Review published In:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 4:1 (2014) ► pp.133136
References (8)
References
Howe, Stephen. 1996. The Personal Pronouns in the Germanic Languages. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Humboldt, Wilhelm. 1827. Ueber den Dualis. Abhandlungen der historisch-philologischen Klasse der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 161–187.Google Scholar
Luján, Eugenio R. 2012. Review of Fritz (2011). Folia Linguistica Historica 331.260–267.Google Scholar
Pauw, Jan W. 1980. The Dual Number in Indo-European: A Two Stage Development. University of California at Los Angeles PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. 1989. On Humboldt on the Dual. Linguistic Categorization ed. by Roberta Corrigan, Fred Eckman & Michael Noonan, 293–333. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rix, Helmut. 1992. Historische Grammatik des Griechischen. Laut- und Formenlehre. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (2. Auflage.)Google Scholar
Rukeyser, Alison. 1997. A Typology of the Nominal Dual: Evidence from Indo-European, Finno-Ugric, Semitic, and Australian languages. University of California at Davis master’s thesis.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald. 1990. Einführung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (4. durchgesehene Auflage.)Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Scarlata, S.
2015. FRITZ, MATTHIAS: Der Dual im Indogermanischen. Genealogischer und typologischer Vergleich einer grammatischen Kategorie im Wandel. Indogermanische Bibliothek Dritte Reihe: Untersuchungen.. Kratylos 60:1  pp. 66 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.