Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 16:1 (2015) ► pp.59–85

Grammaticalization or pragmaticalization of discourse markers?

More than a terminological issue

| Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium
| Utrecht University, The Netherlands

Discourse markers are a crucial component of natural language, which is why a description and account of their diachronic evolution must be part of our linguistic models. However, researchers have different views on whether this evolution should be accounted for in terms of grammaticalization and/or pragmaticalization. In this paper, we provide a structured overview of the accounts given for the diachronic evolution of DMs. It is shown that the different positions encountered in the literature can be brought back to diverging views on the conceptualization of grammar, the categorization of discourse markers, and the weight that is put on specific processes involved in the diachronic change. We provide case studies for each of the positions that we present and discuss.

Keywords: discourse markers, grammaticalization, pragmaticalization
Published online: 3 April 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.16.1.03deg
References
Ahn, Mikyung
2010 “From ‘Favor’ to ‘Cause’: The English Causal Adposition thanks to and its Korean Counterpart tekpwuney ”. Language Sciences 32 (5): 579–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin
1997 “ I think: An English Modal Particle”. In Toril Swan and Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds), Modality in Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative Perspective, 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
2011 “Pragmatic Markers”. In Jan Zienkowski, Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren (eds), Discursive Pragmatics, 223–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds) 2006 Pragmatic Markers in Contrast. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Andersen, Hanne Leth
2007 “Marqueurs discursifs propositionnels”. Langue Francaise 1541: 13–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira
2008 Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Defining Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arroyo, José Luis Blas
2011 “From Politeness to Discourse Marking: The Process of Pragmaticalization of muy bien in Vernacular Spanish”. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (3): 855–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2002 “On the Final though: A Case of Grammaticalization?” In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds), New Reflections on Grammaticalization, 345–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beijering, Karin
2012 Expressions of Epistemic Modality in Mainland Scandinavian; A Study into the Lexicalization-Grammaticalization-Pragmaticalization Interface. (Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics 106). Zutphen: Wöhrmann Print Service. Available online at: [URL] (accessed 10 September 2013).Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper and Peter Harder
2012 “A Usage-based Theory of Grammatical Status and Grammaticalization”. Language 88 (1): 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J
1996 Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Function. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 “From Matrix Clause to Pragmatic Marker: The History of look-Forms”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2 (2): 177–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Pathways in the Development of Pragmatic Markers in English”. In Ans van Kemenade and Bettelou Los (eds), The Handbook of the History of English, 307–34. London: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “The Development of I mean: Implications for the Study of Historical Pragmatics”. In Susan M. Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 37–80. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2005 Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Callies, Marcus
2012 “The Grammaticalization and Pragmaticalization of Cleft Constructions in Present-Day English”. In Sebastian Hoffmann, Paul Rayson and Geoffrey Leech (eds), English Corpus Linguistics: Looking Back, Moving Forward, 5–21. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle
2001 “What’s Wrong with Grammaticalization?” Language Sciences 23 (2–3): 113–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, Miao-Hsia
2008 “Discourse and Grammaticalization of Contrastive Markers in Taiwanese Southern Min: A Corpus-Based Study”. Journal of Pragmatics 40 (12): 2114–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claridge, Claudia
2013 “The Evolution of Three Pragmatic Markers: As it were, so to speak and if you like ”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 14 (2): 161–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claridge, Claudia and Leslie Arnovick
2010 “Pragmaticalisation and Discursisation”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics (Handbook of Pragmatics, Vol. 8), 165–92. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Croft, William A
2001 Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth
2001 Form and Function of Causation: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation of Causal Constructions in Dutch. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth and Benjamin Fagard
2011 “ Alors between Discourse and Grammar. The Role of Syntactic Position”. Functions of Language 18 (1): 29–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Competing Connectives in the Causal Domain: French car and parce que ”. Journal of Pragmatics 44 (1): 154–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, Bert Cornillie and Paola Pietrandrea
2013 “Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Two Sides of the Same Coin?” In Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie and Paola Pietrandrea (eds), Discourse Markers and Modal Particles. Categorization and Description, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth and Henk Pander Maat
2003 “A Contrastive Study of Dutch and French Causal Connectives on the Speaker Involvement Scale”. In Arie Verhagen and Jeroen van de Weijer (eds), Usage-based Approaches to Dutch, 175–99. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
2011 “Introduction: Grammaticalization and (Inter)subjectification of Discourse Markers”. Linguistics 49 (2): 287–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dér, Csilla Ilona
2010 “On the Status of Discourse Markers”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57 (1): 3–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2006 “Discourse Particles and Modal Particles as Grammatical Elements”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 403–25. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2011a “Grammaticalization and Pragmaticalization”. In Heiko Narrog and Bernd Heine (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 450–61. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2011b “Pragmaticalization (Defined) as Grammaticalization of Discourse Functions”. Linguistics 49 (2): 365–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dostie, Gaétane
2004 Pragmaticalization et Marqueurs Discursifs. Analyse Sémantique et Traitement Lexicographique. Brussels: De Boeck. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, Britt and Ulla-Britt Kotsinas
1993 “Pragmaticalization: The Case of ba’ and you know ”. Studier i Modern Språkvetenskap 101: 76–93.Google Scholar
Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline
2005 The Development of Dutch Connectives. Change and Acquisition as Windows on Form-Function Relations. PhD Thesis. Utrecht University. Utrecht: LOT. Available online at: [URL] (accessed 10 September 2013).
Evers, Jacqueline, Liesbeth Degand, Benjamin Fagard and Liesbeth Mortier
2011 “Historical and Comparative Perspectives on Subjectification: A Corpus-based Analysis of Dutch and French Causal Connectives”. Linguistics 49 (2): 445–78.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
(ed.) 2006 Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan
2004 “Subjectivity, Intersubjectivity and the Historical Construction of Interlocutor Stance: From Stance Markers to Discourse Markers”. Discourse Studies 6 (4): 427–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frank-Job, Barbara
2006 “A Dynamic–Interactional Approach to Discourse Markers”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 395–413. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1999 “What are Discourse Markers?” Journal of Pragmatics31 (7): 931–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1983 Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-language Study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 “The Evolution of Dependent Clause Morpho-Syntax in Biblical Hebrew”. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds), Approaches to Grammaticalization, Volume II: Types of Grammatical Markers, 257–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne and Katrin Mutz
2004 “Grammaticalization vs. Pragmaticalization? The Development of Pragmatic Markers in German and Italian”. In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus Himmelmann and Björn Wiemer (eds), What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from Its Fringes and Its Components, 77–107. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197440Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
2005 “From Prepositional Phrase to Hesitation Marker: The Semantic and Pragmatic Evolution of French enfin ”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 6 (2): 37–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Particles at the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface: Synchronic and Diachronic Issues; A Study with Special Reference to the French Phasal Adverbs. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2011 “Discourse Marker and Modal Particle: The Functions of Utterance-Final then in Spoken English”. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (14): 3603–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasselgård, Hilde, Stig Johansson, Bergljot Behrens and Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen
(eds) 2002 Information Structure in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2003 “Grammaticalization”. In Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda (eds), Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “On Discourse Markers: Grammaticalization, Pragmaticalization, or Something Else?” Linguistics 51 (6): 1205–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi and Friederike Hünnemeyer
1991 Grammaticalization. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva and Haiping Long
2013 “An Outline of Discourse Grammar”. In Shannon Bischoff and Carmen Jany (eds), Functional Approaches to Language, 155–96. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P
2004 “Lexicalization and Grammaticization: Opposite or Orthogonal?” In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus Himmelmann and Björn Wiemer (eds), What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from Its Fringes and Its Components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197440Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J
1991 “On Some Principles of Grammaticization”. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds), Approaches to Grammaticalization, Volume I, Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2000 Studies in Descriptive and Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003 [1993] Grammaticalization. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyun-Oak Kim, Alan
2011 “Rhetorical Questions as Catalyst in Grammaticalization: Deriving Korean Discourse Marker ketun from Conditional Connective”. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (4): 1023–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Brian D
2001 “Is There such a Thing as Grammaticalization?” Language Sciences 231: 163–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “Rescuing Traditional (Historical) Linguistics from Grammaticalization Theory”. In Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde and Harry Perridon (eds), Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of Grammaticalization, 45–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine and Tania Kuteva
2011 “On Thetical Grammar”. Studies in Language 35 (4): 848–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koops, Christian and Arne Lohmann
2013 “Discourse Marker Sequencing and Grammaticalization”. In Maria-Jose López-Couso et al. (eds), English Corpus Linguistics on the Move: Applications and Implications (Book of Abstracts ICAME 34), 126–8. Available online at: [URL] (accessed 10 September 2013).
Langacker, Ronald W
2008 Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1985 “Grammaticalization: Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Change”. Lingua e stile 201: 303–18.Google Scholar
1995 [1982] Thoughts on Grammaticalization: A Programmatic Sketch. 2nd edn. (First published as Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien-Projekt 48. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität.) Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Lenker, Ursala
2000 “ Soþlice and witodlice: Discourse Markers in Old English”. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach and Dieter Stein (eds), Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, 229–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Diana M
2007 “From Temporal to Contrastive and Causal: The Emergence of Connective after all ”. In Agnès Celle and Ruth Huart (eds), Connectives as Discourse Landmarks, 89–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “A Discourse-Constructional Approach to the Emergence of Discourse Markers in English”. Linguistics 49 (2): 415–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
2009 “Grammaticalisation et pragmaticalisation des connecteurs de concession en français: cependant, toutefois, pourtant”. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 54 (1–2): 7–20.Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén
2006 “Adjunct, Modifier, Discourse Marker: On the Various Functions of right in the History of English”. Folia Linguistica Historica 27 (1–2): 141–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulder, Jean and Sandra A. Thompson
2008 “The Grammaticization of but as a Final Particle in English Conversation”. In Ritva Laury (ed.), Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions, 179–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel
2009 Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel, and Karin Beijering
2012 “Facing Interfaces: A Clustering Approach”. Paper presented at Refining Grammaticalization , Free University of Berlin, 24 February 2012.
Ocampo, Francisco
2006 “Movement Towards Discourse is Not Grammaticalization: The Evolution of claro from Adjective to Discourse Particle in Spoken Spanish”. In Nuria Sagarra and Almeida Jacqueline Toribio (eds), Selected Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 308–19. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Onodera, Noriko Okada
1995 “Diachronic Analysis of Japanese Discourse Markers”. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics, 393–437. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 “Development of demo Type Connectives and na Elements: Two Extremes of Japanese Discourse Markers”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1 (1): 27–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinto de Lima, José
2002 “Grammaticalization, Subjectification and the Origin of Phatic Markers”. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds), New Reflections on Grammaticalization, 363–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pit, Mirna
2006 “Determining Subjectivity in Text: The Case of Backward Causal Connectives in Dutch”. Discourse Processes 411: 151–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, Sophie
2011 “ A propos from Verbal Complement to Discourse Marker: A Case of Grammaticalization?” Linguistics 49 (2): 391–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rehbock, Helmut
2009 “… ohne jetzt nun gleich aggressiv zu werden: Ein Zeitadverb als Diskursmarker”. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 37 (2): 236–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosenkvist, Henrik and Sanna Skärlund
2013 “Grammaticalization in the Present – The Changes of Modern Swedish typ ”. In Anna Giacolone Ramat, Caterina Mauri and Piera Molinelli (eds), Synchrony and Diachrony: A Dynamic Interface, 313–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossari, Corinne and Corina Cojocariu
2008 “Constructions of the Type la cause/la raison/la preuve Utterance: Grammaticalization, Pragmaticalization, or Something Else?” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (8): 1435–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2000 “Invoking Scalarity: The Development of in fact ”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 11: 7–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie and Dominique Willems
2011 “Crosslinguistic Data as Evidence in the Grammaticalization Debate: The Case of Discourse Markers”. Linguistics 49 (2): 333–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spooren, Wilbert, Ted Sanders, Mike Huiskes and Liesbeth Degand
2010 “Subjectivity and Causality: A Corpus Study of Spoken Language”. In Sally Rice and John Newman (eds), Empirical and Experimental Methods in Cognitive/Functional Research, 241–55. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R
1989 Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Tabor, Whitney and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
1998 “Structural Scope Expansion and Grammaticalization”. In Anna Giacalone Ramat and Paul J. Hopper (eds), The Limits of Grammaticalization, 229–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1995a “Subjectification in Grammaticalization”. In Dieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds), Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995b “The Role of the Development of Discourse Markers in a Theory of Grammaticalization”. Paper presented at the ICHL XII, Manchester. Version of 11/97. Available online at: [URL] (accessed 10 September 2013).
1999 “The Rhetoric of Counter-Expectation in Semantic Change: A Study in Subjectification”. In Andreas Blank and Peter Koch (eds), Historical Semantics and Cognition, 177–96. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vincent, Diane
2005 “The Journey of Non-Standard Discourse Markers in Quebec French: Networks Based on Exemplification”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 6 (2): 188–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard
2002 “Imperatives, Interruption in Conversation, and the Rise of Discourse Markers: A Study of Italian guarda ”. Linguistics 40 (5): 987–1010. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “The Rise of Discourse Markers in Italian: A Specific Type of Language Change”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 61–67. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Wiese, Heike
2011 “ So as an Emerging Focus Marker in German”. Linguistics 49 (5): 991–1039. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wischer, Ilse
2000 “Grammaticalization Versus Lexicalization: “Methinks” There is Some Confusion”. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach and Dieter Stein (eds), Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, 355–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wischer, Ilse and Gabriele Diewald
(eds) 2002 New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zufferey, Sandrine
2012 “ Car, parce que, puisque Revisited: Three Empirical Studies on French Causal Connectives”. Journal of Pragmatics 44 (2): 138–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 52 other publications

Badan, Linda
2020. Italian Discourse Markers: The Case of Guarda te*. Studia Linguistica 74:2 ► pp. 303 ff. DOI logo
Bardenstein, Ruti
2021. Persistent argumentative discourse markers: The case of Hebrew rectification-marker be-ʕecem (‘actually’). Journal of Pragmatics 172 ► pp. 254 ff. DOI logo
Bogdanova-Beglarian, Natalia, Olga Blinova, Tatiana Sherstinova & Ekaterina Troshchenkova
2020. 2020 26th Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT), ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bogdanova-Beglarian, Natalia, Olga Blinova, Tatiana Sherstinova, Daria Gorbunova, Kristina Zaides & Tatiana Popova
2020. Pragmatic Markers in Dialogue and Monologue: Difficulties of Identification and Typical Formation Models. In Speech and Computer [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12335], ► pp. 68 ff. DOI logo
Bogdanova-Beglarian, Natalia, Olga Blinova, Tatiana Sherstinova & Tatiana Sulimova
2021. Pragmatic Markers of Russian Everyday Speech: Invariants in Dialogue and Monologue. In Speech and Computer [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12997], ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Bogdanova-Beglarian, Natalia & Yulia Filyasova
2018. Active Processes in Modern Spoken Russian Language (Evidence from Russian). In Digital Transformation and Global Society [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 859], ► pp. 391 ff. DOI logo
Breban, Tine & Sylvie Hancil
2018. Introduction. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Caffi, Claudia
2016. Revisiting Metapragmatics: ‘What Are We Talking About?’. In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 9], ► pp. 799 ff. DOI logo
Crible, Ludivine
2017. Chapter 3. Towards an operational category of discourse markers. In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 186], ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Dargnat, Mathilde
2022. Mais enfin  : construction et association. Langages N° 225:1 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Dobrovoljc, Kaja
2017. Multi-word discourse markers and their corpus-driven identification. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:4 ► pp. 551 ff. DOI logo
Fedriani, Chiara
2021. Conditional clauses as polite modifiers in Latin:si placetbetween pragmaticalization and language contact. Transactions of the Philological Society 119:3 ► pp. 346 ff. DOI logo
Ghezzi, Chiara & Piera Molinelli
2016. Politeness markers from Latin to Italian. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Ghezzi, Chiara & Piera Molinelli
2020. Connectives and cyclicity. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:2 ► pp. 208 ff. DOI logo
Giomi, Riccardo & Evelien Keizer
2020. Extra-clausal constituents in Functional Discourse Grammar: function and form. Revista da ABRALIN ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gorski, Edair Maria
2020. Espectro funcional de bem e bom no português falado: instâncias de gramaticalização. Revista da ABRALIN ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Guz, Wojciech
2024. Quotative uses of Polish similative demonstratives. Linguistics 0:0 DOI logo
Haselow, Alexander & Sylvie Hancil
2021. Grammar, discourse, and the grammar-discourse interface. In Studies at the Grammar-Discourse Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series, 219], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Haselow, Alexander & Gunther Kaltenböck
2020. The brain and the mind behind grammar. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd
2018. Are there two different ways of approaching grammaticalization?. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202], ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd
2019. Some observations on the dualistic nature of discourse processing. Folia Linguistica 53:2 ► pp. 411 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd
2019. Book review. Journal of Pragmatics 148 ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long
2021. Chapter 1. On the rise of discourse markers. In Studies at the Grammar-Discourse Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series, 219], ► pp. 24 ff. DOI logo
Hernández Páez, Marianela
2020. El significado pragmático del marcador discursivo <i>(Ya) ves que</i>. Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada :70 ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Herrero Ruiz de Loizaga, Francisco Javier
2020. La formación de la interjección <em>¡ahí va!</em> en el español peninsular. Revista de Filología Española 100:1 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Inglese, Guglielmo & Ulrich Geupel
2018. The encoding of ad hoc categories in Sanskrit: A synchronic and diachronic analysis of “compounds” with ādi- . Folia Linguistica 52:s39-s1 ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Parada Dechapratumwan
2022. Creating versatility in Thai demonstratives. Studies in Language 46:3 ► pp. 517 ff. DOI logo
la Roi, Ezra
2022. Weaving together the diverse threads of category change. Diachronica 39:2 ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Lansari, Laure
2020. Introduction: Discourse Markers Within Different Linguistic Traditions. In A Contrastive View of Discourse Markers, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Llopis Cardona, Ana & Marlies Jansegers
2024. Del rollo como sustantivo comodín contracultural al rollo aproximador en el español coloquial actual. Spanish in Context DOI logo
Marcus, Imogen
2018. Introduction. In The Linguistics of Spoken Communication in Early Modern English Writing, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mazzon, Gabriella
2017. Chapter 10. Paths of development of English DMs. In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 186], ► pp. 289 ff. DOI logo
Oleškevičienė, Giedrė Valūnaitė, Vitalija Karaciejūtė & Dalia Gulbinskienė
2023. Lithuanian Discourse Markers And Their Relations In A Multilingual Corpus. Sustainable Multilingualism 22:1 ► pp. 258 ff. DOI logo
Pekelis, Olga E.
2020. A Case of Pragmaticalization in Russian: Micro-diachronic Analysis of the Particle ‘že’ in Questions. Slovene 9:1 ► pp. 340 ff. DOI logo
Rhee, Seongha
2020. Pseudo-hortative and the development of the discourse marker eti poca (‘well, let’s see’) in Korean. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:1 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Rodríguez-Abruñeiras, Paula
2020. Outlining a grammaticalization path for the Spanish formulaen plan (de): A contribution to crosslinguistic pragmatics. Linguistics 58:6 ► pp. 1543 ff. DOI logo
Sanders, José & Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
2022. Coherence in translation. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 23:2 ► pp. 204 ff. DOI logo
Scivoletto, Giulio
2020. Semasiological cyclicity in the evolution of discourse markers. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:2 ► pp. 236 ff. DOI logo
Scivoletto, Giulio
2023. Il siciliano bì e l’espressione della miratività. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 30 ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Shefer, Hagit
2022. Face-saving strategies: The case of Hebrew SAY expressions. Lingua 280 ► pp. 103439 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Xiaoli
2022. The Pragmatic Marker "Eto Samoe" in the Multimedia Corpus. Philology. Theory & Practice 15:9 ► pp. 2882 ff. DOI logo
Tanno, Koji
2017. Semantic change through the discursive strategy of justification: The grammaticalization of the Japanese connective datte. Language Sciences 64 ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Tanno, Koji
2022. The role of discourse strategies in the grammaticalization of the Japanese discourse markerdakara. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 ► pp. 592 ff. DOI logo
Taverniers, Miriam
2018. Grammatical metaphor and grammaticalization. Functions of Language 25:1 ► pp. 164 ff. DOI logo
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka
2020. “So you know ehn … ” The use of bilingual interjections in Nigerian English. Intercultural Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Van Olmen, Daniël & Vittorio Tantucci
2022. Getting attention in different languages: A usage-based approach to parenthetical look in Chinese, Dutch, English, and Italian. Intercultural Pragmatics 19:2 ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Viola, Lorella
2020. On the diachrony ofgiusto?(‘right?’) in Italian. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:1 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Hui & Yicheng Wu
2019. Laurel J. Brinton, The evolution of pragmatic markers in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Pp. xiv + 331.. Journal of Linguistics 55:2 ► pp. 449 ff. DOI logo
Xiaoli, Sun
2023. PRAGMATIC MARKER ETO SAMOE IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF RUSSIAN SPEECH (COMPARATIVE CORPORAL STUDY). Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University 476:6 ► pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Álvarez-Prendes, Emma
2021. (Inter)subjectivisation et chaines sémantiques dans les adverbes français en–ment: analyse du passage de l'adverbe intégré à la proposition au marqueur discursif. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 66:3 ► pp. 346 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Diachrony of Personal Pronouns in Japanese [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 344], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Discourse Structuring Markers in English [Constructional Approaches to Language, 33], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.