Cover not available
Article published In:
Exploring (im)politeness in ancient languages
Edited by Kim Ridealgh
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 20:2] 2019
► pp. 244–262

Supercilious monk at Kiṭāgiri

Early Indian politeness and Buddhist monastic law

 | Leiden University, The Netherlands
This paper focuses on the concepts of etiquette and politeness within a genre of Buddhist texts known as “vinaya”, or monastic law. These texts were created for the purpose of regulating behavior within the monastic institution. While they are often described by the tradition as a set of ethical principles, the content of monastic law codes also includes many things that would be better categorized as examples of normative protocol, encompassing mundane, everyday social situations that promote harmony between the monastic institution and its economic patrons. I argue here that a distinct concept of politeness can be gleaned from the narratives in these texts, despite the lack of such a category in the tradition’s own account of itself. To illustrate this point, I analyze several stories concerned with the proper deportment of monastics, demonstrating that the standards for monastic behavior were sometimes at odds with the expectations of the lay communities that supported them.
Keywords: Buddhism, etiquette, law, monastic, politeness, vinaya
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Ethics and etiquette in Brahmanical Law (dharmaśāstra)
  • 3.The importation of etiquette
  • 4.“Śaikṣadharmas”
  • 5.Being supercilious
  • 6.Rules for social engagement in the Abhisamācārikā Dharmāḥ
  • 7.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 10 December 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00031.han
References (23)
References
Bailey, Greg and Ian Mabbett. 2003. The Sociology of Early Buddhism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1978 [1939]. The Civilizing Process: The History of Manners. (Translated by Edmund Jephcott.) New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
. 1982 [1939]. Power and Civility. (Translated by Edmund Jephcott.) New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Gombrich, Richard. 2009. What the Buddha Thought. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Harvey, Peter. 2000. An Introduction to Buddhist Ethics: Foundations, Values and Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, Maria. 2004. Theories of the Gift in South Asia: Hindu, Jain, and Buddhist Reflections on Dāna. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holt, John Clifford. 1983 [1981]. Discipline: The Canonical Buddhism of the Vinayapitaka. Columbia, MO: South Asia Books.Google Scholar
Horner, I. B. (Translator.) 1996–1997 [1938–1966]. The Book of the Discipline: Sacred Books of the Buddhists. (Six1 volumes.) London: Pali Text Society.Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel. 2017. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karashima, Seishi. (Translator.) 2012. Die Abhisamācārikā Dharmāḥ: Verhaltensregen für buddhistische Mönche der Mahāsāṃghika-Lokottaravādins. (Three1 volumes.) Tokyo: The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology.Google Scholar
. 2014. “The Language of the Abhisamācārikā Dharmāḥ – The Oldest Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit Text”. Annual Report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology XVII1: 77–88.Google Scholar
Kielhorn, Franz (ed.). 1892. The Vyākaraṇa-mahābhāṣya of Patanjali. (Two1 volumes.) Bombay: Department of Public Instruction.Google Scholar
Nolot, Édith. 1999. “Studies in Vinaya Technical Terms IV–X”. Journal of the Pali Text Society XXV1: 1–111.Google Scholar
Olivelle, Patrick. (Translator.) 2003 [2000]. The Dharmasūtras: Annotated Text and Translation. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
. (Translator.) 2004. The Law Code of Manu. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prebish, Charles. 1996. “Śaikṣa-Dharmas Revisited: Further Considerations of Mahāsāṃghika Origins”. History of Religions 35 (3): 258–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “The Role of Prātimokṣa Expansion in the Rise of Indian Buddhist Sectarianism”. Pacific World Third Series 91: 33–48.Google Scholar
Rhys Davids, T. W. (Translator.) 1899. Dialogues of the Buddha. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schopen, Gregory. 2012. “A New Hat for Hārītī: On ‘Giving’ Children for Their Protection to Buddhist Monks and Nuns in Early India”. In Vanessa R. Sasson (ed.), Little Buddhas: Children and Childhoods in Buddhist Texts and Traditions, 17–42. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Rama Nath. 2002–2003 [1987–2003]. The Aṣṭādhyāyī of Pāṇini. (Six1 volumes.) New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.Google Scholar
Thanissaro, Bhikkhu. (Translator.) 2013 [2001, 1994]. The Buddhist Monastic Code. (Two1 volumes.) Valley Center, California: Metta Forest Monastery.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Rubio Orecilla, Francisco Javier
2024. (Im)Politeness in Vedic Sanskrit. Journal of Historical Pragmatics DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.