kategorie im Wandel. Indogermanische Bibliothek Dritte Reihe: Untersuchungen.. Kratylos 60:1  pp. 66 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.